Apologies if this isn't really the right place to ask this, but I figure
someone using formencode with pylons might have a good solution. I'm
using TG on this, but I *think* this is not really specific to either.
I am trying to get user submitted unicode html validated and cleaned up
and limited
On Wed, 2007-17-10 at 13:20 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> FormEncode is overdue for a release, but before that a request: there
> has been some mention that FormEncode should ship more useful form
> validators. For instance, FieldsMatch is an example of something
> currently shipped, but about t
On Thu, 2007-22-11 at 23:53 -0800, zunzun wrote:
> Is there any way to have Google Groups spam filter the postings to
> this news group?
>
> James
I'd recommend doing what we do on the TG list, all new users first
messages are moderated and we have a wack of people with moderator
status. It
On Tue, 2007-04-12 at 12:35 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 11:31 AM, John_Nowlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Haven't there been a few efforts at creating a pylons/sqlalchemy crud
> > interface app that does introspection on a table to generate a simple form?
> >
> > A quick look hasn't
On Fri, 2007-21-12 at 02:33 -0800, zunzun wrote:
> The TG2 trunk posting rate is not very large by my standards, and can
> be very interesting. Here is an example where the use of Mako is
> rejected in TG and will not be used;
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk/browse_thread/thr
On Tue, 2008-08-01 at 14:05 -0600, Devin Torres wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 14:35:12 Mike Orr wrote:
> > * There are three text-to-HTML helpers: 'htmlgen', 'textile',
> > 'markdown'. Do we need all of these or can we standardize on one?
> Do
> > they even need to be in WebHelpers at all?
On Wed, 2008-06-02 at 12:38 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 11:24 AM, Philip Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Feb 4, 9:34 am, Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > What can I use to fill in forms when using Genshi in Pylons? htmlfill
> > > is mentioned
I'm not sure where to ask this so sorry if it's OT. I know pylons is
(optionall?) moving to WebOb, and I'd like to get more experience
using it. I frequently find myself writing mini-apps for clients that
need to be hosted in a crappy environment but really don't need to
execute fast. Are there an
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 18:15 -0400, Noah Gift wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Alberto Valverde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> > I'm not making any judgments about anyone. However, I did
> see a great
> > talk y
> I saw a Java MVC that's totally different. The view knows about the
> model and actively puts things into it and takes things out of it.
> The controller does not know much about the model (if I remember
> right). The database is also distinct from the model; the view talks
> to the database
On Fri, 2008-20-06 at 16:24 +0200, Paul Bloch wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Just tapping in for a brief moment as I'm doing some research on wikis
> based in ruby. I've come across wagn.org which is a pretty hot wiki
> software in the way it handles the database. I was just wondering if
> anyone knows of
On Sun, 2008-29-06 at 18:50 -0700, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> Ha, yeah...
>
> But I need to support embedding flash widgets and all that other fun
> stuff.
In that case you might want to make a custom formencode validator that
uses beautiful soup and/or element tree.
Iain
--~--~-~--~-
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 01:21 -0800, cropr wrote:
>
> It is difficult to choose the right one.
>
> I've tried extjs, jquery and yui for my webproject. Here are my
> findings:
> - I started testing with extjs. Extjs is extremely bloated and
> because of that extjs is slow to load and to use and
Hi folks, I totally do not want to start a flame war here, but was
wondering if people could give me their reasons for preferring buildout
or virtualenv for automated builds of pylons apps or other wsgi apps.
Thanks,
Iain
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
> I don't use FormEncode. It is based on a very common design mistake
> made by a lot of programmers, who think one can better generate html
> from code.
I think you are maybe mixing up Formencode and some projects that use
formencode. Formencode's core is for validating and converting to and
> Cropr's point seems to be that programmers should not design forms
> because graphic designers do a much better job. That is true only if
> a complex visual design for the form page is paramount. In most cases
> the complex design occurs on the home page and content pages, and the
> form is m
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 21:41 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, I totally do not want to start a flame war here, but was
> > wondering if people could give me their reasons for preferring buildout
> &g
> Are you trying to build test suites or do a large number of
> deployments? My deployment method is to make a virtualenv on the
> target machine, "svn export" the application and copy it, then make
> any adjustments needed. So I don't really do anything automated. Are
> you trying to build te
Hi folks, I'm working on a wsgi app that I hope to eventually make
public. I'm not sure what to do about documentation, I plan on using
Sphinx for hand written docs, but don't know whether I should also use a
javadoc style tool like epydoc or doxygen, and if so, which one. If
folks could tell me w
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:12 -0500, Julio Napurí Carlos wrote:
>
> Uhmm
> what about rum [1] and RumAlchemy ?
>
> Some cool things you might overlook http://rumdemo.toscawidgets.org/
>
> [1]http://toscawidgets.org/documentation/rum/
Rum doesn't replace toscawidgets, it provides an admin app fr
> >
> > Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional.
> > No one told you to use any of them.
>
> One thing that might be nice with Pylons, is if each optional
> component had a rating system that included attributes such as:
>
> difficulty to learn:
> full test coverage:
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 16:51 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional.
> >> > No one told you to use any of them.
> >
> > Do you mean better mod_wsgi documentation as part of the Pylons
> > documentation, or that mod_wsgi itself needs better/more
> > documentation?
> >
> I guess I mean better or more complete example is probably a better choice of
> words rather then documentation because as you already ment
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:14 -0700, Philip Jenvey wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 8, 2009, at 4:50 AM, Noah Gift wrote:
>
> >
> > I get frustrated every time I setup a new virtualENV as I forgot that
> > something always breaks. I just got this today:
> >
> > http://pylonshq.com/pasties/d8768f105749c5c1690
I've been working through the Pylons book and new docs ( fantastic
improvement btw! ) as well as Ian's webob tutorials. I'm pretty clear
now on how Pylons calls pylons controllers and wsgi apps, and understand
the difference between calling an instantiated app and the way pylons
re-instantiates a
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 22:22 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > I've been working through the Pylons book and new docs ( fantastic
> > improvement btw! ) as well as Ian's webob tutorials. I'm pretty c
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 01:38 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> > It's like the issue of why Python doesn't have separate float and long
> > types. It uses long throughout because the overhead of a Python
> > object dwarfs the miniscule difference be
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 22:13 -0400, Agustin Villena wrote:
>
> I noticed that Rum & DBSprockets were left nehind and now the prefered
> CRUD solutions is Sprox (http://sprox.org/)
> that is being used on Turbogears 2.0
>
> Any experience on Sprox?
to clarify, sprox is the inheriter of DBSprocket
> At PyCon, some of us experimented with a full plugin system (Zope
> Component Architecture) as used in repoze.BFG. It's too early to tell
> whether it would be feasable for a Pylons-like framework (and most of
> the developers are too busy to pursue it right now). But the
> theoretical idea wo
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:09 -0700, Ben Bangert wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > If you decide to use zope.component a controller could be a named
> > utility. You could then register it like so:
> >
> > class BaseController(object):
> > """This is the stan
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 18:40 +0200, Antonio Beamud Montero wrote:
>
> How do you name virtual environments?
> And where do you store this enviroments?
> Exists any recipe to manage several virtual envs and not die trying it? :)
>
I came up with a slightly odd configuration that I really like, bu
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 15:51 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 18:40 +0200, Antonio Beamud Montero wrote:
> >>
> >> How do you name virtual environments?
> >> And where do you stor
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 10:09 -0700, Tom Longson (nym) wrote:
> I think the relative number of django apps in the wild vs pylons apps
> is a good indicator of how "easy" it is to get something launched. Not
> that I don't <3 pylons, but django's developer base speaks for itself.
> Either that, or py
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:19 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Tom Longson (nym) wrote:
> >
> > I think the relative number of django apps in the wild vs pylons apps
> > is a good indicator of how "easy" it is to get something launched. Not
> > that I don't <3 pylons, but d
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 11:58 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >> What we need now is people with marketing skills who are not
> >> Pylons developers (thus not distracted by development). If you'd like
> >> to do ma
> Oh, I don't know. All three frameworks are based on the original
> Rails vision, so they are all similar in that regard, and all these
> adjectives apply to all of them.
>
> I guess the first question is, regarding "Pylons is a lightweight web
> framework emphasizing flexibility and rapid deve
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 12:45 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> > I am very interested in the idea of having
> > something that supports both Pylons style and zope-traversal style as
> > I'm know finding cases where zope-style
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 19:27 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 12:45 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >> > I am very interested in the
>
> Couple of things we need to be clear before any marketing effort is.
>
> 1. Who is our Target group?
> a.) Decision maker- Who is going to take dicision on which web
> framework to be used for each project
> b.) Influencer- can be a developer/Client, etc..They can influence the
> decision m
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 09:46 -0700, Ben Bangert wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
>
> > Um, I am certainly not the guy to explain it, but I highly recommend
> > Chris M's awesome docs on the bfg site. Basically the router walks an
> > heirarc
Taking Ben's suggestion, I just went ahead created a new thread.
Mike Orr said:
"""
I have started a Talking Points wiki page to gather the essential
points. Please add anything that's missing.
http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonscommunity/Talking+Points
"""
Thanks Mike, what do you and the
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 08:59 +0200, Frank Broniewski wrote:
> Hello Graham,
>
> thank you very much for your detailed response. I find it very helpful.
>
> > FWIW, you will find that Pylons folks would tend to recommend you run
> > each with a separate Paste server instance behind mod_proxy of yo
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 14:16 +0200, Frank Broniewski wrote:
> Nice to hear that either choice is somewhat equal.
I wouldn't take my input as meaning they are *equal*, I am by no means a
server expert. I've been following Graham's work on mod_wsgi and from
what I can see he's really made it a grea
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:59 -0700, DavidG wrote:
> I am a bit concerned. The talk is that after 1.0, pylons will be
> "done". Why is this, necessarily?
>
> My feeling is that any project that "stops", or just goes into
> maintenance mode, loses a good reason for people to currently adapt
> it. Th
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 14:50 -0700, Ben Bangert wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> > If we find some great compatible feature, it can go into Pylons 1.1.
> > If we find some great incompatible feature, it can go into Pylons
> > 2.0.
> > But what would these features be? We
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 16:08 -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:23:50PM -0700, Ben Bangert wrote:
> > Hmm, yes, that is true. What do you think would be the best way? Blog
> > posts? I'm just unsure of what to say, should I just put a new post up
> > now and then saying,
and effort to do something that is not wanted and appreciated and
stand a good chance of being used. I have already railed against that in
previous threads. I would love to see that change though, so I'm sure
the discussion is still productive.
Iain
>
>
> On Jul 19, 5:11 pm, Iain D
> Regarding the lack of Pylons' marketing by the developers, it's not a
> lack of interest. It's just that Pylons 1.0 is not finished yet so we
> don't want to bring a lot of newbies on yet to suffer its growing
> pains. (Of course, the timing of the Pylons Book has brought some in,
> and they'
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 14:53 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Thomas G. Willis
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree too. If Django supported sqlalchemy as well as it does it's
> > own ORM I would likely be using it. But it seems like the price of all
> > the cool stuff Django offers
that those in charge care for their efforts.
thanks for piping up this time.
Iain
>
> Jerry
>
> On Aug 25, 7:45 am, Ben Bangert wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > > That's cool, but Ben still has to show some interest if you g
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 21:56 -0700, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2:38 am, Iain Duncan wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I totally disagree. The above may be true for Django, or for the
> > average person purchasing a Mac, but it is expressly *not true* for
> > Pylons. The Py
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 18:55 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> >> Perhaps Pylons' greatest asset is influence rather than popularity.
> >> It's gaining respect and market share among those who know a lot abou
Hey folks, I'm going to be doing some fairly serious database
refactoring and redesign for a client for whom we are making Pylons glue
apps to replace a cobbled together set of legacy db apps that don't talk
to each other. I figure it's time to take my database design knowledge
to the next level,
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:12 -0300, Mariano Mara wrote:
>
>
> 2009/8/26 Iain Duncan
>
> Hey folks, I'm going to be doing some fairly serious database
> refactoring and redesign for a client for whom we are making
> Pylons glue
>
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:04 -0700, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> i rarely use stored procedures because everything I would put in one
> is easier/faster to handle in the webapp
>
> however i make **HEAVY** use of complicated views so that:
> - i don't deal much with multi-layered orm objects ( like l
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 11:52 -0700, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> there was a "high performance mysql" book a while back , that might
> offer some non-specific db tips that are just good db design. though i
> can't remember if it was good or not.
>
> before i move on i'll note two things in a disclaim
Hey folks, I'm trying to call a repoze.bfg app as a wsgi app from
pylons. bfg app provides a wsgi callable, so I made a controller in
pylons called 'admin'.
in routing.py I have:
map.connect('/admin', controller='admin')
and in admin.py I have:
from dram.run import app
AdminController = app(
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 22:53 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks, I'm trying to call a repoze.bfg app as a wsgi app from
> > pylons. bfg app provides a wsgi callable, so I made a controller in
> > p
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 10:57 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 22:53 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hey folks, I
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 10:57 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 22:53 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hey folks, I
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 10:53 -0700, Jason S. wrote:
> > > map.connect("/admin/{path_info:.*}", controller="admin")
> >
> > Hi Mike and others, I just tried that and the wsgi callable still gets
> > an altereded evn. Path info is '/admin' and script name is still ''. Any
> > ideas what might have go
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:52 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey, it does work, but you had a typo.
> >>
> >> map.connect("/admin{
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 12:04 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 10:53 -0700, Jason S. wrote:
> >> > > map.connect("/admin/{path_info:.*}", controller="admin")
> >>
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 14:26 -0700, Thierry wrote:
> Do we have an online version of the Definitive Guide to Pylons on the
> Pylons web site? Someone just told me he prefers the documentation in
> TG2 over what Pylons have online and because of that, he'll be picking
> TG2 for his next project.
T
Wondering what the sensible way of calling an external wsgi app from
pylons is if we *want* the app to be instantiated at server startup. I
noticed that when I do
AdminController = DramApp( blah blah)
in my dummy controller file, DramApp doesn't get initialized until the
first call to the contr
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 01:28 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Wondering what the sensible way of calling an external wsgi app from
> > pylons is if we *want* the app to be instantiated at server startup. I
>
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:59 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 01:28 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Wondering w
Thanks! This should be on the site prominently somewhere. =)
iain
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 22:23 +0100, Graham Higgins wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 10 Sep 2009, at 18:59, travis+ml-pyl...@subspacefield.org wrote:
>
> > I could use some more complete examples.
Hi folks, I have not built enough pylons to be know how to switch
templating languages beyond mako and genshi, but I'm interested in using
Chameleon. Has anyone got any examples up of what one needs to do to use
Chameleon?
thanks
Iain
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
Hi folks, I am just wetting my feet with pylons. I am curious whether
anyone on here has experience integrating desktop apps with pylons
projects, and if so, would they care to share opinions on feasability,
when it is worth, how it went, how they did so?
Despite what many would have me believe,
> I haven't done it but it's a live issue in our office. I have one
> site that's a web application (Quixote) and will also be a standalone
> web application for laptops without Internet access (e.g., for
> emergency responders on a truck or ship). We debated doing a wxPython
> interface for th
> So far we've done some initial tests with Py2exe (Windows) and Py2app
> (Mac) and put it on the back burner. I've tried to stay away from
> that part because I'm more of a Linux guy.
>
> If I did it again I'd still go the web route because the differences
> between a web framework and a GUI a
>
> A while back I built a TurboGears app that utilized XRC (see
> http://wiki.wxpython.org/index.cgi/UsingXmlResources) templates that
> wxPython can render as GUI elements. The "main" application (compiled
> as an .exe) was little more than a bootstrap loader that downloaded a
> zipfile of Py
> Based on PyCon talks, Pythoncard takes a lot of the pain out of
> wxPython. Dabo seems to be aimed squarely at replacing Filemaker. I
> know the Dabo guys spent a lot of time fighting wxPython.
Hmm, having worked a long time as a user of filemaker, that doesn't seem
a selling point to me. I
On Sat, 2007-11-08 at 13:51 -0700, walterbyrd wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 9, 4:35 am, Marcin Kasperski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > A lot of answers already, so just two points:
> >
> > a) There are plenty of cheap VPS hosting options (you get
>
> I guess it depends on what you call cheap. I can ge
Wichert, thank you so much for your explicit example! I'll try that out
this week. =)
Iain
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 09:40 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 2009-9-16 21:06, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, I have not built enough pylons to be know how to switch
>
Hi folks, apologies for the cross post, I posted this on the repoze list
but didn't get any solutions, so I'll try here.
I'm using the repoze.what pylons quickstart code, and I'm having
problems with the fact that when @protect_action fails, it tries to call
the login action *for the current cont
In Sat, 2009-09-19 at 09:40 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 2009-9-16 21:06, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, I have not built enough pylons to be know how to switch
> > templating languages beyond mako and genshi, but I'm interested in using
> > Chameleon
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 10:16 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:03 AM, KMCB wrote:
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > I think they may be talk about this
> >
> > http://chameleon.repoze.org/
>
> So it's a template engine unifier, the way Buffet was and render_*
> are. It also claims to be fas
> Hm, the chameleon.zpt template has not seen as much love as the
> chameleon.genshi version so it might have broken somewhere. Can you test
> if chameleon.genshi works for you? If so I'll look at fixing up the
> chameleon.zpt version.
Thanks, Chameleon genshi is working with your correction.
> Hm, the chameleon.zpt template has not seen as much love as the
> chameleon.genshi version so it might have broken somewhere. Can you test
> if chameleon.genshi works for you? If so I'll look at fixing up the
> chameleon.zpt version.
I've got the genshi templates being rendered, but I don't
> To be more precise: chameleon.genshi implements the Genshi XML template
> syntax as described in
> http://genshi.edgewall.org/wiki/Documentation/0.5.x/xml-templates.html .
> is not a part of that syntax.
>
> That tutorial does not work due to a limitation chameleon.genshi
> currently has:
Hi folks, wondering if anyone can tell what Pylons (Paste?) uses for
parsing the ini files. I'm breaking some of my app into it's own package
and want to have it parse a local ini file if that component gets used
on it's own separately from the pylons app, but I'd like to use whatever
is the stand
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 14:17 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, wondering if anyone can tell what Pylons (Paste?) uses for
> > parsing the ini files. I'm breaking some of my app into it's own package
> &
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 14:59 -0700, pyl...@mailzilla.com wrote:
> Iain, you're probably better off using python's ConfigParser module.
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/configparser.html#module-ConfigParser
>
> Phil
Thanks Phil
Iain
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Yo
Hi folks, I'm wondering why when using nose to runs pylons
paste.fixture based test classes, setup/teardown don't seem to run
( maybe I'm missing something?)
thanks
Iain
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, s
On Feb 27, 4:53 am, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:26:59PM -0800, iain duncan wrote:
> > Hi folks, I'm wondering why when using nose to runs pylons
> > paste.fixture based test classes, setup/teardown don't seem to run
> > ( maybe I'm miss
On Feb 27, 3:48 pm, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:47:41PM -0800, iain duncan wrote:
> > What I have done is add a method called setup to the same
> > TestControllers that get made when you make a controller. In a normal
> > nose test class, this gets r
aha, thanks!
On Feb 28, 4:09 am, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:47:41PM -0800, iain duncan wrote:
>
> > On Feb 27, 3:48 pm, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:47:41PM -0800, iain duncan wrote:
> > > > What I have done is
I would recommend you work through the BFG docs before trying to
migrate any real apps. The BFG docs are frankly, the best technical
docs I have encountered. They will expose you to a bunch of new ways
of thinking about web apps, and I think wrapping your head around
traversal and the zca before mi
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 10:59 -0800, Iain Duncan wrote:
> > I would recommend you work through the BFG docs before trying to
> > migrate any real apps. The BFG docs are frankly, the best technical
> > docs I have e
My answer would be different from Ben's:
If you consider yourself an advanced developer, or expect to be doing
advance development on this project, I would dive in by using repoze.bfg. If
you aren't doing anything terribly complex or don't expect to need
extensability, then yeah, Pylons is more be
I agree that further documentation on design decisions would be helpful,
though I empathize that processes need to be lightweight.
My two cents from the sidelines:
The design decisions for Pyramid are very very good for long term
extensability and project growth. However, they are, much like the
If I may forward some 'sales guy' opinions...
Names are really really important for marketing, first impressions, brand
identity, etc. I am personally very happy to see repoze.bfg moving to a more
'acceptable' name from a sales perspective. ( I think bfg is funny, but I
have never been happy about
I would register a dissenting opinion and say use Dojo if it's going to be a
big, long lived app. I love jQuery for small projects, and projects where
the ajax is essentially garnish. It's awesome for adding ajax goodness to a
regular app and adding quick and dirty stuff without having to change yo
more
complicated, ditto for Dojo.
So I'm super happy about the Pyramid merger.
iain
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> I would register a dissenting opinion and say use Dojo if it's going to be
> a big, long lived app. I love jQuery for small projects, and proj
Also, I'm using Chameleon.zpt for templating. It's much faster than genshi,
but for me, xml templating is way easier for ajax development.
iain
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> Interesting, my big project started as a Pylons and jQuery app, existed for
&
I'm a reasonably competent BFG user who was a pylons user before that, and
am now going through the pyramid docs. Can someone tell me where I should
send details of mistakes, typos, or things that could be clearer?
thanks!
Iain
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
I just discovered the reify decorator and request_factory in the new docs,
not sure if it's new or I just missed it in recent BFG docs. It looks like a
really nice way to replace some ugliness I had done by hand in a previous
version of my work, wanted to check:
Is this the 'recommended' way to in
Hi folks, I want to have my Pyramid app look first for static html files
when given a path like
/foo.html
I can make this happen by using the following static declaration, but that
seems to hide other views as well:
When I use the above, I seem to get any request at the root directory being
in
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
