Are women allowed to drive? Prepare for doomsday!
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frits Wüthrich
Sent: 29. oktober 2006 16:26
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
no passport
no passport, but a drivers license for B passenger cars up to 3500 kg, G
tractor, and H for a moped, a motorcycle I guess.
On Saturday 28 October 2006 07:21, David Savage wrote:
Something along the same line:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/Passport%20photo.jpg
I can't remember
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Savage
Sent: 28 October 2006 06:22
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
Something along the same line:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/Passport%20photo.jpg
I can't remember where I got it from, or even if it's
] On
Behalf Of David Savage
Sent: 28 October 2006 06:22
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
Something along the same line:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/Passport%20photo.jpg
I can't remember where I got it from, or even if it's real
Woke me up this morning with a good laugh.
Thanks!
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something along the same line:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/Passport%20photo.jpg
I can't remember where I got it from, or even if it's real, but it
makes me laugh and shake
the world. - Richard Dawkins
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Savage
Sent: 28 October 2006 06:22
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
Something along the same line:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc
Five wives? He's breaking the rules.
John
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:19:27 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Excellent. Wish I had a picture like that of my family.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
On 26/10/06, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=192
Well spotted and very topical in the UK at the moment.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Suprisingly arousing.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu PM 11:13:25 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Pointless Family Photo
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=192
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?
Especially if they're all terrorists. One of those is too many.
Jack
--- John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Five wives? He's breaking the rules.
John
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:19:27 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Excellent. Wish I had a picture like that of my
Like to open packages, Mike? ;-))
Jack
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suprisingly arousing.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu PM 11:13:25 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Pointless Family Photo
Anticipation is more than half the pleasure. 8-)))
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/27 Fri PM 01:00:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
Like to open packages, Mike? ;-))
Jack
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Yeah..that photographer is dreamy..sigh
J
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anticipation is more than half the pleasure. 8-)))
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/27 Fri PM 01:00:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pointless Family
On 27/10/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Suprisingly arousing.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=192
Har!! Mike, I always knew you were a randy bugger ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Daughters have to wear the veil, too.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 08:30:38AM +0100, John Forbes wrote:
Five wives? He's breaking the rules.
John
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:19:27 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Excellent. Wish I had a picture like that of my family.
I don't find that comment in any way welcome.
Unfortunately there seems to be a local case here where
a woman was shot while on a shopping trip, apparently
solely because she was dressed as the women in this
photograph. I say apparently, because all the facts
are not yet in evidence, but there
I just died laughing. That had to be staged.
--
Bruce
Thursday, October 26, 2006, 4:13:25 PM, you wrote:
JD http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=192
JD __
JD Do You Yahoo!?
JD Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
3 of them are mistresses.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Forbes
Sent: 27 October 2006 08:31
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
Five wives? He's breaking the rules.
John
I've wondered that too. If so, very clever!
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just died laughing. That had to be staged.
--
Bruce
Thursday, October 26, 2006, 4:13:25 PM, you wrote:
JD http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=192
JD
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
Five wives? He's breaking the rules.
John
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam
Something along the same line:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/Passport%20photo.jpg
I can't remember where I got it from, or even if it's real, but it
makes me laugh and shake my head every time I see it.
Dave
On 10/28/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've wondered that
This one made me spit my coffee all over the key board! Well spotted and
titled!
James
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 9:13 AM
Subject: Pointless Family Photo
It's technically bad too, no shadow details or highlight details.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J and K Messervy
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 7:45 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pointless Family Photo
This one made
Excellent. Wish I had a picture like that of my family.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=192
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Very nice shot. Great frame and composition. Lovely wife and dog.
Overall, a great success.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2005, at 2:44 AM, David Oswald wrote:
She's a ham for the camera and loves showing off this shot to her
friends and family. It's funny because she's pretty shy around
strangers
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/25 Fri AM 11:14:38 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Family Photo
Very nice shot. Great frame and composition. Lovely wife and dog.
Overall, a great success.
For me, it works because of the contrasting and unusual
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: PESO: Family Photo
For me, it works because of the contrasting and unusual expressions
of the personae. Normally, one would expect a doting smile from
the wife and bared teeth from the dog.
Umm, Mike, that dog is smiling
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/25 Fri PM 12:32:30 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: PESO: Family Photo
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: PESO: Family Photo
For me, it works because of the contrasting
That's cute, it would be cuter if the dog had the same expression, too
much to ask for I suppose.
David Oswald wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello David,
Love to take a look, but my browser says the link could not be found.
Oh shoot, I screwed up my first PESO post. Ok, here goes again...
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:21:58 -0800, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello David,
Love to take a look, but my browser says the link could not be found.
Oh shoot, I screwed up my first PESO post. Ok, here goes again...
On 24/2/05, David Oswald, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://davido.perlmonk.org/pictures/aileensandy3.jpg
As mentioned before, it was taken with my new *ist-Ds, my old SMC Pentax
FA 50mm f/1.4. The shot was taken at 1/500th, f/4, ISO400, 6mp,
high-quality Jpeg, cropped, reduced to
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Re: PESO: Family Photo
That's what I said, didn't I?
All the hate that was flowing my way yesterday must have left my
thinking more confused than usual.
Sorry about that
William Robb
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From:
Subject: Re: Re: PESO: Family Photo
That's what I said, didn't I?
All the hate that was flowing my way yesterday must have left my
thinking more confused than usual.
Sorry about that
No problem.
m
From: David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello David,
Love to take a look, but my browser says the link could not be found.
Oh shoot, I screwed up my first PESO post. Ok, here goes again...
http://davido.perlmonk.org/pictures/aileensandy3.jpg
As mentioned before,
Hello David,
Love to take a look, but my browser says the link could not be found.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 24, 2005, 10:30:26 PM, you wrote:
DO Well, now that I know what PESO means, here's my every so often entry. ;)
DO One of the first shots taken with my Pentax
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello David,
Love to take a look, but my browser says the link could not be found.
Oh shoot, I screwed up my first PESO post. Ok, here goes again...
http://davido.perlmonk.org/pictures/aileensandy3.jpg
As mentioned before, it was taken with my new *ist-Ds, my old SMC Pentax
Hello David,
I rather like it, too. That 50mm is one sweet lens! Nice looking
family and your wife's facial expression really adds to the photo.
Thanks for sharing.
Bruce
Thursday, February 24, 2005, 11:21:58 PM, you wrote:
DO Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello David,
Love to take a look, but
Cute shot David.
Nice tone and nicely exposed.
How does your wife like the idea, of you posting that shot? :-)
Dave S
(Or is it a case of, what she doesn't know can't hurt you.)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:21:58 -0800, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello David,
She's a ham for the camera and loves showing off this shot to her
friends and family. It's funny because she's pretty shy around
strangers otherwise.
David Savage wrote:
Cute shot David.
Nice tone and nicely exposed.
How does your wife like the idea, of you posting that shot? :-)
Dave S
(Or
This is the Pentax 'Efina', a small APS PointShoot, a funny little thing.
Sven
Zitat von Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Great Portrait!
What is the smaller, grey and white camera to the right of the MZ-5n?
That photo is Exhibit A. Warning: This list will cause you
to open your purse strings. That is a lot 'o stuff, Sven.
keller.schaefer wrote:
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
It reminds me of the photo I took during one of my trips to south Florida.
I had taken all my screwmount gear with me. While waiting for my friend to
get out of work and after cleaning the gear I set it on a table with my new
MZ-S.
I have acquired some more screwmount gear in the interim :-)
Tanja,
And I am not even close in terms of some other people on this list.
Hmmm, I may have to do a family photo of my own now - ohhh, photo
project!
Maybe I need to include Pentax memorabilia,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
Hi, Sven,
Nice family reunion but a serious problem you have! A whole
generation of family members are missing -- S.F. and his siblings
are not there. Grandpa Asahi is not happy. You need to call them
up:-)
Yefei
[...]
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
[...]
Sven
Hey Sven,
Wanna buy a camera?
A.
On 28 Jun 2004, at 22:09, keller.schaefer wrote:
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family
photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
Only one member could not be present, a 2,0/35 Tak that is
Holy Mackerel! What a great mass of Pentax gear! I'm way behind and
have to go the KEH website right away . . .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/28/04 04:09PM
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family
photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
Thanks!
I showed this to my wife and now she agrees that I´m not that bad after
all, even after buying the 14mm :-)
DagT
På 28. jun. 2004 kl. 22.09 skrev keller.schaefer:
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family
photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 28. juni 2004 22:24
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: a 'family' photo
Holy Mackerel! What a great mass of Pentax gear! I'm way behind and
have to go the KEH website right away . . .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/28/04 04:09PM
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright
Great Portrait!
What is the smaller, grey and white camera to the right of the MZ-5n?
keller.schaefer wrote:
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
Only one member could not be
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family
photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
thud
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
O-M-G!! THAT is one cool photo!
What a collection!
Thanks so much for sharing.
:-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: keller.schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 6:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: a 'family' photo
I had this idea of taking them all out on
, 29 June 2004 6:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: a 'family' photo
Holy Mackerel! What a great mass of Pentax gear! I'm way behind and
have to go the KEH website right away . . .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/28/04 04:09PM
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family
I almost thudded too, until I counted themand realized how many I
have in my _own_ collection!
Pentax bodies and lenses together surpass the total number in our photo,
and when you add the non-Pentax items...well...it's almost decadent!
A number of more Pentax lenses, but fewer bodies.
Add to
On 28/6/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, offered:
I almost thudded too, until I counted them--and realized how many I
have in my _own_ collection!
Pentax bodies and lenses together surpass the total number in our photo,
and when you add the non-Pentax items...well...it's almost decadent!
A
I think we can safely say you have moved into the realm of collector. That
is a lot of Pentax gear. Reminds me of the poster I bought a couple of
years ago. Hope you have fun with them.
Jeff
At 05:34 PM 6/28/2004, you wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:09:40 +0200
From: keller.schaefer [EMAIL
Never fear, I'll be putting most of them on eBay in the next 3 or 5
months...
keith g
Cotty wrote:
On 28/6/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, offered:
I almost thudded too, until I counted them--and realized how many I
have in my _own_ collection!
Pentax bodies and lenses together surpass the
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: a 'family' photo
Never fear, I'll be putting most of them on eBay in the next 3 or 5
months...
keith g
Cotty wrote:
On 28/6/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, offered:
I almost thudded too, until I counted them--and realized how many I
have
I second thaa
aaa
aaat!
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family
photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
thud
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
Wow!!
Malcolm
59 matches
Mail list logo
