Re: A little OT: Volcano for the People: Stunning visuals from Iceland's spectacular volcanic eruption: Digital Photography Review

This was wonderful to watch!  Thanks for that link - best one I had seen ann On 4/22/2021 7:14 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote: Don't miss the videos...some spectacular shots of the Icelandic volcano. https://www.dpreview.com/news/4999134036/volcano-for-the-people-stunning-visuals-from-iceland-s-spect

Re: A little OT: Volcano for the People: Stunning visuals from Iceland's spectacular volcanic eruption: Digital Photography Review

Volcanoes are fascinating! Thanks for sharing. I have visited Kilauea, on the Big Island of Hawaii, on four separate occasions. I have twice ben able to see the lava actively flowing, once flowing into the ocean. Once I was able to get so close I could fgeel the heat on my cheeks, but they park

Re: A little OT: Volcano for the People: Stunning visuals from Iceland's spectacular volcanic eruption: Digital Photography Review

> On 23 April 2021 at 00:14 Paul Sorenson wrote: > > > Don't miss the videos...some spectacular shots of the Icelandic volcano. > > https://www.dpreview.com/news/4999134036/volcano-for-the-people-stunning-visuals-from-iceland-s-spectacular-volcanic-eruption?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=em

A little OT: Volcano for the People: Stunning visuals from Iceland's spectacular volcanic eruption: Digital Photography Review

Don't miss the videos...some spectacular shots of the Icelandic volcano. https://www.dpreview.com/news/4999134036/volcano-for-the-people-stunning-visuals-from-iceland-s-spectacular-volcanic-eruption?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021-april-22&ref_=pe_1822230_579708700_dpr_nl

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

So they'd probably have to use GIMP or something similar. On 9/13/2020 19:50:03, Igor PDML-StR wrote: Lightroom will probably choke on that size of the image... (Unless it were installed on a supercomputer with a huge amount of RAM. But those are not running Windows or even MacOS.) :-) Cheers

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:57 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 8:21 PM Larry Colen wrote: On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: In ten years that rez will come in one of the standard cameras in an iPhone. lets call green light 500nm, so if I do my math right, a

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 9:10 PM Larry Colen wrote: > > > On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:57 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 8:21 PM Larry Colen wrote: > >> > >>> On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > >>> > >>> In ten years that rez will come in one of the standard cam

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

> On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:57 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 8:21 PM Larry Colen wrote: >> >>> On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >>> >>> In ten years that rez will come in one of the standard cameras in an iPhone. >> >> lets call green light 500nm, so if I

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 8:21 PM Larry Colen wrote: > > > On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > > > In ten years that rez will come in one of the standard cameras in an iPhone. > > lets call green light 500nm, so if I do my math right, a square sensor 60,000 > photons on a side wou

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

> On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > In ten years that rez will come in one of the standard cameras in an iPhone. lets call green light 500nm, so if I do my math right, a square sensor 60,000 photons on a side would be 30 um on a side. So, that kind of sets a bottom limit

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

In ten years that rez will come in one of the standard cameras in an iPhone. On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 7:50 PM Igor PDML-StR wrote: > > Lightroom will probably choke on that size of the image... > (Unless it were installed on a supercomputer with a huge amount of RAM. > But those are not running Wi

Re: OT: Largest Digital Camera

Lightroom will probably choke on that size of the image... (Unless it were installed on a supercomputer with a huge amount of RAM. But those are not running Windows or even MacOS.) :-) Cheers, Igor Daniel J. Matyola Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:19:22 -0700 wrote: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart

OT: Largest Digital Camera

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/camera-bound-space-telescope-takes-3200-megapixel-photos-180975758/ Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO The joy of digital

I agree that Blue Jays are difficult to photograph, because they are so fast, but I would not call them timid. They chase the other birds -- and even the squirrels -- from my feeders, and make a mess, eating only the best morsels and tossing the rest on the ground. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxpho

Re: PESO The joy of digital

My blue jays get plenty of enticement in the form of peanut loaded suet cakes, but they are more timid than most other birds. I see them frequently, but I don’t photograph birds while they’re feeding, and the jays perch high up in the trees rather than on the lower branches. Paul > On Mar 27,

Re: PESO The joy of digital

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 8:08 PM P. J. Alling wrote: > > > Bluejays are very shy by the way, > I think David Brooks figured out that they lose that shyness if you > properly bribe them... Probably true. i ca get them to about 15-18 feet from me now Dave > America was founded so we could all be a

Re: PESO The joy of digital

against a white sky. With digital, you can just fire away and change the exposure in poet without any observable loss of quality. This was shot at ISO 250, f9, 1/800th, which was just right for birds fully lit in a neutral setting. This guy was high up in a tree, shaded and against a white sky. I

Re: PESO The joy of digital

thats turned out great Dave On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 4:11 PM Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Sometimes your exposure is set for a normal shot, but then something very > abnormal comes your way. Like a bird in shadow against a white sky. With > digital, you can just fire away and change

Re: PESO The joy of digital

> On 24 March 2019 at 20:10 Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > change the exposure in poet .. Pity it's so early in the morning. I'm sure there's a pun or two in there. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the P

Re: PESO The joy of digital

Nice Jay, Paul! Clean image as well. J Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Sometimes your exposure is set for a normal shot, but then something very > abnormal comes your way. Like a bird in shadow against a white sky. With > digita

Re: PESO The joy of digital

comes your way. Like a bird in shadow against a white sky. With > digital, you can just fire away and change the exposure in poet without any > observable loss of quality. This was shot at ISO 250, f9, 1/800th, which > was just right for birds fully lit in a neutral setting. This guy was

PESO The joy of digital

Sometimes your exposure is set for a normal shot, but then something very abnormal comes your way. Like a bird in shadow against a white sky. With digital, you can just fire away and change the exposure in poet without any observable loss of quality. This was shot at ISO 250, f9, 1/800th, which

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

I'd like to make a suggestion going forward, though it won't help you recover what has already been lost. I do hope you're able to get your work back. Implement something local like FreeNAS, which uses ZFS and software RAID. You'll need some hardware and a few drives. For example, I have a 1U r

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

> On 30 November 2018 at 19:42 Steve Cottrell wrote: > > > On 30/11/18, Alan C, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Laptops have an advantage. > > That stirred a memory. I have only ever owned one desktop computer in my > life. Always had portable machines after that. Don't know why, probably pa

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

d off, I added some files to one of the other drives and then > > started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those > > micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. > > Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

wo at home and one > > off site. The off site one croaked so I had a replacement to format. > > Before that kicked off, I added some files to one of the other drives and > > then started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of > > those micro disruptions,

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

On 30/11/18, Alan C, discombobulated, unleashed: >Laptops have an advantage. That stirred a memory. I have only ever owned one desktop computer in my life. Always had portable machines after that. Don't know why, probably part of the job (being mobile). The wife gets hand-me-downs so we're tota

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

other drives and then started backing that up to the other.  At which point we had one of those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot.  Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work.  Did I mention I hate digital photography? Ouchies! I h

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

7; work. Did I mention I hate digital photography? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

h point we had one of > those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers > reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. > Did I mention I hate digital photography? > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > P

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

ent to format. Before > > that kicked off, I added some files to one of the other drives and then > > started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those > > micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. > > Now neithe

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

ed off, I added some files to one of the other drives and then started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

es is responsive - about four years' work.  Did I mention I hate digital photography? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to U

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

our years' work. Did I > mention I hate digital photography? > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. &g

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

t. Before that kicked off, I added some files to one of the other drives and then started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work.

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

to one of the other drives and then started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate digital photog

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

d off, I added some files to one of the other drives and then > > started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those > > micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now > > neither of the drives is responsive - about four years

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

o the other. At which point we had one of those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate digital photography? Ouchies! I hope the third drive has the images duplicated & y

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

g that up to the other. At which point we had one of those > > micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. > > Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I > > mention I hate digital photography? > >

Re: OT? I detest digital photography

files to one of the other drives and then started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate digital p

OT? I detest digital photography

those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate digital photography? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBS

Re: Metz mecablitz 44 AF-2 Digital Flash for Pentax Cameras - any comments?

Mine is the Metz 48 AF-1 digital which has worked fine for a long time starting with the * istD. On the K1 it showed incorrect exposure with full blast, until I discovered there was an firmware update. Now it's correctly measuring in P-TTL. But I'm using more and more natural light an

Re: Metz mecablitz 44 AF-2 Digital Flash for Pentax Cameras - any comments?

x27;t read the menus in the dark. Given that I had two flashes fail in the same manner I'm skeptical of Metz's quality. But the flash is feature rich, well designed and affordably priced. Mark On 7/27/2018 12:40 PM, luiz felipe wrote: looking at the pc screen, the  Metz mecablitz 4

Re: Metz mecablitz 44 AF-2 Digital Flash for Pentax Cameras - any comments?

read the menus in the dark. Given that I had two flashes fail in the same manner I'm skeptical of Metz's quality. But the flash is feature rich, well designed and affordably priced. Mark On 7/27/2018 12:40 PM, luiz felipe wrote: looking at the pc screen, the  Metz mecablitz 4

Re: Metz mecablitz 44 AF-2 Digital Flash for Pentax Cameras - any comments?

it's favor it's about half the price of the Pentax 360 at B&H right now and is more powerful.  The user interface looks less fiddly as well. Metz has a reputation for very high quality flashes. On 7/27/2018 12:40 PM, luiz felipe wrote: looking at the pc screen, the  Metz mecabli

Metz mecablitz 44 AF-2 Digital Flash for Pentax Cameras - any comments?

looking at the pc screen, the Metz mecablitz 44 AF-2 Digital Flash for Pentax Cameras looks interesting due to low price, advertised P-TTL compatibility and "adjustable four level video light". the cash, as always, is rather short so no option more expensive than the AF360FGZ II

Re: If you're shopping for a new digital

That's what I was thinking. Craig's list the favorite listing site of thieves and pimps everywhere. On 11/29/2017 11:12 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote: On Nov 29, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: https://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/pho/d/pentax-645d-digital-med-format/64007

Re: If you're shopping for a new digital

> On Nov 29, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Collin Brendemuehl > wrote: > > https://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/pho/d/pentax-645d-digital-med-format/64007 > 92484.html > Interesting. Not sure I trust the listing though. He says that he is selling because his needs have changed, he is go

Re: If you're shopping for a new digital

That is one hell of a kit! Too bad I don't have an extra $3700 around. :( Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Collin Brendemuehl < coll...@brendemuehl.net> wrote: > https://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/pho/d/pentax-645d-

If you're shopping for a new digital

https://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/pho/d/pentax-645d-digital-med-format/64007 92484.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: How Magnum is changing in the digital age

Interesting that selling prints is a major revenue generator for a business like Magnum, in this digital age and day. Jostein Den 14. juni 2017 09.49.27 CEST, skrev Chris Mitchell : >From BBC World Service business programme. > >http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p055sfz6 > >Chris

Re: How Magnum is changing in the digital age

Thanks. Look forward to that later. > On 14 Jun 2017, at 09:00, Chris Mitchell wrote: > > From BBC World Service business programme. > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p055sfz6 > > Chris > -- > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net t

How Magnum is changing in the digital age

>From BBC World Service business programme. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p055sfz6 Chris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Digital Slide Scanners

While working in the Middle East, circa 2007, we had an HP Scanner that took slides or 35 mm negative roll film (6) #s at a time. It had an ingenious double lid with the top one for film and the bottom lid for the normal document or photo scan. It had (2) separate scanning lights one inside the t

Re: Digital Slide scanners

The way I scan medium format now uses the Leica BEOON copy device. It is essentially a dedicated kit of extension tubes and a stand to take a Leica M body and lens, with masks and settings for 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:2, and 1:3 reproduction ratio framings. With adapters, I fit my Leica SL body and Micro-

Re: Digital Slide scanners

It would be nice to come up with something for medium format that doesn't cost a terrible amount of money. Right now I'm thinking that a light table and a slab of anti-newtonian glass would be best. On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Bill wrote: > On 4/9/2017 1:56 PM, Larry wrote: >> >> Which slide

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

ody expensive. > > Not if you buy the one I'm not using any more... > Email me. > > -- > Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listin

Re: Digital Slide scanners

On 4/9/2017 1:56 PM, Larry wrote: Which slide copier is that? I have the slide copier K. I suspect the Pentax ones are all pretty much the same. http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/misc/macro/auto_bellows_slide_copier.jpg On April 9, 2017 11:44:30 AM MST, Bill wrote: On 4/7/2017 10:58 PM, Alan

Re: Digital Slide scanners

Which slide copier is that? On April 9, 2017 11:44:30 AM MST, Bill wrote: >On 4/7/2017 10:58 PM, Alan C wrote: >> A slide duplicator or bellows setup works well (easily & quickly) for >> 35mm slides but is very problematic for negatives. A scanner would >allow >> copying of other formats too. In

Re: Digital Slide scanners

On 4/7/2017 10:58 PM, Alan C wrote: A slide duplicator or bellows setup works well (easily & quickly) for 35mm slides but is very problematic for negatives. A scanner would allow copying of other formats too. In the end, the limiting factor will be your budget. My Slide Copier K has a negative

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

Woah! I didn't even look at the price. On 4/8/2017 14:12, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 7/4/17, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: The 2012 MacBook Pro should have a Firewire 800 port & I found a SCSI to Firewire adapter at Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Systems-FR1SX-FireWire-Converter-IEEE

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

Steve Cottrell wrote: >On 7/4/17, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>The 2012 MacBook Pro should have a Firewire 800 port & I found a SCSI to >>Firewire adapter at Amazon >> >>https://www.amazon.com/Systems-FR1SX-FireWire-Converter-IEEE1394/dp/ >B6BANR > >WOW those FR1SX doodads are

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

On 7/4/17, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: >The 2012 MacBook Pro should have a Firewire 800 port & I found a SCSI to >Firewire adapter at Amazon > >https://www.amazon.com/Systems-FR1SX-FireWire-Converter-IEEE1394/dp/ B6BANR WOW those FR1SX doodads are bloody expensive. >There may a

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

On 7/4/17, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: >It should work. > >According to Hamrick's website there's a VueScan version for Apple OS-X >that supports the Nikon LS-1000 > >https://www.hamrick.com/support/how-to-guides/how-to-install-vuescan-on- >mac-os-x.html > >http://www.hamrick.com/vue

Re: Digital Slide scanners

I created customized camera calibration profiles for my Leica SL that do the correct inversion for both color and B&W negatives. they're now almost as easy to capture with the copy setup as slides. "Almost" because the inversion means the controls in the Lightroom develop module work reversed fr

Re: Digital Slide scanners

Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 7:50 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners I picked up a Beseler slide copier from a lab that was closing down a number of years ago. That and the K1 give me a 35mp slide scanner that seems to work really well. Sent from my Sam

RE: OT: Digital Slide scanners

e same job really well, with either the Epson software or Vuescan. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling Sent: Saturday, 8 April 2017 3:24 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners A long ti

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

Mark On 4/7/2017 11:45 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of them. I've

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

It should work. According to Hamrick's website there's a VueScan version for Apple OS-X that supports the Nikon LS-1000 https://www.hamrick.com/support/how-to-guides/how-to-install-vuescan-on-mac-os-x.html http://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/nikon_ls_1000.html#technical-information The 2012 MacBook

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: > > And after I read your post, I thought maybe instead of scanning slides, it > might be more fun > to secure a slide projector and have slide show night [...] I just may follow > my own advice here > —secure a good working slide projector

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

e of which > are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of > them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. > > So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if any of you have gone > down this path, and whether you h

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

On 7/4/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: >I bought a Nikon LS1000 I've got Nikon Coolscan LS1000 I would love to use it again - any workarounds so I can hook it up to my MacBook Pro 2012 :-( -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Produ

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

Larry Colen wrote: >Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> It is far more practical if you have several dozens or even hundreds of >> frames to scan is to wrap them up and send them off to someone like >> http://www.scancafe.com … They'll do as good a job as you will 90-98% of the >> time and whatever th

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

personal control of the scanning process. Buy a scanning service when you want to convert an archive of older film images to digital in order that you can see them and share them. G -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

I have a lot of family slides from when I was kid. Stereorealist. So I figured someday when I am older and have more time, I would sit down and cut them in half and scan them. I can do about 8-12 at a time (don't remember) on the flat bed. It does do a good job and I wouldn't expect the highest

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

ilson wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 07 April 2017 at 16:45 Doug Brewer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera >>>>> and Computer Museum, and have uncover

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

>>>> On 07 April 2017 at 16:45 Doug Brewer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera >>>> and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some >

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

Camera and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if an

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

/2017 11:45 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of them. I've looked here an

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

and have become interested in maybe >>> scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. >>> >>> So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if any of you have >>> gone down this path, and whether you have found a

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

have become interested in maybe >>> scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. >>> >>> So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if any of you have >>> gone down this path, and whether you have found a

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

ome >> of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe >> scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. >> >> So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if any of you have >> gone down this p

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

:45, Doug Brewer wrote: I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digit

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

:00) To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: OT: Digital Slide scanners I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

ement, AKA The Camera and > Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which > are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of > them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. > > So my query, if you haven't

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

but at a greatly reduced resolution of course, I wish I had a few samples but all those scans disappeared in a hard drive crash). The slide and film carriers are made entirely out of plastic, and since the original manufacturer sold out to BANQ the scanner, and it's bigger brother, 20

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

;ve looked here and there at digital slide scanners. > > So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if any of you have gone > down this path, and whether you have found a decent scanner. I'd appreciate > any guidance. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss M

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

Doug Brewer wrote: >I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera >and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some >of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe >scanning some of them. I've looked her

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

hotos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if any of you have gone down this path, and whether you have found a decent scanner. I'd appreciate any guidance.

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

torage room in the basement, AKA The Camera and > Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which > are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of > them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. > > So m

Re: OT: Digital Slide scanners

> scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanners. > > So my query, if you haven't figured it out by now, is if any of you have > gone down this path, and whether you have found a decent scanner. I'd > appreciate any guidance. My observatio

OT: Digital Slide scanners

I've been cleaning out my storage room in the basement, AKA The Camera and Computer Museum, and have uncovered boxes and boxes of slides, some of which are passable photos, and have become interested in maybe scanning some of them. I've looked here and there at digital slide scanner

Re: It's time for a digital flash

Looks like a happening church party ! Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Rick Womer" Subject: Re: It's time for a digital flash I have a Sigma EF500DG Super that I have used very rarely with the K-5 (the senso

Re: It's time for a digital flash

may >> be >> used as it's respectable. >> Anyway. I've not gotten a digital flash before. What's a recommended unit >> suitable for the K5 that will give quality results. > > > You're going to need a really big opener for that can of worms. > &g

Re: It's time for a digital flash

ll be either the F50/1.7 or the FA28/2.8, though the FA28-105 may be used as it's respectable. Anyway. I've not gotten a digital flash before. What's a recommended unit suitable for the K5 that will give quality results. You're going to need a really big opener for th

Re: It's time for a digital flash

something better than the pop-up flash on the K5. Lens will be either the F50/1.7 or the FA28/2.8, though the FA28-105 may be used as it's respectable. Anyway. I've not gotten a digital flash before. What's a recommended unit suitable for the K5 that will give quality results.

It's time for a digital flash

0/1.7 or the FA28/2.8, though the FA28-105 may be used as it's respectable. Anyway. I've not gotten a digital flash before. What's a recommended unit suitable for the K5 that will give quality results. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listi

Re: First 24x36 digital

Dominatrix says to stop? G > On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:51 AM, John wrote: > > So, what does the one on top mean when it's lit up? > >> On 7/12/2016 3:04 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote: >> I think it means 'Ladies must hold hands while crossing'. >> >>> On 12 Jul 2016, at 00:48, Paul wrote: >>> >>> Does t

Re: First 24x36 digital

So, what does the one on top mean when it's lit up? On 7/12/2016 3:04 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote: I think it means 'Ladies must hold hands while crossing'. On 12 Jul 2016, at 00:48, Paul wrote: Does this mean only women can cross the street? http://www.web-options.com/T262b/content/L1000245_large

Re: First 24x36 digital

I think it means 'Ladies must hold hands while crossing'. > On 12 Jul 2016, at 00:48, Paul wrote: > > Does this mean only women can cross the street? > > http://www.web-options.com/T262b/content/L1000245_large.html > > -p > > >> On 7/11/2016 5:16 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >> >> >> Bob W wrote

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >