Bob Rogers a écrit :
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.7.0 "Severe
Macaw." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is a virtual machine aimed at
running all dynamic languages.
As usual, the Windows setup is available on
http://parrotwin32.sourceforge.net/
François.
Parro
Thanks, applied in r30349.
Hey guys,
Today I saw Andrew's last post in his blog about the end of gsoc.
Since I could not find much information about the NCI and GC projects I'm
asking here: What's the status of these projects?
Andrew's last post seems discouraging. How much of the new GC is completed?
Are we going to have a
On Monday, 18. August 2008 20:38:05 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> I would somewhat expect
> a reference to be instead handled using a statement like
>
> $foo[1] := $bar;
>
> Comments and clarifications appreciated.
I would also opt for copy semantics whenever = is used
for assignment. But it see
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #58138]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58138 >
rakudo: method x { say self }; x(1)
OUTPUT[1]
question: should methods be allowed ou
gsoc_nci code is available in branches/gsoc_nci_001
jitted nci stubs works on i386 WIN32 and i386 LINUX
Its probably going to be merged this week.
Kevin
Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
Hey guys,
Today I saw Andrew's last post in his blog about the end of gsoc.
Since I could not find much information ab
Bob Rogers wrote:
>2. I've managed to log in at Perl Monks, but can't even figure out
> how to post. (I managed it last time, so I must be getting stupider.)
Click on the "Perl News" link, and scroll down to the bottom of the page
where it says "Add a piece of Perl News". Fill in the title,
Here's a simple test for resumable exceptions that I'm trying
to get to work. I'm probably coding/understanding something wrong,
so any suggestions or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
.sub main :main
push_eh catcher
'foo'()
pop_eh
say 'ok 4'
.ret
Author: kjs
Date: Wed Aug 20 07:13:25 2008
New Revision: 30378
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd19] document :instanceof pragma. pmichaud++ for writing it
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
==
---
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:18 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the general idea, but I wonder if there's something cleaner than an
> environment variable. Nothing really comes to mind at the moment besides
> making argument processing even uglier in IMCC's main.c.
>
> Let's think a
Author: kjs
Date: Wed Aug 20 09:51:31 2008
New Revision: 30384
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd26_ast.pod
Log:
[pdd26] add description for "register" scope
+ add missing ')'
+ mention :vtable subs have 'self' too (in attribute scope description).
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd26_ast.pod
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:00:24PM +0300, Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
> Today I saw Andrew's last post in his blog about the end of gsoc.
> Since I could not find much information about the NCI and GC projects I'm
> asking here: What's the status of these projects?
> Andrew's last post seems discouragi
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:15 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:00:24PM +0300, Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
>
>> Today I saw Andrew's last post in his blog about the end of gsoc.
>> Since I could not find much information about the NCI and GC projects I'm
>> asking here
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:22:33PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:15 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The overall concepts of the incremental GC are solid, but a couple of
> > details
> > of the implementation need polishing. It's difficult to debug these type
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:38:05PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: There are quite a few tests in the spectest suite that
: make mention of "arrayref" and "hashref", and that expect
: things to work like references do in Perl 5. I'd like to
: get some confirmation/clarification on them.
:
: He
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:59:50PM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
: * Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-13 19:20]:
: > If we allow operator symbols in identifiers then the world
: > will divide into those people who look at Perl 6 programs
: > only through syntax-highlighting editors and
# New Ticket Created by Reini Urban
# Please include the string: [perl #58176]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58176 >
---
osname= cygwin
osvers= 1.5.25(0.15642)
arch= cygwin-thread-multi-64int
cc= gcc
AFAICT, Parrot uses function pointers for NCI. This means NCI uses
whatever calling convention the compiler uses by default.
Unfortunately, there's More Than One Way To Do It.
On Windows, there's the C calling convention (__cdecl), which is usually
used by default by the Visual C++ compiler. The
A quick overview of Microsoft's Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR).
http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/John-Lam-and-Martin-Maly-Deep-DLR/
Ron
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 22:20 +0200, Ron Blaschke wrote:
> I think we need a way to select the calling convention for a function,
> similar to, or maybe even part of, the signature. Also, it would be
> good to have a way to select a calling convention when loading a
> library, as a calling conventio
Andrew Whitworth wrote:
I created a new branch tonight, /branches/pdd09gc to try to continue
some of my GC work from the summer with a blank slate. I have a few
cleanup jobs I want to do first, so that it should be easier to add in
a new GC without having so many problems as I had. One thing I've
chromatic wrote:
If it's *close* (and mostly passing tests) we can always throw it back
into trunk immediately after a monthly release and give ourselves 4
weeks to clean it up.
The important thing to remember is that the GSOC project wasn't "revamp
the GC system to meet the new spec" it was
Will Coleda wrote:
Please open a ticket tracking this if we're not going to apply it
right now so we don't miss it for next release.
CPAN is great for distributing Perl modules, but simply can't handle
Parrot. As soon as we have the alternate FTP site up, we're done with CPAN.
Allison
Running 'make test' now fills the main directory of the repository with
junk files like:
test_98093.out
test_37653.c
test_98093.ldo
test_97159.c
The offending tests need to be modified to clean up after themselves.
Allison
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running 'make test' now fills the main directory of the repository with junk
> files like:
>
> test_98093.out
> test_37653.c
> test_98093.ldo
> test_97159.c
>
> The offending tests need to be modified t
Hi $Larry et al,
I brought this up as a question at YAPC::EU and found to my
surprise that no one seems to have thought of it yet. This is
the mail I said I’d write. (And apologies, Larry. :-) )
Consider the classic example of roles named Dog and Tree which
both have a `bark` method. Then there i
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
What I'm trying to do is to test the ability to resume after
exceptions thrown by C. The C sub above sets up
a handler to catch exceptions, then calls C. The handler
simply resumes any exception that is caught. The C sub
prints 'ok 1', throws an exception, prints 'ok
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
I'm sorry, but this is not the case. It is in fact valid:
running:
==
.sub main
newclass $P0, "foo"
$P1 = new "foo"
$P1 .hi() # note the space before the dot
$P1. hi() # note the space after the dot
.end
.namespace ["foo"]
.sub hi :method
pr
Allison Randal wrote:
Running 'make test' now fills the main directory of the repository with
junk files like:
test_98093.out
test_37653.c
test_98093.ldo
test_97159.c
The offending tests need to be modified to clean up after themselves.
Are these happening notwithsta
From: Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:14:46 +0200
Bob Rogers wrote:
>2. I've managed to log in at Perl Monks, but can't even figure out
> how to post. (I managed it last time, so I must be getting stupider.)
Click on the "Perl News" link, and scro
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi $Larry et al,
>
> I brought this up as a question at YAPC::EU and found to my
> surprise that no one seems to have thought of it yet. This is
> the mail I said I'd write. (And apologies, Larry. :-) )
>
> Consider t
31 matches
Mail list logo
