Re: Looking for opinions on FreeBSD OS for Postfix

D. If you have questions about the OS, ask on the appropriate mailing list and see http://www.freebsd.org. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: 450 temp error when 550 perm error is possible

27;d put them all into smtpd_recipient_restrictions #:) > > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#danger Oh please. Mitigating that danger is trivial; just follow the instructions lower in that same document: In order to avoid surprises like these with smtpd_recipient_restrictions, you should place non-recipient restrictions AFTER the reject_unauth_destination restriction, not before. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

al as i would > expect. Because you specify 'example.com' in $virtual_mailbox_domains, its valid recipients are governed by $virtual_mailbox_maps. The /etc/passwd file does not come into play. Therefore, if mail...@example.com is not listed in the aforementioned map, mail addressed to that address is rejected. It seems everything is working as designed. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Log Stats

watch If you have more questions on this, follow up on the logreporters[1] mailing list with a better problem description than "doesn't seem to work". [1] http://lists.mikecappella.com/mailman/listinfo/logreporters -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

he above parameter is not part of Postfix and hence unsupported here. > Any ideas ? -- Sahil Tandon

Re: redirect to mailbox if listed in spamhaus

On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote: I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept mails and relay to an admin email-id , is that possible. Probably with a policy server and the REDIRECT action.

Re: postfix terminating on signal 15

er such high load conditions? It's being run with -o stress. The master(8) signal handler is receiving SIGTERM and thus terminating. Postfix is only killing itself because it's being *told* to do so. I am not sure how you can debug *who* is transmitting the signal. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: header_checks usage

y header_checks..): This is expected. In an SMTP conversation, RCPT TO: sets the ENVELOPE recipient, and has absolutely no relation to the header. If you wish to specify headers, you must do so after DATA. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: SSL_accept error

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > 2009/8/10 Sahil Tandon > > > On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List < > > grkni...@scent-team.com> wrote: > > > > Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >

Re: SSL_accept error

On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List > wrote: Ebbe Hjorth wrote: Hi, I just installed FreeBSD, postfix and dovecot. I tried to do the setup from purplehat.org , but i keep getting the following error, please help. Aug 9 14:22:55 mail02 postfix/smt

Re: huge volume of SMTP > Tactical AUTH traffic??

matches that of an authenticated user, then you can ask him/her to investigate if you're really curious. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: just one account of my domain that is not getting any email

On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Gerardo Herzig wrote: Well. This is weird. One of my co-workers is not getting any mail, not even internal ones. The logs shows that the email is delivered without any problems: this happens when i (gherzig) send an email to my body (mmanoni). Both in the same doma

Re: check_policy_service

proto=ESMTP helo= > > No real harm done really but if the service should be down longer than a > few minutes > > Is there a way to make sure the mails are accepted without the policy > service running? http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/tools/hapolicy-0.99.1.html -- Sahil Tandon

Re: How to queue messages with diffrent bounce time

On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Robert Socha wrote: Hi, My problem is... :) I would like that the selected messages injected by specified interface remain in the queue for no longer than 2 hours. I used this configuration (master.cf), but it seems that it is not working as I want: bulk.e

Re: multiple relay hosts in transport - syntax

On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Andrew Long wrote: $ host -t mx charite.de charite.de mail is handled by 120 mail.charite.de. charite.de mail is handled by 110 mail-ausfall.charite.de. and then use: domain.de charite.de I'm afraid I'm not quite clear on this. They're are two mx's in the dns f

Re: mynetworks

#x27;s the little things that make us happy. > I'm obviously new to postfix. :) Welcome. Please stop top-posting. If you are not familiar with this term, google it. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: lost my Delivered-To: header

;ve tried the debugging suggested, but I cannot see any Delivered-To: > header at all. > > Hoping someone can help, even if it's just to point me at something that > says that Delivered-To's dead so that I can rework what I want to do. Show 'postconf -n', some log output of the bounce, and the rest of master.cf. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: mynetworks

On Aug 3, 2009, at 5:03 PM, "AMP Admin" wrote: Maybe a dumb question but I can’t seem to change mynetworks in main. cf. I change it to something like: mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, xx.xx.xx.0/8, xx.xx.xxx.xxx, xx.xx.xxx.xxx # mynetworks_style = subnet Then I restart postfix and run postco

Re: Log analysis

On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:08 AM, Martina Tomisova wrote: each recipient will be in its own log line when the message is delivered. So I've got 101 lines like this one: Jul 27 xx:yy:zz server postfix/qmgr[2580]: 50B106A60A8: from=, size=754061, nrcpt=436 (queue active) The time differs (this li

Re: Log analysis

repeats after hours... That is the queue ID, which can be reused/repeated; but no two queue entries will *simultaneously* have the same queue ID. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: put mails in hold queue based on size

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009, Gerard wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 00:06:52 -0600 > LuKreme wrote: > > > On 1-Aug-2009, at 21:29, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, LuKreme wrote: > > > On 1-Aug-2009, at 06:18, ram wrote: > > >>> Some users o

Re: put mails in hold queue based on size

And grossly inefficient. And rude. Irrelevant. Different strokes for different folks. >> Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular >> limit > > Yes, but this would take a policy service. > > <http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html> Better. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: checking local_recipient_maps

On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > i use ldap search all the time for testing but i would like to see how > postfix queries and replies. % man 1 postmap -- Sahil Tandon

Re: put mails in hold queue based on size

rvice called in smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions. An example using postfwd (http://www.postfwd.org): id=PEAK_SIZE; state==END-OF-MESSAGE; \ time=07:00:00-11:00:00; \ size=3000; \ action=HOLD -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Hash file oddity

cess. notices that a file has changed it will terminate before handling the next client request, so that a new process can initialize with the new database. By any chance, are you "testing" the change by using the same lookup key? -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Preventing www@ abuse

es an access(5) map to REJECT envelope sender w...@foo.bar. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: what is ESMTP (Nemesis)

standard. Google "ESMTP" for more information. You are pasting what appears to be some portion of a 220 banner. Paste the entire thing or provide more context for additional assistance. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: What causes the "message file too big" error?

On Jul 30, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: LuKreme wrote: On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: The exact byte count of the message+headers is 100793284 Seriously? 96MB emails? I hope that's internal only. Nope, not internal. Why does that matter? It doesn't matter

Re: Stop spammers sending us spam from users in our domain...

is a...@example.org sending to a...@someother.domain which forwards back to a...@example.org. The OP might consider blocking messages where both envelope sender and recipient == f...@example.org when originating from an untrusted source. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Catchall account and lots of spam in a short period

On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:05 PM, LuKreme wrote: On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:18 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: To name one, I tried to get automobile insurance with GEICO, a large insurer in the USA. If I had access to my old virtual_alias_maps I could find many more who rejected the "+". AT&T, Coca Cola, nearl

Re: postfix maildrop username with dots

d user specified. ) Looks like a maildrop issue. Postfix, via pipe(8), is the messenger of bad news. Configure maildrop to recognize user.surn...@domain. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: transition to Exchange mailstore from Cyrus

On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Jay Kusler wrote: We currently have a postfix MX front-end that uses MailScanner, clamav, and spamassassin to preprocess incoming email. We use LDAP lookups to determine valid recipients. Email that makes it through all of that gets moved to a Cyrus imap mail

Re: which address is which?

'. It seems that adsl-dynamic-pool-xxx.fpt.vn was the EHLO sent by the client. The Received: header typically begins like: Received: from ( [client IP]) except when $smtpd_helo_required = no (the default) and the client does not send a HELO/EHLO; in that case, I believe is displayed in lieu of . -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Exclude a domain from processing, and forward?

On Jul 23, 2009, at 6:30 PM, "Terry Carmen" wrote: Perhaps you could use multiple postfix instances; use use foo_transport (instead of content_filter) to route mail to amavisd- new. For domains or recipients that should skip the filter, use a transport_map entry to route directly from first

Re: Exclude a domain from processing, and forward?

On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:58 PM, "Terry Carmen" wrote: I asked a similar question on the Amavis list, but as I think about it, it might be more appropriate to handle in postfix, before the mail ever gets to amavis. Currently postfix accepts mail for a number of domains, and all mail gets s

Re: postfix strip ??? (highbit chars)

On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:28 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote: On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote: % postconf message_strip_charters postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter be more helpfull then critize my spellings I did not know it was a misspelling.

Re: invalid - header

x27;postconf -n'. Also show FULL logs related to your problem and relevant excerpts from your master.cf. Are you piping mail to a non-default transport? -- Sahil Tandon

Re: postfix strip ??? (highbit chars)

postconf message_strip_charters postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter -- Sahil Tandon

Re: tls_random_source and OSX

t is specifically set on all Linux builds I do to be dev:/dev/ >> urandom. > > And who set it? There is no such setting on my FreeBSD systems. Then you changed it. In sufficiently recent versions of FreeBSD, PREFERRED_RAND_SOURCE defaults to "dev:/dev/urandom". Take a look inside src/util/sys_defs.h. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: postfix strip æøå (highbit chars )

On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:06 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote: On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:00, Noel Jones wrote: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers if postfix changed defaults to yes, then i belive problematic senders would change there problem Oh please. The functionality e

Re: sending a message to two seperate accounts

evidence (logging, at the very least), this is just speculation. Read the DEBUG_README before posting your follow-up. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: message priority

s well as the QSHAPE_README: http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0407/2008.html http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Postfix error - trusted user

ser, e.g.. root or Trusted > User [uid=113(°¶?^A)] > Jul 20 11:39:45 mail dspam[14849]: Unable to initialize agent context These are NOT Postfix logs. Seek help on the appropriate forums. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Getting a lot of these

pertains to the *query* log; if you are looking for errors, you need to sift through the *error* log. See: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/error-log.html http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/query-log.html -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Postfix "Toaster" - replacing vpopmail

On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 7/18/2009, Sahil Tandon (sa...@tandon.net) wrote: > > Just so I understand, you don't use POP3 on the server you manage; > > you have never compared POP3 performance on Dovecot vs. > > $something_else, but you are

Re: Postfix "Toaster" - replacing vpopmail

e never compared POP3 performance on Dovecot vs. $something_else, but you are commenting on the lack of performance benefit? :) See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Define some message_size_limit

On Jul 17, 2009, at 2:06 PM, David Glez Romero wrote: Hi every one!! I want to know if is possible to label message_size_limit postfix separation of different domains. So one wants to define message_size_limit a specific domain and the rest of the domains others message_size_limit. FAQ

Re: postscreen test

short, and simple, and can even be thought of as a > contraction of "smtp" and "entry". A bit less corny than "prefix" IMHO > (sorry Patrick, nothing personal). +1 for sentry. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: How do I deliver to a program using a wild card

ll use anchors and only accept digits in the local-part. /^(\d+)@fax.send$/ localfax,$...@final.mailserver > In /etc/aliases, add > > localfax: |/path/to/program > > and issue "newaliases". -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Simple Aliases question

On Jul 15, 2009, at 5:55 AM, "Cory Hawkless" wrote: Hi all, I have what I think is a simple question regarding Postfix and aliases. I would like all mail for a particular user which is currently being delivered locally and then picked up via dovecot to be 'forked'(For want of a better

Re: Message Size Limit Exceed

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Jacky Chan wrote: > I would like to ask if the size of message exceeds the one defined in > main.cf, how can I configure Postfix to generate a bounce or error notice to > user/admins? Why? Postfix replies with a 552 so the *client* can inform the envelope sender.

Re: fatal: garbage after "]" in server description:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote: > Is there a limit in the length of an email address? We have a couple of > crazy long addresses in there e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1 -- Sahil Tandon

Re: reject 450 NOQUEUE issue

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Jeff Lacki wrote: > > > Im not nearly as versed in postfix as I would like to > > be. Ive tried to figure this log message out but Im not > > sure whats really going on: > > > > Jul 13 23:36:08

Re: reject 450 NOQUEUE issue

server is rejecting the message. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_helo_hostname % host adcvibq01.messaging.nextel.com Host adcvibq01.messaging.nextel.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) -- Sahil Tandon

Re: reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname rejects even if PTR RR is found

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Sun, July 12, 2009 22:47, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > > >> >> Anyway if it is a name server timeout, then I think this is always > >> >> handled by a 4

Re: Hourly Limits

policy server to be queried, which won't be the case when you have mail being submitted via pickup service. 2009/7/13 Sahil Tandon : On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:54 AM, "ad...@gg-lab.net" wrote: Lucian, i saw that solution, but i want something that can globally limit EVERY

Re: Hourly Limits

On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:54 AM, "ad...@gg-lab.net" wrote: Lucian, i saw that solution, but i want something that can globally limit EVERY mail sent: i'll also offer smtp access, and a sendmail wrapper isn't a solution. Benny: ok, so we are speaking about the evenlope sender, so, it seems this

Re: reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname rejects even if PTR RR is found

is not queued/retried, but returned to sender. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: reject mail without valid MX

e RFCs and reject mail without a MX RR. s/WARN/REJECT/ if you decide to actually block such mail. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Milter Reject on Yahoo Mail

tor (public key) record returned from a DNS query could not be parsed (e.g. corrupted, wrong format, etc.). -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Running out of mail queue space encountered - need help analyzing logs

scratching my head as to what happened within > that second. Does anyone have any thoughts on what might have > happened? Any pointers on what to look for will be appreciated. Could something other than Postfix have written to the file system which houses the mail queue? -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Allow a group of unauthenticated senders

_sender_login_mismatch http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_login_maps If you need something that is not provided by these features, then be more specific with your request. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Errors after upgrades

ial backside. Sounds like a MySQL (not Postfix) issue; debug there. Are there any other type of mysql error lines in the log? -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Hourly Limits

e=END-OF-MESSAGE ; \ action==rate($$sender/100/3600/450 4.7.1 max 100 mails per hour) With this, query postfwd in smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions. If you have more questions about postfwd, follow-up off-list or on the postfwd mailing list. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Hourly Limits

ail each user can send in an our. You need a policy server. Search the archives of this list and google postfwd and policyd. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Allow a group of unauthenticated senders

"allow". Can you give two simple examples of both use cases? -- Sahil Tandon

Re: TLS library problems

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Scott Haneda wrote: > system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS > library problem: 45598:error:140760FC:SSL > routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_srvr.c:571: Debug the proxy. What is it? Not Postfix, I'd gue

Re: Mail routing problem

On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:44 AM, Sam Przyswa wrote: Hi, I have to build a mail system with one main server (main) who send mails to several secondaries servers on the net as serv1, serv2, servX, for the same domain but how to send mail from the serv1 to an user on the serv2 for the same doma

Re: Logging sender recipient pairs

policyd can do this. > > The real trick is, as you point out, the quotas for local users. This can also be done via postfwd with a small patch I've submitted to the developer. If anyone is interested, contact me off-list (as we're venturing off-topic!) or wait for Jan to hopefully

Re: smtpd_*_restrictions

allow the message to queue? No. This is also answered in the abovementioned document. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Logging sender recipient pairs

ons or alternative > ways of doing this? You could parse the logs and implement your own solution or maybe use an existing policy service that already has this functionality. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Question About Maildir Mailboxes

On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Carlos Williams wrote: I am setting up a new server to run Maildir style in-boxes. In my main.cf, I added the following parameter: "home_mailbox = Maildir/" The above seems to be working fine in my main.cf. It auto created the directory upon receiving the 1st ema

[zot...@gmail.com: [mail/postfix]: don't build on latest current]

FYI for FreeBSD users of the latest -CURRENT. I will not be able to test this until later this week / weekend, but just in case someone else runs into a similar problem. I know FreeBSD 8 is not "supported" as per the current makedefs, but there are still some people building on there. :) At firs

Re: Address Extensions

On Tue, 07 Jul 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2009, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > > > So...my initial thought was I'd have to create a public Internet name > > for the fax gateway, and apply some level of security to only accept > > submissions f

Re: Address Extensions

ong with ensuring that foo+...@example.org is valid at SMTP time. Untested example: /^(\d+)\+...@mydomain.com$/ $...@fax.myinternaldomain.com -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Mutt, postfix setup for multiple e-mail accounts

version; otherwise see envelope_from. Also see: http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttFaq/Header All follow-ups should probably go to the mutt mailing list. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: milter_header_checks

ttp://www.postfix.org/download.html -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Secondary Servers

e basic info to help debug the problem? See DEBUG_README. > 2) I have compiple SASL but cannot get it run properly despite matching > my ns1 record and adjusting it accordingly? See response to 1). -- Sahil Tandon

Re: How to backhole mail?

ing a 'null' service). > > Thank you for your help > > [1] http://www.wiredfool.com/2002/06/11/how-to-blackhole-email-server/ Unnecessary creation of null: transport; just use the discard: transport. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: How to backhole mail?

so this is not a good test. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Testing/verifying a DKIM setup

the Mail > Relay Testing <http://www.abuse.net/relay.html> site, or does it already > exist? Heh, try "test dkim" and see the first result. :) -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Allow only authenticated sender

k the message > recipients and try again. Cut-and-paste instead of introducing typos by manually transcribing excerpts from your maillog. Nonetheless, the rejection text is quite clear; also see: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Testing/verifying a DKIM setup

.dkim.org/reflector.html. The Port 25 check worked for me. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: header checks not working

On Wed, 01 Jul 2009, Magnus Bäck wrote: > > Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > > > I prefer pcre:, but the following patterns should work with regexp: > > > as well. > > No, {n} isn't supported by regexp. It is. As noted in regexp_table(5), each pattern is a

Re: header checks not working

On Wed, 01 Jul 2009, Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Wednesday, July 01, 2009 at 07:02 CEST, > Rob Brandt wrote: > > > > Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > > > I prefer pcre:, but the following patterns should work with regexp: > > > as well. > > No, {n}

Re: header checks not working

k with regexp: as well. > # No ***SPAM*** > /^Subject .*\*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*/ DISCARD ***SPAM*** /^Subject:.*\*{3}SPAM\*{3}/ DISCARD ***SPAM*** > # SPam flag > /^X-Spam-Flag .YES/ DISCARD Spam Flag /^X-Spam-Flag: YES$/ DISCARD Spam Flag -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Postfix fallback mailserver setup

On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Henry Verbeek wrote: Hi all, I am setting up an postfix server and i want it to be a fallback server. Somehow i dont seem to find info about it. Can anyone help me here? Elaborate and use examples where possible.

Re: Allowing OK instead of just DUNNO in check_recipient_mx_access

ind of kludgy and would need to be updated if and > when new TLD's are added... Use a pcre access(5) map that rejects everything except the "good" TLDs. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Bounce / NDR messages - how to stop them

On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:51 PM, "EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk" > wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 15:23 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: Please don't feed the trolls. :) Oh yawn. Is that the best you can do? Can you not contribute something useful? I don't think you are

Re: Bounce / NDR messages - how to stop them

Please don't feed the trolls. :)

Re: virtual table user bounced

ual_alias_domains within main.cf. > nb : smile yourself NB: RTFM: http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html -- Sahil Tandon

Re: QUEUE/TRANSACTION ID REUSE

Steve wrote: in fact what is the correct term for these parts [24692] & 524B4AC8D9 24692 == process ID; 524B4AC8D9 == queue ID. postfix/cleanup[24692]: 524B4AC8D9: -- Sahil Tandon

Re: QUEUE/TRANSACTION ID REUSE

random; if you are feeling curious, peek inside src/global/mail_queue.c. As mentioned in the comments therein, the only guarantee is that no two queue entries will simultaneously have the same queue ID. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Postfix Logfile

FreeBSD or something similar, look in /etc/newsyslog.conf for rotation time and frequency. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote: > > > > > I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and > > > returns > >

Re: greylist and then still RBL?

OK, REJECT, or DEFER, Postfix iterates through the following restrictions, eventually hitting REJECT via zen.spamhaus.org. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

rom what I understand, the instance attribute does not exist until Postfix chooses/assigns a queue ID, which happens *after* the first RCPT TO command is accepted. If your policy service plugs in before that, there is no instance; therefore, the attribute is empty. -- Sahil Tandon

Re: Header Time

On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe wrote: On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems to doing

Re: Incoming smtp: 554 Access Denied

On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Jesse Kretschmer wrote: Howdy, I've seen error "Client host rejected: Access denied" in many other postings, but more than a day of reading has not led me to a solution. A client is having issues sending mail to our server. I investigated and found that postf

Re: Blocking with smtpd_client_restrictions

ccess_maps, as this is the default configuration. And as a result, if you want to match foo.tld and bar.tld, you need "tld" (and NOT ".tld") as the lookup key on the LHS of an indexed access(5) map. Remember to postmap(1) after editing the underlying flat files to update the table. Alternatively, as Noel suggests, just query for the TLD via regexp, especially since you already use it for something else. -- Sahil Tandon

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >