Hi everybody!
I'm a new user of postfix. Now I have a problem about talking to gmail.
I work in a small company, and my computer's os is debian on which i installed
postfix. My ip address is an inner ip address and It's seems there is only one
outer ip address for my whole company. And I get
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:20:50AM +0500, rihad wrote:
One more thing, please: after myprog has done its job, how can I pass the
original message back to postfix so it does whatever should be done after
myprog is finished (like delivering the message with virtual(8))?
zch.open put forth on 10/21/2009 1:01 AM:
Hi everybody!
I'm a new user of postfix. Now I have a problem about talking to gmail.
Maybe you should start by telling us exactly what it is you want to
do/accomplish with Postfix, on Debian, inside your small company, from a
dynamic IP address.
zch.open kirjoitti:
Hi everybody!
I'm a new user of postfix. Now I have a problem about talking to gmail.
I work in a small company, and my computer's os is debian on which i installed
postfix. My ip address is an inner ip address and It's seems there is only one
outer ip address for my
Thank you for your quick reply, stan!
I think I failed to express my thought -_-!
What I'm going to accomplish is to build a mail server in my Intranet using
postfix. And I hope this mail server can talk to gmail or other e-mail server
on the Internet. So my co-workers can use my mail server.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:04:44AM +0500, rihad wrote:
in the myprog shell script, after it has done its job, how to pass
control to virtual(8)? Something like echo OK virtual? You're
talking to a postfix newbie facing too close a deadline, please bear
with me ;-)
You can't. Postfix has a
zch.open put forth on 10/21/2009 1:45 AM:
Thank you for your quick reply, stan!
I think I failed to express my thought -_-!
What I'm going to accomplish is to build a mail server in my Intranet
using postfix. And I hope this mail server can talk to gmail or other
e-mail server on the
Hi
We're recently enabled Postfix Sender Verify on our mail filtering gateway.
This has worked quite well, however Postfix keeps calling back to
mailservers using a non-fully qualified address, e.g. from=postmaster.
This then sets off spam checks on that mailserver it's calling back to,
* Postflick chris.im...@abeta.co.uk:
Hi
We're recently enabled Postfix Sender Verify on our mail filtering gateway.
This has worked quite well, however Postfix keeps calling back to
mailservers using a non-fully qualified address, e.g. from=postmaster.
Because you configured it that
Hi Ralf
Where would these parameters be configured.
I have not told it to use postmaster, however, using postconf, it does
return that as the address;
u...@spam {uk} [11:56:26] /etc/postfix: postconf -d address_verify_sender
address_verify_sender = postmaster
I can't see any entries within
* Postflick chris.im...@abeta.co.uk:
Hi Ralf
Where would these parameters be configured.
It'Äs hard to tell, it depends on other settings!
I have not told it to use postmaster, however, using postconf, it does
return that as the address;
u...@spam {uk} [11:56:26] /etc/postfix:
Hi Ralf
Here's the output from 'postconf -n', we have the Sender Verify disabled
currently while we get the address_verify_sender configured.
address_verify_map = btree:/etc/postfix/verified_senders
address_verify_negative_cache = no
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps =
* Chris Imrie chris.im...@abeta.co.uk:
Hi Ralf
Here's the output from 'postconf -n', we have the Sender Verify disabled
currently while we get the address_verify_sender configured.
address_verify_map = btree:/etc/postfix/verified_senders
address_verify_negative_cache = no
alias_database
Hi Ralf
Your help is much appreciated, I have modified the local_recipient_maps, and
have modified the mydestination to omit the $mydomain as that was an error on
my part.
The implementation of;
Address_verify_sender = postmas...@domain.co.uk
Has worked correctly, and we're now verifying
Alberto Lepe:
host mail.server_old.com[101.101.101.101] said: 554 5.0.0 rewrite:
excessive recursion (max 50), ruleset canonify
That is not a POSTFIX error message.
Wietse
Russell Jones:
I have Postfix 2.3.3 installed, and am using standard file system quotas
for users. Whenever a user receives a message and the message cannot be
delivered to them due to being over quota, the following bounce messages
is sent back:
russell-example@server2.example.com
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is the right thing , but
we for now I want to accept the null HELO
how do I do this ? I already have
* ram r...@netcore.co.in:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is the right thing , but
we for now I want to accept the null HELO
how do I
On 10/21/2009 7:44 AM, ram wrote:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is the right thing , but
we for now I want to accept the null HELO
how do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 21/10/09 15:07, Wietse Venema wrote:
1) A baseball bat, and a strong WHACK over the idiot's head.
I like te concept. Would you consider stop working on SBTP[1] and do
SBBBWTP[2]? ;)
2) Changes to Postfix source code so that it accepts bad
Hello everyone,
these days you can read dozens of articles that implitely claim that
the following code will produce more than one mail message at a time
if used by a malicous user.
I doubt that it is true, but I'd like to ask here, because you know
your mta better than I. The c code to access
On Oct 20, 2009, at 11:52 PM, Russell Jones rjo...@eggycrew.com wrote:
Aw. That deserves a sad face :-( .
I was hoping, since you can edit bounce.cf to say what you would
like, you could also edit the actual system error message.
Well that is what Postfix is doing: simply acting as a
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:04:44AM +0500, rihad wrote:
in the myprog shell script, after it has done its job, how to pass
control to virtual(8)? Something like echo OK virtual? You're
talking to a postfix newbie facing too close a deadline, please bear
with me ;-)
You
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:52:21PM +0500, rihad wrote:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
In your case (SMS notifications) however, I would keep things simple
and not try to integrate it so tightly into the delivery process, but
just fork your incoming mails to two transports: virtual for actual
delivery
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:52:21PM +0500, rihad wrote:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
In your case (SMS notifications) however, I would keep things simple
and not try to integrate it so tightly into the delivery process, but
just fork your incoming mails to two transports:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Martin Schiøtz mali...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I do any outgoing spam checks with postfix or I'm forced to
install lots of Amavis, spamassassin, etc. software to do that job.
I'm sorry to tell you that blocking outbound spam is at least harder
than blocking
Wietse Venema schrieb:
Oliver Block:
Hello everyone,
these days you can read dozens of articles that implitely claim that
the following code will produce more than one mail message at a time
if used by a malicous user.
I doubt that it is true, but I'd like to ask here, because you know
Oliver Block:
Wietse Venema schrieb:
Oliver Block:
Hello everyone,
these days you can read dozens of articles that implitely claim that
the following code will produce more than one mail message at a time
if used by a malicous user.
I doubt that it is true, but I'd like to
Wietse Venema schrieb:
That depends on how the Postfix sendmail command is invoked,
and you failed to supply that information.
If invoked as sendmail -bs, then the . SEPARATES messages as
defined in the SMTP protocol.
If invoked as sendmail -i, then the . becomes part of the message.
sense? Is it possible?
Zack
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4529 (20091021) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
On 10/21/2009 10:20 AM, Zachary Burns wrote:
I've received a strange request from management and I'm determined to make
it workI'm obviously running Postfix (along with ISPConfig to help
manage it with virtual domains on Ubuntu Linux), here's what they'd like to
do.
1.) Keep existing
On 10/21/2009, Chris Imrie (chris.im...@abeta.co.uk) wrote:
Has worked correctly, and we're now verifying emails as they come in.
Hopefully you aren't doing this for all mail?
If so, you will very likely end up being on different blacklists for
abusing other people's servers, especially if yuou
OK, now more. Apparently there is a problem with one of my users who is
constantly being spammed by a specific remote sender. The remote senders email
is always the same and somehow gets bounced for days in between my postfix
server and my exchange bridgehead. What can I do to just delete
Hi Charles
It checks to verify the sender once, then caches the result in a database, so
mail servers aren't hassled more than once per email address verification.
Regards
Chris
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On
On 10/21/2009, Chris Imrie (chris.im...@abeta.co.uk) wrote:
It checks to verify the sender once, then caches the result in a
database, so mail servers aren't hassled more than once per email
address verification.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think this could still get you blacklisted...
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 10/21/2009, Chris Imrie (chris.im...@abeta.co.uk) wrote:
It checks to verify the sender once, then caches the result in a
database, so mail servers aren't hassled more than once per email
address verification.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think this could still get you
* Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk:
I agree. Sender verification has its uses, but it is *not* suitable
for use as an anti-spam tool on inbound email. At least one major
webmail provider is known to blacklist hosts that employ it
excessively.
So use it selectively only.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
OK, now more. Apparently there is a problem with one of my users who
is constantly being spammed by a specific remote sender. The remote
senders email is always the same and somehow gets bounced for days in
between my postfix server and my exchange bridgehead. What can I do to
just
But this checks the recipient, not the sender.
Good catch. I didn't scroll down far enough in my main.cf. For some reason
I'm using the same access file for both. I need to fix that.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/custom/access,
permit_mynetworks,
* Gary Smith gary.sm...@holdstead.com:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
hash:/etc/postfix/custom/access,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client rhsbl.ahbl.org,
We suspect a few things. It seems to be resolved now. Concurrency
rates were greatly increased during the last test.
1) Postfix 2.6 allows for a higher per process limit. The OS ulimit
by default, may not necessarily support this. The postfix processes
were running out of file descriptors.
On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:50 AM, wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
OK, now more. Apparently there is a problem with one of my users
who is constantly being spammed by a specific remote sender. The
remote senders email is always the same and somehow gets bounced for
days in between my postfix
Hi,
I thought I understood how to block a specific domain from being able
to send mail to users on my server, but I must be doing something
wrong. In main.cf I have:
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access
among others, in
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:34:50AM -0700, Eric Vaughn wrote:
We suspect a few things. It seems to be resolved now. Concurrency
rates were greatly increased during the last test.
1) Postfix 2.6 allows for a higher per process limit. The OS ulimit
by default, may not necessarily support
hi all
i've to keep two postfix mail server; one at head office and another at
regional office;
both users will be using example.com domain; head office mail server has got
hostname/ mx/rdns etc..in the public dns; head office has got seperate
internet connection
the regional office has got
I'm running postfix as a mail gateway for my campus. I want to direct
all inbound SMTP traffic from the world through the gateway systems.
There are about 30 mail systems on campus... one large central system
which handles 99 percent of all mail and 29 small mail systems that
either exist for a
rihad wrote:
We have two maps:
virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-maps.cf
virtual_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual.cf
/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-maps.cf:
user = postfix
password = c00lpass
dbname = mail
table = users
select_field = maildir
where_field = email
I'm implementing grey listing and a few RBL's on our relays. The problem is
when our sending users get blacklisted on their email or something happens in
which they still need to email us, we would like to be able to bypass the grey
listing and possibly the RBL's.
I would like to do this for
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:27:57PM -0500, Jim Rupprecht wrote:
relay_recipient_maps = proxy:ldap:/postfix/etc/ldap_lookup.cf
Change to:
relay_recipient_maps =
proxy:ldap:/postfix/etc/ldap_lookup.cf,
hash:/etc/postfix/non-ldap-relay-recipients
In that table:
rihad:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
rihad wrote:
We have two maps:
virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-maps.cf
virtual_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual.cf
/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-maps.cf:
user = postfix
password = c00lpass
Gary Smith:
I'm implementing grey listing and a few RBL's on our relays. The
problem is when our sending users get blacklisted on their email
or something happens in which they still need to email us, we
would like to be able to bypass the grey listing and possibly the
RBL's.
I would like
/etc/postfix/main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_whitelist
...greylisting here...
And put address OK in the whitelist.
I'll give that a try. I think the problem that I
On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 at 18:49 CEST,
MySQL Student mysqlstud...@gmail.com wrote:
This syntax requires that smtpd_access_maps IS NOT listed in
parent_domain_matches_subdomains. If you stick to the default
value, drop the initial dot in .example.com to match example.com
and
On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 at 19:43 CEST,
rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
OK here's how far I've gone:
master.cf:
smsnotif unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail argv=/root/smsnotif ${recipient}
/root/smsnotif:
#!/bin/sh
echo $@
suomi a écrit :
Hi listers
maildir creation problem:
Oct 20 10:36:43 myhost postfix/virtual[10041]: warning: maildir access
problem for UID/GID=89/89: create maildir file
/data/postfix/maildrop//mydomain/anax/tmp/1256027803.P10041.myhost.mydomain.com:
Permission denied
Oct 20 10:36:43
ram a écrit :
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is the right thing , but
we for now I want to accept the null HELO
how do I do this ? I
Oliver Block a écrit :
Wietse Venema schrieb:
That depends on how the Postfix sendmail command is invoked,
and you failed to supply that information.
If invoked as sendmail -bs, then the . SEPARATES messages as
defined in the SMTP protocol.
If invoked as sendmail -i, then the . becomes
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:34:19PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
SELECT address, '%...@sms.example.com' FROM table WHERE column = '%s'
Note, this pulls '%u' from the localpart of the lookup address (%s).
If the lookup result does not always have the same localpart, and
you want the localpart of
mouss:
Oliver Block a ?crit :
Wietse Venema schrieb:
That depends on how the Postfix sendmail command is invoked,
and you failed to supply that information.
If invoked as sendmail -bs, then the . SEPARATES messages as
defined in the SMTP protocol.
If invoked as sendmail -i, then
Victor,
Thanks a lot for your reply. Let me answer your questions.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:25:20PM +0200, Roland Dirlewanger wrote:
I would like to set up TLS on our mail server the following way :
* connections to port 25 may use TLS. If TLS is used, our server should
Hi everybody!
I have installed postfix-2.5.6 system on my server and I have a question. There
is one alias, that delivers messages to local bash script via pipe:
user: |/my/script.sh
And I want to have behaviour, when script fails (for some reasons) and such
messages should be deferred, not
mouss schrieb:
the user can simply send any messages he wants with a tcp connection. so
what's the problem?
A problem arises when an antrusted user is enabled to send any message
he wants over that tcp connection. Imagine you create a cgi script that
relies on the code in my earlier
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk:
I agree. Sender verification has its uses, but it is *not* suitable
for use as an anti-spam tool on inbound email. At least one major
webmail provider is known to blacklist hosts that employ it
excessively.
So use it selectively
devel anaconda:
Hi everybody!
I have installed postfix-2.5.6 system on my server and I have a question.
There is one alias, that delivers messages to local bash script via pipe:
user: |/my/script.sh
And I want to have behaviour, when script fails (for some reasons) and such
messages
Hello,
Earlier this year I split submissions from inbound smtp.
This has yielded a great improvement in authenticating users and
allowing more aggressive smtp rejection.
However I had trouble for the first time today configuring a client
for the submission port. Mail from this client is
Hi! Somebody can tell me where postfix save the queues
bye
--
Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que
ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistema
Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar
Alejandro Esteban Galvez:
Hi! Somebody can tell me where postfix save the queues
http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, johnea wrote:
However I had trouble for the first time today configuring a client
for the submission port. Mail from this client is rejected with:
Oct 21 13:11:31 atom postfix/smtpd[8849]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
x[aa.bb.cc.dd]: 504 5.5.2 johnealaptop: Helo
On 10/21/09 17:47, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, johnea wrote:
Generally, the output of 'postconf -n' is preferred in lieu of snippets
or entire main.cf dumps.
Next time, exclude the comments. :)
Will do, thank you for those tips
What ever you decide, just make sure to use
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, johnea wrote:
OT?: I commented out the: # -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
since this wasn't a listed value for this parameter in the docs,
and I wasn't sure what that line was doing.
If you do not use milters, then you can safely ignore this.
The
21.10.09, 19:30, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
devel anaconda:
Hi everybody!
I have installed postfix-2.5.6 system on my server and I have a question.
There is one alias, that delivers messages to local bash script via pipe:
user: |/my/script.sh
And I want to have
71 matches
Mail list logo
