Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Tommi Maekitalo
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2003 17:24 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: *nod* but it would be nicer if all loopback interfaces worked by default - hence my localhost suggestion, which would match any of 127.0.0.1/32 :::127.0.0.1/128 and ::1/128 cheers andrew ... That sounds good. Is it

[HACKERS] Regarding PostgreSQL Doubt

2003-09-03 Thread Naveen Babu .G
Dear Sirs and Friends, I would like to know about cube implementation and materialization of views in postgresql database. Is it developed already or is it in process? If it is in process, could u inform me the mail ids please? So kindly, I request u to inform me regarding this

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Tommi Maekitalo wrote: *nod* but it would be nicer if all loopback interfaces worked by default - hence my localhost suggestion, which would match any of 127.0.0.1/32 :::127.0.0.1/128 and ::1/128 cheers andrew ... That sounds good. Is it possible to extend lookup that way? I'd feel

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tommi Maekitalo said: Am Dienstag, 2. September 2003 17:24 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: *nod* but it would be nicer if all loopback interfaces worked by default - hence my localhost suggestion, which would match any of 127.0.0.1/32 :::127.0.0.1/128 and ::1/128 cheers andrew ...

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Andreas Pflug said: Tommi Maekitalo wrote: *nod* but it would be nicer if all loopback interfaces worked by default - hence my localhost suggestion, which would match any of 127.0.0.1/32 :::127.0.0.1/128 and ::1/128 ... That sounds good. Is it possible to extend lookup that way?

Re: [HACKERS] elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1

2003-09-03 Thread Samuel A Horwitz
YES it seems. On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 13:34:09 -0400 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Samuel A Horwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: PostgreSQL-development [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1 Samuel A Horwitz [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] libpq makefile for bcc

2003-09-03 Thread Darko Prenosil
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 00:55, Andreas Pflug wrote: Darko Prenosil wrote: Current bcc32.mak produces : Turbo Incremental Link 5.00 Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 Borland Error: Unresolved external '_pqGethostbyname' referenced from

Re: [HACKERS] ~* operator

2003-09-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera Munoz
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:28:16PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Hi guys, Where can I find a list of all the 'special' characters in the ~* operator? They are the same for the ~ operator, and should be listed at the reference page for regular expressions...

Re: [HACKERS] elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Samuel A Horwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote: [ scratches head ... ] EEXIST and ENOTEMPTY are the same code on your machine? YES it seems. Okay, I've applied a workaround. regards, tom lane ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port

2003-09-03 Thread Merlin Moncure
-Original Message- From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:13 PM To: Joerg Hessdoerfer; Alexander Schulz; Hannu Krosing Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port First, there was a branch created a couple of weeks ago:

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Olivier PRENANT
Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:35:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:20:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lee Kindness writes: You don't... and you

Re: [HACKERS] libpq makefile for bcc

2003-09-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Darko Prenosil wrote: On Wednesday 03 September 2003 00:55, Andreas Pflug wrote: Darko Prenosil wrote: Current bcc32.mak produces : Turbo Incremental Link 5.00 Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 Borland Error: Unresolved external '_pqGethostbyname' referenced from

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Andreas Pflug said: Tommi Maekitalo wrote: *nod* but it would be nicer if all loopback interfaces worked by default - hence my localhost suggestion, which would match any of 127.0.0.1/32 :::127.0.0.1/128 and ::1/128 ... That sounds good. Is it possible

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:59:17PM +0200, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: psql: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host :::127.0.0.1, user postgres, database template1 This is a Linux system that does not have the IPV6_V6ONLY setsockopt() option. Linux only has this option since 2.4.21 (pre3).

Re: [HACKERS] testing for usable C compiler

2003-09-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: BTW, would it be possible to tweak configure's test for minimum working C compiler to include a check that cc accepts ANSI-style function prototypes? That would allow us to bounce HP's lame excuse for a free compiler with a slightly useful message ... Yes, unfortunately

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Andreas Pflug wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Andreas Pflug said: Tommi Maekitalo wrote: *nod* but it would be nicer if all loopback interfaces worked by default - hence my localhost suggestion, which would match any of 127.0.0.1/32 :::127.0.0.1/128 and ::1/128 ... That sounds

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Olivier PRENANT
Olivier PRENANT wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: SNIP I am inclined to think yes. It would prevent uglification of the code by not having to special-case Unixware. However, I was able to read the libc sources to confirm thread-safety. Because you can not see the source, would you try a threaded

Re: [HACKERS] testing for usable C compiler

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane writes: BTW, would it be possible to tweak configure's test for minimum working C compiler to include a check that cc accepts ANSI-style function prototypes? That would allow us to bounce HP's lame excuse for a free compiler with a slightly

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Olivier PRENANT wrote: It's ok to assume thread-safety, as the SCO developer (Kean Johnston) asked the threads guys, and he said that the libc stuff is thread-safe so they don't have to have 2 different versions in libc. LER If any one can write a program that can prove

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: Woh, I thought we just agreed that getpwuid_r() isn't required for thread-safety on your platform. it's CLEANER to use it. Our API Signature is the _r version, why not use it when it's available? My new patch will optionally use it if it exists, but we still

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: This doesn't look consistent to me. Local addresses can be all addresses that the host's interfaces are currently configured with, loopback is nothing special in this sense. The admin can easily do 'ifconfig' to see all addresses configured and enter them into

Re: [HACKERS] Regarding PostgreSQL Doubt

2003-09-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:18:40PM +1000, Gavin Sherry wrote: As for materialised views, I cannot recall any discussion of this in the recent past. Sorry, what is a materialized view? Is it something that you can do with CREATE TABLE AS, or it is more involved than that? -- Alvaro Herrera

Re: [HACKERS] libpq makefile for bcc

2003-09-03 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that Andreas Pflug once said: for pgadmin3 use we have http://snake.pgadmin.org/snapshots/postgresql/libs-win32-20030829.zip which includes a static libpq and the openssl libs. Dave, maybe we should mirror this also to postgresql.org? Yes, I'm not happy with the way things are

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Bruce Momjian wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: We currently have this in the default pg_hba.conf file: host all all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust The idea was to have something which would perform equivalently on IP4 only, IP4 over IP6 and pure IP6 connections, without breaking the

Re: [HACKERS] TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

2003-09-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Bruce Momjian wrote: We have avoided doing dns lookups from pg_hba.conf, and hence the use of 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost. Now that we cache pg_hba.conf, we could consider allowing hostnames in pg_hba.conf. Is that a TODO? Hm. DNS lookup would make postmaster startup last much longer, to

Re: [HACKERS] elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1

2003-09-03 Thread Samuel A Horwitz
Thanks - past that problem. On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:03:58 -0400 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Samuel A Horwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: PostgreSQL-development [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1 Samuel A

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olivier PRENANT wrote: It's ok to assume thread-safety, as the SCO developer (Kean Johnston) asked the threads guys, and he said that the libc stuff is thread-safe so they don't have to have 2 different versions in libc. If any one can write a program

Re: [HACKERS] testing for usable C compiler

2003-09-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: Yeah. I would suggest doing it at the check that C compiler still works stage, after we think we have all the CFLAGS. Couldn't we just throw a prototyped function into that test program? The standard Autoconf prototype test is pretty involved (see AC_PROG_CC_STDC in

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port

2003-09-03 Thread Sean Chittenden
Does anybody know of a BSD licensed signal implementation that compiles on win32? See how Apache handles this problem (via APR?). -sc -- Sean Chittenden ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[HACKERS] Transaction status in default psql prompt?

2003-09-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
What do people think about adding the transaction status indicator to the default psql prompt, so it'd look something like this: peter=# begin; BEGIN peter*=# foo; ERROR: syntax error at or near foo at character 1 peter!=# rollback; ROLLBACK peter=# I think many people would find that useful.

[HACKERS] compile warnings in CVS HEAD?

2003-09-03 Thread Neil Conway
I'm seeing the following with the current CVS code on my Linux dev box: $ make maintainer-clean $ ./configure --enable-depend --enable-cassert --enable-debug --prefix=/pgsql --with-openssl [ ... ] $ make -s In file included from bootparse.y:340: lex.Int_yy.c:1832: warning: no previous prototype

Re: [HACKERS] Need for a 'minor patch person'?

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I thought it was a case of Bruce not having time to work on them, because he was too busy doing patch application and stuff. Bruce would probably be the right person to opine on this, but my impression is that patch

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 60: argument #3 incompatible with prototype: pthread_create() UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 61: argument #3 incompatible with prototype: pthread_create() $ ./test_thread

Re: [HACKERS] Need for a 'minor patch person'?

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I thought it was a case of Bruce not having time to work on them, because he was too busy doing patch application and stuff. Bruce would probably be the right person to opine on this, but my impression is that patch

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread ohp
FWIW, I do confirm, on dual XEON with JT enabled On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 14:53:39 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re:

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I would like every operating system that supports thread-safety to run this program and report back the results. On a Linux system with glibc 2.1: Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe Your getpwuid() is _not_ thread-safe Your

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 17:09:49 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 60: argument #3 incompatible

Re: [HACKERS] Planning to force reindex of hash indexes

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: I've found a number of infelicities in the hash index code that can't be fixed without an on-disk format change. The biggest one is that the hashm_ntuples field in hash meta pages is only uint32, meaning that hash index space management will become confused if the number of

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 60: argument #3 incompatible with prototype: pthread_create()

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I do confirm, on dual XEON with JT enabled Oh, I now see OS as Unixware: I have 2 bi-pro machines here both running unixware 7.1.3 I can make tests if you want -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I do confirm, on dual XEON with JT enabled Operating system? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 60: argument #3 incompatible with prototype: pthread_create() UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 61: argument #3 incompatible with prototype:

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dann Corbit wrote: I sent signal code to Bruce Momjian that can be freely used in the project. It compiles on Win32 and has been contributed as BSD license. The architecture is a bit different from what had already been accomplished, so I don't know how hard it will be to splice it in. I

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: So far as I'm aware Joerg, we didn't have enough time to get all the Win32 stuff done for 7.4, and it was felt (rightly so) that it wasn't worth holding off on 7.4 to get it in. At the moment, the main developers are doing nothing but fixing bugs in 7.4 as we

Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE vs WARNING

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: In fact, I like the criterion that a warning should be raised rather than a notice if the effect of the command deviates from what the command actually says. That puts the messages for serials, primary keys, drop cascades clearly into notices, messages about

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I thought a void pointer would be OK for everyone: pthread_create(thread1, NULL, (void *) func_call_1, NULL); void *(*start_routine)(void*) Here is our man page:

Re: [HACKERS] Regarding PostgreSQL Doubt

2003-09-03 Thread Gavin Sherry
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:18:40PM +1000, Gavin Sherry wrote: As for materialised views, I cannot recall any discussion of this in the recent past. Sorry, what is a materialized view? Is it something that you can do with CREATE TABLE AS, or it

Re: [HACKERS] compile warnings in CVS HEAD?

2003-09-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Neil Conway writes: lex.Int_yy.c:1832: warning: no previous prototype for `Int_yyget_lineno' These are caused by the new flex. Ignore them. tablecmds.c: In function `validateForeignKeyConstraint': tablecmds.c:3546: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-a

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I would like every operating system that supports thread-safety to run this program and report back the results. On a Linux system with glibc 2.1: Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe Your

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can you pass me what's in CVS (anon hasn't updated afaict). And, what didn't you like about my version? LER --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 18:35:44 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I

Re: [HACKERS] [DEFAULT] Daily digest v1.3954 (22 messages)

2003-09-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:19:33PM -0400, Serguei A. Mokhov wrote: If you take a close look at the output above, you will see that the prompt shifts one character to the right when you are in a transaction. That is going to look terrible. I don't think we should have a moving prompt as

Re: [HACKERS] [DEFAULT] Daily digest v1.3954 (22 messages)

2003-09-03 Thread Doug McNaught
Serguei A. Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:19:33PM -0400, Serguei A. Mokhov wrote: On the contrary, it could show the transaction level for the case of nested transactions: foo**=# Ugh... pretty ugly.

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction status in default psql prompt?

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What do people think about adding the transaction status indicator to the default psql prompt, so it'd look something like this: Okay with me. Btw., would anyone mind if the code for this indicator where not %T, but say instead %x, because there is

Re: [HACKERS] compile warnings in CVS HEAD?

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm seeing the following with the current CVS code on my Linux dev box: In file included from bootparse.y:340: lex.Int_yy.c:1832: warning: no previous prototype for `Int_yyget_lineno' lex.Int_yy.c:1841: warning: no previous prototype for `Int_yyget_in'

[HACKERS] Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Adam Kavan
I was attempting to get pg_autovacuum to work on my database and after much hammering at it I discovered that the stats system was not working. I tried it with both 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2 in both cases the number of tuples inserted, deleted and updated remained at 0 no matter what database

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction status in default psql prompt?

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What do people think about adding the transaction status indicator to the default psql prompt, so it'd look something like this: Okay with me. Btw., would anyone mind if the code for this indicator where not %T, but say

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction status in default psql prompt?

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you take a close look at the output above, you will see that the prompt shifts one character to the right when you are in a transaction. That is going to look terrible. It didn't look so bad to me. But anyway, what the %T indicator should look like

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction status in default psql prompt?

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you take a close look at the output above, you will see that the prompt shifts one character to the right when you are in a transaction. That is going to look terrible. It didn't look so bad to me. But anyway, what the %T

[HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there. I'm doing: cvs update -d -P (I sent another note to Marc as a safety). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs

Re: [HACKERS] Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Kavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was attempting to get pg_autovacuum to work on my database and after much hammering at it I discovered that the stats system was not working. Does 'ps' show that the stats collector and stats buffer postmaster child processes are alive? Are there any

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Marc G. Fournier
everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly, and there aren't any log files to that can go stale with that one to prevent it from happening ... I just manually ran it .. did that help? On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Today's commits from Bruce don't seem

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly, and there aren't any log files to that can go stale with that one to prevent it from happening ... I just manually ran it .. did

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 23:34:09 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly, and there aren't any log files to

Re: [HACKERS] Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 23:50, Tom Lane wrote: Does 'ps' show that the stats collector and stats buffer postmaster child processes are alive? Are there any suggestive complaints in the postmaster's log? As Adam mentioned, I took a look at his system since the initial report was about a problem

Re: [HACKERS] testing for usable C compiler

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane writes: Couldn't we just throw a prototyped function into that test program? The standard Autoconf prototype test is pretty involved (see AC_PROG_CC_STDC in /usr/local/share/autoconf/autoconf/c.m4 or whatever). Yikes. And that's really of

Re: [HACKERS] Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Initially I saw an error in the logs about an IPv6 address error but after I recompiled everthing with a simple ./configure --prefix=/home/user/somethingelse/ I didn't get the IPv6 error in the logs anymore. Hm. Could it be an IPv6 issue ---

[HACKERS] Problem with pg_attribute.attstorage for pg_class.relacl

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
pg_class.relacl is of type aclitem[] and has a pg_attribute.attstorage of 'x', even though it doesn't support TOAST expansion: grant select on t1 to foo1,foo2,foo3,foo4, ...(10k of items) ERROR: Tuple is too big: size 32684, max size 813 Is it 'x' to be

Re: [HACKERS] Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 01:23, Tom Lane wrote: Hm. Could it be an IPv6 issue --- that is, the stats collector is alive and faithfully listening on some UDP port, but it's not the same port the backends try to send to? Given the discussion over the past couple of days about bizarre

Re: [HACKERS] Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Initially I saw an error in the logs about an IPv6 address error but after I recompiled everthing with a simple ./configure --prefix=/home/user/somethingelse/ I didn't get the IPv6 error in the logs anymore. Hm. Could

Re: [HACKERS] Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Doesn't the stats collector use unix domain sockets, not IP? No. IIRC, we deliberately chose IP/UDP because it had buffering behavior we liked. There are pipes involved in the stats stuff too, but the weak link in my mind is the

[HACKERS] Debian packages of 7.4beta2

2003-09-03 Thread Oliver Elphick
I have made Debian packages of PostgreSQL 7.4beta2 and uploaded them to Debian's experimental archive. The package version is 7.3.99.7.4beta2-1 (so that when 7.4's final version comes out, it will be perceived as a later package). They are built on a machine running current unstable, so they

[HACKERS] OffsetNumber offnum (LOCKTag)

2003-09-03 Thread Jenny -
the offnum of LOCKTAG I gather indicates which row (tuple) is being locked in a row level locking. But when I lock 2 diffrent rows of a table, offset for both is 0. and also offset is 0 if i take a table lock on the same table. (blkno is the same for all three locks)..shouldnt the OffsetNumber

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Using oids

2003-09-03 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 3 Sep 2003 at 11:28, Bo Lorentsen wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:10, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: Yes. It is correct. As of 7.3.x and onwards oids are optional at table creation times. They default to be available for new objects but that is for backwards compatibility I believe. In

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Using oids

2003-09-03 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:20:42PM +0200, Bo Lorentsen wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:38, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: Well, what I do is, declare a serate sequence, retrive next available value and explicitly insert it into a integer field. That avoids having to retrieve the latest

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Using oids

2003-09-03 Thread Ashley Cambrell
That said, there is no reason why someone couldn't create a last_sequence() function so you could say SELECT currval( last_sequence() ). Ofcourse, if your table has no SERIAL field, you're stuffed either way. Instead of SELECT currval( last_sequence() ), what about implementing oracl type

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Using oids

2003-09-03 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:47:01PM +0200, Bo Lorentsen wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:19, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: The only thing you need to know is the name of the primary key field. This many be a problem in a generic layer. If you like you can make a UNIQUE INDEX on the oid column