On 12/12/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SORRY BUT I DO NOT AGREE.
and that's cool with me.
mishka
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
> Mishka
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:10 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>
>
> there's no such thing as "lenses in general". the bes
10:10 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
there's no such thing as "lenses in general". the best MF lenses are
every bit as good as the best 35mm lenses (although more expensive).
it's all a question of "bang for a buck" -- where the lar
there's no such thing as "lenses in general". the best MF lenses are
every bit as
good as the best 35mm lenses (although more expensive). it's all a question of
"bang for a buck" -- where the larger formats will probably loose.
btw, P645 A300/4 ED IF *is* better than any pentax A-lens (non-macro)
Thanks. I'd heard that the camera division went to a small company
but there were some doubts as to whether they'd survive at all. Good
to hear that they're doing something ... !
G
On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> It's in production. Mamiya's camera division got sold to a sof
It's in production. Mamiya's camera division got sold to a software & Digital
Imaging company (By the fishing rod company), which is a better fit anyways
(the delays on the ZD were software). There were some complications, but
they're back in business and the AF 645 stuff at least is still aroun
Is the Mamiya ZD still in production? I thought they had closed up shop.
G
On Dec 11, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Don't forget that there is also the Mamiya ZD, which can use all
> Mamiya 645 glass (although the non-AF lenses are stop-down only).
> It's a bit pricey at 12 grand or
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "J. C. O'Connell"
> Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>
>
>
>>I would make comments like that based
>>on an old folder? Are you kidding me?
>>Of course not. I am talking about
Don't forget that there is also the Mamiya ZD, which can use all Mamiya 645
glass (although the non-AF lenses are stop-down only). It's a bit pricey at 12
grand or so. Personally, I'd rather a 645DII with a good back, but that's way
out of my price range at the moment.
-Adam
Kevin Waterson wr
: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
> if you are saying that medium format lenses
> in general are just as sharp as 35mm lenses
> I do not agree. I am not ignoring anything
> but
William Robb
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:50 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>I dont have any medium format lens tests in my bookmarks
> b
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>I dont have any medium format lens tests in my bookmarks
> but I saved this one a while back:
>
> http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/testing.html
Try:
http://www.hevanet.com/c
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
> if you are saying that medium format lenses
> in general are just as sharp as 35mm lenses
> I do not agree. I am not ignoring anything
> but you...What evidence are you p
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>I would make comments like that based
> on an old folder? Are you k
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:15 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>I say the very best M
I put six or seven rolls of film through the 645 on my trip. All with
the 45 and 35mm lenses. Don't know what they look like yet, of
course, but I have to say that I like shooting with this camera a
lot ... a 645D with 20-40 Mpixel is a definite "want it" on my future
purchase list.
It wou
On 12/8/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
> >(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
> >work etc for their day to day shooting?
>
> I'
Cotty wrote:
> On 7/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>>Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
>>(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
>>work etc for their day to day shooting?
>
>
> I'm always the odd one out.
Who wouldn't, (uh oh, now we're in for it).
David Savage wrote:
> I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm "full frame" DSLR.
>
> Dave
>
> On 12/7/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It will have a 24 megapixel sensor, it will cost $4000, and it will
>> appeal to a wide range of pros and ser
Cotty wrote:
> On 7/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>>Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
>>(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
>>work etc for their day to day shooting?
>
>
> I'm always the odd one out. 1
On 7/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
>(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
>work etc for their day to day shooting?
I'm always the odd one out. 1D+EF24-70 2.8 + spare battery.
David Savage wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>David Savage wrote:
>>
>>>Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
>>>(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
>>>work etc for their day to day shooting?
>>
>>Consi
>
> From: "Jostein Øksne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/12/07 Thu PM 12:10:08 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> > What about SR?
>
>
Why do you want to use a lead-acid cell?
:-)
Jostein
On 12/7/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and a 1 kg battery to provide enough power to move
> that sensor around!
>
> --- Jostein Øksne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > mike wilson wrote:
> > > What about SR?
> >
> > Yes, please?
Jostein Øksne wrote:
> Just one catch. The existing 645 600mm is manual focus. :-(
>
> Jostein
Not a catch for me. I still rely a lot on manual focus. Even for some
flight shots. :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
...and a 1 kg battery to provide enough power to move
that sensor around!
--- Jostein Øksne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike wilson wrote:
> > What about SR?
>
> Yes, please? :-)
>
> Jostein
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
On 12/7/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Savage wrote:
> > Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
> > (or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
> > work etc for their day to day shooting?
>
> Considering that a 1Ds is the s
David Savage wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 07/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm "full frame" DSLR.
>> The standard reply generally is: 645 is the new full frame camera! ;-)
>
> Well I don't prescribe to that
Just one catch. The existing 645 600mm is manual focus. :-(
Jostein
On 12/7/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jostein Øksne wrote:
> > My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
> > suggested before, so if that's still in production it will have my
> > bet. Pricewise
It's bigger than a 5D, smaller than a 1Ds.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I think the 645D smaller than the Canon full-frame DSLRs. I used only
> 6x7 for quite a while. Took it everywhere.
> Paul
> On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:51 AM, David Savage wrote:
>
>> On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PRO
I think the 645D smaller than the Canon full-frame DSLRs. I used only
6x7 for quite a while. Took it everywhere.
Paul
On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:51 AM, David Savage wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 07/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd prefe
Jostein Øksne wrote:
> My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
> suggested before, so if that's still in production it will have my
> bet. Pricewise my guess is between $5000 and $6000.
First iteration: 18MP, US$3000. 18-month upgrades to 22MP and 30MP.
> As for appeal... T
On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm "full frame" DSLR.
>
> The standard reply generally is: 645 is the new full frame camera! ;-)
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here
On 07/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm "full frame" DSLR.
The standard reply generally is: 645 is the new full frame camera! ;-)
But hey yeah, I'm with you, and chuck in an aperture feedback sensor
too, $3k would have me handing over the cash. No way I'
I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm "full frame" DSLR.
Dave
On 12/7/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It will have a 24 megapixel sensor, it will cost $4000, and it will
> appeal to a wide range of pros and serious amateurs. That's my
> prediction.
> Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
mike wilson wrote:
> What about SR?
Yes, please? :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
> From: "Jostein Øksne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/12/07 Thu AM 11:03:26 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>
> My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
> suggested b
My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
suggested before, so if that's still in production it will have my
bet. Pricewise my guess is between $5000 and $6000.
As for appeal... Throw in some weather sealing, and I believe at least
some non-pentax outdoor/landscape photograpers
It will have a 24 megapixel sensor, it will cost $4000, and it will
appeal to a wide range of pros and serious amateurs. That's my
prediction.
Paul
On Dec 6, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 07/12/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just received the Jan 2007 issue of
- Original Message -
From: "Digital Image Studio"
Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
>
>
> If they couldn't predict the K10Ds market appeal it really may end up
> being a bit of a nightmare. What sensor sill it end up with, what will
> it cost, who wi
Simply indicates it "might" take deeper pockets than had been hoped.
Jack
--- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/12/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just received the Jan 2007 issue of SHUTTERBUG. Included in an
> article,
> > "Photokina, SPECIAL COVERAGE" is a p
On 07/12/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just received the Jan 2007 issue of SHUTTERBUG. Included in an article,
> "Photokina, SPECIAL COVERAGE" is a photo of a version of the 645D
> concept camera along with the comment,"..the 645 looked rather lonely
> as it sat in its sealed transpar
Just received the Jan 2007 issue of SHUTTERBUG. Included in an article,
"Photokina, SPECIAL COVERAGE" is a photo of a version of the 645D
concept camera along with the comment,"..the 645 looked rather lonely
as it sat in its sealed transparent case, waiting for the 30-megapixel
sensor that will mak
43 matches
Mail list logo
