John R. Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all. Parts of this have been discussed elsewhere, but I haven't
seen anybody describing quite this setup. I'm reconfiguring a network
to have a dedicated firewall machine, on which I want to
Sounds like you have test.com in control/locals
Make sure there is nothing in control/locals - this file denotes domains which
are handled by system useraccounts.
Paul.
Jørgen Skogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kindest,
I am having some problems with the setup provided
from Paul Greg. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
on the LAN, there are a few clients which put wrong Date: RFC822
field. I would like to rewrite the date.
I already know of the RELAYCLIENT "@fixme" hack. What I would
like to know is which program should I use to re-stamp the date? It
qmail Digest 8 Nov 1999 11:00:01 - Issue 814
Topics (messages 32598 through 32645):
Pop/Single-UID based POP3/problem
32598 by: Jørgen Skogstad
32599 by: Jørgen Skogstad
32602 by: Chris Johnson
32604 by: Jørgen Skogstad
32611 by:
I have a POP toaster, and I did a complete backup of /
with tar. (this includes /var/qmail...)
I setup a new FreeBSD 3.2 system, minimal, on another
computer with
differing disks (one small IDE rather than a big
SCSI).
Once the new minimum system boot, I untar my previous
backup...
I reboot
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 06:10:26PM -0500, David Harris wrote:
I just didn't want to end up ignoring any message sent by a real user to the
postmaster address. Since they would have a real return path, they would get a
[snip]
But setting something up sounds like too much work for too little
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, [iso-8859-1] Jean-Pierre H. Dumas wrote:
I have a POP toaster, and I did a complete backup of /
with tar. (this includes /var/qmail...)
I setup a new FreeBSD 3.2 system, minimal, on another
computer with
differing disks (one small IDE rather than a big
SCSI).
Once
"Jim B" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ummm.. yeah thanks. But I want to know *why* it's faster.
I know there's a doc that explains 3 different methods, this being one of
them... and it shows situations why one may be preferable over the other.
Do you know what doc I'm talking about?
Hi,
I've setup qmail in the past, long ago.. and just now started putting qmail
back up on a new box, and this time using tcpserver, etc.
My real problem is around getting smtp working (dunno what the problem is),
but I seem to have some lower level problems I should sort out first.
I setup
dear list,
I installed qmail-1.03 and ucspi-tcp-0.84.
I followed the instructions in Dave Sill's "life with qmail"
qmail is up and running now, i can send email to local users and
to remote hosts.
the ip of my server is 141.20.25.44 (www.vifu.de)
I can receive email from hosts in 141.20.* so
Barbara Schelkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... when I telnet to port 25 from another
host, which is not in 141.20.* I don't get a connect, not even a
refused connection, just a timeout. when i run tcprulescheck for
that client on the server, I get "allow connection".
any hints where i can
Your network Admin is wrong: your port 25 *is* being filtered.
Could it be tcpwrappers if it is not a firewall ? Check /etc/hosts.allow
and /etc/hosts.deny.
Peter
At 03:59 PM 11/8/99 +0100, Barbara Schelkle wrote:
dear list,
I installed qmail-1.03 and ucspi-tcp-0.84.
I followed the
I'm searching as best I can, but can't find a site which lists the
approximate number of MTAs permanently connected to the internet.
Anyone care to venture a guess, or mention a site where I can find such
data.
I figure around 100,000???
TIA - Eric
Greetings...
I am having a strange problem... I normally use qmail-pw2u and it has
always worked in the past; I have no idea what has changed now...
I added a new user and then went to run qmail-pw2u and after considerable
time got:
qmail-pw2u: fatal: unable to find alias user
What does this
In previous emails I noted that a qmail installation as part of Network
Associates Webshield SMTP for Solaris was exhibiting strange behaviour with
some email that could not be processed or sent correctly. These messages
kept reappearing in the intd and mess subdirectories, quickly eating up disk
| My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr.
In his case, I think he needs to replace:
21 |
with:
|
i had the same question and had this answer:
You can use this notation
command file_name
but this will stderr AND stdout to the
In a pathological case, qmail can use a lot more network bandwidth
because of the duplication of messages going to the same system. In
practice this is rarely a serious problem. Taking into account the
*decreased* DNS traffic, it's even more rarely a problem.
It depends heavily on the
Sounds like you have test.com in control/locals
Make sure there is nothing in control/locals - this file denotes domains which
are handled by system useraccounts.
Mmm .. no, that was the strange thing. The domain was
removed from the control/locals file. I tripple checked
the installataion
The log should be in /var/log/qmail/smtpd.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Kapinos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 3:17 PM
Subject: Qmail with rh 6.1
Hi,
I've setup qmail in the past, long ago.. and just now started putting
qmail
back
This line in startup/shutdown script
- supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v
-x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ -u$QMAILDUID
-g$NOFILESGID 0 smtp \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 21 | setuser qmaill accustamp |
\ setuser qmaill cyclog
/var/log/qmail/smtpd
Is giving me this error on
"Andres Mendez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The log should be in /var/log/qmail/smtpd.
For LWQ. But he said he used the HOWTO, which uses
/var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd.
-Dave
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
To start with, you have to do a HUGE number of extra DNS
lookups to determine what the recipient systems ARE.
As opposed to the "one SMTP transaction per remote recipient" strategy
that is able to deliver messages without the need to figure out
"Nicole Ron McIntosh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This line in startup/shutdown script -
supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
-u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID 0 smtp \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 21 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
"Andres Mendez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The log should be in /var/log/qmail/smtpd.
For LWQ. But he said he used the HOWTO, which uses
/var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd.
No.. It's runing splogger and not cyclog, which means the logs
using version 0.53 of ucspi-tcp
Nicole Ron McIntosh Proud Parents
ToDevin- 5,Britni- 3, Sierra- 2, Tyler-
1***
Web page services - PnP Designs http://www.pigsnpoof.com/pnpdesigns
Tell your friends about us!!!
"Adam D . McKenna" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
"Andres Mendez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The log should be in /var/log/qmail/smtpd.
For LWQ. But he said he used the HOWTO, which uses
/var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd.
No.. It's runing
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Nicole Ron McIntosh wrote:
using version 0.53 of ucspi-tcp
Wow, is that old! You might want to upgrade it so it works with the
current examples if nothing else. The current version is 0.84 or
something really close to that.
Vince.
--
Pavel Kankovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
To start with, you have to do a HUGE number of extra DNS
lookups to determine what the recipient systems ARE.
As opposed to the "one SMTP transaction per remote recipient" strategy
that is able to deliver
okie sorry for that dont know where my mind is
today .. it is version 0.84 for the ucspi-tcp
the 0.53 is for daemontools
Nicole Ron McIntosh
Hi, after reading the Majordomo+Qmail FAQ, and trying tons of things out I
still can't figure this out:
We're running Qmail 1.03, and Majordomo 1.94.4 together on a RedHat 5.2
machine (qmail and majordomo are both source packages, not RPM's)
Anyway, the problem seems to be with the "majordomo"
"Nicole Ron McIntosh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
okie sorry for that dont know where my mind is today .. it is version
0.84 for the ucspi-tcp
the 0.53 is for daemontools
OK, then your ucspi-tcp is corrupted. Re-download the source tarball
and re-install it.
-Dave
Is there a way to change this code from a user
.qmail to only allow users or domains listed in the file instead of deleting
those mails.
|if test -n "`fgrep -x $SENDER allowfrom`"; then
echo Go Away;exit 99; else exit 0; fi
Tried a bit of perl code but that seems to be causing a few
I have read the FAQ and studied individual setup guides but I am still
stumped on these two issues:
1) I cannot get anything sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
forward to account "reuben".. I have edited my /etc/aliases file and ran
"newaliases" to compile the /etc/aliases.cdb file, but no go. I
Is there a way to change this code from a user
.qmail to only allow users or domains listed in the file instead of deleting
those mails.
|if test -n "`fgrep -x $SENDER allowfrom`"; then
echo Go Away;exit 99; else exit 0; fi
Tried a bit of perl code but that seems to be causing a few
This is not the problem in whole..
The log in /var/log/qmail-smtpd has entries in it of the form..
[root@hootch qmail-smtpd]# ls
@0941952524 @0941996365
But those log entries only contain tcpserver msgs, not the normal loggin I
see from qmail. Plus.. I'm not seeing loggin at all for
"Steve Kapinos" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The log in /var/log/qmail-smtpd has entries in it of the form..
[root@hootch qmail-smtpd]# ls
@0941952524 @0941996365
But those log entries only contain tcpserver msgs, not the normal loggin I
see from qmail.
Right, the smtpd log only logs
Qmail doesn't use /etc/aliases unless patched to do otherwise.
Root mail would be handled by a .qmail file in ~alias
Read INSTALL.alias, and look at the man page dot-qmail.0
Basically create a .qmail-root in ~alias, and put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
.qmail-root to have mail to root forwarded to
Hi
Anyone know the latest version of fastforward? I'm running 0.51.
I've encountered a small problem. In my /etc/aliases file, I have rules of
the following sort:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@bar.com: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User catch-all exists (it's a real account). Mail for
[EMAIL
The second question I will leave to the qmail gods..
Not a Qmail God by any stretch of the imagination but here goes...
2) Any outgoing mail to a server other than what is in the rcpthosts file
will get kicked back to me with an error. I cannot possibly list every
conceivable host on the
"Reuben King" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I cannot get anything sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
forward to account "reuben".. I have edited my /etc/aliases file and ran
"newaliases" to compile the /etc/aliases.cdb file, but no go.
You're using fastforward, I take it?
I read somewhere that qmail
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 01:39:44PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
And, from Steve's process list:
qmaill2893 0.0 1.1 1084 340 ?SNov07 0:00
cyclog -s500 -n5 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
Right.. that's for qmail-smtpd.. Those logs will be useless however if he
wants to
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
Pavel Kankovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
To start with, you have to do a HUGE number of extra DNS
lookups to determine what the recipient systems ARE.
As opposed to the "one SMTP transaction per remote
"Reuben King" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I cannot get anything sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
forward to account "reuben".. I have edited my /etc/aliases file and ran
"newaliases" to compile the /etc/aliases.cdb file, but no go.
You're using fastforward, I take it?
Yes.. I was
Sorry -- the aliases file is like this:
NonExistantUser: RealUser
@foo.com: AnotherRealUser
The box recieves mail for many domains (~alias/../control/locals is a dozen
lines long). foo.com would be one such domain (for argument sake). Mail
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to RealUser from
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 08 Nov 1999 13:56:28 EST:
So if I send a HELP message to majordomo, I don't get the help page
emailed back to me, the message just gets put into the Mailbox of the
majordomo user.
Hmm, it looks like majordomo may be in users/assign perchance?
Andy
--
Learning syslogd as I go.. =)
I looked in /etc/syslog.conf, and according to it, mail.* is being sent to
/var/log/maillog
But it doesn't seem to be happening. Procmail did log qmail tagged messages
to maillog fine tho.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL
Pavel Kankovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed. But are there any EXTRA lookups done? ("Extra" is the keyword
here...read original DDB's text again.)
The answer is: NO unless the implementation is incredibly stupid.
Like sendmail? :-) Sendmail is notorious for unnecessary DNS lookups.
I
"Reuben King" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's anything that goes to root that disappears into the void.
I've looked for any logging to track, but I see nothing in /var/logs that is
mail related..
How are you doing logging? splogger? cyclog? If splogger, have you
looked at /etc/syslog.conf?
I
"Steve Kapinos" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Learning syslogd as I go.. =)
I looked in /etc/syslog.conf, and according to it, mail.* is being sent to
/var/log/maillog
But it doesn't seem to be happening. Procmail did log qmail tagged messages
to maillog fine tho.
Do:
echo foo
"Frank Tegtmeyer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's amazing how qmail haters (here in Germany) always reduced the
discussion about qmail to this special case - it may be bad discussion
style but I also think that there is more need to support this type of
setup than the "normal" qmail
"Todd A. Jacobs" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My /var/qmail/users/ files (assign and cdb) are owned by root:root. The
system seems to work fine in that configuration, but I wanted to know if
those were the proper permissions, or if those files are supposed to be
owned by the qmail group instead.
Do
D. J. Bernstein writes:
ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/qmail.html will continue to work;
some of you have already noticed the www-. symlink. (If you have
a mirror program that can't handle loops, try teaching it about
EPLF's identifiers: http://pobox.com/~djb/ftp/list/eplf.html.)
What
Well, like I said, I was just speculating. Chances are good that
fastforward works the way the documentation says it does. If you can
find a clear contradiction, post the details.
-Dave
Yeah I think I found a "clear contradiction".
I have two rules that demonstrate this:
postmaster:
Yeah I think I found a "clear contradiction".
I have two rules that demonstrate this:
postmaster: keith
#
# Catch all for makeusanoffer.com
#
@makeusanoffer.com: mike
Both keith and mike are real users. "makeusanoffer.com" is in
~alias/../control/locals. A mail coming in for [EMAIL
Okie I re-downloaded and re installed the
ucspi-tcp-0.84 still a no go, only this time the error reads -
tcpserver: usage tcpserver
[ -lpPhHrRoOdDqQv ] [ -c limit ] [ -x rules.cdb ] [ -B banner ] [ -g gid ] [ -u
uid ] [ -b backlog ] [ -l localhost ] [ -t timeout ]
host port
program
Would the following program:
http://public.connect.org.uk/~rkl/replace/
be suited for flogging a dead horse... er I mean replacing uid's/gid's in
qmail binaries?
--
The 5 year plan:
In five years we'll make up another plan.
Or just re-use this one.
We have the source; let's fix it.
What the people with the problem are asking for appears to
be for qmail to not split up identical mails intended for
multiple recipients at identical hosts. These are real problems
and poo-pooing them as degenerate cases or something produces nothing.
In
Figured out my problem--
Silly RPM put a blank ".qmail-root" file in the /var/qmail/alias
directory
Now I need to figure out how to get the logging working... I looked in my
syslog.conf and found no mention of anything QMail related..
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill
"Reuben King" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's anything that goes to root that disappears into the void.
I've looked for any logging to track, but I see nothing in
/var/logs that is
mail related..
How are you doing logging? splogger? cyclog? If splogger, have you
looked at
Source: http://www.sendmail.com/text/press/index.html
More than 1.5 million copies of the Open Source sendmail are installed,
representing over 75 percent of all Internet mail servers.
Eric Dahnke escribió:
I'm searching as best I can, but can't find a site which lists the
approximate
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
Yeah I think I found a "clear contradiction".
I have two rules that demonstrate this:
postmaster: keith
#
# Catch all for makeusanoffer.com
#
@makeusanoffer.com: mike
Both keith and mike are real users. "makeusanoffer.com" is in
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 06:18:34PM -0300, Eric Dahnke wrote:
}
} Source: http://www.sendmail.com/text/press/index.html
}
} More than 1.5 million copies of the Open Source sendmail are installed,
} representing over 75 percent of all Internet mail servers.
That really doesn't answer the
Sorry, this is offtopic:
This message is just for me to avoid the dozens of inquiries I receive
each day about upgrading to the new daemontools.
It seems to me that from now on Dan's programs will come with some
kind of scripts to start the daemons under svscan. Hence it makes no
sense for
OK, now where does the fastforward documentation say that it'll do
what you expect it to do?
-Dave
He'll never be able to show you that because the documentation says it
will do exactly what he is seeing. :)
quoting 'man setforward'
TARGETS
When fastforward sees the
I understand the motivation David, I really do. But you don't
seem to understand who qmail works.
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 09:12:48PM +, David L. Nicol wrote:
What the people with the problem are asking for appears to
be for qmail to not split up identical mails intended for
multiple
Basically I want to setup a dummy host that I can relay mail off of, but I
don't want it to actually send the mail to remote machines.
Reason we're doing this is for load testing a mail application...we want
to see what happens with a real mail list without actually having the mail
go out.
Hi,
I have qmail 1.03 running and delivering with the cyrus deliver
program. When a user has reached the quota limit on their mailbox, the
logs show:
Nov 8 15:44:53 mail qmail: 942104693.358273 starting delivery 95: msg
985125 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nov 8 15:44:53 mail qmail:
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 11:24:23PM +, David L. Nicol wrote:
John White flamed forth:
man pages indicate ... that qmail-remote "sends the message
to one or more recipients at a remote host." Which means that
it still hasn't been split up when qmail-remote gets it, and that
What's the command line you use?
- Original Message -
From: Nicole Ron McIntosh
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 9:58 PM
Subject: Still getting error on startup of qmail
Okie I re-downloaded and re installed the ucspi-tcp-0.84 still a no go, only
this time the
I got it working had an extra space in the
line
Now on to the next problem hehehe
Nicole Ron McIntosh
Dont you like answering your own questions? It was a permission problem.
Never mind :)
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Theodore Cekan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 6:37 PM
Subject: error deleting email
For some reason I am unable to delete
I have sent email to that address several times. I never get a reply and I
never get off the list. I now only scan the list looking for new ways to
get off. IS there a way?
andy
At 11:17 AM 11/3/1999 +, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Miki
I have setup qmail 1-03 on Red Hat 6.0 and I have
done all the =additional needs. Now I can receive mails to the mailbox and
also send. =But now in my client (outlook or netscape) I need to receive the
mail. =So I add the POP3 server and the SMTP server but I do not receive the
=mail at my
Hello,
I have been running cyrus+qmail for quite some time now and recently, users
have been complaining about large mails not being delivered. I initially thought this
was a problem with cyrus' deliver but it seems not to be the case. When large mails
(175k) are sent in the normal
Thus said Andy Davidson on Mon, 08 Nov 1999 18:47:45 PST:
I have sent email to that address several times. I never get a reply and I
never get off the list. I now only scan the list looking for new ways to
get off. IS there a way?
Are you kidding... you have been assimilated... :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
just my useless 2p:
1. As stuff like PGP and/or GnuPG starts to spread, there shall be
no longer identical messages - each and every message shall be
signed/encrypted by a different key.
2. The claims about "new technologies", "users wanting
Hello,
After adding an entry for 192.168.3 to my named.conf file, I am getting
faster response on smtp/pop3 via qmail on my LAN, however, I was wondering
if I could get better performance if I added the class C range I was
assigned via UUnet to my caching DNS server (still learning DNS,
77 matches
Mail list logo
