On 2010-05-06 16:37, David MacMahon wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2010, at 7:27 , Arjen Markus wrote:
>
>> this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
>> the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
>>
>> Also puzzling: why does a repeated invocation of test-drv-info via
On May 6, 2010, at 7:27 , Arjen Markus wrote:
> this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
> the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
>
> Also puzzling: why does a repeated invocation of test-drv-info via
> make
> examine different drivers? It must be record
Hi Alan,
On 2010-05-06 16:27, Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
> the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
>
> I will try and reproduce it.
>
It has disappeared! The only thing I can think of that is different
i
Hi Alan,
this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
I will try and reproduce it.
As for the PostScript files: they look fine to me - there is nothing
wrong with them.
Also puzzling: why does a repeated invocation of t
On 2010-05-06 08:58+0200 Arjen Markus wrote:
> [...]in the process of testing I came across a rather strange
> problem:
>
> (I ran on Windows XP, with the MinGW GNU compilers)
> test-drv-info stops with an error of -10356462 (or something similar),
> thus terminating the build. Restarting the buil
Hi Alan,
On 2010-05-06 02:12, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> The multiple platform test moral is still correct, however; there are
> certain segfaults that show up on some platforms and not others.
>
I propagated the changes to examples 6 and 7 to F77, F95 and Tcl (the
latter not tested yet, but the
On 2010-05-05 16:29-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> It is interesting that I didn't see that x01cc segfault in my early tests
> that originally showed the Tcl and Python issues. Or in my tests after I
> fixed the Tcl and Python issues. I therefore think this is one of those
> cases where x01cc segfa
On 2010-05-05 23:42+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alan W. Irwin
>> wrote:
>>> On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>>>
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. ??My reason
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alan W. Irwin
> wrote:
> > On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> >
> >> Alan,
> >>
> >> Thank you for looking in to this. ??My reason for making that change
> >> was that it doesn't
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>
>> Alan,
>>
>> Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
>> was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
>> that both arguments are non-NULL
Hi Alan, Hez,
I had to plough through a myriad of mails, so my response was a
bit premature/late. Okay, I see it has been solved. My task will
then be to propagate the recent changes to the Fortran 77/95 and
Tcl examples, if not done yet.
Regards,
Arjen
On 2010-05-03 08:58, Arjen Markus wrote:
Hi Alan, Hez,
I will have a look at the interface for Tcl - the coordinate
transformation is a bit roundabout there, as I need a C function
to call the actual Tcl procedure for the transformation. Possibly
this is causing the empty page. My guess is the same holds for
the Python bindings.
Regards
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
> was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
> that both arguments are non-NULL - if the pltr function does not
> require any extra data to be
On 2010-05-01 23:08-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > On 2010-05-01 21:26-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> > > What is the simplest statement of the commumdrum?
> >
> > If you apply the following patch
> > [...]
> >
> > in accordance with Hez's arguments above, then plshade a
Alan W. Irwin writes:
> On 2010-05-01 21:26-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> > What is the simplest statement of the commumdrum?
>
> If you apply the following patch
> [...]
>
> in accordance with Hez's arguments above, then plshade and plshades quit
> working (blank results or one giant t
On 2010-05-01 21:26-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> >
> > > Alan,
> > >
> > > Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
> > > was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
Alan W. Irwin writes:
> On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>
> > Alan,
> >
> > Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
> > was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
> > that both arguments are non-NULL - if the pltr funct
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
> was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
> that both arguments are non-NULL - if the pltr function does not
> require any extra data to be
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Alan W. Irwin
wrote:
> On 2010-04-29 14:46-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2010-04-29 14:22-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>>> python
>>> Missing examples :
>>> Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 19 21
>>> Missing stdout :
>>> D
On 2010-04-29 14:46-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-04-29 14:22-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> python
>> Missing examples:
>> Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 19 21
>> Missing stdout :
>> Differing stdout:
>> tcl
>> Missing examples
On 2010-04-29 16:12-0700 Jerry wrote:
> Alan, thanks for this info. Is it possible to briefly summarize the
> changes that have been made to the C examples and API? I know I can
> figure this out from slogging through SVN but it would be helpful to
> have a guide as to what has changed recently. O
Alan, thanks for this info. Is it possible to briefly summarize the
changes that have been made to the C examples and API? I know I can
figure this out from slogging through SVN but it would be helpful to
have a guide as to what has changed recently. Or has this progress
already been record
On 2010-04-29 14:22-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> python
> Missing examples:
> Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 19 21
> Missing stdout :
> Differing stdout:
> tcl
> Missing examples:
> Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 16 19 2
Here is the current status of our standard examples (from "make
test_noninteractive") for all our languages.
c++
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 06 07 19
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout:
f77
Missing examples:
Di
24 matches
Mail list logo
