In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 at 20:07:59, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 18:28:09, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 at 20:07:59, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>
>>On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 18:28:09, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>>
>>
>>>It is a nice feature of Turnpike to re
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 18:28:09, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
It is a nice feature of Turnpike to receive email from a list like
this into a defined Newsgroup.
However, it doesn't always work. This com
Wolfgang writes:
> The sources for smsqe 3.03 are now officially out.
>
> (smsqe 3.03 itself is avaialble from your usual reseller).
>
> I have enclosed, as an attachment, some small text files, they tell you
> what is new in this version.
>
> I shall be sending the sources out on monday to those
Hi all,
The sources for smsqe 3.03 are now officially out.
(smsqe 3.03 itself is avaialble from your usual reseller).
I have enclosed, as an attachment, some small text files, they tell you
what is new in this version.
I shall be sending the sources out on monday to those who have
recently re
On 23 Oct 2003 at 18:29, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> I've deleted it anyway ... assuming it was meant to be a private
> posting.
It was - and thanks
Wolfgang
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 07:00:36,
=?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN9Pzq7/IpIg==?=
wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:36:48 +0100, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 at 20:09:09,
>> =?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 18:28:09, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
It is a nice feature of Turnpike to receive email from a list like this
into a defined Newsgroup.
However, it doesn't always work. This computer with Turnpike receives
it in the default mailbox, so I have to cut
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Lenerz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 22 Oct 2003, at 23:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
This could save future embarrassment - I can feel the heat from
Wolfgang's ears from here (8-)#
Yup.
I'm just baking bread in them.
He isn't the first to post to the wrong pla
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
=?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN9Pzq7/IpIg==?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:36:48 +0100, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 at 20:09:09,
=?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:36:48 +0100, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 at 20:09:09,
=?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN9Pzq7/IpIg==?=
wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
And while Bruce is at it, I suggest he fixes the ql-users headers to an
appropria
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 at 20:09:09,
=?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN9Pzq7/IpIg==?=
wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>And while Bruce is at it, I suggest he fixes the ql-users headers to an
>appropriate format so it identifies itself as a mailing list :-)
I didn' know that w
On 22 Oct 2003, at 23:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
> This could save future embarrassment - I can feel the heat from
> Wolfgang's ears from here (8-)#
Yup.
I'm just baking bread in them.
> He isn't the first to post to the wrong place, and I am sure won't be
> the last.
Thanks.
I do hope it'll be MY
On 22 Oct 2003, at 23:25, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> > I dont suppose it was intentional
>
> Definitely not.
Bloody right.
(...)
> Yes, fortunately the version didn't include my GD2 aurora driver.
It never does.
Wolfgang
-
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
On 22 Oct 2003, at 21:52, Duncan Neithercut wrote:
>
> I dont suppose it was intentional and its not Wolfgang's licence but its TTs
> SMSQ/E licence, but if you are interested I was sufficiently interested to
> test it on my Aurora setup. Aurora, Supergoldcard 2.49 & Qubide 2.01. After
> approx
On 22 Oct 2003, at 17:30, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> Hi Roy,
>
> This is what should be the final version of SMSQ/E 3.03 for the
> GoldCard.
>
> Would you lminbd having a look at it, to see whther is now (!)
> works OK bvefore I release it?
>
> It works here, but I remember you having had prob
On 22 Oct 2003, at 19:37, Roy wood wrote:
(...)
> You have just broken your own licence !
Well I AM allowed to send it out for testing purposes, and it
obviously was intended only for you, not the entire list.
So the intention was OK, at least.
Wolfgang
-
www.scp-paulet-lener
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:45:28 +0200, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tony Firshman wrote:
If it is possible it would be great to configure the mailing list server
to reject 'binary' messages.
I second that, binaries are a no-no for this list anyway.
Marcel
And while Bruce is at it, I su
Tony Firshman wrote:
> If it is possible it would be great to configure the mailing list server
> to reject 'binary' messages.
I second that, binaries are a no-no for this list anyway.
Marcel
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 at 23:25:24, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>Duncan Neithercut wrote:
>> I dont suppose it was intentional
>
>Definitely not.
>
>> Aurora, Supergoldcard 2.49 & Qubide 2.01. After approx 1.5hrs
>> initial conclusion is that it works OK in mode 4 including wi
Duncan Neithercut wrote:
> I dont suppose it was intentional
Definitely not.
> Aurora, Supergoldcard 2.49 & Qubide 2.01. After approx 1.5hrs
> initial conclusion is that it works OK in mode 4 including window
> move but crashes immediately on boot if the initial colour depth is
> set to 256 inst
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:52:41 +0100, Duncan Neithercut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I dont suppose it was intentional and its not Wolfgang's licence but its
TTs
SMSQ/E licence, but if you are interested I was sufficiently interested
to
test it on my Aurora setup. Aurora, Supergoldcard 2.49 & Qubid
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roy
wood
Sent: 22 October 2003 19:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Re:smsqe 3.03
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Lenerz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Hi Roy,
>
>This is what should be the final version of SMSQ/E 3.03 for the
tober 22, 2003 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Re:smsqe 3.03
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Lenerz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Hi Roy,
> >
> >This is what should be the final version of SMSQ/E 3.03 for the
> >GoldCard.
> >
>
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:37:13 +0100, Roy wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Lenerz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi Roy,
This is what should be the final version of SMSQ/E 3.03 for the
GoldCard.
Would you lminbd having a look at it, to see whther is now (!)
wor
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Lenerz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi Roy,
This is what should be the final version of SMSQ/E 3.03 for the
GoldCard.
Would you lminbd having a look at it, to see whther is now (!)
works OK bvefore I release it?
It works here, but I remember you having had p
26 matches
Mail list logo
