At 11:19 PM 1/21/1999 -0500, you wrote:
There's a *really* good question: what's the difference between Retro and
Timeless?
-- Mike Woods
Retro is a fad that eventually fades...then fads.then fades
Timeless.just keeps on...well, you know...has to do with a pink rabbit g
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rik Collins
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 1999 10:12 AM
To: passenger side
Subject: Re: Americana discussion
I remember when I had my first beer.
rik
If you can remember the first one you haven't
Hey there,
alt.country poster boy JW
Sure, there's a f*cking review on the f*cking Twangzine if you
people would ever bother to read the f*cking thing. g
I cant get at it with 'NetNanny' in the way.
Later...
CK
___
You don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rik makes a couple of points that really bug me: It's all relative and
transitional at best because in 5-10 years these tunes we listen to now
will be gathering dust in some used CD section of your local Media Play.
Please tell me why this is a good thing. Rik,
Geez, if you don't listen to any country music from 10 or 15 years ago,
you're missing George Strait, Ricky Skaggs, Merle Haggard, Don Williams,
Ricky Van Shelton, Conway Twitty, the Judds, John Anderson, Keith Whitley,
Clint Black, Patty Loveless, Randy Travis, and a whole lot more.
As far as
But how do you know that what sounds good today *is* gonna sound good ten
years from now? Does this mean you sidestep everything that includes any sort
of trendy touches, be they in instrumentation or production value? That would
be a bummer. That, to me, eliminates some really great music.
On 21 Jan 99 at 21:39, Budrocket wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 21:39:40 -0500
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Budrocket [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"passenger side" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Americana discussion
X-To: postcard2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Jan 99 at 20:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 20:16:30 EST
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"passenger side" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Americana discussion
But how do you know that what s
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Neal Weiss [I think] wrote:
I'm curious to know what you think about retro acts like Wayne Hancock and the
Derailers. Do you like 'em? Would you call them timeless?
There's a *really* good question: what's the difference between Retro and
Timeless?
-- Mike Woods
rik writes:
Just had the chance to hear
Cisco at the music store I work at and distinctly Bakersfield influenced.
I heard Buck Owens riffs and a general Bakersfield feel(if thats possible)
and would recommend it to anyone who likes that aspect of "Americana"
I have to second the Cisco CD which I
Rik makes a couple of points that really bug me: It's all relative and
transitional at best because in 5-10 years these tunes we listen to now
will be gathering dust in some used CD section of your local Media Play.
Please tell me why this is a good thing. Rik, have you listened to country
Rik wrote:
Also, if you haven't gotten around to picking up the VA-Blastered
tribute CD by all means do so. Personally hadn't heard of several
of the artists on the CD but the thrill of discovering new artists like
The Grandsons,Last Train Home, Highway 13 is the reason why
"Americana" is so
At 03:50 PM 1/20/99 -0500, you wrote:
Is it really necessary to toss around all the expletives in
these discussions.
No, it's not really necessary, but we all have our little faults. Yates is
a folkie, Cantwell is a midget, Weisberger loves Garth, and I cuss. But I
guess I did go overboard this
At 11:20 PM 1/20/99 EST, you wrote:
Rik wrote:
Also, if you haven't gotten around to picking up the VA-Blastered
tribute CD by all means do so. Personally hadn't heard of several
of the artists on the CD but the thrill of discovering new artists like
The Grandsons,Last Train Home, Highway 13
15 matches
Mail list logo