At 10:23 AM 5/9/2018, Igor wrote:
>E.g. for the people who are experts of working with studio lights, - offer
>trying to do a low-light photography of dancers or photography of stage
>artists (musicians, dancers, actors) in ambient and better yet dynamic light.
I am far from an expert with stud
I think there is such a big multitude of parameters in photography that
one can learn some new aspects even after many years of experience.
I am sure that even world-renown photographers can learn some new
techniques in the areas of photography (genres) that they haven't worked
in.
So, if a p
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2018 12:59 PM
Subject: Advice at various stages
On that other timesuck, someone once asked what advice you’d give to
dancers that have 1-3 yea
On that other timesuck, someone once asked what advice you’d give to dancers
that have 1-3 years of experience. People could most benefit from different
advice at different stages of their learning process.What advice would you
give to people at different stages of learning photography?
J
o: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Playing at night, K-1 various lenses, some astrotracer
>
> Great Work, Larry!
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>
>> L
What Dan said.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 6:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Playing at night, K-1 various lenses, some astrotracer
Great Work, Larry!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On
Great Work, Larry!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Last night we went up towards the end of Empire Grade (between Jamison
> Creek and Lockheed) to try some night photography. I wanted to try out
> both astrotr
I’d say you had a fantastic showing for your “experimental session.” Really
fun to see these photographs.
Cheers, Christine
> On Jul 2, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Last night we went up towards the end of Empire Grade (between Jamison Creek
> and Lockheed) to try some nigh
Really good stuff Larry - very interesting!
On 2/7/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>This might be the nicest shot photographically. I was mostly looking to
>learn the gear, but it's nice when you get something half decent out of
>the attempt.
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/ella
Mark Stringer wrote:
Those are great shots Larry.
Thanks a bunch.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
L [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Larry Colen
Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 4:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss List
Subject: Playing at night, K-1 various lenses, some astrotracer
Last night we went up towards the end of Empire Grade (between Jamison Creek
and Lockheed) to try some night pho
Larry Colen wrote:
Last night we went up towards the end of Empire Grade (between Jamison
Creek and Lockheed) to try some night photography. I wanted to try out
both astrotracer and the Rokinon 24/1.4 with the K-1.
This might be the nicest shot photographically. I was mostly looking to
learn
Last night we went up towards the end of Empire Grade (between Jamison
Creek and Lockheed) to try some night photography. I wanted to try out
both astrotracer and the Rokinon 24/1.4 with the K-1.
This might be the nicest shot photographically. I was mostly looking to
learn the gear, but it'
I have a backlog of unused lenses I'm getting rid of. Nothing exotic, so
actually don't expect anyone on this list to bite on any of this, but it's
worth a shot!
Various Pentax lenses for sale:
Autofocus:
DA 50-200mm zoom - $50
F80-200mm zoom - $40
FA50 1:1.7 $150
Manual Focus
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:06:05 -0500 Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>I love that Medicine Mound gas station. Quite a trip, Jan!
Thanks Bruce, and yes it was quite a trip ...
Regards, JvW
>On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
>> I have finally processed the 3500 images taken on a 3 week 4000
Thanks Paul,
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 09:43:24 -0600 Paul wrote:
>
>Nice gallery. It's always fun to see a travelogue of ole Rt 66
And it was a lot of fun traveling down that road too!
Regards, JvW
>-p
>
>On 1/4/2015 7:48 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
>>I have finally processed the 3500 images taken on a
cago.
>
> Apart from typical route 66 stuff, I was searching for vintage cars (rusted
> wrecks),
> bridges, watertowers, ghost towns and derelict buildings, oh and avoiding
> Interstates :)
>
>
> Over time, I will add some mo
recks),
bridges, watertowers, ghost towns and derelict buildings, oh and avoiding
Interstates :)
Over time, I will add some more (themed) galleries with images from various
trips.
Enjoy!
Regards, JvW
--
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfse
Thanks Bob,
Now need to plan for that southern part sometime :)
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 08:48:37 -0600 Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>A nice representation of old Rt 66.
>
--
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com
Flickr : jvw_pentax
--
PDML Pe
cago.
>
> Apart from typical route 66 stuff, I was searching for vintage cars (rusted
> wrecks),
> bridges, watertowers, ghost towns and derelict buildings, oh and avoiding
> Interstates :)
>
>
> Over time, I will add some mo
add some more (themed) galleries with images from various
trips.
Enjoy!
Regards, JvW
--
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com
Flickr : jvw_pentax
--
This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway.
http
I must thank you all for sharing the wonderful shots of flowers, ducks, etc.
which make their appearance in spring. Of course, I have seen them in books
before but never the real thing. My sole experience of snow was in Oct 1979
on the Long Tom mountain pass. There are several places in SA where
And a Heliopan 72mm thrown in for good measure.
http://stores.ebay.com/presuppapologetics?_trksid=p2047675.l2563
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the dire
tp://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
> Dario
>
> -Messaggio originale- From: Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:03 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: K-3 Samples at various ISOs
>
>
> I likewise couldn't find mention of t
This is for doing comparisons:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Paul Stenquist
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:03 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-3 Samples at various ISOs
I likewise couldn't find mention of t
I likewise couldn't find mention of the AA filter mode in the EXIF data. Use of
the Sigma lens is fine by me. Appears to be good glass. Interesting that the
ISO 12,800 exposure was done with noise reduction turned off. And it's quite
good. I can't say for sure, but at a glance it appears to be l
Looking at the EXIF, a couple of observations...
1) They used a SIGMA lens?
2) Where in the EXIF is the info regarding the selectable AA filter?
It seems to be that any evaluation of K-3 image quality needs to
specify if that was OFF, or MODE 1 or MODE 2 (so that we can judge the
differences betwe
Very good news. The noise level is acceptable even at 12,800, and the detail at
lower ISOs is outstanding.
Paul
On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> PS...meant to give a link...SORRY
>
> http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-k3/pentax-k3A7.HTM
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at
PS...meant to give a link...SORRY
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-k3/pentax-k3A7.HTM
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> 6400 looks very good. Ladies and gentleman: We have a winner!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
6400 looks very good. Ladies and gentleman: We have a winner!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On May 22, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> BTW, I shoot strictly RAW, no +JPEG, WB usually fixed at Cloudy, JPEG
> configuration at factory defaults or close to. I stick to a 16-bit
> post-processing workflow. I'm a stickler for image quality.
Likewise
>
> Now elsewhere you have expla
On 5/23/2013 3:36 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 23 May 2013 17:44, Larry Colen wrote:
You can spend ages trying to calculate the perfect exposure. Using incident
and spot meters. Chimping the histogram and exposing to the right. Or,
you could get pretty close to the right exposure, guessing as w
From: Walt
It's amazing anyone ever took a decent digital photo before ETTR or
UniWB were devised, really.
Angels. Pin. Dancing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
: May 23, 2013 5/23/13
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: Pentax K-30 in-camera RAW histogram approximation (UniWB, various
tweaks)
On 23 May 2013 17:44, Larry Colen wrote:
> You can spend ages trying to calculate the perfect exposure. Using incident
> and spot meters. C
On 23 May 2013 17:44, Larry Colen wrote:
> You can spend ages trying to calculate the perfect exposure. Using incident
> and spot meters. Chimping the histogram and exposing to the right. Or,
> you could get pretty close to the right exposure, guessing as well as you can
> on your camera, then b
ogram. It's a really great
> > exposure -- and a very good looking plant too, by the way.
> >
> > An _excellent_ exposure.
>
> The fact that it is an excellent exposure is because I've taken
> about 8 shots with various compensation levels and selected this on
This RAW image is pretty much perfectly exposed. Emphasis on
> _perfectly_. No clipping of highlights; trace clipping of shadows;
> data spread nicely across the entire histogram. It's a really great
> exposure -- and a very good looking plant too, by the way.
>
> An _excellent
Matthew Hunt wrote:
>On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Mark Roberts
> wrote:
>
>> What was arguably his most famous photograph (Moonrise Over Hernandez) was
>> taken
>> without using the zone system. Without even using a light meter, in fact.
>
>"It is difficult to make prints from this negative
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> What was arguably his most famous photograph (Moonrise Over Hernandez) was
> taken
> without using the zone system. Without even using a light meter, in fact.
"It is difficult to make prints from this negative that I truly like."
- Ansel A
Bruce Walker wrote:
>I'm willing to bet that the blinkies are calculated from the JPEG though.
I'd bet you'd win that bet! ;-)
Seriously, the people obsessing over the accuracy of their post-shot
histograms are just the 21st-century equivalent of the Ansel Adams
disciples fretting over every nua
I'm willing to bet that the blinkies are calculated from the JPEG though.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I'd like to ask a question. Under Record menu, screen 5, (on my K-5,
> but I know other models have this same feature), there are Instant
> Review options. One of them i
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> The "underexposure" is exactly the problem: in most cases although
> the JPEG (or the embedded JPEG in the RAW that we see the histogram
> for) is overexposed, t
I'd like to ask a question. Under Record menu, screen 5, (on my K-5,
but I know other models have this same feature), there are Instant
Review options. One of them is "Bright/Dark Area", which when ON will
cause your blown out highlights to blink on the LCD screen. I always
thought that this meant
A PentaxForums thread on this subject:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/68043-finally-camera-raw-histogram.html
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> Just to jump in here
>
>
> On 5/22/13 12:24 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
>
>> Now off-topic a li
Yep.
In reality, there is precisely one degree of freedom for exposure.
You have just one thing you can do - overexpose/underexpose compared
to what your metering system tells you what the "correct" exposure is.
Anything you see on the back of the camera (histogram, flashing pixels
for over/unde
Just to jump in here
On 5/22/13 12:24 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
Now off-topic a little bit to describe my personal context in all this:
* I perfectly understand that what makes the difference between a
"good" and "ordinary" photo is mainly composition (and to a less
extent the
result in PhotoShop.
And given the exposure latitude and high ISO noise levels of the K30 or K-5,
it's a piece of cake.
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Charles Robinson"
> Subject: Re:
It's amazing anyone ever took a decent digital photo before ETTR or
UniWB were devised, really.
-- Walt
On 5/22/2013 5:41 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Now elsewhere you have explained that you want to doctor or calibrate
your histogr
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Robinson"
Subject: Re: Pentax K-30 in-camera RAW histogram approximation
(UniWB,various tweaks)
On May 22, 2013, at 11:41 , Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Charles Robinson
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Now elsewhere you have explained that you want to doctor or calibrate
> your histogram in aid of calculating exposures for doing ETTR. You
> might want to consider that ETTR is considered by many to be no longer
> relevant and even harmful. I
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
The "underexposure" is exactly the problem: in most cases although
the JPEG (or the embedded JPEG in the RAW that we see the histogram
for) is overexposed, the actual RAW data is under exposed, to the
point that almost 2
Excellent article. Thank you
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:51 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax K-30 in-camera RAW histogram approximation (UniWB,
various tweaks)
On Wed
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
For the K30 (and K5), there is so much
k if you
> read a lot of discussions on the Internet.
It is perfectly clear to me that photography is an experimental
and empirical endeavor, and not a controlled laboratory experiment. :)
> Thom Hogan writes quite a bit about UniWB in his guides for the
> various Nikon camera mode
On May 22, 2013, at 11:41 , Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> However - in real-world shooting: I've been shooting RAW since about March
>> of 2008 - starting with my K10D, then the K7, and now the K5. I've never
>> had a problem with
this.
I've done exactly this:
* I've shot one RAW at some scene with both shadows and highlights
(i.e. from inside the room out the window, in a not very sunny day);
* then I've played with various contrast and "high/low key adj"
settings and saved a JPEG from **e
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>> For the K30 (and K5), there is so much exposure latitude that if you're
>>> really worried about oversatura
goals.
If that's what you enjoy, by all means do it. I'm just saying that
photography is a much less precise pursuit than you might think if you
read a lot of discussions on the Internet.
Thom Hogan writes quite a bit about UniWB in his guides for the
various Nikon camera models. To paraphr
Hello and welcome. If my memory does not fail me (which it might),
you're a new poster, at least in de-lurked sense of the word.
Few points:
1. It seems this article is targeted at the people who're willing to
spend their time tinkering with the gear. Without any disrespect to you
and to the
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>>
>> For the K30 (and K5), there is so much exposure latitude that if you're
>> really worried about oversaturation, just "underexpose" by a stop.. or two..
>> or three.. a
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> However - in real-world shooting: I've been shooting RAW since about March of
> 2008 - starting with my K10D, then the K7, and now the K5. I've never had a
> problem with "not knowing what I get". The images largely just work,
> espec
Thanks for sharing a link to your photo-related links page! That
should keep me occupied for a while.
: )
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> I'd like to thank Ciprian for his question, without which I would have
On May 22, 2013, at 11:24 , Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
>
>> Otherwise it seems to me like so much fussing and stressing to "get the
>> right histogram" that you've forgotten that the reason you have a camera is
>> to take photos.
>
>:) Yup. I agree.
>
>However picture this, when sh
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I'd like to thank Ciprian for his question, without which I would have
> been unaware of UniWB. After a bit of reading (
> http://www.malch.com/nikon/UniWB.html ) I can see why some bother to
> try it,
:) No problem.
A little bit of s
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On May 22, 2013, at 09:37 , Ciprian Dorin Craciun
> wrote:
>>I've been struggling twice so far to obtain the so called "UniWB"
>> on a Pentax K-30, but without any "real" success so far.
>
> I'm sorry that I don't have any help for y
I'd like to thank Ciprian for his question, without which I would have
been unaware of UniWB. After a bit of reading (
http://www.malch.com/nikon/UniWB.html ) I can see why some bother to
try it, however for the way I work I'm afraid it would cause more
problems than it would solve. I tend to shoot
On May 22, 2013, at 10:52 , Matthew Hunt wrote:
>
> UniWB, as I understand it, is an effort to find a set of camera
> settings (white balance, etc.) that makes the displayed histogram come
> as close as possible to this ideal.
>
Ugh - sounds like a lot of work. For the K30 (and K5), there is s
When you view the histogram on your camera, the histogram is based on
the JPEG rendering of the photo, even if you're shooting raw. That
means that the R,G,B channels shift relative to each other based on
the white balance setting, the saturation point changes based on the
contrast, etc., even thou
On May 22, 2013, at 09:37 , Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
>Hello all!
>
>I've been struggling twice so far to obtain the so called "UniWB"
> on a Pentax K-30, but without any "real" success so far.
>
I'm sorry that I don't have any help for you on this other than to ask: why?
It sound
Hello all!
I've been struggling twice so far to obtain the so called "UniWB"
on a Pentax K-30, but without any "real" success so far.
Has anyone been able to succeed at this? (And maybe share a raw
photo that has the appropriate WB settings?)
I've tried the method described on
h
I came across a bunch of things by Pentax or related to Pentax.
Some of them might be of interest to some PDMLers...
For those who want to couple a scope to a digital camera (Optio, not a DSLR):
http://www.adorama.com/PXUA1.html
I wonder if there is something specific to Optio, or it can be used
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:56 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
> Just pertaining to the recent discussion on rendering of snow. I was
> out shooting some today, and saw this one:
>
> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-282
>
> There is blue from the sky in the shadows, and a peachlike colour i
Not sure about colors, but the play of lines and shadows pleases my eyes.
On 12/28/2010 7:56 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
Just pertaining to the recent discussion on rendering of snow. I was
out shooting some today, and saw this one:
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-282
There is blu
Wow, very pretty, Jostein. Love it! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "AlunFoto"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 11:56 AM
Subject: PESO - Snow in various colours
Just pertaining to the recent discussion on renderin
AlunFoto wrote:
Just pertaining to the recent discussion on rendering of snow. I was
out shooting some today, and saw this one:
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-282
There is blue from the sky in the shadows, and a peachlike colour in
the low sun. No saturation or vibrance a
Subtle serenity. Pleasing feel to it, Jostein!
Jack
--- On Tue, 12/28/10, AlunFoto wrote:
> From: AlunFoto
> Subject: PESO - Snow in various colours
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010, 9:56 AM
> Just pertaining to the recent
> dis
Jostein,
Lovely picture. I've come to love the color added by brush as in the
left side of your shot.
The meandering stream with a bit of steam it a plus too. Lovely time of day.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:56 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
> Just pertaining to the recent discussion on ren
Lovely. Nice work on the shadows
Dave
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:56 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
> Just pertaining to the recent discussion on rendering of snow. I was
> out shooting some today, and saw this one:
>
> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-282
>
> There is blue from the sky
Just pertaining to the recent discussion on rendering of snow. I was
out shooting some today, and saw this one:
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-282
There is blue from the sky in the shadows, and a peachlike colour in
the low sun. No saturation or vibrance added.
Jostein
--
There was a recent discussion here about the DA* 55/1.4 and a question raised
about how it might compare with the other Pentax 55mm lens, an early PK 55/1.8.
And I had nothing better to do except grade papers and assign final grades for
the semester, so I did some comparisons.
The contenders -
Hi All,
I tried two new papers this weekend.
One is Harman Matt FB Mp (Fibre Matte), and the other one is
Premier Velvet BW.
I am underwhelmed by the former one, while the latter one looks really good.
I had a problem with Harman Matt FB Mp. The ink seems to chip off from
its surface relatively
On 11/25/09, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
> Anybody know of any good websites/forums/
> other resource discussing/covering vintage
> lens adaptations of various
> makes: Pentax m42/Pentax K/ Nikon/Canon FD/ Minolta md/
> Olympus mf/ Konica, etc to the various DSLRS
> o
resource discussing/covering vintage
>> lens adaptations of various
>> makes: Pentax m42/Pentax K/ Nikon/Canon FD/ Minolta md/
>> Olympus mf/ Konica, etc to the various DSLRS
>> on the Market Today? e.g. Pentax, Sony, Canon,
>> Nikon, Olympus 4/3 micro 4/3, etc?
>&g
http://www.novoflex.com/en/products/adapters/
lookee here =)
2009/11/25 J.C. O'Connell :
> Anybody know of any good websites/forums/
> other resource discussing/covering vintage
> lens adaptations of various
> makes: Pentax m42/Pentax K/ Nikon/Canon FD/ Minolta md/
> Olympu
Anybody know of any good websites/forums/
other resource discussing/covering vintage
lens adaptations of various
makes: Pentax m42/Pentax K/ Nikon/Canon FD/ Minolta md/
Olympus mf/ Konica, etc to the various DSLRS
on the Market Today? e.g. Pentax, Sony, Canon,
Nikon, Olympus 4/3 micro 4/3, etc
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:04:19 -0500
>> wendy beard wrote:
>>
>>> I need a light tent :-)
>>
> http://www.backcountrygear.com/catalog/tentdetail.cfm?PRODUCTS__productID=IN2100
>
>
> --
Ah, thanks...
Wendy
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:26:40PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
# You're right. Of course I was trying to be humorous, which I rarely
# manage well. But after posting it occurred to me that a tent like this
# isn't far off the mark. A white one would work just fine.
I saw the humor, and the fa
You're right. Of course I was trying to be humorous, which I rarely
manage well. But after posting it occurred to me that a tent like this
isn't far off the mark. A white one would work just fine.
Paul
On Jan 30, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:02:36PM -0800,
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:02:36PM -0800, John Celio wrote:
# >>wendy beard wrote:
# >>
# >>>I need a light tent :-)
# >>
#
>http://www.backcountrygear.com/catalog/tentdetail.cfm?PRODUCTS__productID=IN2100
#
# AH HAH HAH HAH HAH *SNORK* HAH HAH (etc)
I missed it the first time around, but now t
wendy beard wrote:
I need a light tent :-)
http://www.backcountrygear.com/catalog/tentdetail.cfm?PRODUCTS__productID=IN2100
AH HAH HAH HAH HAH *SNORK* HAH HAH (etc)
John
(wasn't paying attention to the URL)
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/calemp
http://www.cafepress
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:04:19 -0500
wendy beard wrote:
I need a light tent :-)
http://www.backcountrygear.com/catalog/tentdetail.cfm?PRODUCTS__productID=IN2100
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pleas
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:04:19 -0500
wendy beard wrote:
> I need a light tent :-)
http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-make-a-inexpensive-light-tent
--
"Love" is that condition in which the happiness of another person is
essential to your own... Jealousy is a disease, love is a healthy
c
Pics are up on the page (scroll down)
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/forsale
I need a light tent :-)
Wendy
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:39 AM, wendy beard wrote:
> I'm selling a number of items.
> Prices in Canadian Dollars. Shipping extra.
> Feel free to make me an offer on anything. Prices men
I have a whole cupboard full of those but I'm saving them for a rainy day :-)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 30/1/09, wendy beard, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Epson P-2000 photo storage thingy. Includes extra (aftermarket)
>>battery - $CDN 150
>
> I have a few thingys, hav
On 30/1/09, wendy beard, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Epson P-2000 photo storage thingy. Includes extra (aftermarket)
>battery - $CDN 150
I have a few thingys, have you any watchamacallits?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.
I'm selling a number of items.
Prices in Canadian Dollars. Shipping extra.
Feel free to make me an offer on anything. Prices mentioned are based
on completed items on eBay.
Photos will be coming and more detailed descriptions of condition. I
just wanted to set the ball rolling.
smc PENTAX FA 100mm
At the moment, I"m having a hard time locating my card reader. My
desk is a bit of a sty. I have taken photos of these items, and will
provide images once I have them onto the web.
FA 20-35 f/4 -- excellent condition. I purchased this new from B&H in
2006. Includes original caps, hood,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:55 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:27 PM 17/06/2008, David J Brooks wrote:
>>It would be nice, for those of us that do not want to or cannot
>>afford, the upgrades, to have Adobe allow the newer raw files to work
>>with CS and or CS2.
>>
>>I know they w
I still use PSCS to convert my K20D files. But I shoot DNG. My work laptop (a 2
Gigahertz Intel duocore Macbook) is equipped with PS 3, but the monitor sucks.
However, I may start using it more. I'm learning to compensate:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Davi
At 11:27 PM 17/06/2008, David J Brooks wrote:
>It would be nice, for those of us that do not want to or cannot
>afford, the upgrades, to have Adobe allow the newer raw files to work
>with CS and or CS2.
>
>I know they won't, but it would be nice.
Well they do in a roundabout way. You just have to
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
