Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #20315]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20315
Attached is a first try towards eval.
I have
If memory serves me right, Dan Sugalski wrote:
rather than attributes, but I may be incorrect here. Are the current
python instance attributes both:
*) defined per object rather than per class
*) Essentially global, that is not hidden from parent classes or
anything. (Basically one big
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:00:59 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:53 PM -0800 1/14/03, Adriano wrote:
I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for returning a method
(as an object) which can be invoked later with some arguments (or even
applied with a partial list of arguments for currying).
Jerome Quelin (via RT) wrote:
- currently I'm just printing on stdout the resulting parrot code, I
lack an eval instruction in Parrot. Dan, Leo? :-)
$ diff -ub ~/src/parrot/languages/ook/ook.pasm ook.pasm
--- /home/lt/src/parrot/languages/ook/ook.pasm Wed Jan 1 01:34:16 2003
+++ ook.pasm
Peter Haworth wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Adriano wrote:
I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for
returning a method (as an object) which can be invoked
later with some arguments (or even applied with a
partial list of arguments for currying).
This would be a lot
I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for
returning a method (as an object) which can be invoked
later with some arguments (or even applied with a
partial list of arguments for currying).
This would be a lot more useful than a yes-or-no
answer about the existence of a
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
1)
The call function to the compiler/assembler is kept as a NCI. Better
would be a subclass of NCI (Compiler.pmc or so), which provides
invoke_keyed(key, next)
Hmm, I don't know what a NCI is. Where (which files) can I find
information about them?
Jerome
--
[EMAIL
I realize this will vary from language to language, but generally we will
need a PMC that encapsulates a method (and responds to the invoke vtable
method like Sub, or maybe the Sub PMC could do?). This python code is
interesting:
class A:
def f (self):
print A.f()
def g (self):
print g()
From: attriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for
returning a method (as an object) which can be invoked
later with some arguments (or even applied with a
partial list of arguments for currying).
This would be a lot more useful than a
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding Dan's meaning when he talks of invalidating
method handles. In Perl5:
package Foo;
sub bar { print hello world\n }
package main;
my $cref = Foo-can('bar');
undef *Foo::bar;
Foo-$cref();
Foo-bar();
1;
would result in:
hello world
Can't locate object
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:57:28AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 9:37 PM -0500 1/14/03, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
But who knows, maybe it could be made modular enough (i.e., more
interface-oriented?) to allow the best of both worlds -- I'm far too
novice wrt Parrot to figure out what it'd
At 7:11 PM +0530 1/15/03, Gopal V wrote:
If memory serves me right, Dan Sugalski wrote:
rather than attributes, but I may be incorrect here. Are the current
python instance attributes both:
*) defined per object rather than per class
*) Essentially global, that is not hidden from parent
At 8:27 PM + 1/14/03, Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #20315]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20315
Attached is a first try
At 3:10 PM + 1/15/03, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:00:59 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:53 PM -0800 1/14/03, Adriano wrote:
I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for returning a method
(as an object) which can be invoked later with some arguments (or even
In perl.perl6.internals, you wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
1)
The call function to the compiler/assembler is kept as a NCI. Better
would be a subclass of NCI (Compiler.pmc or so), which provides
invoke_keyed(key, next)
Hmm, I don't know what a NCI is. Where (which files) can I find
In perl.perl6.internals, you wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
$ ../imcc/imcc -r ook.pasm hello.ook
Hello World!
You don't seem to have checked in the compile thing...
No, its not ready yet.
About the eval: you said that compile does eval here. In the future, how
should I eval after compile?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:17:17AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
In that case they'd correspond to our properties, and I can already
feel a massive terminology disconnect looming. Maybe we should rename
properties and attributes to frobs and thingies, just so there's no
overlap. :(
We could
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:00:59AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:53 PM -0800 1/14/03, Adriano wrote:
I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for returning a
method (as an object) which can be invoked later with some arguments
(or even applied with a partial list of arguments for
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:27 PM + 1/14/03, Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
Yow, Cool! We *have* to get IMCC built into parrot now.
You do get this wrong - always ;-)
imcc = parrot + assemble.pl - pre-processor + PIR-assembler +
optimizer/10#yet now already
With the help
Sounds like we want objects *and* classes to support:
static_attribs - which are defined at compile time and
accessed by offset probably stored in an array.
dynamic_attribs - which come and go at run time and are
generally accessed by name and likely stored in a hash.
--
Jonathan Sillito
JS == Jonathan Sillito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JS Sounds like we want objects *and* classes to support:
JS static_attribs - which are defined at compile time and
JS accessed by offset probably stored in an array.
JS dynamic_attribs - which come and go at run time and are
JS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Lazzaro) writes:
Great -- then I have only one more question, I think. In the words of
a certain cartoon character, what's *this* button do?
my $b is $a;
I think at this stage it's probably worth reminding everyone that not
every string of characters *needs* to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr. Nobody) writes:
Unicode operators in the core are a very, very, very, very, very, very, very,
very, very, very, very, very, very bad idea.
We've done that.
--
COBOL is for morons.
-- E.W. Dijkstra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
Ah, that's a different question. Having Unicode synonyms may well be
considered reasonable thing
Sounds like the good old days of trigraphs.
--
A witty saying means nothing. -Voltaire
At 12:05 AM + 1/16/03, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
Ah, that's a different question. Having Unicode synonyms may well be
considered reasonable thing
Sounds like the good old days of trigraphs.
I was shooting for the good old days of sarcasm that people
25 matches
Mail list logo
