Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

A scroll of mail from "Paradiso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:43:38 -0700 Read it? y >...and matrix metering were much more >important to me, You have a problem with the *metering* of the Z1-p? My mind is truly boggled now. This camera has, in my experience, one of the best meter

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

Well, I don't think there are many serious photographers in Gisborne. And Pentax seems not to be very popular here. If you go to the shop and ask about Pentaxes, they are highly likely to try and talk you into buying something cheaper :) Maybe because 50% (maybe more) of Gisborne's population is u

Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

nneth --- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:38:21 +0800 From: "dave o'brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?] > Funny you should say that, as a Nikon using friend of mine kept found > that he had to get the databack for his F90X to c

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

Pentax clover wrote: > The problem is not only that there is some features find missed, but for > the price it would be sold, it is not easy to accept this fact. If I was > richer, I will buy it. But it is not my case, and not the case of most of > Pentaxists, that's why I hope this change. > I

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

Dear Paal, > Why do you expect Pentax to give away the MZ-S? Do you expect Nikon to reduce the F100 by 50%? > What other camera offer the MZ-S features and a fully heavy duty metal body for less cash? If Nikon makes the F-100 50% less, I also will be agree, you know ! For a less price, in France,

Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

6:50 PM Subject: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?] > As the lively chats between Doug Brewer and "Pentax Clover" continues, I'd > like to say this: > > I began photography 21 years ago in 1980 with a Spotmatic II, then over the > years went through a K100

Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

As the lively chats between Doug Brewer and "Pentax Clover" continues, I'd like to say this: I began photography 21 years ago in 1980 with a Spotmatic II, then over the years went through a K1000, Super Program, 2 MX's and finally an LX in 1996. But in 1998 I finally jumped into the AF foray, not

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

I don't think he expects it to be reduced 50%, he was only wishing it was cheaper. Interpretation again. Norm Pål Jensen wrote: > Pentax clover wrote: > > > I hope I keep my MZ-3, and of course I hope I could buy a MZ-S for half of > > his price ! > > Why do you expect Pentax to give away the M

RE: MZ-S is really good ?

sage- > From: petit miam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MZ-S is really good ? > > > I am a dedicated Pentax fan, but don't think I would > buy an MZ-S either. I think if you start get

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

petit miam writes: > I am a dedicated Pentax fan, but don't think I would > buy an MZ-S either. I think if you start getting too > many features, you start forgetting about photography. That can certainly happen but it really becomes a matter of thinking of "features" as "tools". Most people

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

IL PROTECTED]> Sent: jeudi 19 avril 2001 06:26 Subject: Re: MZ-S is really good ? > Clover, > > Let me give you some advice, my little friend. Get rid of your MZ-3 and buy an F100. If you don't, you'll never be able to look your little Nikon buddies in the eye, because you're

RE: MZ-S is really good ?

Unnecessarily vitriolic and deliberately hurtful. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Brewer Sent: April 18, 2001 9:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MZ-S is really good ? Let me give you some advice, my little friend

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

I am a dedicated Pentax fan, but don't think I would buy an MZ-S either. I think if you start getting too many features, you start forgetting about photography. Also I don't want a fully automated camera. I love the feel of my manual wind-on, and rewind. And I love setting my shutter-speed and a

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Doug Brewer wrote: > Let me give you some advice, my little friend. Get rid of your MZ-3 > and buy an F100. If you don't, you'll never be able to look your > little Nikon buddies in the eye, because you're more worried about > what they think about your camera than you are ab

Re: MZ-S is really good ?

Clover, Let me give you some advice, my little friend. Get rid of your MZ-3 and buy an F100. If you don't, you'll never be able to look your little Nikon buddies in the eye, because you're more worried about what they think about your camera than you are about your photographs. The F100 is pe