Hi,
yesterday i received a failure-notice;
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 i...@domain.com: Relay access denied --
this is the error-message which i received from the final recipient.
The email was send from our webserver. The webserver (postfix) sends the
email via relayhost (another external
Georg Schönweger put forth on 2/14/2011 1:59 AM:
Hi,
yesterday i received a failure-notice;
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 i...@domain.com: Relay access denied --
this is the error-message which i received from the final recipient.
The email was send from our webserver. The webserver (postfix)
you mean the failure-notice email? Ok here it is;
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtplq01.our-external-smtp.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
i...@final-recipient.com:
Is your server using authentication on the relay-host?
If not this MUST NOT work because if it would work the
relayserver coul be used from everybody out there for spam
Am 14.02.2011 08:59, schrieb Georg Schönweger:
Hi,
yesterday i received a failure-notice;
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1
Hello
I've googled around to tune a bit my mailhub ( AMD64 FreeBSD 8.1, 12 Gb
RAM, 2 Tb raid5 disks , ~4000 mailboxes unix users )
but I am a bit confused,
All my clients use thunderbird as MUA ( IMAP, IMAPS ) to connect to the
mailhub
no direct access to the machine.
Any of you guys has
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I want to replace this line:
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [62.11.11.11]) (using TLSv1 with
cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client
Am 14.02.2011 11:08, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I've googled around to tune a bit my mailhub ( AMD64 FreeBSD 8.1, 12 Gb
RAM, 2 Tb raid5 disks , ~4000 mailboxes unix users )
but I am a bit confused,
All my clients use thunderbird as MUA ( IMAP, IMAPS ) to connect to the
mailhub
no direct
On 02/14/2011 10:47 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
you mean the failure-notice email?
No, he meant logs from your mail server.
Ok here it is;
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtplq01.our-external-smtp.com.
That's not postfix.
When it comes to why your e-mail can't be delivered, the
On 2/14/2011 5:08 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I've googled around to tune a bit my mailhub ( AMD64 FreeBSD 8.1, 12
Gb RAM, 2 Tb raid5 disks , ~4000 mailboxes unix users )
but I am a bit confused,
All my clients use thunderbird as MUA ( IMAP, IMAPS ) to connect to
the mailhub
no direct
Yes the server is using authentication on the relay-host.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/smtp_auth
smtp_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
it is just only this particular
Bjørn Ruberg put forth on 2/14/2011 4:18 AM:
On 02/14/2011 10:47 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
you mean the failure-notice email?
No, he meant logs from your mail server.
Ok here it is;
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtplq01.our-external-smtp.com.
That's not postfix.
When it
On 2/14/2011 5:32 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
Yes the server is using authentication on the relay-host.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/smtp_auth
smtp_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer
Well in the server logs (our local smtp) there are only these lines; I
don't have access to the logs of our relayhost smtp.
Feb 12 19:00:40 susi1 postfix/pickup[23920]: B7B27255B449: uid=33
from=www-data
Feb 12 19:00:40 susi1 postfix/cleanup[25085]: B7B27255B449:
I know this is a few days old, but i've been away on holidays
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Andrew Beverley a...@andybev.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:25 -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
Gary Smith wrote:
As already stated, there's not a huge amount that you can do on your
own.
On 2/14/2011 6:12 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
[SNIP]
You get Relay access denied when you're contacting a RECEIVING mail
server with a message that that mailserver doesn't want to handle,
because it's not the authoritative destination for that domain.
Nothing here implies anything wrong with a
Hi,
I would like to parse my mail logs each month and report on the number
of messages which were encrypted during transmission (TLS) and the
number which were sent/received in the clear (along with domains of
course).
I can see Martin Schmitt proposing a logging enhancement which would
fit this
On 2/14/2011 6:51 AM, Stuart Kendrick wrote:
Hi,
I would like to parse my mail logs each month and report on the number
of messages which were encrypted during transmission (TLS) and the
number which were sent/received in the clear (along with domains of
course).
How do other folks solve
On 2/14/2011 4:16 AM, J4K wrote:
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I want to replace this line:
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [62.11.11.11]) (using TLSv1 with
cipher
Stuart Kendrick:
Hi,
I would like to parse my mail logs each month and report on the number
of messages which were encrypted during transmission (TLS) and the
number which were sent/received in the clear (along with domains of
course).
In the SMTP server, this could be logged as:
On 02/14/2011 02:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/14/2011 4:16 AM, J4K wrote:
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I want to replace this line:
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown
On 2/14/2011 7:29 AM, J4K wrote:
On 02/14/2011 02:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/14/2011 4:16 AM, J4K wrote:
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot
get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I want to replace this line:
Received: from
On 02/14/2011 02:41 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/14/2011 7:29 AM, J4K wrote:
On 02/14/2011 02:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/14/2011 4:16 AM, J4K wrote:
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot
get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I
Am 14.02.2011 12:28, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
On 2/14/2011 6:12 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
[SNIP]
You get Relay access denied when you're contacting a RECEIVING mail
server with a message that that mailserver doesn't want to handle,
because it's not the authoritative destination for that
On 02/14/2011 02:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/14/2011 4:16 AM, J4K wrote:
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I want to replace this line:
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown
Can postscreen be compared to SNARE?
Thank you
Hi
Pending the purchase of our domain, I have already set up an
SMTP email server running postfix this server already has a
public IP address, say aa.bb.cc.dd
Q1:
Can I test send an email to this server by sending to
a_postfix_mail...@aa.bb.cc.dd ?
Q2:
Secondly after getting the domain, how
On 2/14/2011 8:51 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
[SNIP]
[REPOSTED FROM PERSONAL REPLY]
Hello Daniel,
thank you for this clear explanation! How can i figure out if the
receving mail server is listet as current MX for the recipient mail
address? It's not a big problem for us if the recipients mail
On 2/14/2011 7:51 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
thx for your help. i can't check the DNS query on our relayhost smtp
server. On our local Server the MX is current. My conclusion is that a)
our external relayhost smtp has wrong MX entry or b) recipient
mailserver is misconfigured. I will switch off
On 02/14/2011 02:54 PM, J4K wrote:
On 02/14/2011 02:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/14/2011 4:16 AM, J4K wrote:
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I want to replace this line:
On 2/14/2011 7:54 AM, J4K wrote:
On 02/14/2011 02:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/14/2011 4:16 AM, J4K wrote:
Good Monday morning to you all,
I have a regex question for header_checks, that I cannot get to
work. Possible caused by line wrapping.
I want to replace this line:
On 2/14/2011 8:15 AM, sunhux G wrote:
Hi
Pending the purchase of our domain, I have already set up an
SMTP email server running postfix this server already has a
public IP address, say aa.bb.cc.dd
Q1:
Can I test send an email to this server by sending to
a_postfix_mail...@aa.bb.cc.dd
I am new to Postfix and am wondering something about Postfix.
Currently, all our email comes into 2 Proofpoint appliances. Email
that passes through goes straight to the Groupwise Internet Agent
(GWIA), which distributes the email where it needs to go within our
email system.
We are switching
On 2/14/2011 8:39 AM, Scott Fitzhugh wrote:
I am new to Postfix and am wondering something about Postfix.
Currently, all our email comes into 2 Proofpoint appliances. Email
that passes through goes straight to the Groupwise Internet Agent
(GWIA), which distributes the email where it needs to
On 2/14/2011 9:39 AM, Scott Fitzhugh wrote:
I am new to Postfix and am wondering something about Postfix.
Currently, all our email comes into 2 Proofpoint appliances. Email
that passes through goes straight to the Groupwise Internet Agent
(GWIA), which distributes the email where it needs to
Am 14.02.2011 15:20, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
On 2/14/2011 8:51 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
[SNIP]
[REPOSTED FROM PERSONAL REPLY]
Hello Daniel,
thank you for this clear explanation! How can i figure out if the
receving mail server is listet as current MX for the recipient mail
address?
Am 14.02.2011 15:21, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 2/14/2011 7:51 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
thx for your help. i can't check the DNS query on our relayhost smtp
server. On our local Server the MX is current. My conclusion is that a)
our external relayhost smtp has wrong MX entry or b) recipient
Thanks - I'll look into trying this out!
Scott
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org 2/14/2011 8:59 AM
On 2/14/2011 8:39 AM, Scott Fitzhugh wrote:
I am new to Postfix and am wondering something about Postfix.
Currently, all our email comes into 2 Proofpoint appliances. Email
that passes
Thanks.
But gmail doesn't allow/accept brackets (square or round brackets)
in the To: field.
Any particular email client allows this? Outlook?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 2/14/2011 8:15 AM, sunhux G wrote:
Hi
Pending the purchase of our
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:24:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
In the SMTP server, this could be logged as:
QUEUEID: client=foo.example.com, tls=whatever
That line is logged whenever the Postfix SMTP server opens a mail
delivery transaction.
I use a log parser that collates all the
On 2/14/2011 9:36 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
Am 14.02.2011 15:21, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 2/14/2011 7:51 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
thx for your help. i can't check the DNS query on our relayhost smtp
server. On our local Server the MX is current. My conclusion is that a)
our external
On 2/14/2011 10:14 AM, sunhux G wrote:
Thanks.
But gmail doesn't allow/accept brackets (square or round brackets)
in the To: field.
Any particular email client allows this? Outlook?
I didn't say to use round brackets. The form user@[a.b.c.d]
is specified in RFC's covering email.
I know
Hello,
I have different aliases configured under the same domain, say:
ali...@domain.tld ali...@domain.tld ali...@domain.tld
which forward an email to the same mailbox, say:
mail...@domain2.tld
I have tried the following experiments..
EXPERIMENT 1: mail...@domain2.tld is the mailbox
On 2/14/2011 10:56 AM, Scappatura Rocco wrote:
Hello,
I have different aliases configured under the same domain, say:
ali...@domain.tld ali...@domain.tld ali...@domain.tld
which forward an email to the same mailbox, say:
mail...@domain2.tld
I have tried the following experiments..
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 6:10 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Summarizing email
On 2/14/2011 10:56 AM, Scappatura Rocco wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Not sure if this is a bug or not, but thought I'd mention it, as I
noticed it recently when investigating an intrusion attempt (it was an
attempt to exploit this vulnerability in spamassassin-milter:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-03/0139.html)
I have root
Already fixed early 2010. You need to upgrade to Postfix 2.8 or
later. I don't know if this will be back-ported to earlier releases.
Wietse
20100422
Workaround (introduced: postfix-19990906 a.k.a. Postfix
0.8.0). The Postfix local delivery agent did not properly
Hi Guys,
Thanks for your help, and I promise to send my mail in Text format next
time.
So, for sure, I agree with you that it is not the right way to fight against
SPAM, but my configuration is based on SpamAssassin+Amavis+ClamAV with
DNSBL, DKIM implementation and SPF record to fight the
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:55:25PM +0200, JC Putter wrote:
Can postscreen be compared to SNARE?
Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?
Thou art more temperate, and more fair.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snare gives me no clue as to what you
might be asking. However, postscreen has
Le 14/02/2011 11:08, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
I've googled around to tune a bit my mailhub ( AMD64 FreeBSD 8.1, 12 Gb
RAM,
I guess you mean 12 Go (or 12 GB) ;-p
2 Tb raid5 disks , ~4000 mailboxes unix users )
but I am a bit confused,
All my clients use thunderbird as MUA ( IMAP,
Le 13/02/2011 23:30, Franck MAHE a écrit :
I did the same test on a postfix release 2.6.5, and I’ve the same behavior.
Any idea?
Franck
---
E: mailto:m...@civis.net m...@civis.net
De : Franck MAHE [mailto:m...@civis.net]
Envoyé :
Le 14/02/2011 22:22, mouss a écrit :
# MAL FORMATED EMAIL ADDRESS
/^From:.*\.@.*/ REJECT 1 - Your Email address is not compliant with
RFC, Go Away
/^From:.*.*\.\..*@.*/ REJECT 2 - Your Email address is not compliant with
RFC, Go Away
you can probably make all that simpler.
I have recently found out the beuty of restriction classes.
So to reject senders from certain sites that usually misspell their sender
address I have set up the following:
smtpd_restriction_classes = verify_client_sender
verify_client_sender = reject_unverified_sender, permit
On 2/14/2011 4:17 PM, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
I have recently found out the beuty of restriction classes.
So to reject senders from certain sites that usually misspell their sender
address I have set up the following:
smtpd_restriction_classes = verify_client_sender
verify_client_sender =
Per-Erik Persson:
But the sender(roundcube webmail) gets the errormessage 450 could not add
recipient
That is not a Postfix error message.
Wietse
Per-Erik Persson put forth on 2/14/2011 4:17 PM:
I have recently found out the beuty of restriction classes.
So to reject senders from certain sites that usually misspell their sender
address I have set up the following:
smtpd_restriction_classes = verify_client_sender
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:28:22 -0600, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:55:25PM +0200, JC Putter wrote:
Can postscreen be compared to SNARE?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snare gives me no clue as to what you
might be asking. However, postscreen has documentation:
I've recently installed Amavis-new with SpamAssassin and ClamAV on one
of my boxes running Postfix 2.6.5.
I'm now seeing this occasionally in the maillog:
Feb 14 20:42:47 carbonfiber postfix/smtp[19516]: fatal: garbage after
] in server description: [127.0.0.1] :10025
Feb 14 20:42:47 carbonfiber
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:56:07PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
I'm now seeing this occasionally in the maillog:
Feb 14 20:42:47 carbonfiber postfix/smtp[19516]: fatal: garbage after
] in server description: [127.0.0.1] :10025
You have a transport setting or FILTER action, ... that specifies
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:56:07PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
I'm now seeing this occasionally in the maillog:
Feb 14 20:42:47 carbonfiber postfix/smtp[19516]: fatal: garbage after
] in server
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:52:42 -0600, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
wrote:
Per-Erik Persson put forth on 2/14/2011 4:17 PM:
I have recently found out the beuty of restriction classes.
So to reject senders from certain sites that usually misspell their
sender
address I have set up the
60 matches
Mail list logo
