Gautam Sarup wrote:
That's right, I _do_ judge such things. I do my best though I haven't
reached the status of being the VOICE OF REASON.
Well SOMEBODY has to be it. :) I don't agree with Bob on everything and I
suspect that he does not *expect* everyone, or anyone in particular, to
agr
Blakely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 8:57 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
>
>
> The notion of requiring some sort of moral ground for one nation or one
> person to object to the brutal actions of another
Heh!
Gautam
> -Original Message-
> From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 8:33 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
>
>
> You ain't been here long enoug
At 04:48 PM 8/22/2005, keithw wrote:
Please, the both of you, will you either find something more appropriate
to discuss, or at least take this conversation off the list? Please?
I subscribed to the Pentax Camera list, not the Pentagon Critique list.
;-)
Oddly enough, you get what is out ther
Now how did you leap to that!
Most reasonable folks would know that the statement applies to whatever the
subject matter is. We all have different areas of expertise wherein we are
competent. Of course there are those who just love to think the worst of
people and are eager to jump on anything
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 8/22/2005 4:02:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense is
to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To assume
that the President of the US, P
You ain't been here long enough to know what bubbin' over is son...
Gautam Sarup wrote:
Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely.
Brewing nicely? This pot bubbleth over.
Obviously it hasn't been watched very
intently.
Gautam
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (screa
In a message dated 8/22/2005 4:02:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense is
to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To assume
that the President of the US, Prime Minister of Briton, P
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Bob Blakely wrote:
I think it important to let folks talk as they wish. Otherwise, how would we
know the fools among us. Hell, if they kept their mouths shut, we might think
them wise. Occasional lapses of judgment aside (we all have them) we learn
who is worth listening t
The notion of requiring some sort of moral ground for one nation or one
person to object to the brutal actions of another is absurd. Should you be
burglarized, your kin be brutalized and your neighbor witness it, perhaps he
should not intervene in as much he's only been out 5 years after a 7 yea
In response to
We need a big guy, who enjoys a fight, and can take a lot of whipping.
William Robb wrote:
Get Cakalic a can of Dream Whip and a French Maid's outfit and I expect
he'd be up to it.
WW
Hey don't mention my name in the same sentence as "French Maid's outfit"!
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
BW>You could try narrowing it down a bit so that it excludes some
people...
This is constructive!
We need a big guy, who enjoys a fight, and can take a lot of whippin
> > Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely.
Brewing nicely? This pot bubbleth over.
Obviously it hasn't been watched very
intently.
Gautam
From: Bob Blakely wrote:
> > The United States and the United Kingdom reacted to Japanese military
> > actions
>
> Those "actions" as you called them were Imperialism and brutality
> on a grand
> scale.
>
On what possible moral ground could the United Kingdom in the 1940's
object to Imperial
Bob Blakely wrote:
Regarding Eactivist's post:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense
is to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To
assume that the President of the US, Prime Minister of Briton, Prime
Minister of Australia have such p
I'll slap you around too, if you like...
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin, Shut the hell up before you alienate any more people.
I love it when you order me about.
Kevin
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
R
I think it important to let folks talk as they wish. Otherwise, how would we
know the fools among us. Hell, if they kept their mouths shut, we might
think them wise. Occasional lapses of judgment aside (we all have them) we
learn who is worth listening to and who is worth dismissing.
Regards,
gian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23. august 2005 01:16
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: The P
>
> All this making nicey nicey is pretty sickening. I think we
> should roast the living hell out of somebody. I hereby open
> nominations for appointment to Official PDML Whipping Person
> (we can't limit our options here). Frank has unofficially
> served in that capacity for a number of yea
Regarding Eactivist's post:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense is
to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To assume
that the President of the US, Prime Minister of Briton, Prime Minister of
Australia have such powers. To assert that
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I see no further way
forward for educational purposes,
How does this represent any change from your earlier interpretations?
Lewis
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Do
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:16:30PM +0100, Cotty wrote:
> On 22/8/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >We should choose someone who sometimes uses Canon or Nikon equipment,
> >writes to the list prolifically and has been around a long time. Do you
> >have any suggestions?
>
> H. H
On 22/8/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
>We should choose someone who sometimes uses Canon or Nikon equipment,
>writes to the list prolifically and has been around a long time. Do you
>have any suggestions?
H. H.
Nope. Can't think of a single soul.
Cheers,
Cotty
D]
> Sent: 22. august 2005 23:34
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
>
> On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I might do something even worse, ignore you.
>
> sorry, who are you again?
>
>
&
Cotty wrote:
On 23/8/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry to dissappoint you, I bowwed out :)
That's it? What's this list coming too. Years gone by, you coulda
guaranteed a good thrashing for a while. Now it's apologies and bowing
out. Frankly I'm disgusted. I suppose you'l
On 23/8/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Sorry to dissappoint you, I bowwed out :)
That's it? What's this list coming too. Years gone by, you coulda
guaranteed a good thrashing for a while. Now it's apologies and bowing
out. Frankly I'm disgusted. I suppose you'll want to bring th
On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I might do something even worse, ignore you.
sorry, who are you again?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
This one time, at band camp, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup - just needs a nice white-hot lance to pierce it at just the right
> moment LOL
Sorry to dissappoint you, I bowwed out :)
Kevin
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed
This one time, at band camp, keithw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems China might be heading a similar direction with Taiwan...
> I sincerely hope not.
I hope not also, I would not know what side to back.
But this would be another whole discussion on its own. Sino-Thaiwanese
relationships are
This one time, at band camp, "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin, Shut the hell up before you alienate any more people.
I love it when you order me about.
Kevin
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the v
This one time, at band camp, "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest that you read "flyboys" by James Bradley, especially those
> parts that deal with the manner in which the military of Japan dominated
> the government and distorted the samurai code of bushido into a a
> mil
Glen wrote:
At 09:34 AM 8/22/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "Daniel J. Matyola"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
> Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No, those are your words. I mad
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking? Interesting
perspective.
Oh, did he say that?
Interesting interpretation of what he said.
keith whaley
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time,
P. J. Alling wrote:
All true, except that the Japanese were waging an aggressive war of
imperial expansion on the Chinese mainland, (where the Japanese army
used rape and plague as weapons), and had previously fought a short
undeclared war with the Soviet Union, (in which Marshal Zhukov handed
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Launching a war simply because you want to (maybe just for political reasons)
I think all wars are fought for political reasons.
and convincing others it is a good thing, is certainly different from
responding t
I agree.
I didn't start this detour, and I avoided it as long as I could, but
some things just seem to demand answer. I apologize for taking the bait
and engaging in political debate here, where I agree it does not
belong. I know better.
Glen wrote:
At 09:34 AM 8/22/2005, Kevin Waterson
At 09:34 AM 8/22/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
> Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No, those are your words. I made no point abou
Kevin, Shut the hell up before you alienate any more people.
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
N
r some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22. august 2005 18:29
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
>
> On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Chil
On 22/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>...like a good festering boil, eh?
Yup - just needs a nice white-hot lance to pierce it at just the right
moment LOL
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
___
On Aug 22, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Cotty wrote:
Children(addressing all of you). This is not a Pentax or photo
related
subject, can you please stop behaving like .
Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely. Don't be such a killjoy. Just
needs a
few more days and a couple more ingredients and it'll
On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Children(addressing all of you). This is not a Pentax or photo related
>subject, can you please stop behaving like .
Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely. Don't be such a killjoy. Just needs a
few more days and a couple more ingredients and it'
aniel J. Matyola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22. august 2005 15:30
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
>
> So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
> Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking? Interes
I attempted to take no high ground, moral or otherwise.
I just responded to your preposterous statement that "Pearl Harbour was
the result of failed US foreign policy." The attack was the direct
result of the attempt by the Japanese govenment of that time to gain
miltary control over the main
This one time, at band camp, "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was probably impossible to
> avoid conflict with the Japanese without ceding them hegemony over Asia
> and the Western Pacific.
I think you may be right here, the whole mess was believed to have started
with the San Fra
This one time, at band camp, "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
> Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No, those are your words. I made no point about justification and we
have all seen how Americ
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking? Interesting
perspective.
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Launching a war simply because you want to (maybe just for poli
All true, except that the Japanese were waging an aggressive war of
imperial expansion on the Chinese mainland, (where the Japanese army
used rape and plague as weapons), and had previously fought a short
undeclared war with the Soviet Union, (in which Marshal Zhukov handed
them their heads), w
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Launching a war simply because you want to (maybe just for political reasons)
I think all wars are fought for political reasons.
> and convincing others it is a good thing, is certainly different from
> responding to an outright attack (Pe
.
Regards, Bob S.
On 8/22/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Glen"
> Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
>
>
> >
> > I wonder if this thread will ever get back to protecting the rights o
William Robb wrote:
We in the US had a President some years back by the name of Richard
Nixon. He uttered a line that became somewhat famous: "I am not a
crook." My reply was meant to be a play on that old phrase.
Didn't he turn out to be a crook?
They (politicians) are all crooks.
Tom Ree
- Original Message -
From: "Glen"
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
I wonder if this thread will ever get back to protecting the rights of
photographers to use their Pentax cameras for whatever peaceful
law-abiding purpose they see fit? ;-)
So last nig
> I wonder if this thread will ever get back to protecting the rights of
> photographers to use their Pentax cameras for whatever peaceful
> law-abiding
> purpose they see fit? ;-)
The rights of photographers to use all kinds of cameras
without regard to media, colour or national origin. :)
Ch
At 04:52 PM 8/21/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But I see a difference between the U.S. having heavy involvement and light
> involvement and a president starting it or not.
I wonder if the families of those killed see the difference.
I won
In a message dated 8/21/2005 1:54:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But I see a difference between the U.S. having heavy involvement and light
> involvement and a president starting it or not.
I wonder if the families
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But I see a difference between the U.S. having heavy involvement and light
> involvement and a president starting it or not.
I wonder if the families of those killed see the difference.
Kind regards
Kevin
--
"Democracy is two wolves and
The reactionary press at the time...
The War Starts on March 24, 1999! At approximately 1830 UTC the first bombs
were dropped on Kosovo. Mr. Clinton really has no idea of what he is going
to accomplish with this action. All we know is that US lives will probably
be lost in this military action
In a message dated 8/20/2005 11:49:46 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
didn't bring up Clinton because, what with Haiti and Somalia, I
thought there might be room for argument.
=
Well, sort of. But as I recall, Clinton didn't START anything. And our
involvement was sor
To add to Peter's list, the President of the "Committee of Safety" (those were
the guys who started the whole affair) was David Rittenhouse. That is about as far back
as you can go and claim that it had anything to do with the United States.
No, he was not an ancestor of mine, although family l
This one time, at band camp, "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And by the way, I remember that there were conflicts in Afghanistan,
> Angola, Mozambique and Central America in that time frame, but for the
> life of me I can't remember any sort of wars in the Caribbean during the
> Cart
He was the head of a body much like the UN but smaller with less power.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Washington got a city named after him because he was instrumental in
getting the "Federal
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Washington got a city named after him because he was instrumental in
getting the "Federal City" built
But why did Peyton only get a Place?
WW
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and only lived a
month? William Henry Harrison. Anybody since him?
As to recent presidents hell-bent on starting wars, I don't recall which
war
ite House list those people who were before George
Washington?
And why did George Washington get a state *and* a city named after him, but
Peyton only got a Place?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2005 01:37
To: penta
Well, considering the powers of the presidency under the Articles of
Confederation, maybe we were...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Bob ... Nope, it's not a trick question. Think about this for a moment:
The country was officially formed on March 1, 1781 with the adoption of The
Articles of Confede
e before George
Washington?
And why did George Washington get a state *and* a city named after him, but
Peyton only got a Place?
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 August 2005 01:37
> To: pentax-discuss@
No, Shel, we weren't leaderless. Neither was there a President of the United
States. Rather, there was a President of the Congress of the Confederation
which operated under the Articles of Confederation.
Lewis
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Bob ... Nope, it's not a trick qu
Why hasn't anybody told the White House?
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 August 2005 01:30
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
>
> Give that man
Hi Bob ... Nope, it's not a trick question. Think about this for a moment:
The country was officially formed on March 1, 1781 with the adoption of The
Articles of Confederation. Washington was inaugurated in April of 1789. We
were not leaderless during those years before Washington became preside
Give that man a Kewpie doll! Very good Peter. Washington was actually the
eighth President of the US.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: P. J. Alling
> Articles of Confederation -- John Hanson
> New "Federal" Constitution -- George Washington
>
> But just in case you were referring to the Co
This one time, at band camp, "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and only lived a
> month? William Henry Harrison. Anybody since him?
> As to recent presidents hell-bent on starting wars, I don't recall which
> wars Ford and Carter st
This one time, at band camp, Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you only counting major wars, or are you including all military actions
> abroad?
Any military action is an act of war. This rubbish about police actions and the
like wears a little thin very quickly, especially for those on the
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and
only lived a month?
you had a month-old president!?
He just acts that way.
HAR!!
WW
At 10:12 AM 8/20/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars,
Nixon
> seems to have been commited to ending them.
I dont know a great deal about American history but
ROTFLMFAO
Dave (wiping tears from his eyes)
On 8/21/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Other than not keeping his you-know-what in his pants, he was a pretty good
> >president. 8 years of peace and prosperity.
>
> Okay, pardon
On 20/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Other than not keeping his you-know-what in his pants, he was a pretty good
>president. 8 years of peace and prosperity.
Okay, pardon me but this joke isn't bad and seems like a good place to
chuck it in...
---
Oh yea, just forget about the war in Kosovo and throwing missiles arround...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 8:02:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message d
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny thing is he probably did more good than any president in US history,
but the only thing he is remembered for is Watergate.
===
Personally, I can think of quite a few presidents who did more for this
country.
Articles of Confederation -- John Hanson
New "Federal" Constitution -- George Washington
But just in case you were referring to the Continental Congress --
Peyton Randolph
(I had to look that one up).
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking of which, who was t
nkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 August 2005 18:15
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking of which, who was the first president of the US?
Shel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 8:02:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
o: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
>
> Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
>
> Speaking of which, who was the first president of the US?
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Bob W
>
> > you had a month-old president!?
>
>
>
>
>
In a message dated 8/20/2005 8:02:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I dont know a great deal about
get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
- Socrates
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
This one time, at band camp, "William Robb"
GDubya, with a cherry tree instead of a bush, AFAIK.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 7:15 PM
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Spea
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking of which, who was the first president of the US?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bob W
> you had a month-old president!?
> What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and
> only lived a month?
you had a month-old president!?
--
Cheers,
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
president
_NOT_ involved in a military conflict?
Kind regards
Kevin
==
Uh. Taft?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars, Nixon
seems to have been commited to ending them.
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
president
_NOT_ involved in a military conflict?
Gerald Ford, (maybe, at least no major conflicts durring his
administration).
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars, Nixon
seems to have been commited to ending the
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
president
_NOT_ involved in a military conflict?
Kind regards
Kevin
==
Uh. Taft?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
This one time, at band camp, "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars, Nixon
> seems to have been commited to ending them.
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last president
_NOT_ involved in a
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny thing is he probably did more good than any president in US history,
but the only thing he is remembered for is Watergate.
===
Personally, I can think of quite a few presi
In a message dated 8/19/2005 1:33:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny thing is he probably did more good than any president in US history,
but the only thing he is remembered for is Watergate.
graywolf
===
Personally, I can think of quite a few presidents who did m
This one time, at band camp, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want, you can still get a gun. Just not one that shoots as fast
> as you can pull the trigger.
You would need a _very_ good reason to have a firearm now in .au
As an aside, I went to hand in a 12g shotgun at a local pol
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:32:48 +0100, Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote, inter alia, about Nixon:
Funny thing is he probably did more good than any president in US
history, but the only thing he is remembered for is Watergate. graywolf
Would you care to expand on that? I remember that he s
one, you'll become a philosopher.
- Socrates
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
William Robb hen-pecked at his keyboard:
What makes you think I think
William Robb hen-pecked at his keyboard:
What makes you think I think?
I would say "You are therefore you think". However I personally know of
some exceptions to the rule.
al Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Not in the strictest sense. No one credible ever accused him of
personal enrichment.
I see. The quickie online dictionary I use from time to time doesn't
mention personal enrichment as a requirement
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
