Hi all!
I found my qmail server has been hanging time to time. At hang situatin, it
receives mail from any smtp client but does not delever it to destination.
All mails are queued. I have to restart the machine to get life working.
qmail works nice for 2/3 days and suddenly hangs again. Even if I
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:39:10PM -0600, Director tecnico del Nodo Nicarao -- Juan
Navas wrote:
> I'm still having problems setting up a pop account without a system
> account.Everything has been ok so far. I can send mails from anywhere and
> qmail redirect everyone to the non system pop accoun
Did you run qmail-newu?
JES
Director tecnico del Nodo Nicarao -- Juan Navas wrote:
> I'm still having problems setting up a pop account without a system
> account.Everything has been ok so far. I can send mails from anywhere and
> qmail redirect everyone to the non system pop account test mailbo
I'm still having problems setting up a pop account without a system
account.Everything has been ok so far. I can send mails from anywhere and
qmail redirect everyone to the non system pop account test mailbox
(./qmail/popboxes/domain-com/test).But when I try to check these mails the
system tells m
Hi,
I was checking my qmail queue (with ./qmail-qread) and I found a lot of :
.
.
done remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doen remote "
done remote "
done remote "
done remote "
done remote "
.
.
Can you tell me what documentation should I read in order
Quoting Aaron L. Meehan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> sanctions. @home: scourge of the internet.
Bleh, of course we're talking about road runner! I get all these mega
cable co's confused, I guess.
Perhaps they learned from @home's problems and took proactive measures.
Aaron
Quoting Racer X ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> if you mean the ISP blocks inbound port 25 connections to your machine: yell
> at your ISP. they're being too nazi with their firewall rules. if they
> don't open the port find a new ISP. this is assuming, btw, that you have a
The reason they took this dr
Director tecnico del Nodo Nicarao -- Juan Navas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if any of you know of any qmail feature that allows
> restrict E-Mail checking at a specific time of the day
>
> Juan Navas
> System Administrator
> Managua, Nicaragua
The general solution to this kind of thing
if you mean the ISP blocks inbound port 25 connections to your machine: yell
at your ISP. they're being too nazi with their firewall rules. if they
don't open the port find a new ISP. this is assuming, btw, that you have a
static IP. if you don't, you really have no reason to complain, cuz peo
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 05:51:16PM -0500, Brian R wrote:
> My isp is Time-Warner (roadrunner), they block incoming only. I am assuming
> this is to avoid the problems that @home has(had) with open mail relays and
> spamming, though i could be wrong. Yes, they do offer to open it for an
> additiona
if you need to actually STORE the mail spool under /var/spool/mail/*, then
yes, you need procmail or similar. however, if you just need to fool stupid
lusers/mail clients, you can deliver to the homedir and have a symlink from
/var/spool/mail/user -> ~user/Mailbox.
of course, mbox delivery has i
ok to answer the numerous questions:
My isp is Time-Warner (roadrunner), they block incoming only. I am assuming
this is to avoid the problems that @home has(had) with open mail relays and
spamming, though i could be wrong. Yes, they do offer to open it for an
additional cost. Unfortunately, for
Note: I haven't set this up yet. I need to figure how doable it is before I
start.
I want to set up a high-uptime qmail server for all our inbound
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mail, and to send out machine generated email. Our
employees, however, are going to be on an exchange server. I have no choice
in
Marco Leeflang wrote:
[cut]
> What tools are used to check mail for viruses.
> I have to setup virusscanning with qmail.
Well, what about reading the archive?! :-) This question is getting
boring ;-)
Step 1: get one or more virus scanners, for Linux see Mini-FAQ
"antivirus software for Linux" a
For some strange reason, the qmail daemon on my machine would just die.
Is there a way I could keep track of what happened?
There's no trace of it under /var/log/qmail, /var/adm/messages.
It didn't produce any core file...
Pls. help...tnx
-Andrew
Roland Pelzer wrote:
> -Ursprngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Datum: Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2000 22:10
> Betreff: virus scanning & lotus
>
> >Hi everyone.
> >
> >question:
> >
> >I mentioned that there is open sour
"Max" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I need to configure several e-mail boxes with autoresponders
>something like this...
>
>info@domain (responds with message "Thank you blah, blah, blah", and
>forwards the e-mail to "inside-info@domain").
There's a qmail vacation program. See www.qmail.org.
-D
"Chris Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>how do i unsubscribe from this list
See:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#mailing-lists
-Dave
clifford thurber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am trying to configure qmail so that I may send mail from our domain to
>any other domain. Does this require an empty RCPTHOSTS
>file?
No.
>Can someone elaborate on the
>proper entries in to control files? Thanks in advance.
See:
http://Web.In
Also, do you know what the flags -R and -b mean for rblsmtpd ?
>On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 04:20:48PM +, kevin wrote:
>} The problem I have is if I do use:
>} /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -u 101 -g 100 0 smtp
>} /opt/software/bin/rblmstpd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
>
>Could this typo
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 10:43:37AM -0600,
> David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True; but if you're modifying existing files, the directory data to
> > locate it is already safely on disk; only the timestamp might be
> > wrong. This isn't the qmail situa
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 07:46:17AM -0500,
Brian R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My isp blocks port 25, I was looking for suggestions to get around this. The
> only thing I can come up with is: setting up a relay from an outside box to
> another port on my machine. Is this plausible?
I am assu
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 10:43:37AM -0600,
David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True; but if you're modifying existing files, the directory data to
> locate it is already safely on disk; only the timestamp might be
> wrong. This isn't the qmail situation, but it's an important real
> s
I would just like to take a quick second to
thank the following people for all of their help installing and configuring my
qmail box.
Dave Sill, Chris Johnson, Patrick Mullen,
and Petr Movotny thank you all very much!
Maxe. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need to configure several e-mail boxes
with autoresponders something like this...
info@domain (responds with message "Thank
you blah, blah, blah", and forwards the e-mail to
"inside-info@domain").
How do I configure this on my newly
configured qmail system (I have never used qmail befo
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 01:03:00PM -0500, clifford thurber wrote:
> I am trying to configure qmail so that I may send mail from our domain to any
> other domain. Does this require an empty RCPTHOSTS file? I currently have
> .mydomain.com in out rcpthosts file as well as 127.0.0.1. When telnetting
Hello,
I am trying to configure qmail so that I may send mail from our domain to
any other domain. Does this require an empty RCPTHOSTS
file? I currently have .mydomain.com in out rcpthosts file as well as
127.0.0.1. When telnetting to port 25 and typing Rcpt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
am given the m
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 04:20:48PM +, kevin wrote:
} The problem I have is if I do use:
} /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -u 101 -g 100 0 smtp
} /opt/software/bin/rblmstpd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
Could this typo ^^^be the problem?
}
} I cannot send mail through my server fr
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:39:00AM -0500, Shakaib Sayyid wrote:
> We are an ISP and whenever our dialup customer send an attachment
> over 500K it returns with the error "SMPT timed out".
>
> Thanks for all the suggestions to find a solution.
first: look into the ISPs mail server log files.
se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 3 February 2000 at 22:49:15 -0600
>
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:15:41 -0500 (EST) , Russell Nelson writes:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > What use is syncing the data to disk, if you can't
> > > get to it after a crash? It might as well hav
We are an ISP and whenever our dialup customer send an attachment
over 500K it returns with the error "SMPT timed out".
Thanks for all the suggestions to find a solution.
Shakaib
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:12:59AM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Then it is very (and more performant) in .qmail-virtual-vdomain-default:
> > |/usr/bin/forward $DEFAULT
> > should do it.
>
> That'll deliver the mail locally. If you want to do that, just make it a local
> domain. I don't think t
The problem I have is if I do use:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -u 101 -g 100 0 smtp
/opt/software/bin/rblmstpd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
I cannot send mail through my server from an email client like Claris
Emailer, I get the error: network stream error.
I so as I set it back to the or
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 05:05:21PM +0100, Robert Sander wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:02:09AM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is delivered locally as virtual-vdomain-user. If that
> > ends up being handled by ~alias/.qmail-virtual-vdomain-default, then $DEFAULT
> >
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:02:09AM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
> Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is delivered locally as virtual-vdomain-user. If that
> ends up being handled by ~alias/.qmail-virtual-vdomain-default, then $DEFAULT
> is user, i.e. the address with virtual-vdomain stripped off. If the ad
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 04:40:34PM +0100, Robert Sander wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 03:01:11PM -, Petr Novotny wrote:
>
> > > Set up an ~alias/.qmail-virtual-vdomain-default that contains
> > >
> > > |/var/qmail/bin/forward `echo $LOCAL | cut -f 4- -d "-"`
> > >
> > > That cuts the fir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Why require two separate fsync() calls when one
> > > will do?
> >
> >Because it's faster to only do the one. What is the point of spending
> >10% of your disk throughput taking steps to prevent something that
> >never happens?
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 03:01:11PM -, Petr Novotny wrote:
> > Set up an ~alias/.qmail-virtual-vdomain-default that contains
> >
> > |/var/qmail/bin/forward `echo $LOCAL | cut -f 4- -d "-"`
> >
> > That cuts the first three parts of alias-virtual-vdomain-user
> > revealing the real username.
I agree, I used to deliver to /var/spool/mail/$USER but I am happy to say I
do no longer.
The only way I was able to do it was to use procmail and fastforward for my
aliases.
I cant remember the syntax exactly but you need a .qmail-default to call
procmail from.
Its ugly, unreliable, and a securi
*confused look*
Strange, either something IS speech, or it isn't (in my opinion anyways)..
This is going to be one HELL of a legal precedent setting case if the deCSS
defendants can't present more evidence in their favor.
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: iv0 [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
If you read what the Judge said in the DeCSS case in New York, he
stated that the courts are not clear on this issue. He sited
the Bernstein case as "it is speech" and cited some other cases
as "it is not speech".
Ken Jones
"Soffen, Matthew" wrote:
>
> I am wondering if this ruling is availab
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 05:10:01PM +0900, Kristina wrote:
> I want to configure qmail-local to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail.
> The /usr/share/man/cat5/dot-qmail.0 file tells you how to write a
> .qmail file to change delivery, however its too difficult for me to comprehe
> nd.
>
> Can someone
I am wondering if this ruling is available online ?
The reason in I ask is that in the deCSS case the judge has stated that
software is NOT speech, If memory serves me correct, the judge in Dan's case
stated that software IS speech.
Thanks for any help !
Matt Soffen
Applications Develo
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Why require two separate fsync() calls when one
> > will do?
>
>Because it's faster to only do the one. What is the point of spending
>10% of your disk throughput taking steps to prevent something that
>never happens?
"never happens" != "can't happen". My impressi
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:39:01AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Set up an entry in virtualdomains like
vdomain.foo:alias-virtual-vdomain
Every mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be redirected to the local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Set up an ~alias/.qmail-virtual-vdomain-default that contains
|/var/q
Rainer Link wrote:
Just as a follow-up:
Please use *only* AMaViS 0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-5 with qmail. The official
AMaViS 0.2.0-pre6 has (still) some problems with qmail.
Thanks.
> > There seems to be something wrong but I can't figure out what.
> > I've setup Qmail-1.03, AVP 3.0 Beta 2 and compi
We are presently Qmail 1.03. We added a virtual domain. To route the mail
to the virtual domain users, we had to add an alias for each user. We're
actually routing the mail for that domain to a specific mail server. Is
there a way to route that email w/o adding an alias for each emember of tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 00, at 8:28, Paul Schinder wrote:
> >Yes, that's what i thought of ... if i would be able to code this :-<
> >I don't know (anymore) how to c-code and in perl i'm not familar with
> >sockets and so on :-((
>
> Install libnet, available from
At 12:43 PM +0100 2/4/00, Puck wrote:
>
>Yes, that's what i thought of ... if i would be able to code this :-<
>I don't know (anymore) how to c-code and in perl i'm not familar
>with sockets and so on :-((
Install libnet, available from CPAN (if you don't know what CPAN is,
you should: http:/
At 10:44 AM + 2/4/00, kevin wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Is there anyone who knows about how to setup rblsmtpd ?
>
>I've tried loads of different sources and I can't seem to find a way to
>set-up qmail to bloke relay spam to my server.
>
>This my current start-up for qmail in /etc/init.d :
> /usr/l
Hi all,
My isp blocks port 25, I was looking for suggestions to get around this. The
only thing I can come up with is: setting up a relay from an outside box to
another port on my machine. Is this plausible?
Thanks,
Brian
Bolmehag, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My setup fails test 6 at orbs, but some say it is safe anyway and that
> the mail is rejected internally. Some say that I need to install some
> extra program to get that security.
> Which is the correct answer?
The simple ORBS tester (the one that
Mullen, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, after grinding the heck out of my hard drive, I finally found both
> "shell-init" and "could not get current directory" in the same program.
> As should have been expected, they were from /bin/bash (and /bin/sh
> which is only a symbolic link to
Hi !
>> > Is that really neccessary?
>> Yes it is ! :-(
> Why? :-)
Because at this adress there is running a "tobit david mailserver" (windows-nonsene ;)
)
that can only be set up to parse for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for internal reasons) :-|
> What makes you think it's complicated? Will take you
Erwin van Kroonenburg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be something wrong but I can't figure out what.
> I've setup Qmail-1.03, AVP 3.0 Beta 2 and compiled amavis with "configure
> --enable-qmail". I followed the instructions on www.unixzone.com/virus and
> even applied the "error in Kaspersky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 00, at 12:22, Puck wrote:
> > Is that really neccessary?
>
> Yes it is ! :-(
Why? :-)
> > Sure there is. You need two qmail installations for that
> > (edit conf-home, and recompile/reinstall).
>
> Must this be so complicated?
What makes
>> The original sender and recipient must stay intact, that's the
>> problem!
> Is that really neccessary?
Yes it is ! :-(
> Sure there is. You need two qmail installations for that
> (edit conf-home, and recompile/reinstall).
Must this be so complicated?
Is there perhaps a shell-script that c
Thanks everyone who replied on and off list. I now have enough data to stop worrying
that i've under
provisioned. Guess i have somewhere to play quake from now. :-)
Await the next installation. Cheers all. :-)
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 18:54:25 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>If I understand correctl
Hi!
I have installed the recent (yesterday) version of qmail. I have a rcphosts
file with a few domains. Now is it secure or nor? I get confused by reading
the list.
My setup fails test 6 at orbs, but some say it is safe anyway and that the
mail is rejected internally. Some say that I need to
Just a thought, if an email is revoked due to rblsmtpd refusing it, will
an email client return the error:
** Couldn¹t complete the last command because a network stream error
occurred.
Or, is that just a bad setup of rblsmtpd ?
Regards,
Kevin
qmail Digest 4 Feb 2000 11:00:00 - Issue 901
Topics (messages 36662 through 36750):
SPAMCONTROL101 Patch
36662 by: Erwin Hoffmann
Error on startup
36663 by: Andreas Altenburg
36682 by: Dave Sill
36683 by: Chris Johnson
SPAMCONTROL patch not working?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 00, at 11:43, Puck wrote:
> The original sender and recipient must stay intact, that's the
> problem!
Is that really neccessary?
> Is there a solution?
Sure there is. You need two qmail installations for that
(edit conf-home, and recompil
Hi All,
Is there anyone who knows about how to setup rblsmtpd ?
I've tried loads of different sources and I can't seem to find a way to
set-up qmail to bloke relay spam to my server.
This my current start-up for qmail in /etc/init.d :
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -u 101 -g 100 0 smtp
/var
Hi there,
i've checked the mailinglist but found nothin (or i'm to silly today ;o) ) .
I have a virtual-domain "n-online.net".
Now all mail arrives at our qmail-server and vmailmgr is running.
Now i have to reroute only a few [EMAIL PROTECTED] adresses to an internal IP-Adress.
the easyest would
Hi,
There seems to be something wrong but I can't figure out what.
I've setup Qmail-1.03, AVP 3.0 Beta 2 and compiled amavis with "configure
--enable-qmail". I followed the instructions on www.unixzone.com/virus and
even applied the "error in Kaspersky AVP call" fix. When I try so send an
ema
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 10:19:59AM +0200, TAG wrote:
> Is it possible to set a databytes file for a specific user that will
> overide the system wide databytes file??
You could use the qmail-smtp AUTH patch and hack it. It looks
pretty easy to do. I almost did it myself but then decided I
didn'
how do i unsubscribe from this list
Hi folks,
I have some problem with vpopmail and .qmail. I've tried to make an user
autorespond (vacation-like-behaviour) so when a person send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] it automatically respond to that email and that email
automatically copied to user's Maildir.
First I make an experiment m
Hi,
Is it possible to set a databytes file for a specific user that will
overide the system wide databytes file??
Many Thanks
Tonino
I want to configure qmail-local to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail.
The /usr/share/man/cat5/dot-qmail.0 file tells you how to write a
.qmail file to change delivery, however its too difficult for me to comprehe
nd.
Can someone help me here?
Thanks in advance,
Kristina
P.S I do not want to use /b
71 matches
Mail list logo
