I don't know what you are talking about, Ann. These are really natural,
intimate photos, with some touching moments. The lighting is gentle and
NY as a backdrop can't be beat. Such great faces.
On 29/08/2013 1:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the
Thanks Derby, these were pruned a lot (down from about 80) - the bright
sun photos were removed except for the one of Bride and Groom with
buildings..
I'm glad so many people I respect mostly liked what I pruned to and
now I'm getting some good feedback from the folks who were there.
ann
On
I'm a little late coming to this Ann, but I think you have a lot of good
photos there. 16,18 and 33 stand out for me. I think you caught a lot of
good emotion, despite some of the technical flaws (e.g. the noisy
images). I only did 3 weddings nad never did get a good shot of bride
and groom
Thanks Mark -
My wounds have healed somewhat.. :-)
But truly, I'm NOT doing any more weddings... stress city!
ann
On 9/2/2013 21:43, Mark C wrote:
I'm a little late coming to this Ann, but I think you have a lot of good
photos there. 16,18 and 33 stand out for me. I think you caught a lot
On 28/08/2013 9:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would rather have not done the posed pics -
This is a small Geso - I feel ok about most of them - meaning
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would rather have not done the posed pics -
This is a small Geso - I feel ok about most of them - meaning
not too embarrassing.
I had put 75 up to
Works OK for me Ann. The people look good. :-) Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would
Ann,
Don't be too hard on yourself.
Your pics look very spontaneous and unposed, not necessarily a bad thing.
Posed pics are difficult because they mean giving people directions
(and sometimes giving individuals directions in a group, which is
logistically more difficult).
Generally, my simple
The pictures are very nice. Love 29, 26, 19, 21 and numerous others. But, like
you, I hate shooting weddings and haven't done one in years now.
Enjoy your K-5!
Paul
On Aug 28, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:28:54AM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
You should have ordered some overcast to be delivered.
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would rather have not done
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Assignments/Paul-and-Linda-Get-Hitched/31453928_TSxSrg#!i=2724712337k=x4jSmRR
Ann,
The outside photos look good to me. Some of the inside photos on the
second page look excessively noisy; even
I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
rather capturing small slices of time in a dynamic (and fun!) party. Your
friends should be pleased with the results.
Two post-processing issues -
a. could be my monitor settings, but many of the earlier ones
Like the others, I think they look fine. I have respect for anyone
that shoots a wedding. It's to much stress for me. gs
George Sinos
www.GeorgesPhotos.net
www.GeorgeSinos.com
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
I see no
I've shot about three weddings total in my life. And after every one of
them, I've experienced the exact same angst you're experiencing.
Then, I work on them a bit and go back through them, and still think
they're horrible.
Then, I go back through them a few days later and see things that I
Some very nice ones in there ... You captured the moments well. That's the
important thing for weddings.
Godfrey
On Aug 28, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting
You did fine, Ann. You caught the enjoyment and celebration, and
that's the heart of it after all.
You even got a classic lens-hood-on-backwards shot in #12. :-)
Don't beat yourself up. You did really well with the outdoor shots
despite the terrace light. A few indoor shots are noticeably noisy,
Not a wedding masterpiece, for sure.
Still, there are really good ones.
I liked 10, 13 and 18, for example.
I have difficulty memorizing beyond 3 two-digit numbers, that is why ;)
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
on the terrace where there was
no bright sun was impossible -
The DIRECTOR was the groom - an old friend and ex beau from the 70's
I had no time to chimp.
I've never shot weddings the way other people do... usually that is why
someone wants me to do it. The trouble here is I tried to do what he
wanted me
On 8/28/2013 12:08, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Assignments/Paul-and-Linda-Get-Hitched/31453928_TSxSrg#!i=2724712337k=x4jSmRR
Ann,
The outside photos look good to me. Some of the inside photos on
On 8/28/2013 12:22, Stan Halpin wrote:
I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
rather capturing small slices of time in a dynamic (and fun!) party. Your
friends should be pleased with the results.
Two post-processing issues -
a. could be my
On 8/28/2013 12:37, Walt wrote:
I've shot about three weddings total in my life. And after every one of
them, I've experienced the exact same angst you're experiencing.
Then, I work on them a bit and go back through them, and still think
they're horrible.
Then, I go back through them a few
Paul via phone
On Aug 28, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 8/28/2013 12:22, Stan Halpin wrote:
I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
rather capturing small slices of time in a dynamic (and fun!) party. Your
friends
Hi Ann: I think you caught nice expressions--lots of great emotion. I think
you're being too negative. Very nice selection. Cheers, Christine
On Aug 28, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there
On 8/28/2013 20:04, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Paul via phone
On Aug 28, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 8/28/2013 12:22, Stan Halpin wrote:
I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
rather capturing small slices of time in a
thanks Christine, Paul, Stan, walt, darren, bob, Godders - you know, all
youse guys
sorry I'm so -um- so down... it combines with a couple of other things
at the moment.
I'll get back up soon - I've fallen but I CAN get up - just not as fast
as I ustah
Thanks everyone for holding me up
Ann, I do think that you're being too negative. I've looked at the
pictures you posted. There were few that I thought that the focus was
off, but beside that point - you conveyed the mood of the event and it
would seem to me it wasn't a big wedding, so that in a sense, you
needn't have to
On 8/28/2013 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would rather have not done the posed pics -
This is a small Geso - I feel ok about most of them - meaning
I think I saw this information mentioned elsewhere previously:
http://connect.dpreview.com/post/2355497650/photographer-50-weddings-one-day
First, this guy is going to shoot 50 weddings in 1 day,
whatever that means...
But it cannot really mean a complete wedding coverage, does it?
Maybe just
saw this information mentioned elsewhere previously:
http://connect.dpreview.com/post/2355497650/photographer-50-weddings-one-day
First, this guy is going to shoot 50 weddings in 1 day,
whatever that means...
But it cannot really mean a complete wedding coverage, does it?
Maybe just the 5-10
on 2013-02-12 10:53 Igor Roshchin wrote
First, this guy is going to shoot 50 weddings in 1 day,
whatever that means...
But it cannot really mean a complete wedding coverage, does it?
Maybe just the 5-10-minute civil ceremony... or, conversely, just
a few shots of the couple and the family
Bob,
Yes, I enjoyed watching that video, even though I am not sure
I agree with all the points criticized there.
Even before Instagram people were taking photos of their feet, weird
signs, self-portraits in the mirror, and what's not...
Experimenting and playing is fine, and that platform is
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013, steve harley wrote:
as you note, if he feels larger cameras have an undesirable social
impact, there are plenty of options; i don't think a smartphone is
the best alternative ? the situation in the Philippines has little
relation to the ubiquity of smartphones, which is
Another one of those don't know why but I thought this was funny:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/07/three-weddings-short.html
Perhaps you do to? Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
, 2012 4:51 AM
Subject: PESO - Three Weddings Short
Another one of those don't know why but I thought this was funny:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/07/three-weddings-short.html
Perhaps you do to? Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:23 PM, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The average NC farmer had a crop allotment of 50 - 75 acres for tobacco
on maybe a 100 - 200 acre farm. The allotment was all the tobacco the
farmer was permitted to
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
If you think country gravy has any relationship to mushroom soup,
besides both, supposedly, being food stuffs, you've not had country
gravy, nor would you be likely to long survive encounter ...
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Mind you, I noticed the smoke as I peered through the steam rising off
my plate of biscuits and gravy (something we don't have in The Great
White North, I'm afraid). Man they tasted good! I
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:23 PM, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The average NC farmer had a crop allotment of 50 - 75 acres for tobacco
on maybe a 100 - 200 acre farm. The allotment was all the tobacco the
farmer was permitted to plant, and would allow him to sell a certain
number
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:41 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Mind you, I noticed the smoke as I peered through the steam rising off
my plate of biscuits and gravy (something we don't
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:42:23PM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:41 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Mind you, I noticed the smoke as I peered through the
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:48 PM, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:42:23PM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
If you grow up with it down here, your body learns how to process the
cholesterol and stuff. ;-)
I never thought of that. Ya gotta start 'em young, I
David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:41 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Mind you, I noticed the smoke as I peered through the steam rising off
my plate
P. J. Alling wrote:
If you think country gravy has any relationship to mushroom soup,
besides both, supposedly, being food stuffs, you've not had country
gravy, nor would you be likely to long survive encounter ...
Though I'm not much of a fan of country gravy, I have to agree with PJ
on
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I'm not much of a fan of country gravy, I have to agree with PJ
on this one. It bears not even a passing resemblance to mushroom soup,
if the gravy and the soup were made correctly. And hand-thrown cathead
frank theriault wrote:
Well, I've only had biscuits and gravy when I've been down to GFM, so
that's what, three trips now? Anyway, the gravy certainly didn't
taste like mushroom soup. It ~was~ quite delicious, but it was
~rich~!! I've never tasted anything quite like it.
Yeah, it's /way/
frank theriault wrote:
Mind you, I noticed the smoke as I peered through the steam rising off
my plate of biscuits and gravy (something we don't have in The Great
White North, I'm afraid). Man they tasted good!
They don't taste right without the smoke.
Every once in a while I'll wander into
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I'm not much of a fan of country gravy, I have to agree with PJ
on this one. It bears not even a passing resemblance to mushroom soup,
if the gravy and the soup were made correctly.
Hey, that's WEST Virginia . . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/17/2008 2:26 PM
I guess you're not in Virginia, where he'd have been sleeping around
with
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's some pretty serious moonshine operations out there. Places with
virtual private armies where the police don't even like to go. Dealing
in moonshine and North Carolina's second biggest cash crop (after
tobacco, of
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's some pretty serious moonshine operations out there. Places with
virtual private armies where the police don't even like to go. Dealing
in moonshine and North Carolina's
frank theriault wrote:
Mind you, I noticed the smoke as I peered through the steam rising off
my plate of biscuits and gravy (something we don't have in The Great
White North, I'm afraid). Man they tasted good! I suspect, however
that a steady diet of those things would clog the arteries in
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He'll be getting a shave and much more. He reports to USMC boot camp
at Paris Island, NC on October 5. I think they're both very young.
The bride is in school. Paul
On Sep 15, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Paul, Very good but the groom needs a
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We don't say mean things about the bride...
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/9/08, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Very good but the groom needs a shave.
Well, at least the bride didn't.
At least
He's already been paid. He doesn't shoot until he's paid.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2008, at 9:40 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We don't say mean things about the bride...
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/9/08, Bob Sullivan,
I had a wedding lined up for next weekend but it was called off by the
bride. Bad news for me but amusing none the less...
You see the Groom was sleeping around on the Bride to be...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
wait for it...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
WITH HER SISTER!
(What a maroon).
I think I've entered
I guess you're not in Virginia, where he'd have been sleeping around
with HIS sister...
I had a wedding lined up for next weekend but it was called
off by the
bride. Bad news for me but amusing none the less...
You see the Groom was sleeping around on the Bride to be...
.
.
wait
Isn't that a qualification?
If'n she ain't good enough for her own Kin, she ain't good enough for
ours!
Bob W wrote:
I guess you're not in Virginia, where he'd have been sleeping around
with HIS sister...
I had a wedding lined up for next weekend but it was called
off by the
bride.
Virginia is fine. It's the hills of West Virginia and the Carolinas
where the banjo music starts a playin'...Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you're not in Virginia, where he'd have been sleeping around
with HIS sister...
I had a
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Virginia is fine. It's the hills of West Virginia and the Carolinas
where the banjo music starts a playin'...Regards, Bob S.
When Mark and Dave and I head down to GFM we're a couple of hours
driving through West
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess you're not in Virginia, where he'd have been sleeping around
with HIS sister...
LMFAO--;-) Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
frank theriault wrote:
When Mark and Dave and I head down to GFM we're a couple of hours
driving through West Virginia. It's beautiful-but-kind-of-sad
country. Hard to imagine how such a place could be economically
viable (coal and tourism seem to be about the only industries - and no
one
Doug Franklin wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
When Mark and Dave and I head down to GFM we're a couple of hours
driving through West Virginia. It's beautiful-but-kind-of-sad
country. Hard to imagine how such a place could be economically
viable (coal and tourism seem to be about the only
When I worked for Hearst Magazine Division in the early eighties, I was assiged
to photograph a tow truck that had won a Motor Magazine contest for custom tow
trucks. Picking this vehicle was sort of a gag on the prt of the editors. The
truck was kind of obscene. It was decorated with hundreds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I worked for Hearst Magazine Division in the early eighties, I was
assiged to photograph a tow truck that had won a Motor Magazine contest for
custom tow trucks. Picking this vehicle was sort of a gag on the prt of the
editors. The truck was kind of obscene. It
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:43 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe she does but it's hidden by her gown...
Now that's just rude...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hehe... That's always my ultimatum too. I can shoot if you promise
I'm not the only one you rely on. Works wonders to set people's
expectations. :-)
Jostein
2008/3/8, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Yashica-Mat camera is great for that use as it is almost
completely quiet. One of the very few
is basically batch processed. In printing, some control is exercised,
the
amount of which varies in proportion to how much one pays. With digital,
each
frame is processed individually and prints or print files can e fine
tuned. The
last two weddings I shot were digital, and I was ale to roduce
shoot weddings for enjoyment...that is
for guests. I can say that after shooting a bunch, it does seem less
stressful, or perhaps you are able to handle the stress much better.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 6:28:35 AM, you wrote:
R ouch. I'd love to shoot
Had a beer with a friend last night. They were at a relatives wedding
last month, and the wife of a brother was asked to
do the wedding photos.
She has some sort of a non PS camera i'm lead to believe.:-)
Anyway, he tells me last night, that NONE of the photos she took came
out, Unknown if she
ouch. I'd love to shoot a wedding, but not as the official
photographer, more for my own enjoyment. That sure seems like a
weighty responsibility!
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had a beer with a friend last night. They were at a relatives wedding
last month, and the
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Why i don't shoot weddings.
Had a beer with a friend last night. They were at a relatives wedding
last month, and the wife of a brother was asked to
do the wedding photos.
She has some sort of a non PS camera i'm lead to believe
An Ouzi is what you get when you cross an Uzi with a
bottle of Ouzo.
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't shoot weddings anymore, as my temptaton at
the last few was to use
an Ouzi rather than a Pentax.
But that not got anything to do
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: Why i don't shoot weddings.
An Ouzi is what you get when you cross an Uzi with a
bottle of Ouzo.
HAR
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Rebekah escribió:
ouch. I'd love to shoot a wedding, but not as the official
photographer, more for my own enjoyment. That sure seems like a
weighty responsibility!
I was once the official photographer at a wedding. Everything turned
out well and everyone liked the photos, but I wouldn't
Back before I knew better, I took my Yashicamat camera to a wedding
of a co-worker. I took pictures at the same time as the hired
photographer was taking the formal photos at the altar. Managed to
get 5 shots before he told me that I couldn't photograph. Turned
out that the pro had
There are a lot of amateur photographers who make the jump to
professional wedding photographer. I've done dozens of weddings
over the past 30 years. Still an amateur, and still shooting film
ONLY at weddings. Have had lots of good food and good beer.
Jim A.
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:28 AM
Hello Rebekah,
I have to chuckle, you don't shoot weddings for enjoyment...that is
for guests. I can say that after shooting a bunch, it does seem less
stressful, or perhaps you are able to handle the stress much better.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 6:28:35 AM, you wrote
I've done a half dozen or so over the years. It's much less stressful
with digital than it was with film. Particularly if you bring a
laptop or portable drive and back up your full cards.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Carlos Royo wrote:
Rebekah escribió:
ouch. I'd love to shoot a
William Robb wrote:
[...]
I don't shoot weddings anymore, as my temptaton at the last few was to use
an Ouzi rather than a Pentax.
But that not got anything to do with this.
William Robb
An Ouzi?
If you meant Ouzo, yeah, you're right. it's better to drink yourself to
oblivion than
The Yashica-Mat camera is great for that use as it is almost
completely quiet. One of the very few times I have been fooled to take
pictures during a wedding (it was my brother) they didn´t want to be
distracted by cameras during the ceremony, so I got a seat in front in
the church and
Heh, my brother-in-law loves the photos I took at his wedding with my
seagull. The real photographers pictures were just passable.
Evan
On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Jim Apilado wrote:
Back before I knew better, I took my Yashicamat camera to a wedding
of a co-worker. I took pictures at
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Evan Hanson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, my brother-in-law loves the photos I took at his wedding with my
seagull. The real photographers pictures were just passable.
Thats because you had a birds eye view.
Dave
Evan
On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Jim
Thats because you had a birds eye view.
It's true, I'm sure the pictures were im-peck-able ;)
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Evan Hanson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, my brother-in-law loves the photos I took at his wedding with my
Do you mean that you shoot no film except at weddings,
=or= that your wedding shoots are exclusively film?
If the latter, why?
Rick
--- Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot of amateur photographers who make
the jump to
professional wedding photographer. I've done
dozens
at weddings,
=or= that your wedding shoots are exclusively film?
If the latter, why?
Rick
--- Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot of amateur photographers who make
the jump to
professional wedding photographer. I've done
dozens of weddings
over the past 30 years
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why i don't shoot weddings.
I have the same question. Digital takes much of the stress out of wedding
shooting, because the
photographer has complete control. Not true with film.
Or it can add to the stress because you know
]
Do you mean that you shoot no film except at weddings,
=or= that your wedding shoots are exclusively film?
If the latter, why?
Rick
--- Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot of amateur photographers who make
the jump to
professional wedding photographer. I've done
Film is basically batch processed. In printing, some control is exercised, the
amount of which varies in proportion to how much one pays. With digital, each
frame is processed individually and prints or print files can e fine tuned. The
last two weddings I shot were digital, and I was ale
is basically batch processed. In printing,
some control is exercised, the
amount of which varies in proportion to how much
one pays. With digital, each
frame is processed individually and prints or
print files can e fine tuned. The
last two weddings I shot were digital, and I was
ale
one pays. With digital, each
frame is processed individually and prints or print files can e fine tuned.
The
last two weddings I shot were digital, and I was ale to roduce perfectly
matched
shots. The busiest and most expensive wedding photographers i know all shoot
digital. Yes
I don't photograph weddings very often. If my favorite lab were to go out
of business than I probably will just quit doing them. I do teach a
wedding photography class through a community college. Everyone in my
class last spring shoot digital. They took the class because they were
not sure
I don't shoot weddings because I don't like weddings.
No other reason is needed.
That said, I would never shoot a wedding for a friend or relative. Ever.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: I don't shoot weddings
I shot a few weddings in the seventies, and I was cured. The
organizational work was a big pain in the ass. You really have to be
devoted to the whole wedding shoot scenario to make it work. It can't
be an on again, off again thing
Sent: 8. desember 2006 06:55
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: I don't shoot weddings
I shot a few weddings in the seventies, and I was cured. The
organizational work was a big pain in the ass. You really have to be
devoted to the whole wedding shoot scenario to make it work. It can't
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally, there was a
dinner at a Polish restaurant in Hammtramck, Michigan. (I had some
duck blood soup. Yum)/
Czarnina and placzki. Mmmm - m
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using
Nice shots Paul.
And Hammtramck is a pretty unique place.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/7/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a few weddings in the seventies, and I was cured. The
organizational work was a big pain in the ass. You really have to be
devoted to the whole wedding shoot
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I shot a few weddings in the seventies, and I was cured. The
organizational work was a big pain in the ass. You really have to be
devoted to the whole wedding shoot scenario to make it work.
I have a friend who shoots weddings. He used to be very high end
On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:11, Mark Roberts wrote:
But his specialty is the five hundred
dollar wedding package. He shoots the wedding by himself. The bride
and groom get proofs and files from which they can get more prints
made. He gets $500.00. Bang. Done.
He says these jobs are usually fun and
Both are very nice Paul.
What is your flash source. Looks like you might be using one of those
Lumiquest bouncers, just by the amount of light hitting everyone.
Dave
BTW, i hear you about weddings.
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shot a few weddings in the seventies, and I
about weddings.
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shot a few weddings in the seventies, and I was cured. The
organizational work was a big pain in the ass. You really have to be
devoted to the whole wedding shoot scenario to make it work. It can't
be an on again, off again thing
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
