Re: Exhibit closed until after LAbor day

Hi Ann, It is really good to hear from you. You're missed even while feeling "anti -social". Hope you feel better soon as the goings get smoother :) Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flick

Re: Exhibit closed until after LAbor day

Thanks for allaying our concerns re why we were without your treasured company. I haven't exhibited in a gallery for several years. I've avoided the stress which has resulted in my turning down a couple gallery requests to "post some work." I recall lathering up in the early days if I even sensed

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:59:50AM +1000, Derby Chang wrote: > > Outstanding, especially the noirish 11, ... I initially read that as "no irish" > It's my favourite shot of the gallery > On 24/04/2012 12:09 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > >Derby, all the pinups appear here ... > > > >http://135mm.50

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Thank you kindly, Derby! BTW, #11 was lit by a single 160-LED lamp on a stand, right, and the effect in #12 is entirely optical -- no Ps -- courtesy of the magical DA* 55mm. :-) On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Derby Chang wrote: > > > Outstanding, especially the noirish 11, and the lovely lens

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Outstanding, especially the noirish 11, and the lovely lens flare in 12. On 24/04/2012 12:09 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: Derby, all the pinups appear here ... http://135mm.500px.com/creative/ All but the 12th image are part of the exhibit. There are a couple of other Girls In Hats in the exhibi

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Thanks, Bob! On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Bruce, > Thanks for the link.  The pictures are an interesting > re-interpretation of the 'pin-up'. > I hope you enjoy the exhibit and get lots of success thru it. > Regards,  Bob S. > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Bruce Wa

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

; Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > - Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker" > Subject: Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups > > >> Derby, all the pinups appear here ... >> >> http://135mm.500px.com/creative/ >> >> All

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Bruce, I really like the bright, crisp feel of most of the images, the subjects aren't bad either ! Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker" Subject: Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups Derby, all the pin

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Bruce, Thanks for the link. The pictures are an interesting re-interpretation of the 'pin-up'. I hope you enjoy the exhibit and get lots of success thru it. Regards, Bob S. On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > Derby, all the pinups appear here ... > > http://135mm.500px.com/cr

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Thanks, Christine! On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: > Way to go, Bruce!  Big congrats.  Hope you sell lots!  Cheers, Christine > > > > On Apr 17, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > >> This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: >> >> Postmodern Pinup

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Derby, all the pinups appear here ... http://135mm.500px.com/creative/ All but the 12th image are part of the exhibit. There are a couple of other Girls In Hats in the exhibit but not in that gallery, but I've also shown them here before so you've likely seen them. Cheers! On Sat, Apr 21, 2012

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

ftheria...@gmail.com wrote: > >> "Torontonians". >> >> :-) >> >> cheers, >> frank >> >> "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- >> Christopher Hitchens >> >> --- Original Message -

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- > Christopher Hitchens > > --- Original Message --- > > From: Derby Chang > Sent: April 21, 2012 4/21/12 > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups > > > Is there an online c

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Frank: After the event, do a report for the PDML list! We want all the news. Take pics! Cheers, Christine On Apr 17, 2012, at 6:15 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: > Dave? You there? > > I know I will be. Who else is on this list from TO these days? TOPDML ain't > what it used to be.

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Way to go, Bruce! Big congrats. Hope you sell lots! Cheers, Christine On Apr 17, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: > > Postmodern Pinups > Photography by Bruce Walker > at the Junction Chiropractic & Wellness Centre > 3093

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

"Torontonians". :-) cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Derby Chang Sent: April 21, 2012 4/21/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: Re: Exhibit: Postmode

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Is there an online catalog we non-torontons could look at? D On 18/04/2012 1:25 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: Postmodern Pinups Photography by Bruce Walker at the Junction Chiropractic& Wellness Centre 3093 Dundas St West (just west of

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

I really appreciate that, Walt. And thank you very much Ann, Dan, Don, Paul, Ken and Mark C! I'm quite looking forward to it. On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote: > Well, it's of interest to me, locale notwithstanding. > > Here's hoping all goes well and you pick up more busine

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

5.5 hours? You'd drive that to come here? Yowza! Stan, I would be highly honoured if you came. I think twice before I drive to downtown Toronto, a mere 20 minutes away! :-) On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > Congratulations! > > I've been looking for an excuse to spend a day

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Hi Frank! It was great finally meeting you last night. And now I have my own official knarF-taken shaky shot on my SD card. I'll never erase it. :-) I think that with you and I being in the same place that constituted about 20% of the entire TOPDML. The other 80% that I can think of is Dave, Adam

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Thanks very much, Igor. I muchly appreciate that! On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote: > > Bruce, > > That looks like a great exhibit! I wish it was closer. > > One of the communities whose interest overlaps with the vintage styles > is the swing dancers (Lindy Hop, Balboa, Char

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Well, it's of interest to me, locale notwithstanding. Here's hoping all goes well and you pick up more business than you know what to do with. -- Walt On 4/17/2012 10:25 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: Postmodern Pinups Photography by Bru

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

On 4/17/2012 11:25 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: Postmodern Pinups Photography by Bruce Walker at the Junction Chiropractic& Wellness Centre 3093 Dundas St West (just west of Quebec Ave.) May 2 - June 4, 2012 Opening Reception Wednesday Ma

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Congratulations! I've been looking for an excuse to spend a day or two in Toronto which is, after all, only 5.5 hours from my home. We've got several conflicts on the calendar between now and early June (which is also why I am not going to Grandfather Mountain) but I will give serious considera

RE: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Dave? You there? I know I will be. Who else is on this list from TO these days? TOPDML ain't what it used to be. Oh yeah, Congrats, Bruce. Might see ya tonight! cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Bruce, That looks like a great exhibit! I wish it was closer. One of the communities whose interest overlaps with the vintage styles is the swing dancers (Lindy Hop, Balboa, Charleston). I've previously met a few swing dancers from Toronto, but don't know them closely. So, I sent an e-mail to TS

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Congrats - break a leg. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker" Subject: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: Postmodern Pinups Photography by Bruce Walker at the Ju

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Congratulations. Looks like a great show. Love the poster. Good luck! Paul On Apr 17, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: > > Postmodern Pinups > Photography by Bruce Walker > at the Junction Chiropractic & Wellness Centre > 3093 D

RE: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Well I wish I could be there. Love the poster! Message: 2 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:25:40 -0400 From: Bruce Walker To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List Subject: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Congratulations! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: > > Postmodern Pinups > Photography by Bruce Walker > at the Junction Chiropractic & Wellness Centre

Re: Exhibit: Postmodern Pinups

Congrats, Bruce looks like fun -- nice poster ann On 4/17/2012 11:25, Bruce Walker wrote: This may be mainly of interest to Toronto PDMLers, but fwiw: Postmodern Pinups Photography by Bruce Walker at the Junction Chiropractic& Wellness Centre 3093 Dundas St West (just west of Quebec Ave.) May

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

2010/5/5 David Parsons : > That's not really surprising if you understand how camo works.  It's > not really designed to hide you, it's designed to break up your > pattern while you are moving so it's harder to determine your shape. > You see a moving form, but not a distinct outline.  It's similar

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On 05/05/2010, Stan Halpin wrote: > In a related pet peeve of mine, I intensely dislike drivers of greyish > vehicles who drive in rain or dim light conditions without headlights turned > on. Yes, they can see the road well enough without their lights, but others > can't see them. This is a pe

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Normally John I would agree. But these incidents (no one was actually hit by the way, just close calls) occurred because soldiers weren't using crossing areas, and the road section was poorly lit. As you know the Army recognizes the need to be visible for traffic safety and requires reflective c

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

From: Mark Roberts John Sessoms wrote: >From: Miserere >> On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin wrote: >>> > Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have >>> > developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the >>> > number of complaints about pedestrians being hit by cars o

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

David Parsons wrote: >That's not really surprising if you understand how camo works. It's >not really designed to hide you, it's designed to break up your >pattern while you are moving so it's harder to determine your shape. >You see a moving form, but not a distinct outline. It's similar to >ho

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

That's not really surprising if you understand how camo works. It's not really designed to hide you, it's designed to break up your pattern while you are moving so it's harder to determine your shape. You see a moving form, but not a distinct outline. It's similar to how the stripes on a zebra wo

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

2010/5/4 Mark Roberts : > > Seriously, the colors of "camo" have been developed over years to be > as difficult as possible for human to pick up in a wide variety of > conditions. Works pretty well: Statistics of motorcycle accidents, for > example, show riders wearing camo/khaki clothing to be ove

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

John Sessoms wrote: >From: Miserere >> On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin wrote: >>> > Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have >>> > developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the >>> > number of complaints about pedestrians being hit by cars on >>> > base. Hell

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

From: Miserere On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin wrote: > Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have > developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the > number of complaints about pedestrians being hit by cars on > base. Hell - they are all wearing camo! And then

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin wrote: > Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have developed an > aversion to camo. What triggered it was the number of complaints about > pedestrians being hit by cars on base. Hell - they are all wearing camo! > And then they wander acros

RE: Exhibit Question - Dress

> > I still have a few PDML hats for those that really want to stand out. > > Dave > I have a Lehman Brothers hat! They used to be one of our biggest clients, but we were smart enough to sack them before they crashed. Amazing to think that my hat is worth more than the bank whose name is on it.

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

I still have a few PDML hats for those that really want to stand out. Dave On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Tom C wrote: > Got it. Thanks! > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Christine  Aguila > wrote: >> Hi Tom & Everyone coming:  dress is nice casual.  I'll probably wear nice >> jeans or sla

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Gave me a good chuckle there, Stan. Thanks! On Apr 30, 2010, at 20:03 , Stan Halpin wrote: Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the number of complaints about pedestrians being hit by cars on base. Hell - they are a

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the number of complaints about pedestrians being hit by cars on base. Hell - they are all wearing camo! And then they wander across the street expecting people to see them? stan On

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > I was planning on a tux (but not tails). But I don't have a matching do-rag. > May > have to stick to something more casual. At least where I live, a camouflage do-rag is believed to complement any attire. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

I was planning on a tux (but not tails). But I don't have a matching do-rag. May have to stick to something more casual. I do like the Planters Order from the old British Empire but that really should be reserved to warmer weather. stan On Apr 29, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Tom C wrote: > I'm assuming

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Larry Colen wrote: On 4/29/2010 7:23 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: m...@robertstech.com wrote: Tom C wrote: I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On 4/29/2010 5:49 PM, eckinator wrote: 2010/4/29 P. J. Alling: not me. I'm coming as someone with talent. Kennyboy? He said somebody with talent, not with anti-talent. You obviously DON'T KNOW something the PROS know... Interesting since under the definition

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

2010/4/29 P. J. Alling : >>> >>> not me. I'm coming as someone with talent. >>> >> Kennyboy? >> > He said somebody with talent, not with anti-talent. You obviously DON'T KNOW something the PROS know... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On 4/29/2010 12:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On 4/29/2010 7:23 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: m...@robertstech.com wrote: Tom C wrote: I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? A kilt would be questionable unless arri

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On 4/29/2010 7:23 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: m...@robertstech.com wrote: Tom C wrote: I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white shirt/black t

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On 4/29/2010 11:05 AM, Subash wrote: On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:58:52 -0400 m...@robertstech.com wrote: Tom C wrote: I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? A kilt would be questionable unless arriv

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:58:52 -0400 m...@robertstech.com wrote: > Tom C wrote: > > >I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, > >if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? > > > >A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white > >shi

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

I'm sure as long as you're not naked everyone will be happy. On 4/29/2010 10:32 AM, Miserere wrote: At the moment I can only commit to come dressed. Please don't ask for more. --M. On 29/04/2010, Bob Sullivan wrote: NO, no. Mark Roberts is wearing his kilt. And somebody is dressing in

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

At the moment I can only commit to come dressed. Please don't ask for more. --M. On 29/04/2010, Bob Sullivan wrote: > NO, no. Mark Roberts is wearing his kilt. > And somebody is dressing in black tie and tails like a penguin. > That's why Cotty wants the video feed. > Wait, you'll see. > Rega

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

m...@robertstech.com wrote: Tom C wrote: I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white shirt/black tie/long tails? We're doing it as a costu

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

NO, no. Mark Roberts is wearing his kilt. And somebody is dressing in black tie and tails like a penguin. That's why Cotty wants the video feed. Wait, you'll see. Regards, Bob S.;-) On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Tom C wrote: > I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Before anyone get ideas; no, I will not dress to match my photo subject. Thanks Jostein 2010/4/29 : > Tom C wrote: > >>I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if >>any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? >> >>A kilt would be questionable unless arrivin

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Tom C wrote: >I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if >any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual? > >A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white >shirt/black tie/long tails? We're doing it as a costume party. I'm coming disgui

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Got it. Thanks! On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: > Hi Tom & Everyone coming:  dress is nice casual.  I'll probably wear nice > jeans or slacks, a blouse, and a casual blazer of some sort.  If it's > warmish, I might skip the blazer.  Cheers, Christine > > > - Original

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Domke vests with PDML embroidery for everyone =) Cheers Ecke 2010/4/29 Christine Aguila : > Hi Tom & Everyone coming:  dress is nice casual.  I'll probably wear nice > jeans or slacks, a blouse, and a casual blazer of some sort.  If it's > warmish, I might skip the blazer.  Cheers, Christine > >

Re: Exhibit Question - Dress

Hi Tom & Everyone coming: dress is nice casual. I'll probably wear nice jeans or slacks, a blouse, and a casual blazer of some sort. If it's warmish, I might skip the blazer. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "Tom C" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Thursday, Apr

Re: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook

Without consulting anyone, I've promoted the book and exhibition on LinkedIn. :-) Jostein 2010/4/21 Larry Colen : > After consulting with Mark, I set up a facebook event for the gallery > opening. It should make it easier to invite people and spread the word. > I took the liberty of uploading the

Re: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook

2010/4/21 Chris Mitchell : > Eckinator wrote >> Sent: 21 April 2010 08:24 >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook >> >> Yes, I want that too but waiting for confirmation from Chris that he >> can bring my copy

Re: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook

On 4/21/2010 1:46 AM, Larry Colen wrote: After consulting with Mark, I set up a facebook event for the gallery opening. It should make it easier to invite people and spread the word. I took the liberty of uploading the event postcard jpegs. If you're on facebook, you should be able to see it at

RE: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook

Eckinator wrote > Sent: 21 April 2010 08:24 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook > > Yes, I want that too but waiting for confirmation from Chris that he > can bring my copy of this year's along to Bob W > Cheers > Ec

Re: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook

Yes, I want that too but waiting for confirmation from Chris that he can bring my copy of this year's along to Bob W Cheers Ecke 2010/4/21 Larry Colen : > I realized that this show will also be a great opportunity to get last > year's copy of the annual signed as well. > > -- > Larry Colen l...@re

Re: Exhibit opening now an event on facebook

I realized that this show will also be a great opportunity to get last year's copy of the annual signed as well. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pleas

Re: exhibit artist statements & bios & misc

For all practical purposes mine should have been there as well... *Deep sigh* On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: > Bong, all your paperwork has arrived at DANK! :-) > > Also, received Jostein's COA today in the mail, but that was the only one. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-D

Re: exhibit artist statements & bios & misc

On 17 April 2010 19:48, ann sanfedele wrote: > >> of course, the real loons haven't sent anything yet. > > > Not true - she has mine already Yeah, and mine too. We loons are known to be punctual 5% of the time when it counts. --M. -- http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photog

Re: exhibit artist statements & bios & misc

Doug Brewer wrote: Christine Aguila wrote: Just got off the phone with our exhibit curator, Sue. She's received lots of contracts, and she's impressed with the professionalism of the PDML exhibitors. She also said they are very interesting to read. So, good work PDMLers for doing a great

Re: exhibit artist statements & bios & misc

Christine Aguila wrote: Just got off the phone with our exhibit curator, Sue. She's received lots of contracts, and she's impressed with the professionalism of the PDML exhibitors. She also said they are very interesting to read. So, good work PDMLers for doing a great job. The DANK webmast

Re: exhibit artist statements & bios & misc

Christine, if you are accurately reporting Sue's comments, it really marks a momentous event: someone using "professional[ism]" to refer to a bunch of Pentax photographers who by definition do not use pro equipment. I would offer to buy Sue a drink in gratitude, but her comment might indicate sh

Re: exhibit artist statements & bios & misc

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: > Just got off the phone with our exhibit curator, Sue.  She's received lots > of contracts, and she's impressed with the professionalism of the PDML > exhibitors. I'm sure she's very busy, and we'll forgive her for confusing us with some

RE: Exhibit details

[...] > > Chris you could trade with Doug, that is if he wants a shot > of a bunch of Brit hillbillies strumming on ukuleles ;) > Cotty'll be singing 'When I'm Cleanin' iMacs'... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mai

Re: Exhibit details

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:18 AM, P N Stenquist wrote: >> Where it says:   *I, __, etc etc*    is the place to sign >> the contract. >> > I added a signature and date at the bottom and typed my name into the > blanks. Most contracts provide a legible and readable rendering of the >

Re: Exhibit details

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:29 PM, paul stenquist wrote: > Only you can determine what your work is worth. If you've displayed in > galleries before, > you probably have an idea. But if not, figure you'll want to recoup the cost > of printing and > framing, plus the 30% the gallery gets, plus a s

Re: Exhibit details

On 13/4/10, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed: >If you are coming to Chicago, >please give him a big hug At last an incentive not to go -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: Exhibit details

Christine Aguila wrote: ...I think Paul makes several great points here--and gives great advice, especially to folks like me who have little exhibit experience. And I agree with his point about the difficulty in selling photography--especially in these recessionary times. But still, everyo

Re: Exhibit details

On 13 April 2010 21:25, Christine Aguila wrote: > > I think Paul makes several great points here--and gives great advice, > especially to folks like me who have little exhibit experience.  And I agree > with his point about the difficulty in selling photography--especially in > these recessionary

Re: Exhibit details

From: "paul stenquist" Only you can determine what your work is worth. If you've displayed in galleries before, you probably >have an idea. But if not, figure you'll want to recoup the cost of printing and framing, plus the 30% the >gallery gets, plus a small profit. That will probably bring

Re: Exhibit details

2010/4/12 paul stenquist : > Showoff:-) hehehe. -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the di

Re: Exhibit details

On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:33 PM, AlunFoto wrote: > 2010/4/12 Bruce Walker : >> >> I did the same. And even more amazingly, Ann, the doc was openable in the >> freeware OpenOffice.app on my Mac. Kudos to the gallery for apparently >> using ancient s/w. > > You could also have opened it in GoogleDo

Re: Exhibit details

2010/4/12 Bruce Walker : > > I did the same.  And even more amazingly, Ann, the doc was openable in the > freeware OpenOffice.app on my Mac.  Kudos to the gallery for apparently > using ancient s/w. You could also have opened it in GoogleDocs. -Just mention it since you post from gmail. :-) My ta

Re: Exhibit details

ann sanfedele wrote: hehe _ I typed in my name then took it out and signed in those two places... but there is at least two other places where I typed it. It was helpful for Christine to send both a .doc and a pdf as I only have a pdf reader. and the doc, amazingly, was downward compatable wi

Re: Exhibit details

ail List" Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:18 AM Subject: Re: Exhibit details On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: Hi Mike: If your photograph doesn't sell, Sue will contact you on the cost of return shipping, and she will tell you the Paypal address to pay to. She does

Re: Exhibit details

On Apr 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > I've been struggling with the CV and the artists statement, if anyone > wants to read and comment, I posted them on my LJ: > > http://lrc.livejournal.com/1094985.html Larry, Here is a good description of you that might help: http://tinyurl.com

Re: Exhibit details

You're right - I added a space for my signature opposite the "Date". -p On 4/12/2010 2:39 AM, mike wilson wrote: BTW; I think the contract is very badly designed. It doesn't actually ask for my signature anywhere. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.co

Re: Exhibit details

Sounds good, Paul. That works :-). Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "P N Stenquist" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:18 AM Subject: Re: Exhibit details On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: Hi Mike:

Re: Exhibit details

ul As to using someone's Paypal, you have to make those arrangements yourself. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "mike wilson" > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:39 AM Subject: Re: Exhibit details And some furt

Re: Exhibit details

the contract. As to using someone's Paypal, you have to make those arrangements yourself. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "mike wilson" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:39 AM Subject: Re: Exhibit details

Re: Exhibit details

2010/4/12 mike wilson : > > As I don't do Paypal maybe someone (Mark...) would provide me with a suitably > worthy Paypal account address for monies to go to in the unlikely event of a > sale. You can use mine. I've done the same for the widow of the late oil minister of Nigeria ]=) -- PDML Pe

Re: Exhibit details

And some further questions: I assume that the framing fee did not include return shipping. What happens if (when...) a work does not sell? I'm happy to donate mine to whatever is convenient but what to put for the return shipping address? As I don't do Paypal maybe someone (Mark...) would pro

RE: Exhibit details

Cotty wrote: > On 12/4/10, Chris Mitchell, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >I've taken a pragmatic approach. I don't hold out a lot of hope of > making a > >sale, but I've asked $250 with a rock bottom $150. This is on the > basis that > >it will cost quite a bit to get it shipped back to me in t

Re: Exhibit details

On 12/4/10, Chris Mitchell, discombobulated, unleashed: >I've taken a pragmatic approach. I don't hold out a lot of hope of making a >sale, but I've asked $250 with a rock bottom $150. This is on the basis that >it will cost quite a bit to get it shipped back to me in the UK, so if I can >get rid

RE: Exhibit details

Larry Colen wrote > Sent: 12 April 2010 01:01 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Exhibit details > > I'm trying to tie up the final details for the show. > > I don't understand how the pricing of the art works as there is both > an "asked for" and a "minimum" price on the form. Is there s

Re: Exhibit details

Paul's right about landscapes selling better than people pictures, but you have to play to your audience. I live in a coastal town, most of my sold prints have a nautical/shore theme. People around here want pictures of boats, though I must say that I've sold more copies of the photo I've sub

Fwd: Re: Exhibit details

Addendum - You don't want to overprice the market, but don't sell yourself short, either. If you think your image is only worth 10 bucks, your buyer will think it's worth less. -p Original Message Subject:Re: Exhibit details Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010

Re: Exhibit details

Larry - Try this formula to put some concrete figures to your pricing. (Your costs -printing, framing, etc + the minimum cash you'd like) / .7. Yes, that's divided by 7/10. Dividing by .7 adds the 30% that the gallery will get. Now get rid of the cents and round up to the nearest $1, $5,

  1   2   >