hash => {
field structure_id => match qr{^ (? STRUCT
\d+ ) $}x;
field type => 'dolmen',
field material => 'concrete',
}
}
--
Andy Lester => www.petdance.com
first argument (and in $_) and the sub should return
a boolean value.”) would be good, too.
I’d be glad to write the docs if I knew the answers to the questions and the
zen of what to use when.
As a newbie to Test2, I’d really like to start using it as much as possible,
but I’m also afraid of screwing up existing tests because I use a new tool
incorrectly.
Andy
--
Andy Lester => www.petdance.com
docs that explains the differences between the two.
Anyone else have troubles with these two functions? Or other gotchas where new
features aren’t what people switching from Test::More might expect?
Andy
--
Andy Lester => www.petdance.com
I don’t like the name bool_eq() (“booleans are equal”) but it was the best I
could come up with.
--
Andy Lester => www.petdance.com
t2::Suite. I think that will
help future Test2::Tools writers.
So those are my high-level thoughts.
--
Andy Lester => www.petdance.com
rd party module.
--
Andy Lester => www.petdance.com
er?
Do we have an FAQ started for things like this? If not, I assume it would be
good to start one, and if so, then where should I start it?
--
Andy Lester => www.petdance.com
On Feb 28, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> I'd like to have a Mechanize that has both the testing functions, and
> also JavaScript support, which the WWW::Scripter sub-class has.
Seems to me even better would be to fold WWW::Scripter's JS support into Mech
itsel
nch of wrappers and some convenience functions.
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
eally seeing your point.
There was no point. I wasn't debating. It was a question, asking for
information.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:08 AM, Mark Keating wrote:
> The hackathon site is up, we are looking for sponsors and attendees.
What made you put it up at a new domain, rather than qa.perl.org? I was
surprised.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
oking for Test::Output.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Output/
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
top energy intended. I just wanted to provide a counter
viewpoint from a potential customer.
I don't want to have another module prereq. I'd probably just do the cut &
paste into my t/00-load.t.
Carry on!
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
not installed permanently on their system.
test_requires is Module::Build only, right? I don't use Module::Build.
Even if I did, I don't think I'd require the user to go through a download and
temporary build of AutoBailout.pm just to remove boilerplate.
xoa
--
Andy Lester
As a module author, I would not require a user to install AutoBailout.pm just
to remove boilerplate in my t/00-load.t
But that's just me.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
::Next::VERSION,
Perl $], $^X" );
it sounds like we're saying that the use_ok() doesn't help at all, and I might
as well write
use App::Ack;
use App::Ack::Repository;
use App::Ack::Resource;
use File::Next;
diag( "Testing App::Ack $App::Ack::VERSION, File::Next $File::Next::VERSION,
Perl $], $^X" );
Agreed?
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
> --
> ROCKS FALL! EVERYONE DIES!
> http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp05032002.shtml
>
I think we've found our correct non-loading module behavior right there.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
So is there ANY legit use for use_ok()?
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
) ought to die if it fails. But then we might as well not
wrap our use in use_ok().
Is there a case when we DO want to use use_ok()?
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Apr 6, 2012, at 7:46 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
> Could someone post a summary of what was done/not done at this year's QA
> hackathon in Paris (http://2012.qa-hackathon.org/qa2012)?
I've posted a couple of links on @perlbuzz already.
xoa
--
Andy Lester =>
d, then lets do that,
rather than saying to "just" do this workaround. If we always took that
approach, then we would never have prove in the first place.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On 23 Aug 2011, at 09:54, Mark Keating wrote:
> At this moment I am free in that period and as always willing to help
> organise/promote. As soon as BooK/Andy agree I will start the announcement
> process. I am hoping this year to make more contacts with the other OS
> languages and
On 23 Aug 2011, at 00:58, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> Equally happy to do London - there shouldn't be too much Olympic related
> mayhem in April.
By which I mean to say that I'm happy to host it in London in either 2012 or
2013 :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
e last times: when do you have time around April? (Traditionally, the QA
> hackathon is from Saturday to Monday and avoids Easter.)
I'm happy with Paris.
Equally happy to do London - there shouldn't be too much Olympic related mayhem
in April.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
Each tram has its own stop and there are maps of the layout of the stops.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
indstorms out. :-)
Sounds like some pre-hackathon hacking is in order... :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
.pm from upgrading likewise.
>
> I suspect it might be due to a bug in Getopt::Long as another 5.6.2
> with upgraded Getopt::Long passes the tests with no problems.
Sorry for the delay. I released Test::Harness 3.23 last night - it's on the
mirrors now. That should fix the problem.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
hopeful that I can make it.
>
> Likewise. Really hope I can make it this year :-)
I hope so too Adrian :)
The dates are fine for me, thanks Lars.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
lans to host it the source on github
> (and elsewhere) which should make it easy to help out. Thanks all.
Thanks Fergal :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
eep making this
> mistake from some reason.
Oops - sorry Shlomi. I think hands used to typing English do that automatically
- I nearly did it again :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
to snub Schlomi's kind offer but I'm a big Test::Deep fan and would
be happy to take it on.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
rness-3.22.tar.gz
>
> The following report has been written by the PAUSE namespace indexer.
> Please contact [email protected] if there are any open questions.
> Id
>
> User: ANDYA (Andy Armstrong)
> Distribution file: Test-Harness-3.22.tar.gz
>Numb
On 10 Aug 2010, at 20:33, Andy Lester wrote:
> I know that there is stuff that is pending, questions to be answered about
> something in the T::H toolchain. Is there anything in there that precludes
> Andy releasing a version of T::H now?
>
> I've got projects depending on
I know that there is stuff that is pending, questions to be answered about
something in the T::H toolchain. Is there anything in there that precludes
Andy releasing a version of T::H now?
I've got projects depending on patches I submitted a couple of weeks ago, and
it would be swell if
ack 2.0.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
On 15 Jul 2010, at 22:20, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> What's your question? (Andy's probably asleep, given that he lives in GMT.)
Here now :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 15 Jul 2010, at 18:06, Andy Lester wrote:
> But yeah, if this is just a matter of 'ext=s+', then who can make that change
> and push it out?
I'll take a look at it this weekend :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
This whole SourceHandler looks much more like the Right Way To Do It.
I wish Mr. Armstrong were around for discussion.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
ing because now we're passing around an array
ref. But I'm working on the guts to handle it all.
My concern was not about handling command line arguments, but about all the
internals, and what I might break that is some sort of defined API that I don't
know about.
xoa
-
st...%3F
> I don't think that will do what you want if your test scripts are in other
> languages. The thing to do would be to implement
> TAP::Parser::SourceHandler::PHP and release it on CPAN -- or contribute it to
> Test::Harness, if there's interest in it (I leave t
27;t want to make this a CYJ.
> But then you'll need to write a PHP handler. Brief intro:
>
>
> http://www.justatheory.com/computers/programming/perl/tap-parser-sourcehandler.html
And that's fine, I don't mind doing that. I wrote a Test::Harness::PHP for the
old 2.x one.
But yeah, if this is just a matter of 'ext=s+', then who can make that change
and push it out?
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Matt Heusser wrote:
> Is there a way to do prove -dont-actualy-execute-anything-just-input --file
> pregeneratedTAPinput.txt
>
> ?
>
> I just want the summary features.
prove --exec=/bin/cat tap.txt
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] =>
fold back,
but this feature missing makes those I'd convert to prove very sad.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
ong.
Now requires Test::LongString 0.12.
t/put_ok.t now passes, but with a handful of warnings. Help in figuring
out why would be appreciated.
[INTERNALS]
Hoisted common code out of get_ok, post_ok, etc.
[DOCUMENTATION]
Updated copyright and licensing information.
--
Andy Lester =&
n a flat by then - and there's a spare room you're welcome to stay
in if that appeals...
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
er
> information at the [hackathon wiki](http://2010.qa-hackathon.org/qa2010/wiki).
Yes please. I'd like to (finally) make Test::Harness handle nested TAP from
start to finish.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
new changes.
Yeah, they should be moved I think. I didn't move yours because I
assumed you'd want it under your own name on Github :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 29 Jun 2009, at 21:21, Gabor Szabo wrote:
When running tests with prove -a file.tar.gz it nicely creates the
archive file
but if the test bails out the archive file is not created at all.
Is this a feature or a bug ?
Bug I'd say...
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
pport nested TAP, though.
The current implementation hard-codes the indent.
Yeah, that sounds sensible.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
It's part of the spec (at
least loosely) so it will be supported going forward.
Yeah, it doesn't currently support arbitrary diagnostic blocks though
- which would be my fault :)
I can probably make a release that does within a few days if that's
the kind of thing that Ga
YAML blocks though - so if you can figure
out how to emit them you'll be good to go.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
front if
done_testing() replaced no_plan or worked with it.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
Result: FAIL
"Looks like you failed 1 test of 2 run". I guess that it's counting
done_testing() as a test in itself, but that doesn't seem to be
right. Is that intentional?
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
-
Softpedia - the encyclopedia of free software downloads
http://www.softpedia.com/
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
to be "no, there's nothing that is general
purpose enough for what you want." Maybe something like CruiseControl
will do it, I don't know.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
ng to
return a pre-filled data structure?
That sounds like it would work, yeah. I can add it to my list for the
QA hackathon in Birmingham next weekend unless anyone else gets to it
first ;)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
e, but I'm not convinced. Thoughts?
Yeah, I think that's right. Maybe we need the option to have a rules
file that can express more complex rules?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
d the two.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
and kisses,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
to receive the TAP?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
ear path to the differing
item
- Has multiple output modes: YAML, msbuild-friendly, terse
- Supports testing of "internal" classes and methods
The project home is at http://code.google.com/p/taps-testing.
>>
Thanks in advance and thanks for your time.
--
cheers, Frank van
something about the option proliferation that seems to
afflict us. That's not your fault of course :)
You you should probably subscribe to
http://www.hexten.net/mailman/listinfo/tapx-dev
also.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 20 Feb 2009, at 16:52, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Feb 20, 2009, at 3:18 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
RENUMBER
Won't that fuck up existing users of the library?
Yeah, I was making a BASIC joke :)
The description for verbose should really be "show the raw TAP
stream".
Pa
On 19 Feb 2009, at 21:16, Michael G Schwern wrote:
This makes me think that -1 should actually be "normal", from what
Schwern has said, and 0 should include the failures and diagnostics
and
messages and whatnot (# stuff), as Andy seems to have expected in the
past. But I can'
On 19 Feb 2009, at 20:01, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 18 Feb 2009, at 22:44, Michael G Schwern wrote:
The thing which most takes advantage of this is TODO tests. They
send
their
failure diagnostics to STDOUT so the user is not spammed with
passing
test
information
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Andy Lester wrote:
Second point: Should tests 3 and 6 pass? Being unnumbered?
Yes, that's by design (or at least happy historical accident).
But "ok 0" should certainly fail, right?
xoa
--
Andy Lester =>
ok 9
ok 10
ok 11
The test number is 0, and yet, it passes as well.
I ask all of this because we have what should be failing tests in
Rakudo that are passing because of what seems to me TAP that should
fail.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
lo last year. It's status is in
limbo. http://testanything.org/wiki/index.php/TAP_logging_syntax
OK - let's move on that then.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
n that all us Perl hackers are used to seeing it show up
anyway, even if it is in STDERR. No?
Yeah, I think you're right.
I suspect nobody's noticed the lack of diagnostics because diagnostics
on STDOUT are currently rare. Thanks for exercising this :)
I'll make the change.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
it's structured data
rather than just "data".
+0 - in the sense that it's fine by me - but I can still imagine a
better noun even if I can't think what it is :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 11 Feb 2009, at 12:38, Andy Armstrong wrote:
There are no TAPx:: modules there except the intermediate
TAPx::Parser
which is now TAP::Parser. But there are some TAP:: modules. That's
why
I ask.
I'd say TAP::Data is absolutely fine.
But, of course, Ovid is right about ::Da
are some TAP:: modules. That's why
I ask.
I'd say TAP::Data is absolutely fine.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:23 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
people see Perl 6 as an opportunity to rethink things.
Except that Perl 6 isn't changing TAP.
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
exaggerating. The horse is dead.
Also, Hitler.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
ny others do as well.
Perhaps I'm being unclear. I do not find either 'no_plan' or 'plan'
to
be useful in their current state.
Yes, but many others do.
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
ting that many people use and rely
on.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
I'm not convinced.
Hmm. No, I don't reckon that's valid. I'll take a look.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
The daily email is fantastic. So much easier to read, to see what is
good and what isn't, and to ignore what I don't care about (Yes, I
know I can turn off specific platforms and distros too)
Thanks very much to all of you.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EM
e. Oh well. :-/
To you it's the side note. To me, and others, it is the key issue.
Flailing attempts at fixing Kwalitee are not worth alienating current
and future contributors.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
ests.
Again, Salve, please understand that the vast majority of humans do
not divorce their feelings from their work, as much as you may see
that as a "problem."
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
n seeing
his or her module on the list, is going to go and modify the
distribution? The chances of that are miniscule * tiny.
Most of all, what problem are you trying to solve? I suggest that low-
Kwalitee modules on the CPAN pose no problem whatsoever.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
se metrics, please file a bug report.)
Oh, come on Eric, I'm proud of TP (which is really brian's) and TPC!
/me goes to cry.
Tito, hand me a tissue.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
ith someone who is an unpaid
volunteer, working on his projects and contributing to the CPAN, and
you'll get that horse to walk away and go somewhere else, or just not
bother uploading code.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
t a way to encourage volunteers to work on
projects.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
;
Really, does anyone think these ideas through?
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
.org/highscores/hall_of_shame
A beautiful point, sir.
I kiss you!
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On 15 Oct 2008, at 14:09, Michael G Schwern wrote:
0.82 accidentally shipped with a dependency on Mouse. We're only
using that
for experiments.
I was just about to ask about that. Still, I now have Mouse on all the
machines I've upgraded - which is a good thing :)
--
Andy
On 25 Sep 2008, at 09:50, Ovid wrote:
So I don't know who vpit is, how to contact this person, or which
version of Module::Build this is (so the line number might not match
mine (v0.2808)).
http://search.cpan.org/~vpit/
:)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 22 Sep 2008, at 05:08, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 20, 2008, at 00:29, Barbie wrote:
See http://use.perl.org/~barbie/journal/37496 for all the gory
details.
Barbie++ # Thank you!
Seconded. Thanks so much!
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
gs people would want?
I'd lean towards epoch for easier comparison on SQLite.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 11 Sep 2008, at 19:11, David E. Wheeler wrote:
According to svn blame:
470 andy sub summary {
481 andy my ( $self, $aggregate ) = @_;
791 andy
754 andy return if $self->silent;
So I'd say the summary it's been there for a while :)
(we'
On 11 Sep 2008, at 17:21, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 11, 2008, at 05:09, Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 8 Aug 2008, at 20:46, David E. Wheeler wrote:
I've started fiddling with the stdout option to TAP::Harness. It's
nice, although it doesn't capture everything. I mean, I think
On 11 Sep 2008, at 15:19, Barbie wrote:
[snip good stuff about test reports]
Thank you! :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
STDOUT appears to be to set verbosity to -2
-2 really quiet Suppress everything but the tests summary.
-3 silent Suppress everything
:)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
re watching your code, and if you'd like
to follow our monitoring of your code, go here, and if you want
messages all the time, you can do such-and-such."
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Sep 5, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
You know, a "hello" that doesn't start with "FAIL!"
Yes, beautiful. We need to remember that not everyone is a grizzled
veteran.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
ere.
What they do need permission to do is send me the mass mail, and
fortunately that's what's going to happen.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Sep 5, 2008, at 1:36 PM, David Golden wrote:
I will be changing Test::Reporter to stop all author CC'ing which will
take effect when/if we convince existing testers to upgrade.
Thank you, sir.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
ch certain criteria or else we will send you mass email
about it"?
Am I the only one looking at this from the point of view of others?
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
1 - 100 of 977 matches
Mail list logo
