On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:23:58AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Yeah, I think getting the docs better will be an aggressive goal for
> >> the next release.
>
> > How's this all looking now we're in Feb?
>
> There is still a lot of outdated (or unimplem
Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yeah, I think getting the docs better will be an aggressive goal for
>> the next release.
> How's this all looking now we're in Feb?
There is still a lot of outdated (or unimplemented?) stuff in assembly
related docs.
WRT release :)
,--[ p6i ]
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:33:57AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 11:52 AM + 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >Has a date been set for the next release?
>
> Nope. I suppose we could shoot for another holiday release, if
> someone's got a good february one.
>
> >Are the docs (especially the PDDs)
* Andrew Dougherty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040120 02:19]:
>
> Wordsize errors are one common type of error that show up on PPC
> (and SPARC) more readily than on x86, due to byte-order issues.
>
> When reporting problems, it's often a good idea to include the ./myconfig
> file in the parrot build di
* Harry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040118 05:06]:
>
> --- Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, I don't think you're going crazy. The funny thing is that
> > about a three
> > weeks ago my cvs checkout worked fine. I did a cvs update, and then
> > Configure.pl didn't work[1], so I re-chec
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> This also gives me an opportunity to mention to anyone with more time (and
> possibly ability) than me, that parrot is having problems on LinuxPPC. The
> specifics are:
> - parrot hangs on t/op/arithmetics when doing make test
> - make gives an
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:01:41PM +, Harry Jackson wrote:
>
> If there are any shy lurkers out there please speak now or forever hold
> your peace.
>
Well, here i speak ;-)
I have some (minor) skills in C, Perl, Networking, compiling, and other
stuff. I also downloaded Parrot some months a
Harry Jackson wrote:
Harry Jackson
If there are any shy lurkers out there please speak now or forever hold
your peace.
Alright, that's me too. I've been lurking for a couple years, actually,
and have only made one post on perl6-language, I think. I just
downloaded parrot again last week after
Well, there is always up-to-date documentation, your debugger output ...
0x4C56
Who says that the copy-paste antipattern is bad?
Mark Solinski wrote:
I'm also a shy lurker but would love to help in any way I can. I have twenty+ years experience in C/C++/OOP. Is there a reasonable place to start?
Bloody hell man, what took you so long ;-). With that amount of
experience, take your pick.
http://www.parrotcode.org/todo
Har
I'm also a shy lurker but would love to help in any way I can. I have twenty+ years
experience in C/C++/OOP. Is there a reasonable place to start?
Mark Solinski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 12 January 2004 17:58, Harry Jackson wrote:
> Robert Eaglestone wrote:
> > Yes, I'm a shy lurker.
>
> Are there any more, don't be shy, there might be a lot of barking but no
> one bites at least I have not had anyone bite me _yet_.
>
> Is there anyone on the list who wants to help but do
Ooh, ooh, a chance to leave shy lurker status behind and work on one of
the coolest software projects out there, count me in.
I have some rudimentary C skills and I'm sure there's some elbow grease
around here somewhere...
Jeff
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:58:18PM +, Harry Jackson wrote:
> Rob
Paul Cochrane wrote:
If there are any shy lurkers out there please speak now or forever hold
your peace.
I'll admit to being a shy lurker... (and have rudimentary C knowledge, but a
bit low on the elbow grease atm :-/)
Another one, we are getting more and more of them pop up from all over
the
> If there are any shy lurkers out there please speak now or forever hold
> your peace.
I'll admit to being a shy lurker... (and have rudimentary C knowledge, but a
bit low on the elbow grease atm :-/)
This also gives me an opportunity to mention to anyone with more time (and
possibly ability)
Ping. One quiet lurker here. I'd like to help out, but not really sure
where to start. Given Dan's suggestion, I think I might start looking at
some more abusive-type tests. Destruction and dissection can be fun. I'd
be happy to help out in other newbie-type ways, too.
--Kevin
Harry Jackson wr
Harry~
You have outlined my situation exactly. I completely agree.
Matt
Harry Jackson wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
The developers _of_ parrot need to keep in mind the needs of those
poised on the edge of developing _in_ parrot.
I think that there are a lot of people who would help but the learni
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 5:01 PM + 1/12/04, Harry Jackson wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
and am always worried about making an ass of myself when posting.
Dammit, and here I was trying to lead by example. It's OK! :)
Smoothing the path for newcommers, of both types, is very important.
I spent
Harry Jackson wrote:
If there are any shy lurkers out there please speak now or forever hold
your peace.
Poit. That's me.
At 1:26 PM -0500 1/12/04, Simon Glover wrote:
Well, one thing that people can contribute that doesn't require much
(if any) knowledge of the internals is tests (whether in PASM, PIR,
or one of the other languages that run on top of Parrot). Tests that
uncover bugs are particularly helpful!
Abso
Well, one thing that people can contribute that doesn't require much
(if any) knowledge of the internals is tests (whether in PASM, PIR,
or one of the other languages that run on top of Parrot). Tests that
uncover bugs are particularly helpful!
Simon
I'm currently building some docs related modules which will allow us to
create an html tree from the pod, inline stuff included.
I cleaned up all the pod errors last week and was going to report on
that but got sidetracked when I realised that POD::Checker diverged
somewhat from Perl's own pod
At 5:01 PM + 1/12/04, Harry Jackson wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
and am always worried about making an ass of myself when posting.
Dammit, and here I was trying to lead by example. It's OK! :)
Smoothing the path for newcommers, of both types, is very important.
I spent quite a bit of time fishin
Robert Eaglestone wrote:
Yes, I'm a shy lurker.
Are there any more, don't be shy, there might be a lot of barking but no
one bites at least I have not had anyone bite me _yet_.
Is there anyone on the list who wants to help but does not know where to
start. If you are really that shy email me off
Harry Jackson wrote:
>
> I think that there are a lot of people who would help but the learning
> curve seems too high. I for one am finding it a pretty steep curve at the
> moment and am always worried about making an ass of myself when posting.
> I decided to hell with it, if you're ain't in y
Tim Bunce wrote:
The developers _of_ parrot need to keep in mind the needs of those
poised on the edge of developing _in_ parrot.
I think that there are a lot of people who would help but the learning
curve seems to high. I for one am finding it a pretty steep curve at the
moment and am always wo
At 4:47 PM + 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:33:57AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:52 AM + 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
>Has a date been set for the next release?
Nope. I suppose we could shoot for another holiday release, if
someone's got a good february one.
Valen
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:33:57AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 11:52 AM + 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >Has a date been set for the next release?
>
> Nope. I suppose we could shoot for another holiday release, if
> someone's got a good february one.
Valentines day? :-)
[ On a whim I thou
At 11:52 AM + 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
Has a date been set for the next release?
Nope. I suppose we could shoot for another holiday release, if
someone's got a good february one.
Are the docs (especially the PDDs) upto date on best practices?
Alas not, no.
If not, will that be a goal for th
Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has a date been set for the next release?
No, not yet. But I can imagine to have a release in February. It of
course depends on progress WRT objects and threads.
> Are the docs (especially the PDDs) upto date on best practices?
No. Not much better then as o
30 matches
Mail list logo
