Hi!,
I am facing a mail forwarding problem to my SMTP users. I have a qmail
running on Linux 5.2 server.
Question: How can i configure same name for two different domains. As alias
in QMAIL directory forwards the mail only through the user name and it
doesn't see the domain name. I feel t
"Mark E. Drummond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Wotta stupid bandwidth starvation : the content is the same than a
> > plain text message, but with twice its size.
>
> Wrong-o! Want to send a nicely formatted proposal (with appropriate
> highlights etc) to the department director so you can
Hey,
Try something like this:
:0:
*
/home/mordac/mailbox
Check out the procmail docs for details.
-Deke
Eric LaLonde [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I'm trying to set up procmail so that when a user emails another user locally using
>'mail', it will go to ~/user/Mailbox. (mordac is my test use
"Md. Sifat Ullah Patwary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am running an offline Internet Server. I like to use qmail server in my
> LAN. How can I queue my out going mail from my LAN till the server goes
> online ...
Have a look at serialmail. You find it on http://www.qmail.org .
> ... and how
You don't need that. allow is the default.
As someone else pointed out, his problem is that he has no rcpthosts file.
--Adam
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 01:16:40AM -0500, Keith Warno wrote:
> | Hi
> | I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
> | with 3 domains in rcp
HI ALL,
I have a odd question - is it possible to restrict the amount of people
in in reciepient and cc's??
Also is there a way of flushing the mail queue???
MANY THANKS ALL
--Tonino
| Hi
| I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
| with 3 domains in rcpthosts and the following in etc/tcp.smtp
|
| 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
| 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
|
| According to what I've read, this should allow only users with 192.168.1.*
| to use my
Russell Nelson wrote:
Faried Nawaz writes:
> And how does someone with /bin/false as their shell put commands in their
> .qmail files?
The sysadmin put /bin/false into /etc/shells, and now ftp lets them
deposit files in their home directory.
Well, yes -- that's what I imagine h
Faried Nawaz writes:
> And how does someone with /bin/false as their shell put commands in their
> .qmail files?
The sysadmin put /bin/false into /etc/shells, and now ftp lets them
deposit files in their home directory.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells s
Stig Hackvän wrote:
qmail invokes commands with /bin/sh regardless of the user's login shell, so even if
a user has /bin/false for a shell, that user's .qmail file can be used to gain shell
access.
And how does someone with /bin/false as their shell put commands in their
.qmail files?
i
Hi all,
This may have been answered before but I searched the archive and found nothing
on it.
How do I set *.domain as a local delivery in /var/qmail/control/locals or do I
need to do something
entirly different?
Example:
I want @.domain to be considered local.
After which fastforward will be h
qmail invokes commands with /bin/sh regardless of the user's login shell, so even if a
user has /bin/false for a shell, that user's .qmail file can be used to gain shell
access.
i consider this to be a qmail bug.
stig
--
Stig... Friend of Hacking ... 707-987-3236 work@
Hi all,
Help me about qmail.
I am running an offline Internet Server. I like to use qmail server in my
LAN. How can I queue my out going mail from my LAN till the server goes
online and how can i retrive my in coming mails which are also queued in
other Inthernet mail (running qmail) server?
Re
Jedi/Sector One wrote:
>
> Right, and many Netscrap and Grootlook users are sending HTML mails
> (and even HTML + plain text) for a plain text content, or just ugly and
> useless colors or background.
> Wotta stupid bandwidth starvation : the content is the same than a
> plain text message, b
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> You can use a mailcap definition to pipe html attachments through lynx.
> This works well for mutt. The html attachments look like plain text
> attachments.
Not adequate .. some of the html mail I receive is complex and does not
render in any decently readable fashion
Perfect. This is just what I needed.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: Truncating large attachments in bounced mail
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 a
I'm trying to set up procmail so that when a user
emails another user locally using 'mail', it will go to ~/user/Mailbox. (mordac
is my test user)
to do this i put:
"/home/mordac/Mailbox" (minus quotes) in
/home/mordac/.procmailrc
and in
/home/mordac/.qmail
i put:
| preline procmail
but
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:23:59PM -0500, Nathan J. Mehl wrote:
>
> Anybody got any sample maildir delivery code in perl lying about that
> I could snarf? A quick scan of CPAN revealed nothing of any use.
http://search.cpan.org/doc/KJOHNSON/MailFolder-0.07/Mail/Folder/Maildir.pm
John White
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:16:20PM -0800, David Cunningham wrote:
> I've thought of truncating the message before it's bounced but this still
> requires my server to read in the entire message. Any suggestions for how
> to handle this?
There's a patch to do this. Search the qmail home page for '
Not in there right now but given the usage of checkpassword in qmail-pop you
could implement a time based check of the user.
Quoting Stephen Mills ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> there is no feature like this that Im aware of.
>
> but you could setup a cron job to remove pop3 and enable at given hours,
>
Mark Delany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What made you think you had to use a qmail specific feature to achieve
> this result rather than something general to Unix?
Exactly right. As someone well-known once said, ``This is UNIX. Stop
acting so helpless.''
However, killing the POP listener was
LWQ has some very handy examples of how to use daemontools:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html
jon
At 12:47 AM +0100 1/27/00, Vincent Schonau wrote:
>At 03:22 PM 26/1/2000 -0800, Bill Rogers wrote:
>>Installing qmail and thought it would be a breeze just
>>to install daemontools and use
Title: RE: Restrict Times
there is no feature like this that Im aware of.
but you could setup a cron job to remove pop3 and enable at given hours, athough your users will get a nasty no connection when they check mail at times when its disabled...
--Steve
-Original Message-
From:
Jeff Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> According to what I've read, this should allow only users with 192.168.1.*
> to use my server as a relay.
That's correct.
> But when I test remotely, the test messages are allowed through.
On 27-Jan-00 Director tecnico del Nodo Nicarao -- Juan Navas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if any of you know of any qmail feature that allows
> restrict E-Mail checking at a specific time of the day
Launch and kill your pop and imap servers from cron.
Vince.
--
===
There is nothing in qmail, but the beatuy of Unix
is that there are plenty of ways of building a collection
of tools to do this.
There is, eg, cron. With it you can issue any command at any time
of the day or night. One such command might be to kill your pop
listener. Another (at a different time
Hi,
I was wondering if any of you know of any qmail feature that allows
restrict E-Mail checking at a specific time of the day
Juan Navas
System Administrator
Managua, Nicaragua
At 03:22 PM 26/1/2000 -0800, Bill Rogers wrote:
>Installing qmail and thought it would be a breeze just
>to install daemontools and use old scripts. WRONG.
>
>Could someone point me to some standard qmail-* scripts
>using daemontools .61
I wouldn't call them 'standard', but I've been working on
s
Installing qmail and thought it would be a breeze just
to install daemontools and use old scripts. WRONG.
Could someone point me to some standard qmail-* scripts
using daemontools .61
Thanks,
Bill
Get your own FREE, personal N
Let's try this again...I *gotta* quit putting in *lists*.cr.yp.to
--- Patterner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:24:00 -0800 (PST)
> From: Patterner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: [Fwd: Strange queue behaviour]]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Anybody got any sample maildir delivery code in perl lying about that
I could snarf? A quick scan of CPAN revealed nothing of any use.
-n
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Listen up, freaks: This is the last time I'm going to run one of your wh
Chris Readle wrote:
>
> I'm having a bit of strand queue behaviour. Basically I've got 50+ (I
> think 54, without looking) local-bound messages in the queue that I
> cannot get to flush no matter what I try. I've tried sending an ALRM, a
> HUP, stopping and restarting qmail and rebooting the se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles wrote:
> > qmail is designed to process each recipient separately. This tends to
> > maximize performance at the expense of network bandwidth.
> I live in Brazil, so network badwidth is a little expensive, so if i can
> send all equal messag
Petr Novotny writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27 Jan 00, at 6:47, Giles Lean wrote:
> > It sounds like the person you were talking to had some sort of DNS
> > problem he or she failed to solve.
>
> No. If I understand correctly, that file was rcpthosts. It
Hi
I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
with 3 domains in rcpthosts and the following in etc/tcp.smtp
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
According to what I've read, this should allow only users with 192.168.1.*
to use my server as a rel
At 6:47 AM +1100 1/27/00, Giles Lean wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:24:27 - "Petr Novotny" wrote:
>
> > I have recently spoken to a guy who said me something along
> > these lines:
> >
> > "I have considered qmail once. I found it easy to install and
> > configure. But I had to write all
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:47:07 +1100 Giles Lean wrote:
> It sounds like the person you were talking to had some sort of DNS
> problem he or she failed to solve.
Or maybe I misunderstood. If your correspondant was concerned about
rcpthosts and locals like Russell Nelson's reply suggests, then
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Jan 00, at 6:47, Giles Lean wrote:
> It sounds like the person you were talking to had some sort of DNS
> problem he or she failed to solve.
No. If I understand correctly, that file was rcpthosts. It means he
just put
.cz
.sk
.com
.edu
.whatev
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:24:27 - "Petr Novotny" wrote:
> I have recently spoken to a guy who said me something along
> these lines:
>
> "I have considered qmail once. I found it easy to install and
> configure. But I had to write all the top-level domains to some file,
> can't remember wh
Petr Novotny writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I have recently spoken to a guy who said me something along
> these lines:
>
> "I have considered qmail once. I found it easy to install and
> configure. But I had to write all the top-level domains t
Please...let's not bring that up again.
"Mike Denka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have searched all the faqs and all the literature that I can stomach in
one sitting. I have read and re-read the dot-qmail man page. But I'm
still missing something: it seems that to alias root, for example, you put
the real address you want ro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I live in Brazil, so network badwidth is a little expensive, so if i can
> send all equal messages to a host in a unique tranfer, that would be good,
> there is some patch to do this or it's up to me work on something for it?
If bandwidth is that expensive, buy a co
Andrea Verni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have one domain and several departmental mail servers and all users
must have the same domain in their email address.
I want to avoid that when "user a" sends and email to "user b", both on
the same dempartmental mail server, the email goes fr
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:02:47 -0800 "Mike Denka" wrote:
> Turns out that the solution to this problem was to make sure that the
> ampersand, '&', is in front of each line followed by each additional
> recipient address. ...
>... However the documentation makes it sound
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have recently spoken to a guy who said me something along
these lines:
"I have considered qmail once. I found it easy to install and
configure. But I had to write all the top-level domains to some file,
can't remember which one, to be able
Andrea Verni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have one domain and several departmental mail servers and all users
must have the same domain in their email address.
I want to avoid that when "user a" sends and email to "user b", both on
the same dempartmental mail server, the email goes fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> My qmail system when receive a message with x recipients always split in x
> deliveries, is there a way to qmail-remote do one delivery using a "Cc"
> field instead of use a lot of processes?
The extremely short answer is "0". The slightly less short answer is
"no"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My qmail system when receive a message with x recipients always split in x
> deliveries, is there a way to qmail-remote do one delivery using a "Cc"
> field instead of use a lot of processes?
qmail is designed to process each recipient separately. T
I live in Brazil, so network badwidth is a little expensive, so if i can
send all equal messages to a host in a unique tranfer, that would be good,
there is some patch to do this or it's up to me work on something for it?
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PR
My qmail system when receive a message with x recipients always split in x
deliveries, is there a way to qmail-remote do one delivery using a "Cc"
field instead of use a lot of processes?
Randolph S. Kahle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, qmail will try to create several simultaneous SMTP
> connections if there are multiple messages in the outbound queue.
>
> I am trying to debug a problem and I would like to limit qmail to using
> only one connection at a time.
Turns out that the solution to this problem was to make sure that the
ampersand, '&', is in front of each line followed by each additional
recipient address. Thanks to Jim Gilliver for the solution and Ruben van
der Leij for an explanation. However the documentation makes it sound as
though the
As I understand it, qmail will try to create several simultaneous SMTP
connections if there are multiple messages in the outbound queue.
I am trying to debug a problem and I would like to limit qmail to using
only one connection at a time.
How can I do this?
Thanks -- Randy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>when i use outlook express to connect my qmail server, error occur:
> " -ERR usage: popup hostname subprogram"
>i had a entry in inetd.conf :
> " pop-3 stream tcp nowait root /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup qmail-popup \
> head.paic /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/q
"Juan E Suris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am in the process of changing my email adress. I tried to subscribe
>my new address and it did not work.
What did you do, exactly? How did it "not work"? No response? Error
message?
-Dave
"Max" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am really confused now. How should I be starting qmail on a freebsd
>system.
I recommend installing using the directions in "Life with qmail":
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html
Which only requires that you add "/usr/local/sbin/qmail start" to a
star
Joe Millay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am installing qmail on a box with RedHat 6.1 as the OS. I am following
>LQW's instructions. I have downloaded the source for qmail, ucspi, and
>daemontools. I am to the section where I create users and groups, but I
>am confused (VERY confused).
>
>I canno
"Muhammad Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'll be highly thankful to you if U suggest me with the settings
>which I have to made at my company. I am replacing five mailservers
>running smail with Qmail. the layout is described with the
>attachement. Would U plz. let me know the settings .tha
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 11:33:17AM -0500, Kevin Lee wrote:
> At 09:47 AM 1/24/00 -0800, Mark Delany wrote:
> >Do your logs show that you are sending it twice?
> >
> >Note that duplicates are always possible with SMTP and there is nothing
> The logs do sometimes have an error that the connection
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
[...] Everyone will suggest you to ditch splogger
> and use cyclog instead.
Well, cyclog is already history for some of us. :-)
History: BigBang -> syslog -> splogger -> cyclog -> multilog
Mads
At 09:47 AM 1/24/00 -0800, Mark Delany wrote:
>Do your logs show that you are sending it twice?
>
>Note that duplicates are always possible with SMTP and there is nothing
>you can do about it. One scenario is simply that the other end sends back
>a 250 OK which your end never sees. What does your
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > 2. qmail-send is run as root?
>
> Yup. Well, qmail-start is run as root. Along the line it gives up
> its rootness, becoming qmail-send, and leaving only qmail-lspawn
> running as root.
Login is run as root. It switches to my privs and execs my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Jan 00, at 11:10, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > > Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
> > > run as root (unlike qmail-send).
> >
> > 1. qmail-popup is a setuid program?
>
> No, howeer syslog is often used by
Pavel Kankovsky writes:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> > Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
> > run as root (unlike qmail-send).
>
> 1. qmail-popup is a setuid program?
No, howeer syslog is often used by daemons, and some daemons run
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
> run as root (unlike qmail-send).
1. qmail-popup is a setuid program?
2. qmail-send is run as root?
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"
Derek Callaway writes:
> What about the calls to syslog in qmail's splogger.c? Are they secure?
Maybe. Maybe not. But splogger isn't a setuid program and needn't be
run as root (unlike qmail-send).
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free soft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Jan 00, at 10:49, Derek Callaway wrote:
> > I don't recommend applying that patch. Every line of it is wrong. It
> > makes qmail-popup less secure, by inserting a call to syslog(), which
> > is a security disaster. It also sucks in the string
I have been informed that my mail system is "incorrectly" denying mail relaying. It
is to my understanding that the ip's of users should be allowed to relay mail,
anything else should never have to--which is how I currently have it setup.
One of my users is on a mailing list and the list admin
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > 5. Recommendation
> >
> > Impose the 40 character limitation specified by RFC1939 into qmail.
> > Apply qmail-popup patch http://www.ktwo.ca/c/qmail-popup-patch
>
> I don't recommend applying that patch. Every line of it is wrong. It
> makes
qtools 0.50 is available via
http://www.superscript.com/qtools.html
The package includes a variety of .qmail command tools. There is also
a mailing list for discussion of qtools not relevant to the qmail
list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the BLURB file:
qtools is a suite of utilities for use w
"Petr Novotny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On 26 Jan 00, at 7:48, iv0 wrote:
>> I've been running it for over two weeks.
>>
>> the return information on an MX record is different than
>> bind. It returns less information and doesn't seem to
>> s
Hello!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 08:00:49PM +, George Cox wrote:
> On 24/01 23:04, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to have qmail-smtpd log the connecting IP address (and/or
> > hostname) in the same log (preferably the same line) for every incoming
>
> This may not _exactly_ ans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Jan 00, at 7:48, iv0 wrote:
> I've been running it for over two weeks.
>
> the return information on an MX record is different than
> bind. It returns less information and doesn't seem to
> send the oversized DNS packets. If you read about dns
On 26 Jan 2000, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
> Chris Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I tested the env setting by printing out the ENV variable to a log file
> > from within the CGI script, and it came up empty...this held true with
> > non-QMAIL environment variables.
> >
> > So I suppose this
Petr Novotny wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> is someone of you running qmail fed from dnscache? How does
> dnscache deal with oversized DNS packets? The same way as
> unpatched qmail?
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
I've been running it for over two we
Hello,
I am setting up qmail on a RedHat Linux 6.1 machine. I am using life
with qmail's installation directions. I posted a message yesterday and I
am still a little confused. I have 3 questions (for now);
QUESTION #1:
The instructions say there should be a file named INSTALL.ids in the
source
HI!
Is there any support for RFC 2554 ( SMTP Extension Authentication ) for
qmail available?
And if it is available can i combine it with the Relay mechanism'n?
For example:
Client: Outlook with the option Smtp-Server needs authentication.
Server: qmail
Scenario with user granted to relay me
Hi everyone.
This account is not on the list, but if you could respond to this I'd
appreciate it.
I'm not sure if this is qmail or not, but I can't send messages outside of
our firewall, nor can I get messages in. However, I am able to email
interoffice. So qmail is functioning, but only par
This is a set of small messages being sent to my client (a large corporation).
Regards,
Randy
At 07:30 AM 1/26/00 , Petr Novotny wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On 26 Jan 00, at 6:27, Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
>
> > I am new to qmail and I have a question about message
Hi guys,
I have resolve this problem (if anyone can help me or just give me a
link with detailed instruction):
I have one domain and several departmental mail servers and all users
must have the same domain in their email address.
I want to avoid that when "user a" sends and email to "user b"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Jan 00, at 6:27, Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
> I am new to qmail and I have a question about message delivery.
>
> I have several messages in my outbound queue that are not getting
> delivered. The log file says
>
> "[...] deferral: Connected_t
I am new to qmail and I have a question about message delivery.
I have several messages in my outbound queue that are not getting
delivered. The log file says
"[...] deferral: Connected_to_151.xxx.x.xx_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/"
The email is being send to an address @.com that
works when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is someone of you running qmail fed from dnscache? How does
dnscache deal with oversized DNS packets? The same way as
unpatched qmail?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Chris Hardie wrote:
> I've tried this to no avail. As the above part of my message indicates,
> it seems the environment variables aren't even being set, let alone used.
I did notice that when I upgraded from 1.3b5 to 1.3.9 (internal server)
that SetEnv no longer worked whe
qmail Digest 26 Jan 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 892
Topics (messages 36062 through 36121):
cyclog loggin?
36062 by: Michael Boman
36072 by: Dave Sill
smtp auth
36063 by: Thomas Schachner
Re: High-load servers...
36064 by: Dave Sill
Re: Configuration for high vol
Chris Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tested the env setting by printing out the ENV variable to a log file
> from within the CGI script, and it came up empty...this held true with
> non-QMAIL environment variables.
>
> So I suppose this might be more of an apache question, but surely one
Dear Sir,
I'll be highly thankful to you if U suggest me with the
settings which I have to made at my company. I am replacing five mailservers
running smail with Qmail. the layout is described with the attachement. Would U
plz. let me know the settings .thanx.
=
According to Magnus Bodin:
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 02:55:19PM -0700, Steve Wolfe wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Apologies for the previous HTML post.
> >
> > I can see the package now - "HTMLReject" for Qmail. : )
>
> It's kinda included in ezmlm already.
>
Are there any standalone, fast HTML -
I'm running into a qmail-pop3d problem which I haven't seen before.
I've just migrated to daemontools-0.61, and am having trouble getting
qmail-pop3d fully operational under svscan.
Symptoms: users can issue USER and PASS commands, but an immediate
-ERR unable to write pipe
is issued.
contents
first, you have to know, that you MUST filter your logfiles throug
qmailanalog/bin/matchup.
this nice piece of software finds together the lines of the log for
each mail.
the output comes to STDOUT. lines matchup is not able to glue togehter
come to channel 5.
since i do looging with splogger,
IMHO it should be the username of the owner of Maildir
a.j.
>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<
Am 1/26/00, 3:05:47 AM, schrieb Brian Baquiran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> zum
Thema users/assign format question:
> What is the significance of the second field in users/assign?
alias and qmaild these are users needed for qmail to run. the
INSTALL.ids should hve been gone to /var/qmail/doc
if you do not find it, i will mail them to you directly. and: the line
"qmaild:*:7791:2108:: /var/qmail/:bin/true" is an /etc/passwd line and
not /etc/group
a.j
>>
When I sent to a mailing list it ques the entire list (175,000 addresses)
then the que takes forever (24 hours) to deliver. Anyway to speed this up?
The server is a dedicated P 450, 128Meg, RedHat. Dedicated to qmail.
Thanks,
Randy
On Wed 2000-01-26 (02:34), Curtis Generous wrote:
> According to Guan Yang:
> > 1. A rackful of SMTP servers, running mini-qmail and qmail-qmqpc, behind
> > pickdns.
>
> What is 'pickdns'?
A load-balancing DNS server, part of the dnscache package -
http://cr.yp.to/dnscache.html
Neil
--
Neil Bl
96 matches
Mail list logo
