I change the build-farm.conf file to have the following make line:
make = 'make -j 8', # or gmake if required. can include path if necessary.
2 pass, 4 fail. Is this a build configuration you want to pursue? I can
either create a new machine, or change one of my existing machines. Makes
Hi,
We are trying to introduce a thread that monitors the creation of the
trigger_file. As and when the file is created, the process that monitors
postgres server needs to be notified through the inotify API.
This is to reduce the 3-4 seconds delay that exists with the current
implementation in
Hi,
We are trying to introduce a thread that monitors the creation of the
trigger_file. As and when the file is created, the process that monitors
postgres server needs to be notified through the inotify API.
This is to reduce the 3-4 seconds delay that exists with the current
implementation in
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I found some whitespace characters in utility.c introduced by commit
3a0e4d3.
Please find attached a patch fixing that which can be applied on postgres
master (commit 2f0c7d5).
That probably exists in
It seems like this has reproduced once more. And once again, there
doesn't appear to be any funny business in pg_control (but the structs
are pasted here for your re-check), and there are successful sensical
updates to it. The primary is running 9.0.6.
However, we do have a new piece of data:
I noticed the syntax of the \copy command in the psql reference page is an old
style. ISTM it's better to update the document. Please find attached a patch.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
psql-copy-ref.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi writes:
Hmm, I was thinking that when walsender gets the position it can send the
WAL up to, in GetStandbyFlushRecPtr(), it could atomically check the current
recovery timeline. If it has changed, refuse to send the new WAL and
terminate. That would be a
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 11:00 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 06:20:59 AM Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
I can see why that would be nice, but is it really realistic? Don't we
expect some more diligence in applications using this
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittner writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
The grammar changes look wrong: I think you eliminated the
ability to have zero setup steps, no? Instead, setup_list should
expand to either empty or setup_list setup.
I tried that first, but had shift/reduce conflicts.
[
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittner writes:
By not visiting the heap page for tuples, index-only scans fail to
acquire all of the necessary predicate locks for correct behavior
at the serializable transaction isolation level. The tag for the
tuple-level predicate locks includes the xmin, to
Hello. It took me a while to get a version of this that was independent of
my data, but here it is. I don't understand what's going wrong but if you
change any part of this query (or at least any part I tried), the correct
result is returned.
This script will reproduce it:
=
create table
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Aug 28, 2012 9:59 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I don't see anything particularly
This doc sentence about pg_upgrade is now inaccurate:
If doing option--check/ with a running old server of a pre-9.1 version,
and the old server is using a Unix-domain socket directory that is
different from the default built into the new productnamePostgreSQL/
installation, set
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:42 AM Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
This patch is based on below Todo Item:
Consider adding buffers the background writer finds reusable to the free
list
I have tried implementing it and taken
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 24.08.2012 18:51, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 20.08.2012 00:31, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
New version of patch.
* Collect new stakind STATISTIC_KIND_BOUNDS_**HISTOGRAM, which is lower
and
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
I am taking a look at this patch now. A few quick comments:
* It looks like bounds_adjacent modifies it's by-reference arguments,
which is a little worrying to me. The lower/upper labels are flipped
back, but the
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:44:09PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's make check to
succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Aug 28, 2012 9:59 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Well, why don't we just s/restoring/processing/ in the debug message,
and call it good?
Are we allowed to backpatch
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Aug 28, 2012 9:59 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Well, why don't we just s/restoring/processing/ in the debug message,
and call it good?
Are we allowed to backpatch things to 9.2 at this point that changes
strings for translators?
Well,
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I found some whitespace characters in utility.c introduced by commit
3a0e4d3.
Please find attached a patch fixing that which can be applied on postgres
master (commit
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012:
And here's the first Windows buildfarm check of pg_upgrade.
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=pittadt=2012-09-04%2003%3A00%3A05stg=check-pg_upgrade
Great, thanks.
Who's going to work now on
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012:
And here's the first Windows buildfarm check of pg_upgrade.
Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com writes:
Hello. It took me a while to get a version of this that was independent of
my data, but here it is. I don't understand what's going wrong but if you
change any part of this query (or at least any part I tried), the correct
result is returned.
Huh. 9.1
On 09/04/2012 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012:
And here's the first Windows buildfarm check of pg_upgrade.
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=pittadt=2012-09-04%2003%3A00%3A05stg=check-pg_upgrade
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:07:30AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
It seems like this has reproduced once more. And once again, there
doesn't appear to be any funny business in pg_control (but the structs
are pasted here for your re-check), and there are successful sensical
updates to it. The
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Also, I am a bit doubtful about the advice on sizing the
connection pool as applied to small servers:
surely it's not sane to recommend that a single-processor system
with one disk should have
On 09/04/2012 09:47 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:44:09PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's make check to
succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
forward
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Who's going to work now on porting the shell script to Perl? ;-)
Well, we require Perl for development, but not for usage, at least not
yet.
This is a regression-test script, so that
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:12:52AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/04/2012 10:49 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012:
And here's the first Windows buildfarm
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
This is a test script, not what you should use in production. I don't
see any reason why we shouldn't require Perl for running the standard test.
But on the third hand ... we've taken pains to ensure that you don't
*have* to have Perl to build from a
On 09/04/2012 10:49 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012:
And here's the first Windows buildfarm check of pg_upgrade.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.comwrote:
Current gistchoose code has a bug. I've started separate thread about it.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg00544.php
Also, it obviously needs more comments.
Current state of patch is more
On 09/04/2012 11:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
This is a test script, not what you should use in production. I don't
see any reason why we shouldn't require Perl for running the standard test.
But on the third hand ... we've taken pains to ensure that you
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:07:30AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
It seems like this has reproduced once more. And once again, there
doesn't appear to be any funny business in pg_control (but the structs
are pasted here for your
On 9/3/12 5:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I went back for another try at building the Fedora packages with 9.2
branch tip ... and it still failed at pg_upgrade's make check.
The reason for this is that test.sh starts a couple of random
postmasters, and those postmasters expect to put their sockets in
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 01:44:59PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 9/3/12 5:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I went back for another try at building the Fedora packages with 9.2
branch tip ... and it still failed at pg_upgrade's make check.
The reason for this is that test.sh starts a couple of
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Yeah, I have resorted to putting something like
export PGHOST=/tmp
in all my test scripts, because the above-mentioned issues have affected
Debian for a long time. Welcome to the party. ;-)
Yeah, my current patch for Fedora does exactly that in
On 09/04/2012 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Somehow the verbose reporting of user relation files being copied does
not seem exceedingly useful; and I don't remember seeing that on Linux.
Yeah, and it does something odd anyway when it's not writing to a
terminal. Can we get rid of it,
I wrote:
Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com writes:
Hello. It took me a while to get a version of this that was independent of
my data, but here it is. I don't understand what's going wrong but if you
change any part of this query (or at least any part I tried), the correct
result is returned.
Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of jue jul 19 06:29:03 -0400 2012:
Hi,
Attached is v2 of the patch.
Hello,
I gave this code a quick read some days ago. Here's the stuff I would
change:
* There are way too many #ifdef VERBOSE_DEBUG stuff for my taste. It
might look better if you had
On 09/04/2012 03:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I realized this morning that I might have been a bit cavalier in using
dos2unix to smooth away differences in the dumpfiles produced by
pg_upgrade. Attached is a dump of the diff if this isn't done, with
Carriage Returns printed as '*' to make
Excerpts from Robert Creager's message of sáb sep 01 12:12:51 -0400 2012:
I change the build-farm.conf file to have the following make line:
make = 'make -j 8', # or gmake if required. can include path if
necessary.
2 pass, 4 fail. Is this a build configuration you want to pursue?
On 9/1/12 12:12 PM, Robert Creager wrote:
I change the build-farm.conf file to have the following make line:
make = 'make -j 8', # or gmake if required. can include path if
necessary.
2 pass, 4 fail. Is this a build configuration you want to pursue?
Sure that would be useful, but
Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of jue jun 28 17:06:49 -0400 2012:
On Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:03:26 PM Andres Freund wrote:
What I wonder is how hard it would be to remove catcache.h's structs into
the implementation. Thats the reason why the old and new list
implementation
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar sep 04 18:49:46 -0300 2012:
On 9/1/12 12:12 PM, Robert Creager wrote:
I change the build-farm.conf file to have the following make line:
make = 'make -j 8', # or gmake if required. can include path if
necessary.
2 pass, 4 fail.
On 09/04/2012 05:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 9/1/12 12:12 PM, Robert Creager wrote:
I change the build-farm.conf file to have the following make line:
make = 'make -j 8', # or gmake if required. can include path if
necessary.
2 pass, 4 fail. Is this a build configuration you want
On 9/1/12 6:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
When initializing a large database, pgbench writes tons of %d tuples
done lines. I propose to change this to a sort of progress counter
that stays on the same line, as in the
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I found some whitespace characters in utility.c introduced by commit
3a0e4d3.
Please find
Guys,
Is this a patch to 9.3?
i.e. do we need to delay the release for this?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 04.09.2012 03:02, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Heikki Linnakangashlinn...@iki.fi writes:
Hmm, I was thinking that when walsender gets the position it can send the
WAL up to, in GetStandbyFlushRecPtr(), it could atomically check the current
recovery timeline. If it has changed, refuse to send the
On 04.09.2012 15:41, Josh Berkus wrote:
Guys,
Is this a patch to 9.3?
i.e. do we need to delay the release for this?
It is for 9.2. I'll do a little bit more testing, and barring any
issues, commit the patch. What exactly is the schedule? Do we need to do
a RC2 because of this?
- Heikki
Heikki,
It is for 9.2. I'll do a little bit more testing, and barring any
issues, commit the patch. What exactly is the schedule? Do we need to do
a RC2 because of this?
We're currently scheduled to release next week. If we need to do an
RC2, we're going to have to do some fast rescheduling;
On Sep 4, 2012 6:06 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Frankly, I have had enough failures of parallel make that I think doing
this would generate a significant number of non-repeatable failures (I had
one just the other day that took three invocations of make to get right).
So I'm
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
Heikki,
It is for 9.2. I'll do a little bit more testing, and barring any
issues, commit the patch. What exactly is the schedule? Do we need to do
a RC2 because of this?
We're currently scheduled to release next week. If we need to do an
RC2, we're
On 03.09.2012 17:40, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 03.09.2012 16:26, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 03.09.2012 16:25, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Heikki Linnakangashlinn...@iki.fi
wrote:
Hmm, I was thinking that when walsender gets the position it can send
the
WAL up to,
On 04.09.2012 16:50, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com writes:
Heikki,
It is for 9.2. I'll do a little bit more testing, and barring any
issues, commit the patch. What exactly is the schedule? Do we need to do
a RC2 because of this?
We're currently scheduled to release next
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On 9/1/12 6:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
When initializing a large database, pgbench writes tons of %d tuples
done lines. I propose to change this to a sort of progress counter
that
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Frankly, I have had enough failures of parallel make that I think doing
this would generate a significant number of non-repeatable failures (I
had one just the other day that took three invocations of make to get
right). So I'm not sure doing this
On 09/04/2012 03:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/04/2012 03:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I realized this morning that I might have been a bit cavalier in
using dos2unix to smooth away differences in the dumpfiles produced
by pg_upgrade. Attached is a dump of the diff if this isn't done,
On 09/04/2012 08:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Frankly, I have had enough failures of parallel make that I think doing
this would generate a significant number of non-repeatable failures (I
had one just the other day that took three invocations of make to
On 09/04/2012 02:25 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/04/2012 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Somehow the verbose reporting of user relation files being copied does
not seem exceedingly useful; and I don't remember seeing that on Linux.
Yeah, and it does something odd anyway when it's not
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 08:46:53PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/04/2012 03:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/04/2012 03:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I realized this morning that I might have been a bit cavalier in
using dos2unix to smooth away differences in the dumpfiles
produced
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
the attached version works fine for me.
Yeah, that should do it. Will apply.
Pushed to master and REL9_2_STABLE.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
New version attached. Will apply if no further problems are found.
Pushed to master and REL9_2_STABLE.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 04.09.2012 17:34, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 04.09.2012 16:50, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com writes:
Heikki,
It is for 9.2. I'll do a little bit more testing, and barring any
issues, commit the patch. What exactly is the schedule? Do we need
to do
a RC2 because of this?
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On 9/1/12 6:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
When initializing a large database, pgbench writes tons of %d tuples
done
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
It is something which has to be considered, and I don't think it's
theoretical at all. Here's how we deal with it. We don't use a
plain FIFO queue for our transaction requests, but a prioritized
FIFO with 10
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, this whole things seems like a solution in search of a
problem to me. We just reduced the verbosity of pgbench -i tenfold in
the very recent past - I would have thought that enough to address
this problem. But maybe not.
The
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 20:46 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
OK, nobody else has reacted. I've spoken to Bruce and he seems happy
with it, although, TBH, whe I talked to him I thought I understood it
and now I'm not so sure. So we have 3 possibilities: leave it as is with
an error-hiding hack
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, this whole things seems like a solution in search of a
problem to me. We just reduced the verbosity of pgbench -i tenfold in
the very recent past - I would have thought that enough to
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:44:09PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's make check to
succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a
I wrote:
I think probably the best fix is to rejigger things so that Params
assigned by different executions of SS_replace_correlation_vars and
createplan.c can't share PARAM_EXEC numbers. This will result in
rather larger ecxt_param_exec_vals arrays at runtime, but the array
entries aren't
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, this whole things seems like a solution in search of a
problem to me. We just reduced the verbosity of pgbench -i tenfold in
the very recent past - I would
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually it'd be nice to even get a bit more output: say, a timestamp
on each line, and a completion percentage... but now I'm getting
greedy.
May be we need a verbosity level and print a lot less or a lot more
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 20:46 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
OK, nobody else has reacted. I've spoken to Bruce and he seems happy
with it, although, TBH, whe I talked to him I thought I understood it
and now I'm not so sure. So we have 3 possibilities:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 19:34 -0700, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The attached patch fixes it for me. It fixes the original problem, by
adding the missing locking and terminating walsenders on a target
timeline change, and also changes the behavior wrt. WAL segments
restored from the archive,
On 04.09.2012 21:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 19:34 -0700, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The attached patch fixes it for me. It fixes the original problem, by
adding the missing locking and terminating walsenders on a target
timeline change, and also changes the behavior wrt.
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:40 AM Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I have another question after thinking about that for awhile: is there
any security concern there? On Unix-oid systems, we
79 matches
Mail list logo
