On 09/22/2010 09:57 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
(at my site) spam arrives in big slugs. when a big
slug arrives sendmail will bog down--what wouldn't?
A properly configured postfix 2.7+ with postscreen wouldn't.
AFAIK your stated problem is exactly why postscreen was developed: to
keep
On 09/23/2010 12:01 AM, Nick Edwards wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl
mailto:jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 09/22/2010 02:22 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth
On 09/21/2010 01:06 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/20/2010 6:01 PM:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:56:14AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Yes, when traffic to the destination is light (message deliveries
are spaced multiple seconds or more apart) or is very heavy
On 09/21/2010 08:56 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
closest param I've found so far are always_bcc friends, but these
lose some information (at least the BCC field).
On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients?
You can't.
Of course you can.
That's what
On 09/21/2010 09:12 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:07 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails
On 09/21/2010 09:18 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
they haven't started shouting yet, but i sense it's coming.
i just swapped postfix in for sendmail on a mail server.
Congratulations , you've arrived on the right side of sanity :)
are there any metrics i can get to show why postfix is better?
On 09/20/2010 08:37 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
No, but it does guarantee durability from the receiving SMTP session to
the delivering process.
This CAN be
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
...and the customer uses round robin dns for mail.customer.domain so
that it points to multiple IPs like
On 09/21/2010 12:52 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:10:49AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp
On 09/19/2010 06:11 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
different mail folders.
As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't taken care
of that.
Is
On 09/18/2010 11:10 PM, Eugene V. Boontseff wrote:
Hi, colleagues!
I set up the verification of the recipient as follows:
main.cf:
smtpd_restriction_classes = CheckRelayRecipient
CheckRelayRecipient = reject_unverified_recipient, permit
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
On 09/16/2010 10:33 PM, Brian Pribis wrote:
When I receive an email addressed to, say, t...@virtual_domain.com, I
want this forwarded to someone_e...@virtual_domain.com.
I have this done in the virtual file and everything appears to work,
except one thing I can't understand:
On 09/16/2010 10:50 PM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
using versions 2.8-20100913 and 2.8-20100915 - when i shutdown postfix,
i sometimes (more often that not) see the postscreen daemon hanging out
around 10 seconds after the master process terminates. Same results on
two different machines
On 09/15/2010 02:05 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 9/14/2010 5:56 PM:
On 09/14/2010 04:42 PM, Christian Rößner wrote:
Sep 11 10:34:36 mx0 postfix/lmtp[29594]: 40FC3520A6:
to=ad4f0.5040...@roessner-net.com, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24,
delay=0.39, delays=0.19
On 09/15/2010 06:33 AM, Frank Doege wrote:
On 09/15/2010 01:47 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/14/2010 12:13 PM, Frank Doege wrote:
Hi all,
id like to modify the message postfix sends to the server when it
rejects an email in one of the checks performed.
For example,
450 Helo command
On 09/15/2010 01:00 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/9/15 Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl:
On 09/14/2010 03:06 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
smarthost
On 09/15/2010 09:36 AM, Christian Rößner wrote:
ad4f0.5040...@roessner-net.com is a message-ID, not an email address.
Here it is used as an email-address
That was the original recipient address that was shown in my daily logs. So I
tested the situation with the same destination
On 09/14/2010 03:06 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
smarthost with tlsv1 only?
If these hosts are using you as their smarthost, simply whitelist their
IPs.
On 09/14/2010 12:13 PM, Frank Doege wrote:
Hi all,
id like to modify the message postfix sends to the server when it
rejects an email in one of the checks performed.
For example,
450 Helo command rejected: Host not found; http://readhereforemore.info
Any check_*_access map can return an
On 09/14/2010 04:42 PM, Christian Rößner wrote:
Sep 11 10:34:36 mx0 postfix/lmtp[29594]: 40FC3520A6:
to=ad4f0.5040...@roessner-net.com, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24, delay=0.39,
delays=0.19/0.06/0.01/0.13, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]
Who is that ?
said: 550
On 09/10/2010 05:28 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
Hi!
what I'd like to do is block all emails from individual contries based
on sender email address (.au, .jp, etc)
What makes you think those are dependable criteria for filtering ?
In reading the docs, it looks like I can block
On 09/10/2010 09:58 PM, Raymond Fagnon wrote:
I am having issues with my postfix install. When I telnet to port 25
and try to do any smtp commands the system doesn't respond. I see in
my logs /var/lib/postfix/smtpd_tls_session_cache.db: Permission
denied. I have chown of the /var/lib/postfix/
On 09/07/2010 12:16 PM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Hello all,
I use Postfix with mysql database for the users lookup. I have recently
found an information leak with the RCPT TO command.
Here is an example:
telnet mailserver 25
Trying XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX...
Connected to mailserver.
Escape character is
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 07/09/2010 16:17, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 9/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm
On 09/07/2010 08:07 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:13:23PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
This question has no answer, except to say that on typical commodity
server hardware you are unlikely to send more than ~3,000 msgs/sec per
Postfix instance. A queue-manager
On 09/05/2010 08:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ralph Seichter:
I'm currently trying to figure out if it is possible to use different
header_checks for TCP ports 25 (mail from world) and 587 (mail submitted
by authenticated users). I tried the following without success:
# cat
On 09/05/2010 11:02 AM, Carlos Velasco wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to choose source IP address for LDAP query in postfix?
We have a multi-instance setup where one instance need to use a specific
source ip address in the system because LDAP queries must go trough a
VPN IPsec connection. I
On 09/05/2010 02:52 PM, Frank Doege wrote:
Hi,
i have a postfix implementation where i use recipient_bcc maps to
duplicate
messages which are from users which are on my exchange server.
Don't you mean sender_bcc_maps in that case ?
This is needed
because users still want to be able to
On 09/04/2010 10:42 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/4/2010 7:33 AM:
What do you mean by filters?
Spam filters in the form of table lookups and dnsbl queries. I'm
currently processing
12,581 CIDRs
1,568 regular expressions (PCRE)
5 dnsbl lookups
On 09/05/2010 04:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen Geilman:
As for your original question, the combined processing time of all your
smtpd_* checks will still be reflected in the delay-a value (pre-queue).
Whatever time postfix itself adds for processing will be either static
On 09/05/2010 07:20 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
I'm currently trying to figure out if it is possible to use different
header_checks for TCP ports 25 (mail from world) and 587 (mail submitted
by authenticated users). I tried the following without success:
Since header_checks is performed by
On 09/02/2010 03:26 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
If Postfix server gets a mail message with multiple TO: address (i.e.,
multiple recipients), does Postfix send one message to each address?
These decisions are not made when postfix receives mail.
The message in the incoming queue includes
On 09/02/2010 02:19 PM, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
Hi all,
intro: I won't ask for amavis fix, I just need to make sure my postfix config
is ok before getting support elsewhere with amavis ;)
I've a bit of trouble with my production mail gateway:
FreeBSD 7.x in VMWare Virtual Machine,
On 09/01/2010 04:25 PM, Mike A. Leonetti wrote:
How can I have postfix stil accept e-mail for certain domains but only
allow e-mails from a specific IP and the range of allowed internal IPs?
To accept mail for your domains OR from specific IPs, just order the
relevant restrictions
On 08/25/2010 03:17 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
We want to implement SMTP authentication in Postfix and support multiple
virtual domains. Rather than having user/domain/endpoint in different
files, we prefer them either in database (Oracle) or LDAP. I am trying
to weigh the pros and cons of
On 09/01/2010 08:21 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 20:13 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/25/2010 03:17 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
We want to implement SMTP authentication in Postfix and support multiple
virtual domains. Rather than having user/domain
On 08/25/2010 02:59 PM, Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
This is more of an annoyance than anything else. When my Postfix (v
2.6.7) attempts to send a message via TLS the following warning is
received:
postfix/smtp[28338]: certificate verification failed for
On 08/24/2010 02:48 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/24/2010 7:24 AM, Edward avanti wrote:
Halo,
We are have odd occasional problem where, some customer that
have made up name in hostname on pc and try send mail get
rejected by us
submission is told use - submission inet n -
n -
On 08/16/2010 11:24 AM, Aaron Roberts wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman
Sent: 15 August 2010 20:54
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent
On 08/16/2010 01:52 PM, Aaron Roberts wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of zhong ming wu
Sent: 16 August 2010 12:02
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent
On Fri, Aug
On 08/13/2010 07:05 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
I am apparently having an issue with some servers whose mail is being
rejected because of
reject_unknown_hostname
the reject was shown here
Aug 11 00:21:36 xxx
batfish ?
postfix/smtpd[96422]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
On 08/10/2010 10:05 AM, Bjorn Mork wrote:
Hi,
can POSTFIX handle load of 120k mailboxes
Since postfix has relatively little to do with mailboxes, and a
mailbox is most definitely not a unit of load, I'd say... VERMILION.
These mailboxes/accounts presumably have users associated with
On 08/07/2010 02:05 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
Dear all
I would like to thanks to the postfix users that answers me better
than a professional support (who said that Open Source products have
support problems ?).
I would like to thanks to wietse that accomplish the best SMTP server
used in the
On 08/07/2010 05:24 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
Hi
four anyone what sources
it is here
http://github.com/dtouzeau/artica
Thanks!
Perhaps you would consider linking to them on your web site ?
I may have been overly harsh, but I hardly ever see open source projects
that have all the exterior
On 08/03/2010 02:05 AM, Edward avanti wrote:
Halo Noel,
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
It appear from more investigation this cause is SERVFAIL
always send 4xx, can postifx override to 5xx with
On 08/01/2010 08:42 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
On 08/05/2010 10:15 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 08/05/2010 11:57 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 08:42 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a mail server
On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
Postfix instances to handle a specific task.
Why ?
It's totally useless in this case.
SMTP runs on port
On 07/31/2010 02:15 PM, Mark Scholten wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a solution to get the following information from postfix:
- Ignore connections from 127.0.0.1 or process only connections from
127.0.0.1 (with another flag/option set)
- What is done with the connection (mail accepted/mail
On 07/30/2010 07:53 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
Hello,
I have a new Postfix install running under Centos 5.3. I am able to
send mail from the command line, but anything sent from another
machine is not sent, nor is it logged.
Then it did not reach postfix.
J.
On 07/29/2010 05:07 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
Jul 29 10:20:08 mx2 postfix/smtpd[63722]: connect from
mail2.beth.k12.pa.us[192.227.0.10]
Jul 29 10:20:08 mx2 postfix/smtpd[63722]: 15B7551C06DA:
client=mail2.beth.k12.pa.us[192.227.0.10]
Jul 29 10:20:08 mx2 postfix/cleanup[63726]:
On 07/26/2010 10:48 AM, Bernard T. Higonnet wrote:
I'm having a terrible problem with
Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname
That means the connecting IP has no PTR record and you have included
reject_unknown_client_hostname in your restrictions.
A simple dig - x 125.207.64.38
On 07/23/2010 08:42 AM, Joe Wong wrote:
Hello,
For some good reason, I want to have a way to bounce all message in
deferred queue. Is there a command(s) to do so?
That is a very bad idea.
The only valid reason to do this would be if you /knew/ these messages
can never be delivered, which
On 07/24/2010 12:44 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
Hi guys, I have the following question:
Is it possible to restrict some virtual accounts from sending emails
through my Postfix?
What does through mean ?
If you mean FROM an address that is in your virtual_*_maps, then no, not
trivially.
On 07/24/2010 01:42 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 07/24/2010 12:44 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
Hi guys, I have the following question:
Is it possible to restrict some virtual accounts from sending emails
On 07/14/2010 01:27 AM, Thomas Arnett wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What are the symptoms of the problem?
postfix/pipe[22169]: 5991748: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot, delay=1.9,
delays=1.8/0.05/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with
On 07/14/2010 08:09 PM, markus reichelt wrote:
* Theodore Dursttdu...@durstmedia.com wrote:
Any hints?
When I started I found this quite useful:
http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/postfix_tutorial.html
Please stick to the actual documentation, to avoid misunderstandings :
On 07/14/2010 10:29 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7: /usr/libexec/dovecot
On 07/14/2010 10:29 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7: /usr/libexec/dovecot
On 07/12/2010 04:41 PM, John A. wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to setup a multi-server mail architecture with a mail gateway and 2
final dest. servers hosting mailboxes, all on the same domain.
I'm using virtual mailboxes wih MySQL backend (same for the 3 servers).
I set up the gateway which forwards
On 07/12/2010 09:53 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I've added a domain name which has email addresses that are only in
the virtual map. There are no real mailboxes over on Dovecot (via
transport) for this one. Attempts to send mail to
postmas...@newdomain.example.com gets Relay access denied, so it
On 07/10/2010 09:20 PM, Teh Kim Chooi wrote:
Here's postconf -n
[r...@smtp2 postfix]# postconf -n
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 0.0.0.0/0
Open relay, here we come.
relay_domains = example.net, example.com.my
One or both of these domains loops back to your postfix (via an MX
On 07/07/2010 08:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
postfix properly.
Name it.
Okay, I may have been baiting a bit there.
The obvious inference
On 07/08/2010 06:10 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reicheltm...@mareichelt.com wrote:
ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
slackware specific questions on a slackware
On 07/08/2010 05:42 PM, Teh Kim Chooi wrote:
Hi,
i have disable local delivery follow the document instruction, then i
enable 2 user in the virtual file but not able to send to these users.
Jul 8 22:57:07 smtp2 postfix/error[9618]: 3E7C82BE8004:
to=postmas...@xxx.xxx.com
On 07/07/2010 05:25 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I am finally putting together a test mail server (something I wish I
had when putting together the first mail server, but lack of hardware
due to lack of funding flow limited that). But now I have another
machine.
But I am still seeing all the issues
On 07/04/2010 01:38 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Hi All
I am planning to migrate from qmail to postfix.
Currently our qmail uses QMAILQUEUE, qmail-scanner, clamd,
spamassassin, rbldnsd, greylite, qmail-pop, qmail-ldap, virtuals and
ezmlm.
(I hope I did not miss anything)
I found few suggestions from
On 07/03/2010 08:45 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
How about publishing an SPF record for postfix.org.
This would work well:
v=spf1 mx include:cloud9.net ~all
http://openspf.org/
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=Postfix.org
Um.. and then what ?
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbage on the CISCO box.
As far as I know, there is
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup
On 07/03/2010 11:24 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have
On 07/03/2010 11:38 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:24:20PM -0700, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai
On 29-6-2010 16:28, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/29/2010 2:47 AM, ramesh wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have suggestion, presently we have internet service
subdomain from ISP.
Ex: Domain: @providerdomain.com
Subdomain: @mydomain.providerdomain.com
Email Id:
On 06/27/2010 01:20 PM, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote:
Hello List,
I have a mail relay and an internal mail server both under Postfix and
behind a firewall (DMZ and LAN), on both segment i'm using a private
IP address with NAT.
On all outgoing emails headers sent by our users, i can see my
On 06/25/2010 11:44 PM, ms...@ciu.edu.tr wrote:
Hi,
I have a mail server with the postfix/Squirrelmail/Dovecot combination
which I have user data on MySQL as virtual users. I have configured SM so
that users can now change their own password.
Is there any opensource solution to provide self
On 06/26/2010 01:01 AM, Keld Simonsen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:20:56PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Keld Simonsen:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:56:49AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Keld Simonsen:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Thu, Jun
I have a problem with receiving mail from yandex (large mail service).
May 21 13:30:09 mx postfix/smtpd[77115]: timeout after DATA (47440
bytes) from forward11.mail.yandex.net[95.108.130.93]
May 21 13:31:56 mx postfix/smtpd[76924]: lost connection after DATA
(33439 bytes) from
Hi,
Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=u...@domain.tld, relay=none,
delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp will log
separate messages, one for every receipient.
On 6/15/2010 4:30 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Hi,
Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=u...@domain.tld, relay=none,
delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp
I just got smtpd_sender_maps to work with smtpd_sender_restrictions using
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch.
While researching how that worked, I saw information indicating that you could
apply the reject_sender_login_mismatch to the smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
Can someone explain
Hi Wietse,
main.cf:
+ mailbox_transport=smtp:[weitan.org] # forward everything ...
+ mailbox_transport_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/mailbox_transport_maps # ...
except some mails
With mailbox_transport_maps:
+ jan local
You have set up an infinite loop, asking the local delivery agent
There's no need to be rude sir.
You have strange conceptions of rudeness.
Also, please do not top-post.
I'm just trying to become more familiar with the Postfix system as an
alternative to Qmail which I've had more real world experience dealing
with,
Yeah. Qmail breaks so many standards
On 06/12/2010 07:06 AM, Walter Pinto wrote:
Recipient map is also SQL based, here's the config.
[r...@mx sql]# cat relay_recipient_map.conf
user = xxx
password = xxx
dbname = xxx
query =
SELECT y
FROM relay_recipient_map
WHERE x='%s'
I'm pretty sure I
On 06/11/2010 04:40 PM, motty.cruz wrote:
*From:* owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeroen Geilman
*Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:02 PM
*To:* postfix-users@postfix.org
*Subject:* Re: how to stop backscatter without check headers
On 06
On 06/11/2010 05:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Wietse Venema put forth on 6/11/2010 9:21 AM:
Stan Hoeppner:
Does Postfix consider architettobellucci.com an FQDN? I've always
understood an FQDN as requiring all 3 of host.domain.tld. If my understanding
of FQDN is correct, then a spam
On 06/11/2010 11:00 AM, Joern Merkel wrote:
Hi,
I need to forward a single user to another smtp-relay. The rest of the
users of this domain is delivered local. So I put her into
/etc/postfix/transport:
u...@testdomain.de smtp:[212.6.xxx.xxx]
Where are the logs of attempting this after
On 06/11/2010 08:00 PM, motty.cruz wrote:
*From:* owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeroen Geilman
*Sent:* Friday, June 11, 2010 10:32 AM
*To:* postfix-users@postfix.org
*Subject:* Re: how to stop backscatter without check headers
On 06
On 06/12/2010 02:08 AM, Walter Pinto wrote:
I'm looking for information on restricting users who send mail through
our MX servers to authenticated users only, we currently use
SASL2/MySQL to store valid user info, I'll try to include as much info
as possible.
The reason I ask is because it
On 06/10/2010 11:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
can distinguish somebody using telnet from a machine speaking SMTP.
I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.), but
little useful.
Anyway. Is there such a
On 06/11/2010 12:44 AM, motty.cruz wrote:
Is there a best way to stop backscatter spam without using check
headers? Traffic is too heavy to user check headers + we received
email for three different domains.
Using postfix 2.6.
Thanks,
motty
To stop backscatter spam, don't accept mail
On 06/11/2010 12:59 AM, Emmanuel Bailleul wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently working on a test box to verify the behavior of some features I'd
like to implement on a production mail relay server.
Among those are recipient_bcc_maps/sender_bcc_maps (to keep copies of certain
emails) and after-queue
Hello,
I have set up a postfix(2.6.6) mail receiving server (customized with three
milters (dkim,sid, custom java milter) and two content filters (amavisd, custom
java based)).
Is it possible that if someone sends a mail for my postfix and it gets received
in a manner that duplicate mails
Hi,
I am using postfix + MailScanner + Mailwatch, Everything is working
fine... postfix is relaying emails for all of my clients/domain, but I
am unable to telnet localhost 25. Although I have allowed 127.0.0.0/8
range, listening on all interfaces, and is sending emails for all
customer
Hi,
We migrated a mail server from qmail + vpopmail to postfix+vpopmail
and the mail server is working properly with virtual domains.
The only problem is that if the user has a .forward file in the home
or in the Maildir doesn't read them and doesn't forward the emails but
delivers them
Now this has always been puzzling. This looks like a spam from a
customers machine. They swear up an down there machine is clean. The
are also a good friend of the boss. Well he knowns them. What I did
was grep the 2E3F10D8005 and then did another grep when 7F92C10D8193
via mailscanner.
Ciao
Somebody have any idea how can i change User unknown in virtual
mailbox table reject code from 450 to 550 (don't send again)
The unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code response defaults to 550.
If it is not 550 on your system, somebody altered it from the default.
(I don't see how an
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:26:46 +0200
Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
Ciao
Somebody have any idea how can i change User unknown in virtual
mailbox table reject code from 450 to 550 (don't send again)
The unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code response defaults to 550.
If it is
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:33:04 +0200
Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:26:46 +0200
Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
Ciao
Somebody have any idea how can i change User unknown in virtual
mailbox table reject code from 450 to 550 (don't send again)
On 06/04/2010 03:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Moe:
The docs for 'myhostname' even explicitly state The default is to use
the fully-qualified domain name from gethostname(), which makes no
sense as gethostname() does not normally return a FQDN.
Only a brain-damaged person would claim
601 - 700 of 716 matches
Mail list logo
