* Stan Hoeppner :
> Does postscreen run one process per connection, allowing balanced
> scheduling across cpus/cores, or is it just one process handling all
> connections? If only one process, do you see possible benefit to
> pinning its affinity to a single cpu/core in a high traffic
> multi-cpu
Hi,
postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
2.6.9-42.ELsmp
postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
d
Nick Lunt put forth on 10/9/2009 3:03 AM:
> postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7
>
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
>
> 2.6.9-42.ELsmp
Sorry, I don't have your answer. I'm sure someone else will get you
going. However, may I humbly suggest you consider upgrading? The
version o
Hi,
I'm trying to run mailq command from a user account that is jailed. I'm getting
this permission error:
u...@host:~$ mailq
postqueue: fatal: Connect to the Postfix showq service: Permission denied
I've mounted /var/spool/postfix directory on /home/chrooted/var/spool/postfix
and i'm gettin
Manuel Mely:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to run mailq command from a user account that is jailed. I'm ge
>-tting this permission error:
>
> u...@host:~$ mailq
> postqueue: fatal: Connect to the Postfix showq service: Permission denied
>
> I've mounted /var/spool/postfix directory on /home/chrooted/var/
:)
Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
The sleep time grows cpu time consume and established connections.
Enforce no sleep time and a very low hard limit (to drop connection)
has better performace.
How an almost halt process, doing nothing could possibly consume any
relevant CPU time or bandwidth?
Rene Bartsch wrote:
>> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm running the combination of Postfix, Postfix-GLD (Greylisting) and
>>> DBMail(MDA) as a
>>>
> stand-alone
>
>>> Internet host on a Ubuntu-9.04 system. The file 'sql-recipients.cf'
>>> provides the MySQL access
>>>
All,
We have an application server to generate mail and use postfix as relay mail
server for outgoing mail. We ran the test and postfix did catch the error.
However, it didn't report back to application server.
We used sendmail as relay mail server and it did report back to application
server.
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>
>>> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
I'm running the combination of Postfix, Postfix-GLD (Greylisting) and
DBMail(MDA) as a
>> stand-alone
>>
>>
Internet host on a Ubuntu-9
* Mark Johnson :
> All,
> We have an application server to generate mail and use postfix as relay
> mail server for outgoing mail. We ran the test and postfix did catch
> the error
> However, it didn't report back to application server.
Please show complete logs for 47E79249AA4 and 5813B249AA6
>
On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Mark Johnson wrote:
All,
We have an application server to generate mail and use postfix as
relay mail server for outgoing mail. We ran the test and postfix did
catch the error. However, it didn't report back to application server.
We used sendmail as relay mail
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > Oct 9 10:17:34 smtpmailer postfix/smtp[27126]: 47E79249AA4:
> > to=, relay=none, delay=20, delays=0.07/0/20/0,
> > dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service
> > error for name=varsitygold.com type=MX: Host not found, try again)
This is a TEMP
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
wrote:
> Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>>
>> The sleep time grows cpu time consume and established connections.
>> Enforce no sleep time and a very low hard limit (to drop connection)
>> has better performace.
>>
>
> How an almost halt process
Mark Johnson wrote:
> All,
> We have an application server to generate mail and use postfix as relay mail
> server for outgoing mail. We ran the test and postfix did catch the error.
> However, it didn't report back to application server.
> We used sendmail as relay mail server and it did report
On 10/8/2009 10:17 AM, Duncan B. wrote:
Are you able to point towards some docs as to how I can achieve what I
need, to search for existence of a particular header
Thanks
Duncan
Requiring some specific coded header in postfix is not
possible without some external content filter or milter.
Wietse Venema wrote:
Note, I am primarily interested in keeping the bots away from the
real SMTP server. Unlike spamd and other solutions, I am not so
much interested in keeping botnets busy. People who want to do that
can install spamd. It works with pretty much every MTA.
Point taken.
Yo
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 05:42:34AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Nick Lunt put forth on 10/9/2009 3:03 AM:
>
> > postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7
> >
> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
> >
> > 2.6.9-42.ELsmp
>
> Sorry, I don't have your answer. I'm sure someone else will ge
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:32:53PM -0500, Davy Leon wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> When running postfix on a dialup machine you must
> disable spontaneous SMTP mail delivery, but documentacion
> http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#dialup say
> only if using on-demand dialup.
To pr
thanks Viktor
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Dialup not on-demand
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:32:53PM -0500, Davy Leon wrote:
Hi folks
When running postfix on a dialup machine you must
disable spontaneous SMTP
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>>
Rene Bartsch wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm running the combination of Postfix, Postfix-GLD (Greylisting) and
> DBMail(MDA) as a
>
>
>>> stand-alone
>>>
>>>
> Internet host on a Ubuntu-9.04 system. The file 's
Rene Bartsch wrote:
>> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>
>>> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm running the combination of Postfix, Postfix-GLD (Greylisting) and
>> DBMail(MDA) as a
>>
>>
>>
> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>>> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>>
Rene Bartsch wrote:
>> Rene Bartsch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm running the combination of Postfix, Postfix-GLD (Greylisting) and
>>> DBMail(MDA) as a
>>>
>>>
>>>
> stand-
I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver.
Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good
and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ?
--
Eero
google provide many documentation
for differents shemas for mysql table
nb : 'google est ton ami'
Le vendredi 9 octobre 2009 20:42, Rene Bartsch a écrit :
> > Rene Bartsch wrote:
> >>> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Rene Bartsch wrote:
> >> Rene Bartsch wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >
Rene Bartsch:
> > I hope you are not trying to list all domains with every query.
> > For virtual_(alias|mailbox)_domains or mydestination using a mysql map,
> > Postfix expect to give a domain to a query .
> > If *any* result is returned, the return value is ignored and the lookup
> > is considere
Eero Volotinen:
> I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver.
>
> Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good
> and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ?
You can use Postfix 2.3 until one of the following happens:
1) You need some
subject: newbie config smtp-cli & postfix
date: Oct 9/2009
I want to mail from Linux logged in user accounts to the internet
and more importantly from Korn shell scripts to the internet.
so scripts running by cron could email error situations to people at home.
I do not want to receive any email
> Rene Bartsch:
>> > I hope you are not trying to list all domains with every query. For
virtual_(alias|mailbox)_domains or mydestination using a mysql map, Postfix
expect to give a
domain to a query .
>> > If *any* result is returned, the return value is ignored and the lookup is
>> > considered
Owen Townsend wrote:
[...]
Oct 9 12:42:05 uvsoft4 postfix/smtp[10496]: ECF0546964:
to=, relay=smtp.webfaction.com[74.55.86.74]:587,
delay=0.62, delays=0.07/0.01/0.4/0.14, dsn=5.7.1,
status=bounced (host smtp.webfaction.com[74.55.86.74] said: 554 5.7.1
<65-38-39-25.dhcp465.dsl.ucc-net.ca[65.38.
Rene Bartsch:
> Sorry, I had the approach according to the DBMail-Setup-Wiki
> running for years, but after changing
> machine and distro I didn't got it working again. So I didn't
> consider the MySQL-queries but some
> kind of configuration error. Maybe you could add an example to
> the docs for
Bjørn Ruberg put forth on 10/9/2009 4:44 PM:
> Owen Townsend wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Oct 9 12:42:05 uvsoft4 postfix/smtp[10496]: ECF0546964:
>> to=, relay=smtp.webfaction.com[74.55.86.74]:587,
>> delay=0.62, delays=0.07/0.01/0.4/0.14, dsn=5.7.1,
>> status=bounced (host smtp.webfaction.com[74.55.86
Owen Townsend put forth on 10/9/2009 4:14 PM:
> Note - somebody on postfix user list said I might need SASL library
> - BUT I can't find a recent rpm for my RHEL 5 x86_64 ?
> I found cyrus-sasl-2.1.1.19-14.x86_64.rpm but hesitant to try it ?
>
> Hope you can help me with this problem
Dangit, I'm
Hi,
I have a postfix mail server that successfully delivers thousands of
messages per day, primarily to the same smarthost connected to it.
However, I have a number of messages that are stuck in the queue with
timeout errors:
said: 421 smtp01.example.com Error: timeout exceeded (in reply to end
MySQL Student:
> Hi,
>
> I have a postfix mail server that successfully delivers thousands of
> messages per day, primarily to the same smarthost connected to it.
> However, I have a number of messages that are stuck in the queue with
> timeout errors:
>
> said: 421 smtp01.example.com Error: tim
Hi,
>> said: 421 smtp01.example.com Error: timeout exceeded (in reply to end
>> of DATA command))
>
> Unfortunately, you deleted lots of useful information from the
> logging, including the break-down of handshake delays and of
> transmission delays.
I wasn't sure that I should post the whole qu
Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the outgoing
mails from all the users or selective users are held in a queue, and are
released only after they are examined and approved by the administrator or a
designated person ?
--
Manish
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the
> outgoing mails from all the users or selective users are held in a
> queue, and are released only after they are examined and approved by
> the administrator or a designated person ?
2009/10/10 MySQL Student :
>> Unfortunately, you deleted lots of useful information from the
>> logging, including the break-down of handshake delays and of
>> transmission delays.
>
> I wasn't sure that I should post the whole queued message here.
The logs for a single message are usually about h
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Manish Kathuria wrote:
>
> > Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the
> > outgoing mails from all the users or selective users are held in a
> > queue, and are released only after they are exami
40 matches
Mail list logo
