mouss wrote:
and if the probes use multiple TCP connections (if the pop server
disconnects after a failure), then he can use rate limiting in his
packet filter if supported ("recent" in iptables, "overload" in pf).
here is an example using iptables recent module:
http://lists.opensuse.org/open
Steve Crawford wrote:
postmas...@klam.ca wrote:
I don't currently own a blackberry, but am thinking about getting one
(the Obama effect). A friend who works in the Cellphone business has
warned me that if I just setup the BB to go get my email from my postfix
server this will treated as internet
mouss wrote:
and if a spam filter blocks/discards/quarantines mail because of this,
it is the filter that should be blamed.
I use this setup for detecting Backscatter. Until now without problems,
but it's difficult to know.
Hello everyone,
I created a second cleanup for the submission service to have separate
header checks from incoming emails.
cleanup-out unix n - - - 0 cleanup
-o header_checks=pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks-out
-o body_checks=pcre:/etc/postfix/bod
Noel Jones wrote:
To fix this, just add
-o receive_override_options=
(ie. an empty value)
to your submission service.
Now it's working.
Thanks.
rafael.
Received: from icbu211.cnmail.cnh.yahoo.com
(icbu211.cnmail.cnh.yahoo.com [119.42.242.94])
by farallon.riovia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80472581C6
for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 12:31:03 -0200 (UYST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by icbu211.cnmail.cnh.yahoo.c
content filter to running it as a milter as well. At least that was in my
case :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
t;maennerchor-kirchseeon.de"
from there) and also appropriate mappings for "the-grue.de" domain in
/etc/postfix/vmailbox. Be aware that any local accounts - if you have any -
will now become adddresses in the domain "maennerchor-kirchseeon.de" and not
"the-grue.de&
and these addresses are accepted only
in that domain and not any other. So you basically have a separate domain
for the mailing list only.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 21.03.2021 o godz. 18:48:12 Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 05:14:39PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> >
> > /^examplelist.*@list\.maennerchor-kirchseeon\.de$/DUNNO
> > /@list\.maennerchor-kirchseeon\.de$/550 5.1.1 User unknown in lo
Dnia 21.03.2021 o godz. 18:43:40 Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 04:22:06PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> > If you want "maennerchor-kirchseeon.de" to be a local domain instead, you
> > need to make "the-grue.de" a virtual domain,
>
&g
counts in both domains.
If you don't want this, you have to use recipient access restrictions like
in the example I sent previously.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
he receiving
server (MX for "example.com" domain) to forward the mail via UUCP to the
machine it knows as "joe" and deliver it to user "b" on that machine :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
st regarding UCEPROTECT
practices and basically everybody agreed that it isn't a reliable blacklist
and they can't be trusted.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 1.04.2021 o godz. 19:38:30 DEPRÉ Gaëtan - NGServers.com pisze:
>
> I enabled port 465, but no chance. Still the same problem, only with
> android/outlook...
Looks like you have to sniff network traffic to see what's actually going
on...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r.
am-friendly company/ISP or company/isp who doesn't care).
L2 and L3 lists are exactly the problem. They recently changed rules for
these and now list almost everyone there ;)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're
write your own content filtering rules
(you can use eg. spamassassin, procmail, sieve etc. to do the actual
filtering - there are many tools available) that target these particular
messages.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they
are... well, just strange, doing everything differently.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
cleartext SMTP session (like on port
587) in case of "TLS". In recent versions they changed these settings to
"TLS over dedicated port" and "STARTTLS after connection".
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
; either the primary name or an alias.
We can just use port number in the Postfix master.cf file, then there will
be no problem, right?
(I am actually running another smtps instance on a nonstandard port on my
server, and use just port number in master.cf, so I guess the same applies
for standard
e incoming mail, no relaying at all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
tings in Debian. Here is conection from
Postfix list server for your message:
Apr 18 12:45:31 rafa postfix/smtpd[1653]: Anonymous TLS connection
established from camomile.cloud9.net[168.100.1.3]: TLSv1.2 with cipher
AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
-
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
not
used at all, or "hosts: files" when only /etc/hosts is used and DNS is not
used at all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
't mean split views.
I meant to create different "type forward" zones in /etc/named.conf with
different set of forwarders for different domain suffixes.
But I don't know what to do if you have everything under the same domain
suffix.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.or
uters (all newest
releases) connect perfectly to http-only sites. Maybe you have HTTPS only
mode turned on in the preferences (AFAIK, it is not on by default), or have
some extension like "HTTPS Everywhere" installed?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years,
send to them
must pass SPF/DMARC check - as a method of "antispam protection" (which it
isn't, because spammer can have a perfectly valid SPF/DMARC setup) - people
were forced to adopt it universally, whether necessary or not (which for
example causes problems with mailing lists).
--
thing in non_smtpd_milters=.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
local mails come from existing accounts in your own domain, right?
What other source could they come from?
So you will be not sending bounces out to the Internet. They will stay at
your local machine.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to scho
Dnia 23.04.2021 o godz. 08:27:31 Phil Stracchino pisze:
> On 4/23/21 5:15 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > However, "thanks" to Google and other
> > big e-mail providers who started to enforce that EVERY email send to them
> > must pass SPF/DMARC check - as a method of
egards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
pposite: if you will only be sending mail via VPN (that
means from a fixed IP address), then don't bother using submission port,
just add that IP to "mynetworks" and send the mail to your server the
normal way via port 25... Less to set up...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.
his Postfix server) without the need to
add authentication to it...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
;t match, sendmail logged something like
unknown (reverse.dns.hostname) [ip.ad.dr.ess]
and when they match, it logged just
reverse.dns.hostname [ip.ad.dr.ess]
I guess the OP would be satisfied if Postfix did something similar?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million
I thought that sendmail logs the HELO
>
> unknown (HELO-or-EHLOname [ipaddress])
Maybe you're right, I don't remember too well, as I stopped using sendmail
quite long time ago. However, I'm sure it also logged non-matching DNS in
somehow similar way...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Ra
e (delivering to Sent folder) it works well. You can think of
creating something similar if you only want to deliver to a particular
folder. For something more general, however, using sieve (or even procmail,
as mentioned) would be definitely a better solution.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r
t is described here: http://www.postfix.org/tcp_table.5.html
Seems like this can be a solution for you. You have of course to write the
appropriate program that replies with the correct server address depending
on recipient's email adress.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
-
hat users have full control over, you usually send
mail directly and not via relayhost. In both cases there's no issue.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
rpose
> SMTP transaction tester utility program for generating test emails
> using SMTP transactions. For example:
Ubuntu desktop should have Thunderbird preinstalled. Why not just try to
send mail using a regular mail client?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a mill
sendmail.
Thunderbird, as far as I remember (I haven't used it for a few years, I
use Evolution as my desktop client now) can be configured to use locally
installed sendmail, but this is a special case. Submission or SMTP is still
the default method of sending mail it uses.
--
Regards,
Ja
mandatory) TLS whenever possible, only if the server does not offer it, but
offers TLS-wrapped port 465, fall back to that instead.
But all this discussion has nothing to the original question, as the OP
explictly wanted to test sending mail via port 25.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.e
connection between server X and server Y so
that only server Y can access the services on server X (iptables).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
al mail if not deliver it locally? Where else can it
be delivered if there is only one server?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 18.05.2021 o godz. 13:47:15 post...@ptld.com pisze:
> >On 05-18-2021 12:36 pm, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >If Postfix on server X is only for submission, then how does Postfix on
> >server Y deliver mail to server X?
>
> It doesn't because as you said, server X is o
a single message with multiple
recipients?
Tell him to use some software that will send one message per recipient and
per session. This will take time, but it should be basically one-time job
and will allow him to catch the bounces and remove the bouncing addresses
from his list.
--
Regards,
needs to be available:
"The Dovecot SMTP submission service directly proxies the mail transaction
to the SMTP relay configured with the following settings:"
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
service.
And if Postfix weren't there, then Dovecot submission service will relay
mail via...?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
strictions
> # -o smtpd_sender_restrictions=$mua_sender_restrictions
>
> but no proposed values for those.
These lines are commented out. Did you uncomment them in master.cf? If you
didn't, then you are probably keeping global values from main.cf for these
parameters without overriding them.
--
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 14.06.2021 o godz. 09:51:30 Linda Pagillo pisze:
>
> Any other ideas of what may be causing this?
Is it possible that the client is trying STARTTLS (and not TLS-wrapped SMTP)
on port 465?
Have you tried a different mail client instead of Outlook?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Raf
now have a formal business
justification to be not compliant with the mentioned security guidelines -
because they will be unable to communicate with their customers if they
comply.
That's just how the corporate bureaucracy works...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a
t; failure, with the time stamp as the only link between both.
Well, maybe I'm using quite old versions of Postfix and Dovecot, but with
default logging setup on Debian plus "auth_verbose=yes" in Dovecot config I
get in /var/log/mail.log lines like:
Jul 30 23:15:17 rafa postfix/smtpd
elps. At least they will know :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
7;t
> really know. Whatever SASL layer Postfix is using obviously must
> know, but it is likely not to log it.
I have asked this already here, but nobody replied. Maybe I try again :)
When and why was the logging regarding AUTH failures changed? Because in
quite old version of Postfix I ca
t it doesn't let
> you see anyone else's content. Wierdly unhelpful.
I vaguely remember that this topic has been discussed several times on
mai...@mailop.org mailing list. I highly recommend this mailing list for
dealing with deliverability issues.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@r
es seem to enable DKIM signing for them
> (via the milter application that I've configured), it still does not
> apply any header checks to them.
If you are able to apply a milter to them, you can write a milter that
rewrites those headers.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
to include some.domain
literally in your regular expression, then it won't match again on the
already transformed address, which does not contain some.domain.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once ther
essage in mutt, it puts the
e-mail address of the original sender (not you) at the beginning of the
subject of the forwarded message.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she
ix should outright reject the
message without trying to deliver it.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
tant one) and there's no reason to
replace them (or sometimes there isn't even anything to replace them with).
The concept of trusted hosts/networks has a reason behind it and cannot be
abandoned so simply...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids
ion.outlook.com). The *client* address in your case is
mx0f-00376703.gpphosted.com, so it is *not* from domain dhs.gov. So it was
not whitelisted.
As far as I know, there's no option to whitelist *sender* addresses in
postgrey.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a m
this check for authenticated users (ie. submission ports).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
own
reject_unknown_helo_hostname is known to produce quite a lot of false
positives, and it is not recommended to use this restriction.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
you
should try to configure an email client like Thunderbird and check email
sending/receiving with it.
Not everything at once!
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with
19/0.01/0.01/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
V/yJDH9grmHtmgAAdabr2Q Saved)
Dec 6 19:11:59 softlinksys postfix/qmgr[38286]: 04E4CA06C5: removed
It's only strange why your qmgr is logging empty "from", and lmtp empty
"to". But this message should be somewhere on you
(eg. Postfix) usually use.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ut yes, Google IS dumb enough to do so.
> If so, given they allow spammers virtually free range to send FROM
> gmail this is a bit hypocritical.
100% agree.
They simply don't care about anyone that isn't using Gmail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In
7;s what PSL is for -
to specify which domains should *not* be mixed up with one another.
Don't defend Google's email service, it's already so bad that it's not worth
defending...
Friends should not let friends use Gmail - that's all that can be said about
it.
--
Regar
y what Public Suffix List is for. It lists all such domains.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ries do not use any generic SLDs under country's
TLD (at least not mandatory ones), but just allow to register names directly
under country's TLD, like somename.de, somename.hu, somename.nl etc.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
on procedure and policy, and maybe be
able to demonstrate a bunch of actual independent subdomains registered
under this domain, run by someone else than you? Because that's the way
eu.org, uk.com and similar operate.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a millio
Dnia 14.12.2021 o godz. 13:06:49 Andrew Sullivan pisze:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >That's exactly what Public Suffix List is for. It lists all such domains.
>
> Well, to be a little more pointed about it, it attempts to provide a
>
all text/plain parts from multipart
messages, up to 5 levels nesting of multipart messages one inside another
(that level is configurable via a parameter in the script).
If you want to look at it, it's here: http://rafa.eu.org/media/textconv.pl
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.
etc. but it is not - and *should not* be - mandatory.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
somehow commerce-related
and collect personal data.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
pient of the mail can access its content. No operator of any
mail server is able to read your message. If you use only level 2, then
operators of both sending and receiving server (and any intermediate server,
if there are any) can have access to the message in plaintext form.
--
Regards,
nd sell your metadata.
And you are right with regard to the fact that metadata is often more
important in "spying" on the individual than the actual data transmitted;
but simple solutions like HTTPS don't protect you from metadata being
collected.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r..
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
>
> What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
> (non-spam) would generate soft fail?
Forwarding.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 12:51:54 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
> > On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
> >>
> >>What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
> >
et's trust Postfix authors that
they have done it right. To implement TLS support, one certainly has to know
more about it than an average mail administrator. So just trust them.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're go
t have one in the configuration shown in your mail)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
v an "overkill" for using one simple utility? Why
couldn't it just use the system-installed Python?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
is
run to provide this service. Both services, on port 25 and 587, are provided
by two instances of the same executable, therefore "smtp" in both cases.
After "smtpd" there can be arguments used to call this executable - these
arguments are used to make both services operate differently.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
mtpd_" :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
P address, for example by using
permit_mynetworks ?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ee availability test results here:
> https://ping-admin.com/free_test/result/16443944516w2j65r1y4j0kca10wdw3q.html
> (not sure if this link will be valid for long, though).
Poland, ISP is UPC ( https://www.upc.pl/ ), works OK.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a mill
.postfix.org and tells where it
stops.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 9.02.2022 o godz. 13:58:01 Jaroslaw Rafa pisze:
>
> I think it's just a routing misconfiguration at some major ISP. It might be
> hepful that the OP does a traceroute to www.postfix.org and tells where it
> stops.
I did a traceroute to the first five sites that fail acco
where this post exists. But
maybe his security team will be happy with removing it from that particular
place where they found it...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
pretty rare case for me (I usually work with single-server setups). I did
not think that it can be used in such context as rewriting by canonical
maps.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hu
al_alias_maps seems completely unneccessary in your case. What
funtion exactly does it provide here?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
maps mapping
destination@address->mailbox. Is that your case?
But this still doesn't have anything to do with Dovecot "accepting" any
email addresses, because Dovecot just provides access to a mailbox. Once you
properly log in, you have access to all messages stored in the mailbox,
re
Dnia 21.02.2022 o godz. 13:09:19 Alexey Shpakovsky pisze:
> On Mon, February 21, 2022 12:59, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >
> > The part I am wondering about is exactly "Dovecot accepts". As far as I
> > know, Dovecot does not need to "accept" anything, becaus
onfiguration_manual/authentication/user_databases_userdb/
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
you try apt-get?
milter-regex is not in the Ubuntu repositories (at least for 20.04).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ely on random on-access file scanning.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
kind of password.
You may also (again if this is possible in setroubleshootd) insert a very
specific header into the message and use a milter to reject message if the
header is not present.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ltiple
"department" (or how do you call them) mail servers that relay mail to a
central server. Then you can very easily have mail-from and rcpt-to equal on
port 25.
Seems like a pretty valid case to me.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids
ound email
>
> MX is for inbound e-mail by definition
I think what the OP meant is that recipient domain has two MX-es and
the goal is that the Postfix doesn't try the second MX in case the
first one rejects with 4xx but defers the message immediately (for
this specific recipient domain
oIP provider is using
separate login & password for each phone line). This setup will work for
any ISP as long as ISP isn't blocking inbound UDP ports 5060/5061.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
1 - 100 of 483 matches
Mail list logo