I've had good luck with Sigma service in the US. But I bought the 500
and something Pentax flash anyway, because I had a job coming up
where I needed a compact P-TTL flash. I'm going to send my Sigma in
for service soon.
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 6:42 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Arggg.
>
>
Maybe there was an earthquake in India?
Norm
David J Brooks wrote:
> Arggg.
>
> Sorry, but i need to vent here.
>
> First it was Pentax for poor returned phone calls, but i could always
> reach someone in service.
>
> Then, after getting into Nikon, they over a period of 5 years, only
> re
I know you'd call me back.
Eh?:-)
Dave
Quoting Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe there was an earthquake in India?
> Norm
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
>> Arggg.
>>
>> Sorry, but i need to vent here.
>>
>> First it was Pentax for poor returned phone calls, but i could always
>> reach so
Actually, Gentec is about 10 Km's from work.
All i need is a confirmation they can do the work.
Dave
Quoting Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe there was an earthquake in India?
> Norm
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
>> Arggg.
>>
>> Sorry, but i need to vent here.
>>
>> First it was Pentax
It is not just businesses, alas -
Forgive me if you are a young adult/ college kid, who answers every
phone call you receive,
but I've been finding that people in that age group rarely answer their
cell phones and take
days to reply to messages. Although, to be fair, I know a couple of
people
One reason for that is that the younger set has grown up in an era of
Telemarketing. Few calls from unrecognized sources have any worth and most are
a waste of time.
I certainly never answer calls from names/numbers I don't recognize.
-Adam
ann sanfedele wrote:
> It is not just businesses, al
But then you get people who'll break off a face to face conversation,
to answer the phone. That really pi55es me off.
I go days without even turning my mobile on.
Dave
On 1/6/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not just businesses, alas -
> Forgive me if you are a young adult/ c
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:50 PM, David Savage wrote:
> But then you get people who'll break off a face to face conversation,
> to answer the phone. That really pi55es me off.
I won't put up with a salesclerk who does that. I politely tell him/
her to put the caller on hold until we finish. If he/
On 1/06/07 1:31 PM, "Bob Shell", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think cell
> phone use in theaters, restaurants, and many other places should
> simply be banned since people are too damned stupid to know when it
> isn't appropriate.
They are not only rude and unsophisticated, but have nerve to
On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:56 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
>> I think cell
>> phone use in theaters, restaurants, and many other places should
>> simply be banned since people are too damned stupid to know when it
>> isn't appropriate.
>
> They are not only rude and unsophisticated, but have nerve to do
>
Bob Shell wrote:
> Agreed. I saw on TV that they have the technology now to disable
> cell phones inside of buildings, and that it was being used in some
> French movie theaters. Now that's technology that makes sense.
>
> The only good side of this is that people who have mental disorders
You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
Bob Shell wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:56 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
>
>
>>> I think cell
>>> phone use in theaters, restaurants, and many other places should
>>> simply be b
On 6/1/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
>radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
Only works one day a week though. Bummer.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
|
On Jan 7, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
> Somebody in the next booth started making calls and talking to
> whoever he was calling very loudly.
That's something that bugs me, too. People always seem to raise
their voice when using telephones for some reason. Maybe it's the
same thing th
--- David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:57 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> > You could always disable cell phones inside
> buildings, like any other
> > radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday
> cage.*
>
> I think this may be one of those problems where a
> level of
On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:57 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
> radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
A lot easier said than done on that kind of scale. It's quite hard
to effectively shield a room against RF, especially
Hi!
David Mann wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:57 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
>> radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
>
> A lot easier said than done on that kind of scale. It's quite hard
> to effectively s
On Jan 6, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> You mean, hitting a cell phone user over the head with
> a big club and draging them away by their hair?
>
> Trust me, this has crossed my mind!
Or just throwing the cell phone on the ground and bashing it with the
club.
Bob
--
PDML Penta
David Savage wrote:
>But then you get people who'll break off a face to face conversation,
>to answer the phone. That really pi55es me off.
>
>I go days without even turning my mobile on.
>
>Dave
>
Dave, this is ann calling, I just happened to be walking by your house and
a saw two guys loading
I agree with you there, Adam, although I need to answer mine if I've
given someone on craigslist the number.
No, I'm talking about the college kids I know personally who take days
to return phone calls and don't even
listen to their messages. To me a cell phone is a lifeline. I've
never gott
On 1/8/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Savage wrote:
> >I go days without even turning my mobile on.
> >
> >
> Dave, this is ann calling, I just happened to be walking by your house and
> a saw two guys loading a truck with all your stuff in it .
>
> :)
What are you doing
Well, I have to say this has been an interesting discussion full of
implicit self-contradictions.
I too hate the imbeciles who use phones inappropriately ... when
driving, when doing other things that require their attention, in an
obnoxious manner, etc ... all the fault of the imbeciles and
On 1/8/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I didn't have it with me and enabled for communications most of
> the time, then the people I gave the number to for purpose of finding
> me when it was *necessary* would not be able to rely upon it for
> communications in need and it woul
While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks who take
the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
they took the kid in with them they picked carried him/her. Now you go
in the store and there are two women with their strollers completely
blocking the
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:08:05PM -0500, graywolf wrote:
> While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks who take
> the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
> they took the kid in with them they picked carried him/her. Now you go
> in the store and
On Jan 7, 2007, at 8:55 AM, David Savage wrote:
> I don't have a mobile so people can call me, as such very few have
> the number.
>
> I have one so if I need to make a call, for instance when I'm on site
> at a job and need some information that's back at the office, I can.
> As I've said, if
Quoting John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:08:05PM -0500, graywolf wrote:
>> While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks who take
>> the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
>> they took the kid in with them they picked ca
On Jan 7, 2007, at 1:21 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:08:05PM -0500, graywolf wrote:
>> While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks
>> who take
>> the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
>> they took the kid in with them th
On 7/1/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I understand that ... for years, my mobile was only for work use,
>paid for by my company, and it was only with me or switched on when I
>was doing things for work. Nowadays, however, I work for myself and
>"in need" communications ar
On 7/1/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
>While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks who take
>the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
>they took the kid in with them they picked carried him/her. Now you go
>in the store and there are tw
lf Of Bob
Shell
Sent: 7. januar 2007 14:02
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated
On Jan 6, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> You mean, hitting a cell phone user over the head with
> a big club and draging them away by
I think anyone who takes a stroller in a store should be stoned. It's
time we imposed some discipline on the unruly masses. Damn strollers.
Damn babies. Why weren't they aborted? :-).
Paul
On Jan 7, 2007, at 4:08 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:52:54PM +, Cotty wrote:
On Jan 7, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I think anyone who takes a stroller in a store should be stoned. It's
> time we imposed some discipline on the unruly masses. Damn strollers.
> Damn babies. Why weren't they aborted? :-).
Yep. Personally, I think abortion should be legalup
> As I've said, if it wasn't for these work situations I wouldn't have
> one at all.
I use one for work, but I don't like the constant availability it
seems to imply. However, I would still keep one even if not for work
because they are very useful in other ways. For example, London
transport is
I use a cell phone for virtually all of my voice communications. My
home phone is used only as a link for my satellite television
account. I am rarely in a position to take calls at home. But I have
to stay in contact with a lot of clients and friends. The cell phone
has simplified my life
I see the issue with cell phones is that many people let the phones rule
them. If it rings it must be answered.
Its a tool & as such the user should be in control & not vice versa.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
I'm with you there. On my cell phone I answer most calls because the
number is not widely distributed. But I always check the ID. If it's
suppressed, I don't answer. I never answer my land line. I do check
the messages from time to time.
Paul
On Jan 7, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Digital Image Studio w
On 08/01/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see the issue with cell phones is that many people let the phones rule
> them. If it rings it must be answered.
> Its a tool & as such the user should be in control & not vice versa.
I've noticed that the callers expectations have changed,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:54:33AM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 08/01/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see the issue with cell phones is that many people let the phones rule
> > them. If it rings it must be answered.
> > Its a tool & as such the user should be in contr
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I think anyone who takes a stroller in a store should be stoned. It's
> time we imposed some discipline on the unruly masses. Damn strollers.
> Damn babies. Why weren't they aborted? :-).
Nuke the unborn gay baby seals. :D
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Di
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> I see the issue with cell phones is that many people let the phones rule
> them. If it rings it must be answered.
> Its a tool & as such the user should be in control & not vice versa.
It's not just cell phones, either. I've seen the same thing with email
and land-line ph
On 08/01/07, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About cell phones, the ones that kill me are the ones that walk out of
> the house, and fire up the cell phone even before they get into their
> car to leave.
Umm, I've found most people never turn them off to start with ;-)
--
Rob Studder
Yes! Finally, someone on the list gets it right! :-))
Paul
On Jan 7, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> I think anyone who takes a stroller in a store should be stoned. It's
>> time we imposed some discipline on the unruly masses. Damn strollers.
>> Damn babies. Why
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 08/01/07, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> About cell phones, the ones that kill me are the ones that walk out of
>> the house, and fire up the cell phone even before they get into their
>> car to leave.
>
> Umm, I've found most people never turn them
Quoting Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Absolutely.
>
> I have to be contactable 24 hours a day as a part of my contract, and so
> I carry 2 cell phones > Cheers,
> Cotty
Then how come Norm got your voice mail:-)
Dave
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
> ||=|http:/
When I commuted to work @ 6:00AM EST, I was amazed @ the number of people
I'd see on the cell phone @ such an early hour. Who are they talking to?
Their broker in Japan?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:52:54PM +, Cotty wrote:
> On 7/1/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks who take
> >the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
> >they took the kid in with them they p
On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> And I must admit I'm far less inclined to answer any
> phone these days if the senders caller ID has been suppressed.
I learned that trick fairly quickly after I set up a toll-free line
for my business. The only people who suppressed t
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:55 AM, David Savage wrote:
> I have one so if I need to make a call, for instance when I'm on site
> at a job and need some information that's back at the office, I can.
The major reason I carry a phone is in case of emergency, or if I
lose my partner at the mall or somethi
On 1/8/07, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Being able to dash off a quick
> text message is also rather handy for times when immediate attention
> is not required. I wish landlines could do that.
Telsra (the major phone provider here) offers SMS text messaging on
home phones that support
On 7/1/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm with you there. On my cell phone I answer most calls because the
>number is not widely distributed. But I always check the ID. If it's
>suppressed, I don't answer. I never answer my land line. I do check
>the messages from time to t
On 1/8/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You guys are all nuts. I answer any phone call I get, mobile or
> landline. Unsolicited canvassing calls amount to probably less than half
> a dozen a year.
We get about 3-4 per day on average.
> We get / make many calls to / from friends and
> relati
On 08/01/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You guys are all nuts. I answer any phone call I get, mobile or
> > landline. Unsolicited canvassing calls amount to probably less than half
> > a dozen a year.
>
> We get about 3-4 per day on ave
Same here, usually at dinnertime, until they implemented national 'do
not call' lists and laws with $200 fines.
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/8/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/01/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/8/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Y
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated
>
>
>
>> Kenneth Waller wrote:
>>
>>> I see the issue with cell phones is that many people let the phones rule
>>> them.
On 08/01/07, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same here, usually at dinnertime, until they implemented national 'do
> not call' lists and laws with $200 fines.
We have similar laws too (but the fines are huge) however they have no
jurisdiction over calls initiated from outside the country
John Coyle
Praxis Data Solutions (www.epraxisdata.com)
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that
Yep. Now I 'only' get 1-2 unsolicited sales calls a week.
If I only got one every two months it wouldn't be a problem.
Mind you, that still doesn't get rid of the biggest source
of unwanted calls (especially in the late evening) - our
phone number is one simple digit transposition away from
the
On 08/01/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mind you, that still doesn't get rid of the biggest source
> of unwanted calls (especially in the late evening) - our
> phone number is one simple digit transposition away from
> the local Blockbuster Video/DVD rental store.
Oh the Joy. A fri
>
> From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/01/08 Mon AM 08:11:31 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated
>
> On 08/01/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Cotty wrote:
> You guys are all nuts. I answer any phone call I get, mobile
> or landline. Unsolicited canvassing calls amount to probably
> less than half a dozen a year. We get / make many calls to /
> from friends and relatives. Call me old-fashioned, but
> chatting using voice is still my
When you dial another person's phone you are asking to be allowed to
take up some of their time. It's like entering a room where someone is
busy doing his or her own thing. You intrude upon their space and may,
or may not, be welcome. I often find the telephone a bloody nuisance and
may choose
On Jan 7, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> And I must admit I'm far less inclined to answer any
> phone these days if the senders caller ID has been suppressed.
>
I simply don't answer such calls. None of the people who should be
calling me have suppressed caller IDs. Let them
On Jan 7, 2007, at 6:27 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> About cell phones, the ones that kill me are the ones that walk out of
> the house, and fire up the cell phone even before they get into their
> car to leave.
When I go for a drive around town almost everyone I see has a cell
phone glued to th
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:10 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> Despite being listed only in Yellow Pages, under "Ecological
> Consultancies", my company, having one letter different to a major
> UK houseware retailer, still gets calls asking if the local shop is
> open. I suspect that they are getting t
- Original Message -
From: "Digital Image Studio" Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message
really that complicated
> On 08/01/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Mind you, that still doesn't get rid of the biggest source
>> of
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Bob Shell wrote:
> One year the phone company put my photography studio in the yellow
> pages under Welding instead of Wedding. We could have sold a lot of
> acetylene that year !!!
> It's funny in hindsight, but sure wasn't at the time.
I apologise for laughing loud :-)
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 08/01/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> phone number is one simple digit transposition away from
>> the local Blockbuster Video/DVD rental store.
>
> mis-dialled by listeners attempting to dial a local radio stations
> competition line.
I don't kno
On 1/8/07, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I go for a drive around town almost everyone I see has a cell
> phone glued to their ear and are chattering away. My question: Who
> in hell are all of these people talking to??
>
> Bob
Maybe some of the older list members can educate me. Wh
Digital Image Studio wrote:
>
> Oh the Joy. A friend of mine once had a number that was commonly
> mis-dialled by listeners attempting to dial a local radio stations
> competition line. For some entertainment he put together a bogus
> winners message on his answer machine which was quite rude, a l
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really
that complicated
> I don't know what number mine is "close to", but I keep getting calls on
> my cell phone from escort services! Now, if it was "
Cotty wrote:
>You guys are all nuts. I answer any phone call I get, mobile or
>landline.
Hmm. I seem to recall *one* phone call you didn't answer but let go
straight to voice mail...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Doug Franklin" Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really
> that complicated
>
>
>> I don't know what number mine is "close to", but I keep getting calls on
>> my cell p
On 1/8/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
> >You guys are all nuts. I answer any phone call I get, mobile or
> >landline.
>
> Hmm. I seem to recall *one* phone call you didn't answer but let go
> straight to voice mail...
>
I say that this year, about an hour after he goes
My house number is 1 digit off the local Canadian Tire store.
Most calls are for the garage, and want to know if their vehicle is ready.
I always say, YES.:-)
Dave
Quoting Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Digital Image Studio wrote:
>>
>> Oh the Joy. A friend of mine once had a number that w
Quoting Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 1/8/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Cotty wrote:
>>
>> >You guys are all nuts. I answer any phone call I get, mobile or
>> >landline.
>>
>> Hmm. I seem to recall *one* phone call you didn't answer but let go
>> straight to voice mail.
Quoting David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 1/8/07, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> When I go for a drive around town almost everyone I see has a cell
>> phone glued to their ear and are chattering away. My question: Who
>> in hell are all of these people talking to??
>>
>> Bob
>
> Ma
On 7/1/07, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
>About cell phones, the ones that kill me are the ones that walk out of
>the house, and fire up the cell phone even before they get into their
>car to leave.
Believe me, I would switch it off if I could. I haved to have mine on
for work. In fa
On 7/1/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>> I have to be contactable 24 hours a day as a part of my contract, and so
>> I carry 2 cell phones > Cheers,
>> Cotty
>
>Then how come Norm got your voice mail:-)
Ahar - I have to be contactable 24 hours a day since my contract started
(D
On 1/6/07, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:50 PM, David Savage wrote:
>
> > But then you get people who'll break off a face to face conversation,
> > to answer the phone. That really pi55es me off.
>
> I won't put up with a salesclerk who does that. I politely tell h
Cotty wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> About cell phones, the ones that kill me are the ones that walk out of
>> the house, and fire up the cell phone even before they get into their
>> car to leave.
> Believe me, I would switch it off if I could. I haved to ha
On 8/1/07, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I answer all the calls I get* and I get at least two canvassing calls a day
>on average.
Malcolm, are you ex-directory?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
oh um a question about that -
I dont' use nor do I want to use text messaging - email is tough enough
and trying to type on little cell phone buttons let along see the
letters on them
is maddening - but if someone sends me a text message and I don't ahve
text messaging
on a cell phone does my ce
On 8/1/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hmm. I seem to recall *one* phone call you didn't answer but let go
>straight to voice mail...
Call screening - listen to the voicemail first to see who it was - just
because I have to be contactable 24/7 doesn't necessarily mean I'm
*availab
On 8/1/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I say that this year, about an hour after he goes to bed, we call him
>again. And again. And again
You ain't seen nothin yet Scotty.
>
>Better yet, lets call his wife and ask where he is. ;-)
Grr.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\
Cotty wrote:
>On 7/1/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>I'm with you there. On my cell phone I answer most calls because the
>>number is not widely distributed. But I always check the ID. If it's
>>suppressed, I don't answer. I never answer my land line. I do check
>>t
Scott - This year he is going to be there :)
we can just go rattle his tent
ann
Scott Loveless wrote:
>On 1/8/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Cotty wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>You guys are all nuts. I answer any phone call I get, mobile or
>>>landline.
>>>
>>>
>>Hmm. I seem t
Nah Ann, we'll still call him.
Norm
ann sanfedele wrote:
> Scott - This year he is going to be there :)
> we can just go rattle his tent
> ann
>
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
>> On 1/8/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Cotty wrote:
>>>
You guys are all nuts. I answ
Cotty wrote:
> >I answer all the calls I get* and I get at least two
> canvassing calls a
> >day on average.
>
> Malcolm, are you ex-directory?
Yes. The trouble is so many companies you do deal with sell their telephone
lists - no matter what is ticked in boxes on forms to suggest otherwise.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:11:31PM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 08/01/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Mind you, that still doesn't get rid of the biggest source
> > of unwanted calls (especially in the late evening) - our
> > phone number is one simple digit transposit
Those four foot thick stone walls wouldn't have anything to do with
that, would they?
Cotty wrote:
>
> Believe me, I would switch it off if I could. I haved to have mine on
> for work. In fact the reception in our area is shady - I have to have it
> in the window or it won't work.
>
--
PDML
Norm Baugher wrote:
>ann sanfedele wrote:
>>
>> Scott Loveless wrote:
>>>
>>>I say that this year, about an hour after he goes to bed, we call
>>>him again. And again. And again
>>>
>>> Better yet, lets call his wife and ask where he is. ;-)
>>
>> Scott - This year he is going to be
Quoting Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Norm Baugher wrote:
>
>> ann sanfedele wrote:
>>>
>>> Scott Loveless wrote:
I say that this year, about an hour after he goes to bed, we call
him again. And again. And again
Better yet, lets call his wife and ask where he i
Hey, when I was growing up we did not even use the phone to call our
neighbors, it was cheaper to walk down the street. A local phone call
cost a dime for 3 minutes, didn't matter if it was your phone or a pay
phone. 10 cents please. BTW, that dime would buy a cup of coffee or a
bottle of Coke
You knew THIS was coming.:-)
Quoting graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey, when I was growing up we did not even use the phone to call our
> neighbors, it was cheaper to walk down the street.
Oh, your lucky to have a street.We had to walk to school in the sewer
pipes.:-)
Dave(with the normal
On 8/1/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>we can just go rattle his tent
LOL
;-
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
On 8/1/07, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Yes. The trouble is so many companies you do deal with sell their telephone
>lists - no matter what is ticked in boxes on forms to suggest otherwise.
I'm surprised. We're ex-directory as well, but honestly, nowhere near
two a day :-/
--
On 8/1/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Those four foot thick stone walls wouldn't have anything to do with
>that, would they?
Everything!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
-
49:43 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated
>
> oh um a question about that -
> I dont' use nor do I want to use text messaging - email is tough enough
> and trying to type on little cell phone buttons let alo
ECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated
> On 1/8/07, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> When I go for a drive around town almost everyone I see has a cell
>> phone glued to their ear and are chattering away. My question: Who
>&g
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
