Actually Hiroshima and Nagasaki were part of the war
machine. Only cloud cover saved Tokyo.
After plunging the war into world war, the Germans had
it coming and Dresden was the right time and the right
place.
To me even without such unintended victims, it is
simply a crime against
humanity.
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 19:41, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I think everybody knows the real racist, who is also a cunning
Machiavellian.
Hi Leland!
Who, you? Always thought you expounded too much on Machiavelli . . .
Michael Madigan wrote:
Bottom Line: Obama is a Racist.
---
Michael Madigan wrote:
It's amazing how catty some women are. I had another
model tell me, I can do better than those 3 skanks.
Amazing ! I would never have guessed that you were a model g
Paul Newton
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Guys,
I have a really, really weird behavioural problem here with VFP and I'm
pulling my hair out - what little I have.
Simple scenario:
1. A form subclassed from a base form.
2. The base form contains code in the Load() event
3. The production form calls the default code in the base class
They look the same to me but I think I have the IE plug-in for Firefox which
might explain it (either that or my eyesight is dimming with old age - what
girls are you talking about? g)
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
Michael Madigan wrote:
Does the coment command in Firefox not work?
I thought a shank was a ball of wool. What's a shank, I would take a guess
as a tart which was my thoughts.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pete Theisen
Sent: 19 March 2008 03:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Really weird
Im not convinced there is not a timing problem with VFP9. I have a calendar
class which is loaded at start of form and often it messes up unable to make
an object. Yet most the time, and I mean most, it is fine. I am wondering if
its an XP thing maybe in a update. It’s a bit like the write ahead
Allen wrote:
I thought a shank was a ball of wool. What's a shank, I would take a guess
as a tart which was my thoughts.
Allen
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=skank
--
Cheers
Brian Abbott
___
Post
Thanks Brian
This is a good place to learn. Im having enough trouble with french however
:)
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Abbott
Sent: 19 March 2008 10:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Really weird diffence between
A HANK is a coil of wool, SHANK is a leg - as in lamb shank and Shank's
Pony.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
I thought a shank was a ball of wool. What's a shank, I would take a guess
as a tart which was my thoughts.
Allen
___
Post
Dave Crozier wrote:
thought I would ask around to see if anyone else has had similar
experiences.
Don't recall ever hitting this one Dave. Maybe try using scope
resolution (::) to run the parent code rather than DoDefault() ...
___
Post
Yes John. See even the English is going now.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Weller
Sent: 19 March 2008 10:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [NF] Really weird diffence between Internet Explorer and
Firefox
A HANK is a coil
Alan,
Good idea, I'll try that
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 19 March 2008 09:37
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP9 Wierd Behaviour
Dave Crozier wrote:
thought I would ask around to see if anyone
- Original Message -
From: Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 March 2008 08:12:08 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: VFP9 Wierd Behaviour
Guys,
I have a really, really weird behavioural problem here with VFP and I'm
pulling my hair out - what little I have.
Alan,
That seems to work fine, however it is a little worrying as to WHY
DoDefault() sometime barfs. I'll give it some more testing first to see if
it falls over.
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 19 March
Paul,
See...I told you it was getting to me!
Cognitive word recognition is the first thing to goA!
I need a holiday.
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Newton
Sent: 19 March 2008 10:07
To: profox@leafe.com
Did you check the event firing sequence? Perhaps when you are instanciating the
other objects called from the load event in your base class, you inadvertently
fire an event that occurs either in the object called or in a top level form.
Especially, if you use a background top level form to
No harm, no foul. Sorry if I seemed like a
dooschbag in my hasty responsesometimes I'm a turd. g
Heh-heh, as long as nothing gets splattered on me things are fine g. My
skin is relatively thick, yet my biggest concerns when dealing with others
is to do no harm. So, back to you, no
Rafael,
All the events are firing at the right time in the correct sequence and I've
just managed to create exactly the same problem with the scope operator.
However this occurs less frequently than with the DoDefault() method.
My feeling is that this is a timing issue as Allen suggested. As a
Dave Crozier wrote:
My feeling is that this is a timing issue as Allen suggested.
Try this just before the DoDefault() or scope call.
* -- Use Win32 API call to suspend for 1 second.
Declare Sleep In Win32API Integer nMilliseconds
= sleep(1000)
... or maybe, if you have a dual-core CPU,
Re the possible timing error what I have noticed is the debugger comes up if
I save suspend and clicking go again continues without another error. This
is why I think it’s a timing error. I also have doevents before and after
the creation of the calendar and that does not help.
In my case no dual
Alan and Rafael,
I think that I have the problem at least isolated now in that when it
occurs and I am thrown into the debugger if I then:
1. Cancel the program from the debugger, the problem will continuously
re-appear when I re-run the program again until I issue a clear all in the
command
I wish I could say that, mainly because it happens in runtime as well though
I think that’s possible a bad download. And I would have to thank Microsoft
or hans christian anderson :)
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Crozier
I
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:48 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Russell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:26 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scenario: product inventory database, complete with Products,
Michael Oke, II wrote:
I realize that it is politically correct to label any
statement that doesn't fit with a rosy picture of the world as racist
but that doesn't make it so. While what was said might have been
unpalatable and even untrue, I just want to know how that makes it racist.
i before e except after c - and some others as well g
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
Guys,
I have a really, really weird behavioural problem here with VFP and I'm
pulling my hair out - what little I have.
You have weird spelling in the subject line too !
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. How many Blacks believe that White Doctors created
AIDS to kill Blacks?
-
Why do you always quote this line? I cannot find any back up references to
this
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There should only be three large photos at the top of
the page. I think that firefox is ignoring the
commented-out html code and including that code in the
screen. The first blurry girl, and the two small
photos
Because it allows him to justify his xenophobia and fuel the prejudices
and stereotypes he tries to peddle
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: 19 March 2008 12:53
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] The teflon
Search your code for a similarly named base class. This sounds like one of
the weird behaviors Christof explained in one of his SWFox presentations.
VFP might be linking the base to a different base then you might want it to
via a cache.
I've also seen it with setting a property on a form at
Target-bombing civilians and non-military facilities to inflict severe
damage to the enemy psychic was first adopted by Winston Churchill.
Such a creative thinking was a big surprise even to the generals of NAZI
Germany.
Dresden bombing is one of the well-known examples. Such approach has been
Howdy all,
Roll on the weekend...
I have a an VFP application that is copied and executed throughout the day.
They run for ~40 mins and then close. They appear in the Task Bar as separate
entries, even though they are all myapp.exe running - this is because my form
caption changes for each
Racist statements don't have to be as overt as are all dirty
lying thieving scum! The deadliest ones can be the implied meanings
delivered most often as just a joke.
But unless you're naive, or a true innocent, I think you already knew
all the above.
The thought police have spoken!
A general question regarding how those of you out there using SPT and Auto
update cursors onto a Client Server back ends deal with record inserts into
a table.
As some of you may well know, I'm in the process of writing a set of data
access classes for VFP to Client server back ends. OK, you may
Rules of War has always seemed odd to me. I mean, by definition, doesn't
it indicate people want to kill each other?
JH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:46 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Just for your info,
Luis Navas posted on VFPx forum there is a microsoft fix for this Vista
problem
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932406
Hello,
I think I may have solved the Vista freak out problem.
I posted the problem in the VFPx forum and Doug Hennig
answered that he had experienced
Dave Crozier wrote:
A general question regarding how those of you out there using SPT and Auto
update cursors onto a Client Server back ends deal with record inserts into
a table.
As some of you may well know, I'm in the process of writing a set of data
access classes for VFP to Client
Greetings All!
I have a client who tried to run an XP Pro SP2 update on his home PC (at
long last). All went well other than the fact that his desktop icons do not
come up any longer upon reboot. He end up having to manually fire off the
.lnk file for his settings, then all is okay. He does
Garry,
The groups on the status bar are defined by the application not by the
window title. If you load up the application enough times to fill up the
status bar then eventually Windows will group the same applications together
in one group. However I don't know how to force this to happen apart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Racist statements don't have to be as overt as are all dirty
lying thieving scum! The deadliest ones can be the implied meanings
delivered most often as just a joke.
But unless you're naive, or a true innocent, I think you already knew
all the
John Harvey wrote:
Rules of War has always seemed odd to me. I mean, by definition, doesn't
it indicate people want to kill each other?
JH
Yes, but rules of war are based on the understanding that your side may
be losing at some point - so you agree to certain basic standards of
treatment
1. How many Blacks believe that White Doctors created
AIDS to kill Blacks?
-
Why do you always quote this line? I cannot find any back up references
to this claim.
You just haven't looked. I must have seen the clip of Rev Wright making
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 09:15, John Harvey wrote:
Rules of War has always seemed odd to me. I mean, by definition, doesn't
it indicate people want to kill each other?
Hi John!
I think the idea is to take the combatants out of the action by either capture
or disabling injury, but death only
Garry,
Just found this free utility and it does just what you want.
http://www.freewebs.com/nerdcave/taskbarshuffle.htm
In she settings page, select the group tasks with this or more windows.
That one's a keeper in the utilities from now!
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Vince Teachout wrote:
The implication is if they DO kill ours, we'll kill theirs.
And if we do torture their soldiers, we are agreeing that it is fair
that they torture ours.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages
And this one is a similar program, but not free.
http://wstaskborg.janis-elsts.qarchive.org/
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Garry Bettle
Sent: 19 March 2008 14:07
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Task Bar Grouping
Howdy
Hi guys and gals
I have a problem with a com dll from ASP. Gives an error basically
permissions. I have the same thing running on my 2003 server here but I get
problems on the server it will be going on.
The main thing will run inder .net and Network Service logon. It will be a
c# .net web service
Try TWEAKUI
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx
And rebuild icons!
HTH,
Robbo.
Rob Anderson | Software Engineer | Pegasus, an Infor company | Tel: +44
(0)1536 49 5006 | Fax: +44 (0)1536 495214 | Mobile: +44 (0)7917 615401
Orion House, Orion Way | Kettering |
Very nice find, Rob! Thanks. I will forward this to my client and have him
play with it. He does, by the way, do a great job imaging and backing up
his PC on a scheduled basis. He drank my kool-aide and actually believes
that backing up and imaging is a good thing to do. The point? If he
Another way to rebuild the icon cache is to drop the desktop colour
depth to 16 bit, then put it back up to 32 bit.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
Ed Leafe wrote:
And if we do torture their soldiers, we are agreeing that it is fair
that they torture ours.
I didn't want to be the one to point out the obvious. :-)
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Vince Teachout wrote:
I didn't want to be the one to point out the obvious. :-)
It doesn't seem too obvious to many here. Either that, or they don't
mind if our troops are subjected to torture.
-- Ed Leafe
Excellent! Thanks!
Gil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] XP SP2 grief
Another way to rebuild the icon cache is to drop the desktop colour
I am not sure, but I think I have come across something similar to this a
while ago. From what I remember I had to log on as administrator and
register the dll then it worked.
Hope this helps.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Al
Sent: 19
Pretty amazing that a computer with Vista would run long enough to have a
problem like that.
- Original Message -
From: Kent Belan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:20 AM
Subject: RE: VFP9 SP1 and Vista - Possibly Solved
Just
What do you mean backup reference? I'm asking a
question which I have no answer for.
--- Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Michael Madigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. How many Blacks believe that White Doctors
created
AIDS to kill Blacks?
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008 11:05 AM Ed Leafe wrote:
It doesn't seem too obvious to many here. Either that, or they
don't mind if our troops are subjected to torture.
It is a war. If we don't want our troops tortured then we shouldn't be
torturing the 'enemy' troops.
It has become more
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:04, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Vince Teachout wrote:
I didn't want to be the one to point out the obvious. :-)
It doesn't seem too obvious to many here. Either that, or they don't
mind if our troops are subjected to torture.
Hi Ed!
I didn't make up this conspiracy theory, it is
rampant.
--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it allows him to justify his xenophobia and
fuel the prejudices
and stereotypes he tries to peddle
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:22 AM, David Crooks wrote:
It is a war.
No. It is an occupation. The war ended in May 2003.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Paybacks are a bitch.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yes, and I seem to remember that the Nazis were
heavily bombing London and other cities in the UK,
then later, sending buzz bombs across the channel.
I guess that was OK?
--
Larry Miller
Yes, and the Bataan Death March was enough
justification for nuking Japan.
--- Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Harvey wrote:
Rules of War has always seemed odd to me. I
mean, by definition, doesn't
it indicate people want to kill each other?
JH
Yes, but rules of war
What's disturbing is that a presidential candidate
nods his head to such statments and says, Amen
Brother.
I hardly ever go to Catholic Mass because it is as
boring as watching paint dry. For someone to sit
through 20 years of this vile crap means that he
agrees with it.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008 11:26 AM Ed Leafe wrote:
No. It is an occupation. The war ended in May 2003.
From www.dubyaspeak.com:
The security situation has certainly improved, the political situation
is getting better and the economy is beginning to improve. But it takes
a while to
In your mind maybe... the only references I could find by googling is a
claim that:
In the fall of 1986 the Russians shocked the world by claiming that
AIDS originated as a result of U.S. germ warfare
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Hi Dave,
When I converted a couple VFP apps to MySQL, I went the SPT route which
worked great. I chose the route of:
1) insert blank record
2) commit
3) get last_insert_id from backend
4) repopulate the spt cursor
Today, I would generate my pk id's on the front end using GUIDs. While
it is
On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:32 AM, David Crooks wrote:
Yet, the media still calls it a war...
Of course - they have been complicit in the lie all along. They never
questioned the WMD claims, nor the Mission Accomplished claim, nor
anything else that got us into this mess. They are buying
Stephen Russell wrote:
Use the same db for multiple retail stores for the tires store. If your
using ints your going to be screwed or have a LOT of code rewrite on your
hand
I thought about that. The solutions could be :
1. use another integer field in each table called iClientID
Fletcher Johnson wrote:
But MS hasn't made it easy for me in the VFP world
...been that way for a LONG time, even more than 10 years imo!!
although VFPx is looking rather interesting.
Yeah, those advancements/enhancements are really cool, but I think it's
something for the church faithful
Sadly, our soldiers have always been tortured and raped when caught by the
enemy. Our high moral ground (which I agree we should strive to maintain)
has not protected our soldier. During Desert Storm in 1991 it occurred to
American captives and it has occurred in Iraq during this war. The
Dave Crozier wrote:
A general question regarding how those of you out there using SPT and Auto
update cursors onto a Client Server back ends deal with record inserts into
a table.
As some of you may well know, I'm in the process of writing a set of data
access classes for VFP to Client
Ajit Abraham wrote:
Hi Dave,
I found it easier generating the primary keys at the frontend rather
than asking the backend to generate it (autoinc or @@)
I use the technique suggested in
FoxPro 2.5 Advanced Developer's Handbook
*by Adams and Powell, Chapter 18, page 644.
FUNCTION ukey
Paul M¢Nett wrote:
Hi Dave,
When I converted a couple VFP apps to MySQL, I went the SPT route which
worked great. I chose the route of:
1) insert blank record
2) commit
3) get last_insert_id from backend
4) repopulate the spt cursor
Today, I would generate my pk id's on the front end
Michael Madigan wrote:
It's amazing how catty some women are. I had another
model tell me, I can do better than those 3 skanks.
At which point you unzipped your flyoh wait...that was a different
movie..lol!!
___
Post Messages to:
He lives!
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~FoxRockXArchives
Note at bottom...
Bill
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
rofl
Bill Anderson wrote:
He lives!
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~FoxRockXArchives
--
Richard Kaye
Vice President
Artfact/RFC Systems
Voice: 617.219.1038
Fax: 617.219.1001
For the fastest response time, please send your support
queries to:
Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=white+created+aids
--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your mind maybe... the only references I could
find by googling is a
claim that:
In the fall of 1986 the Russians shocked the world
by claiming that
AIDS originated as a result of U.S.
Boom chicka wow wow boom chicka wow wow
--- MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
It's amazing how catty some women are. I had
another
model tell me, I can do better than those 3
skanks.
At which point you unzipped your
I saw that this morning .. and just rolled my eyes. ;-)
Cathy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:27 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: He who must not be named...
He lives!
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=white+created+aids
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=santa+claus%2BrealbtnG=Search
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Bill Anderson wrote:
He lives!
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~FoxRockXArchives
Note at bottom...
That's made my day!
ROFLMAO
--
Cheers
Brian Abbott
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
I'm not sure if you're getting it.
I don't believe that white doctors created aids.
BLACK PEOPLE BELIEVE WHITE DOCTORS CREATED AIDS.
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Michael Madigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I detect an air of cynicism here or what?
ROFLMA
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Anderson
Sent: 19 March 2008 16:27
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: He who must not be named...
He lives!
Bill Anderson wrote:
He lives!
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~FoxRockXArchives
Note at bottom...
Bill
How childish. What possible rhyme/reason could one have for forbidding
their past contributions to be shared with those they could help in the
distant future.
btw -- that was a
Cathy Pountney wrote:
I saw that this morning .. and just rolled my eyes. ;-)
Cathy
Cathy --- welcome! Love your work/contributions to the community. Nice
to see you here, even if we can't actually see you! ;-)
___
Post Messages to:
IMO the only way to deal with someone who thrives on controversy is to
simply ignore him. Probably got another member banned on the UT...
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Thanks for that. I was in as admin for the dll regsvr32.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: 19 March 2008 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: COM and IIS
I am not sure, but I think I have come across something
IMO the only way to deal with someone who thrives on controversy is to
simply ignore him. Probably got another member banned on the UT...
Yeah, but someone ought to tell JVP he is being ignored g.
Gil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
I'm a parts model. Bulges.
--- Paul Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
It's amazing how catty some women are. I had
another
model tell me, I can do better than those 3
skanks.
Amazing ! I would never have guessed that you were
a model g
Paul Newton
Ok - please explain. I saw that an individual did not want his articles
displayed though I cannot see any valid reason why not unless he hopes to
sell them a second time. Obviously this individual is well known to the
community - but not to me g
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
Do I
Please keep either NF or take OT with the sex jokes.
Thanks,,
Mike Wohlrab
Computer Technology Solutions
585-944-3823
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mikewohlrab.com
ftp://mikewohlrab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if you're getting it.
I don't believe that white doctors created aids.
BLACK PEOPLE BELIEVE WHITE DOCTORS CREATED AIDS.
Define BLACK PEOPLE
Quite sure some black people believe in Santa too
A+
jml
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Cathy Pountney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I saw that this morning .. and just rolled my eyes. ;-)
Cathy
Welcome to Profox!
Everyone else -- We've got a newbie, drinks are on her!
Cheers! ;)
Bill
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
On Mar 19, 2008, at 12:46 PM, John Weller wrote:
Obviously this individual is well known to the
community - but not to me g
Well, aren't you the lucky one! ;-)
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
John Weller wrote:
Ok - please explain. I saw that an individual did not want his articles
displayed though I cannot see any valid reason why not unless he hopes to
sell them a second time. Obviously this individual is well known to the
community - but not to me g
Thank your stars.
Mike Wohlrab wrote:
Please keep either NF or take OT with the sex jokes.
Sorry! You're rightwhere's that paypal link to the Hotlanta Slush,
er uh, Scholarship fund, Kevin Cully?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
Gil Hale wrote:
IMO the only way to deal with someone who thrives on controversy is to
simply ignore him. Probably got another member banned on the UT...
Yeah, but someone ought to tell JVP he is being ignored g.
Way to go, Gilyou weren't supposed to use the initials.jinx!!!
Thanks for the welcome .. and the praise on my work. I'm glad to be here and
hope I can contribute. So if you guys have any report questions ... bring
'em on! ;-)
Cathy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions General
John Weller wrote:
Ok - please explain. I saw that an individual did not want his articles
displayed though I cannot see any valid reason why not unless he hopes to
sell them a second time. Obviously this individual is well known to the
community - but not to me g
A brilliant mind but
Hey .. don't pour the drinks on me .. it mess up my hair!!
Cathy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:52 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: He who must not be named...
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
