We've been having an intermittent problem with mail originating from a
specific domain, which may or may not be related to a specific host or
message type. It seems that the sending host is timing out before it
finishes the message transmission. I enabled debug logging (and bumped
up the smtp timeo
2009/5/20 Just E. Mail :
>
>> mouss wrote:
>>
>> you can find postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql.i386.rpm on
>>
>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.3/centosplus/i386/RPMS/
>>
>> although it is old. the easiest way to install it is by using "rpm -i"
>> (to avoid any network problem, download it
tom lee:
> > >
> >>
> >> I need to write a script to scan the queue to be alerted before the
> >> mails start to bounce back.
> >
> > That is what "delay_warning_time" is for.
>
>
> Thanks. for my case, my postfix server is the relay server. once the
> relay server cannot connect to the relayhost
>>
>> I need to write a script to scan the queue to be alerted before the
>> mails start to bounce back.
>
> That is what "delay_warning_time" is for.
delay_warning_time will let the sender get the email about the status
of mail in the queue.
what I want to do is to avoid to notify the sender but
> >
>>
>> I need to write a script to scan the queue to be alerted before the
>> mails start to bounce back.
>
> That is what "delay_warning_time" is for.
Thanks. for my case, my postfix server is the relay server. once the
relay server cannot connect to the relayhost listed in relay server
main.
ice. The defect was introduced with Postfix 2.3, but
it could not cause corruption before the change dated 20090427.
You can find Postfix version 2.6.1 at the mirrors listed at
http://www.postfix.org/
The same code is also available as Postfix snapshot 2.7-20090519.
Postfix versions 2.5 and earl
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Just E. Mail
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 May 2009 10:10 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix with PostgreSQL
>
> In my first post, I mentioned that I plan
mouss wrote:
you can find postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql.i386.rpm on
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.3/centosplus/i386/RPMS/
although it is old. the easiest way to install it is by using "rpm -i"
(to avoid any network problem, download it first and install it from disk).
After go
tom lee:
> >
> >> Is there a better way or command to find out queued mails more than 2
> >> days old instead of using find to search /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
> >
> > Can you describe the problem, instead of the solution (locate
> > file older than N days)?
> >
>
> I need to write a script to
Carlos Williams wrote, at 05/19/2009 02:04 PM:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Just E. Mail
> wrote:
>> Thank you all.
>>
>> I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
>
> It's really eacy to install. Main thing is making sure you have PHP
> 5.2+ installed on Apache and also configu
>
>> Is there a better way or command to find out queued mails more than 2
>> days old instead of using find to search /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
>
> Can you describe the problem, instead of the solution (locate
> file older than N days)?
>
I need to write a script to scan the queue to be alerte
tom lee:
> Hello,
> I want to find out if there is a mail in the queue for two days using
> "find" command.
> However, creation time for the mails under /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
> is always about 40 minutes ahead of my local time, I also noticed
> that the time stamp for the mails in the qu
> I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am likely
> to respond more if there are people who show an interest in these rpms
> I build.
I too am interested and would like to try it. I have never used
anything beyond the vendor supplied version of Postfix but am tired of
waitin
Hello,
I want to find out if there is a mail in the queue for two days using
"find" command.
However, creation time for the mails under /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
is always about 40 minutes ahead of my local time, I also noticed
that the time stamp for the mails in the queue changes and alway
On May 19, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mark Edwards :
I would like to issue a custom message for 550 5.1.1 errors, on a
per-
user basis. In other words, instead of the generic
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
that goes out now, I want the
* Mark Edwards :
> I would like to issue a custom message for 550 5.1.1 errors, on a per-
> user basis. In other words, instead of the generic
>
>> Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
>
>
> that goes out now, I want the ability to override that with a message
> say
I would like to issue a custom message for 550 5.1.1 errors, on a per-
user basis. In other words, instead of the generic
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
that goes out now, I want the ability to override that with a message
saying something like:
is n
David Favro a écrit :
> Friends,
>
> What would be valuable (or at least interesting) to me is to treat the RDNS
> lookup (peer address->name and subsequent name->address) as a part of
> smtpd_client_restrictions, or in some way delay it until that time.
> [snip]
The lookup result is used in th
Dr.Pesko a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> can postfix automatically create delivery notification info for every
> sent message and store it in another mailbox? Thanks.
>
it's unclear what you mean by "delivery notification". if it's DSN, then
the client needs to request it.
but you probably want
Am 12.5.2009 15:17 Uhr, Wietse Venema schrieb:
> Postfix stable release 2.6.0 is available. After Postfix was declared
> "complete" with version 2.3, the focus has moved towards improving
> the code/documentation, and updating it for changing environments.
I've updated the Solaris packages to 2.6
Scott Haneda a écrit :
> On May 18, 2009, at 8:08 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 17-May-2009, at 19:44, Carlos Williams wrote:
>>> u...@mail.myserver.com
>>
>> myserver.com is a real domain name. Is it YOUR domain name? Somehow I
>> doubt it.
>
> Thank you for pointing this out. I feel bad for anyo
Robert Lopez:
> This is one of a few problem areas in main.cf I have found. They all seem to
> involve at lease the syntax of parameter assignment. The following is from
> working email gateways running postfix 2.2.10.
>
> The "value" of the assignment consists of tokens separated by commas and by
This is one of a few problem areas in main.cf I have found. They all seem to
involve at lease the syntax of parameter assignment. The following is from
working email gateways running postfix 2.2.10.
The "value" of the assignment consists of tokens separated by commas and by
comma followed by newli
Hello everyone,
can postfix automatically create delivery notification info for every
sent message and store it in another mailbox? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Dr.Pesko
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 05:21:54PM +0200, Julius Thijssen wrote:
> Hmm.. the reason I wanted to do this is precisely because it already caused
> harm
> by upsetting silly users that worried they were doing something wrong in the
> way their clients were configged. Explaining that it does no harm
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Just E. Mail wrote:
> Thank you all.
>
> I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
It's really eacy to install. Main thing is making sure you have PHP
5.2+ installed on Apache and also configuring your MySQL database
which is super easy if you follow th
David Favro:
> Friends,
>
> What would be valuable (or at least interesting) to me is to treat the RDNS
> lookup (peer address->name and subsequent name->address) as a part of
> smtpd_client_restrictions, or in some way delay it until that time.
> Currently,
> it seems that both of the above loo
Security Admin (NetSec):
> I have a network device that I am trying to have logs sent to my
> mail server via my postfix mail gateway. When trying to send a
> test e-mail I get the following error in my maillog file:
>
> postfix/smtpd[17063]: warning: Illegal address syntax from
> device.domain.c
post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 11:40 AM 5/19/2009, Noel Jones wrote:
Add an entry to /etc/postfix/relay_recipients:
@the.backed-up.domain.tld x
Technically correct, but unwise.
You must validate recipients for the backed-up domain.
why "must"?
Won't the mail just be forwarded to the primary m
Thank you all.
I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
I have a network device that I am trying to have logs sent to my mail
server via my postfix mail gateway. When trying to send a test e-mail I
get the following error in my maillog file:
/postfix/smtpd[17063]: warning: Illegal address syntax from
device.domai
I have a network device that I am trying to have logs sent to my mail server
via my postfix mail gateway. When trying to send a test e-mail I get the
following error in my maillog file:
postfix/smtpd[17063]: warning: Illegal address syntax from
device.domain.com[xxx.yyy.zzz.9] in MAIL command:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, wrote:
> At 11:40 AM 5/19/2009, Noel Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Add an entry to /etc/postfix/relay_recipients:
>>> @the.backed-up.domain.tld x
>>
>> Technically correct, but unwise.
>> You must validate recipients for the backed-up domain.
>
> why "must"?
>
> Won't the
At 11:40 AM 5/19/2009, Noel Jones wrote:
Add an entry to /etc/postfix/relay_recipients:
@the.backed-up.domain.tld x
Technically correct, but unwise.
You must validate recipients for the backed-up domain.
why "must"?
Won't the mail just be forwarded to the primary mail server, who can
reject
Friends,
What would be valuable (or at least interesting) to me is to treat the RDNS
lookup (peer address->name and subsequent name->address) as a part of
smtpd_client_restrictions, or in some way delay it until that time. Currently,
it seems that both of the above lookups take place before any
s
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Just E. Mail
> wrote:
>
>> I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
>> webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been asked
>> and answered several times but since LINUX is changing
post...@corwyn.net wrote:
I have a postfix mail server (postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql)
hosting 20-30 virtual domains on mysql.
Now I find myself with the need to make that server also the secondary
MX for another specific domain that I was for all users.
If I understand the steps c
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Just E. Mail wrote:
> I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
> webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been asked
> and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I am asking
> again.
>
> Sy
Just E. Mail wrote:
> I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
> webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been
> asked and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I
> am asking again.
>
> System: CentOS 5.3, NSF-1.3.23, Post
I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been
asked and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I
am asking again.
System: CentOS 5.3, NSF-1.3.23, PostgreSQL-8.3.7, Postfix-2.3.3,
[Reply-To set, as this is only peripheral to Postfix]
Just E. Mail wrote, On 5/10/09 11:17 AM:
This question is going to be difficult for many to answer, but please
help.
I am trying to setup a Master/Client server setup to run Postfix. The
MASTER server has Postfix & PostgreSQL Client install
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 17:36, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 09:42:08AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > IF /^Received: .*by mail.my.domain/
> > IF /no client certificate/
> > /(.*)\(No client certificate requested\)(.*)/
> > REPLACE $1 $2
> > ENDIF
> > ENDIF
>
> This will leave
On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
> Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix?
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
?
--
Best regards,
Charles
I have a postfix mail server (postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql)
hosting 20-30 virtual domains on mysql.
Now I find myself with the need to make that server also the
secondary MX for another specific domain that I was for all users.
If I understand the steps correctly (from
http://www.
Zitat von Andreas Schuldei :
* Julio Cesar Covolato (ju...@psi.com.br) [090514 07:26]:
Hi!
I made a litle shell script to stoping bootnets and zombis, and I want
know what you think about it.
The purpose is drop via iptables hosts that are rejected several
times in a litle space of time,
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Steve wrote:
lookups from Postfix. I can't see why nothing else does this, just
postfix and PTR.
Sendmail also does this (and likely Exim and others), unless IIRC, the
range was included in access AND class R, this likely wont work with
Postfix's methods since Sendmail's
* punit jain :
> Hi ,
>
> I have a setup with postfix integrated with spamassassin and amavis. I
> have a configuration with all spam tagged mails redirected to a spam
> id. For a user i have a problem with mails not being recieved in inbox
> though postfix logs say its delivered.
How do you chec
Hi ,
I have a setup with postfix integrated with spamassassin and amavis. I have
a configuration with all spam tagged mails redirected to a spam id. For a
user i have a problem with mails not being recieved in inbox though postfix
logs say its delivered. I checked out time stamp with client system
Steve:
> DNS for local queries. It's wierd that it only happens with reverse
> lookups from Postfix. I can't see why nothing else does this, just
> postfix and PTR.
You have turned on the "chroot" feature for smtpd in master.cf,
but you have not provided the proper name service files in the
/var/s
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:32 +0200, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Steve wrote:
> > I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
> > has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
> > it really s
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:52 +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:51:57AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> >
> > I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
> > has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
>
> Thanks for the laugh. I wonder
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 06:41 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
> > Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix? There is a lot of
> > 'half' documentation Ralf and plenty of 'assumed that you know'. It the
> > documentation was soo
Steve:
> I've recently noticed that my Postfix is being a naughty bunny. It is
> attempting to query my ISP nameserver to reverse resolve LAN addresses
> defined in my_networks.
There are many errors in that statement.
1) Postfix does not send DNS queries to your ISP, or to anyone else.
2) The c
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:51:57AM +0100, Steve wrote:
>
> I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
> has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
Thanks for the laugh. I wonder what you call not having a local caching
nameserver then? You
> I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am likely
> to respond more if there are people who show an interest in these rpms
> I build.
+1 for me as well, Simon. I appreciate your work and have used your RPMs
for years to keep my mail servers and filters up to date.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Steve
wrote:
>>
> Can you fix your client to post ONLIST please, and not direct to user.
>From the headers of your email:
Reply-to: steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk
So either the list software is broken, or yours is (I suspect the
former). It's not the fault o
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 06:41 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
> > Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix? There is a lot of
> > 'half' documentation Ralf and plenty of 'assumed that you know'. It the
> > documentation was soo
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 10:49, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> smtpd_peername_lookup = yes
>> I meant: smtpd_peername_lookup = no - of course.
>
> smtpd_peername_excemptions_maps missing so ?
>
Its way.
Steve,
Its not possible disable PTR look
On Tue, May 19, 2009 10:49, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> smtpd_peername_lookup = yes
> I meant: smtpd_peername_lookup = no - of course.
smtpd_peername_excemptions_maps missing so ?
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
> Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix? There is a lot of
> 'half' documentation Ralf and plenty of 'assumed that you know'. It the
> documentation was s great I would not have had to ask on a list for
> something ra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Steve wrote:
> I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
> has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
> it really should be more configurable than on or off. There needs to be
> a way to ma
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 11:15 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Steve :
> > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > > smtpd_peername_lookup = no
> >
> > Any idea what it defaults to Ralf?
>
> postconf -d smtpd_peername_lookup
>
No good. Stops all PTR lookups. Never mind.
I
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 20:38:54 PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am
> > likely to respond more if there are people who show an interest in
> > these rpms I build.
>
> +1 for me, thanks if you find the time!
"2.7 snapshot rpms for C
* Steve :
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > smtpd_peername_lookup = no
>
> Any idea what it defaults to Ralf?
postconf -d smtpd_peername_lookup
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.computerbesch
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> smtpd_peername_lookup = no
Any idea what it defaults to Ralf?
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > Indeed, Postfix does *not* perform DNS queries. However, it asks the
> > question in the first instance that results in the lookup. This is just
> > a case of arguing semantics. It is close to buggy behaviour IMHO. If it
> > produces unintended results = bug.
>
> smtpd_pe
* Steve :
> Indeed, Postfix does *not* perform DNS queries. However, it asks the
> question in the first instance that results in the lookup. This is just
> a case of arguing semantics. It is close to buggy behaviour IMHO. If it
> produces unintended results = bug.
smtpd_peername_lookup = yes
--
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:43 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Steve :
>
> > > Where is this behaviour documented?
>
> > Good question. If it is not surely it would make a sensible feature
> > request? Clearly as an expert on Postfix perhaps you can tell *ME* how
> > to get Postfix to stop attemp
* Steve :
> > Where is this behaviour documented?
> Good question. If it is not surely it would make a sensible feature
> request? Clearly as an expert on Postfix perhaps you can tell *ME* how
> to get Postfix to stop attempting rubbish DNS lookups rather than try
> and start an argument with me?
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:39 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Steve :
>
> > I disagree. It looks like Postfix is broken. Whilst I can see the desire
> > to look up private IP ranges to see if they have a PTR record, it would
> > not be unreasonable to expect it not to do it for trusted clients -
* Steve :
> I disagree. It looks like Postfix is broken. Whilst I can see the desire
> to look up private IP ranges to see if they have a PTR record, it would
> not be unreasonable to expect it not to do it for trusted clients - such
> as those defined in 'my_networks'.
Where is this behaviour do
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:28 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Steve :
> > Hello 'list';
> > This is my first time out in 'list' land so please don't flame me if I
> > get the format wrong. Coaching and constructive criticism is fine ;-)
> > {usenet group seems to be almost dead ?}
> >
> > I've re
* Steve :
> Hello 'list';
> This is my first time out in 'list' land so please don't flame me if I
> get the format wrong. Coaching and constructive criticism is fine ;-)
> {usenet group seems to be almost dead ?}
>
> I've recently noticed that my Postfix is being a naughty bunny. It is
> attempti
Hello 'list';
This is my first time out in 'list' land so please don't flame me if I
get the format wrong. Coaching and constructive criticism is fine ;-)
{usenet group seems to be almost dead ?}
I've recently noticed that my Postfix is being a naughty bunny. It is
attempting to query my ISP names
74 matches
Mail list logo
