On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:59:24PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Secondly what does that (#4.4.1) mean? I can't find any paragraph
number 4.4.1 in the documentation.
It's defined in RFC 1839 http://rfc1839.x42.com/
4.X.X Persistent Transient Failure
A persistent transient
I am running qmail on redhat linux6.1. My dir structure is as follows:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 486M 326M 135M 71% /
/dev/sda8 1.9G 975M 894M 52% /opt
/dev/sda9 1.4G 45M 1.3G 3% /reg
/dev/sda6 23G 2.8G 19G 13% /users
/dev/sda10 1.4G 677M 730M 48% /usr
/dev/sda3
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:59:24PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Secondly what does that (#4.4.1) mean? I can't find any paragraph
number 4.4.1 in the documentation.
It's defined in RFC 1839 http://rfc1839.x42.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 May 00, at 13:21, kapil sharma wrote:
df -i shows the following output:
FilesystemInodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 128520 12460 116060 10% /
/dev/sda8 256512 12727 2437855%
Hi,
I have checked the disk usage and found that /var/qmail/queue has taken
158 MB of disk space. Now how to delete the email queue and restart
qmail. Please help
kapil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 May 00, at 14:08, kapil wrote:
I have checked the disk usage and found that /var/qmail/queue has
taken 158 MB of disk space.
But has it taken the inodes? _That_ is the question.
Now how to delete the email queue and
restart qmail.
If
Is there a virus in the attachment? I ran Norton AV on it, but it did not
find any.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Claus Färber wrote:
Date: 23 May 2000 14:10:00 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Claus Färber)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pop3
- snip -
Claus
[Message contains
qmail Digest 24 May 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1011
Topics (messages 42200 through 42259):
Aack,_child_crashed
42200 by: David Sedeño Fernández
(no subject)
42201 by: kapil sharma
Re: Could my problems be Mandrake 7 security settings?
42202 by: Jörgen Persson
According to Magnus Bodin:
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:59:24PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Secondly what does that (#4.4.1) mean? I can't find any paragraph
number 4.4.1 in the documentation.
It's defined in RFC 1839 http://rfc1839.x42.com/
Small typo above, it's actually, RFC1893
Hi
everyone,
I'm
a rather newbie on Qmail. I've set it up and it seems to be working fine, with
tcpwrappers. What I wanted to do is set up qmail as a front-end server. It will
accept all the smtp mail in the name of another server (which is behind a
firewall). I think this is about
It will accept all the smtp mail in the name of another
server (which is behind a firewall). I think this is about
/etc/tcp.smtp and control/smtproutes files. I've set them
as following;
/etc/tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
For those hosts which are allowed to use this
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 10:43:40AM -0300, "Próspero, Esteban" wrote:
Does anybody know if mail clients like Netscape Communicator or MS Outlook
support the Maildir format? I haven't found out how...
Communicator and Outlook communicate with your server via POP3, and don't know
or care what
Hello!
I've installed qmail+tcpserver+supervise in my Solaris 2.6 environment and
now I want to get the pop3 server up and running. I kept up with Life with
qmail, but it does not specifiy how to set up the pop3 server under
supervise. How do I run a supervised version of qmail-pop3d? Does it
Thanks!! so please take a look at my second question!
Esteban
-Original Message-
From: Chris Johnson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:45 AM
To: Próspero, Esteban"
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 May 00, at 10:47, Prspero, Esteban wrote:
Hello!
I've installed qmail+tcpserver+supervise in my Solaris 2.6 environment
and now I want to get the pop3 server up and running. I kept up with
Life with qmail, but it does not specifiy how to
Hello,
i guess there are (at least) two answers with both same result, but
one is funnier..
1.) Netscape Communicator and MS Outlok boes do support Maildir
format..
2.) It (should) does no matter what client (MUA, mail user agent)
your´e using, they all are »knocking« on the mail-servers
Actually, here Qmail is supposed to be an inbound relay. The
servers behind the firewall sends out smtps directly. So in
this case too, will the tcp.smtp be like below you said?
No - if you're only relaying inbound, then you don't need to modify
tcp.smtp at all. That file only
Thanks for your answer Mark.
Actually I need to setup Qmail only as an inbound
server. And tcp.smtp lines' purpose seems to specify from which hosts Qmail is
to accept relaying smtp queries. But in my case, there is no such relaying. I
want it to accept all smtp connections from all over
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:11:13PM +0300, Ali Sahin wrote:
Actually I need to setup Qmail only as an inbound server. And tcp.smtp lines'
purpose seems to specify from which hosts Qmail is to accept relaying smtp
queries. But in my case, there is no such relaying. I want it to accept all
smtp
In that case you should be all set. Are you experiencing problems
with this working, or were you just getting a sanity check on your
configuration?
---
Yeah, when I try to send an email to a user (which has a mailbox on the
internal server but does not have one on the Qmail) qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 May 00, at 17:15, Ali Sahin wrote:
Yeah, when I try to send an email to a user (which has a mailbox on
the internal server but does not have one on the Qmail) qmail refuses
to pass that mail to my internal server.
Take that domain out of
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:15:50PM +0300, Ali Sahin wrote:
In that case you should be all set. Are you experiencing problems
with this working, or were you just getting a sanity check on your
configuration?
---
Yeah, when I try to send an email to a user (which has a mailbox on
Yeah, when I try to send an email to a user (which has a
mailbox on the internal server but does not have one on
the Qmail) qmail refuses to pass that mail to my internal
server.
You know, if we knew what error messages or log messages accompany
this "refusal," we'd probably be
Ok, here's my setup;
control/smtproutes
---
mycompany.com:10.21.200.200
my2ndcomp.com:10.21.200.201
---
control/rcpthosts
---
mycompany.com
my2ndcomp.com
---
control/me
---
mx1.mycompany.com
---
and, here's a sample log of what happens;
I've opened a telnet session to Qmail, and sent two
Ok, here's my setup;
...
control/smtproutes
control/rcpthosts
control/me
What's in control/locals?
info msg 128846: bytes 196 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 2949 uid 503
starting delivery 842: msg 128846 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
delivery 842: failure:
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 07:00:43AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
+ // changed Wed-24.05.00-03:29 -ino: because fetchmail hickups when 553
+ // arrives out-of-band after recipient has been checked!
+ // following line moved up from it's place in smtp_rcpt
+ if (flagbarf) { err_bmf(); return;
This message indicates that the mail relay thinks that
it accepts mail for ihlas.com.tr (presumably that's either
mycompany.com or my2ndcomp.com) locally, and it doesn't even
look at smtproutes.
Sorry, brain outsped fingers; I meant:
This message indicates that the
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:32:23PM +0300, Ali Sahin wrote:
control/smtproutes
---
mycompany.com:10.21.200.200
my2ndcomp.com:10.21.200.201
---
control/rcpthosts
---
mycompany.com
my2ndcomp.com
---
control/me
---
mx1.mycompany.com
---
Okay, first of all, WHAT ARE YOUR REAL DOMAIN
Hi !
I have a qmail mail server with tcpserver and it works fine. Now I want to
setup a second qmail server to use for secondary MX in my domains. How can I
allign the 2 mail servers so if the first server go down the second accepts
mails for my customers in automatic mode ? When the first goes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 May 00, at 15:43, Origoni, Maurizio wrote:
I have a qmail mail server with tcpserver and it works fine. Now I
want to setup a second qmail server to use for secondary MX in my
domains. How can I allign the 2 mail servers so if the first
Ok, here's my setup;
...
control/smtproutes
control/rcpthosts
control/me
What's in control/locals?
controls/locals
mx1.mycompany.com
mycompany.com
mx1.mycompany.com
There's your problem. Remove mycompany.com from locals, because it
isn't local.
--
Thanks... So have I not to use tcpserver ? Can I start the second in
inetd.conf and manage only rcphosts file ?
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Petr Novotny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mercoledì 24 maggio 2000 16.47
A: Qmail List (E-mail)
Oggetto: Re: How to set 2 qmail servers in the
Okay, first of all, WHAT ARE YOUR REAL DOMAIN NAMES? Fake
domain names make
people on this list *insane*. It may not make a difference in
this case, but it
frequently does make a difference, and the person posting the
question often
doesn't realize this.
Why I didn't give the real
hi,
i´m a bit in trouble for now.
i set up qmail and all works ok.
then i use /etc/aliases with fastforward, and after that the machine acts as a
relay.
following situation :
we are hosting serveral domains, each has for example a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc. there is also an old mail-server using
Hi,
you may have a look on my remarks about SUSE Linux and QMAIL:
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
cheers.
eh.
At 14:46 24.5.2000 GMT, Anton Pirnat wrote:
Hello,
i guess there are (at least) two answers with both same result, but
one is funnier..
1.) Netscape Communicator and MS Outlok
Hi !
I installed qmail successfully on a linux 2.2.x host before. Now I am
trying to do the same thing on a SunOS 5.7 server. I used gcc-2.95.2 to
compile qmail and followed the installation instuctions carefully and
created maildirs for my users and changed /var/qmail/rc to use the
maildir
Dear netters,
we are using qmail 1.03 (instead of sendmail) on SGI O2.
Qmail is configured to work w/mbox format
(binmail for local delivery to /var/mail/user).
We want to install pop-3 (or imap) daemon on this
workstation. Unfortunately qmail-pop3d opereates
only w/Maildir format.
Is
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:19:13PM +0400, Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote:
[snip]
Is there some other pop-3/imap daemons which can work
succesfully in cooperation w/qmail ?
Sure, lots of 'm.
http://freshmeat.net/appindex/daemons/pop3.html should be helpful.
Greetz, Peter.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Is there a templet user for
QMAIL?
Hi Walid,
what do you mean with "templet user" ?
regards
Christian
Walid Kassab schrieb:
Is
there a templet user for QMAIL?
Havent seen this forwarded to the list, and it probably applies to quite a
few people. Just in case someone isnt on bugtraq.
BTW, in my source (2.53) i couldnt find any lines similar to what he
suggests changing, perhaps he was looking at the FBSD ported version and
it has been modified
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Wasn't it claimed that 2.53 was safe -- only earlier versions
(alpha/beta?) were at risk? Seems like they should just release
another version to lessen the confusion.
Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.2
Unknown. The advisory specifically mentions 2.53 -- i can tell you this.
2.53 _was_ safe from the PREVIOUS exploits (ie. the ones that worked on
the 2.51, etc) but this appears to be a new exploit in a different
function of the program.
Also, the advisory suggests upgrading to 3.1b1 (which i
I'm using qmail 1.0.3 with the included qmail-pop3d.
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as clear text over the network for a pop3 session? I know users
will be reluctant to change their mua's. So what can I do on my side?
Is there any way around this
Not quite sure what you mean,
But have you had a look at
qmailadmin.
It creates users with thier Maildirs etc by the
click of a button.
Or else another way would be to create a skel
with all the necessary info there and run a script using useradd and
skel
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as clear text over the network for a pop3 session?
I'm afraid the best way is also the only way, and it doesn't exist. You
cannot use POP3 without sending passwords in the clear.
Len.
--
It is possible to wrap POP3 with SSL, which most mailers support.
Take a look at http://www.rickk.com/sslwrap/
--Adam
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:38:53PM -0400, Len Budney wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as
Where do I find this program?
Or any "vacation" program, preferably one that the user themselves can handle
(edit message and starting / ending time etc).
--
Kaare Rasmussen--Linux, spil,--Tlf:3816 2582
Kaki Datatshirts, merchandize Fax:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Len Budney) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as clear text over the network for a pop3 session?
I'm afraid the best way is also the only way, and it doesn't exist. You
cannot use POP3
John Gonzalez/netMDC admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unknown. The advisory specifically mentions 2.53 -- i can tell you this.
2.53 _was_ safe from the PREVIOUS exploits (ie. the ones that worked on
the 2.51, etc) but this appears to be a new exploit in a different
function of the program.
Hi-
I think you mean "user template". I am not sure about BSD, but in
Linux, you add the stuff you want new users to have to the /etc/skel
directory.
The qmail utility "maildirmake" will create a maildir in a certain directory.
If you tell maildirmake to create one in /var/skel ,then all
Hi,
It's not a qmail question, but because many of you are in the
high-volume mail business, I hope to get a few answers :-)
A colleague of mine works for a place where they're going to
change from an X400 system to MS Exchange. I don't have details
on the hardware, but they're planning on
I am always happy when I see another "big" web operation using qmail..
I just discovered paypal.com runs qmail, after I got the "I'm sorry
it didn't work out." bounce message from a typo...
--Pete
I was reading a howto about that and from what I understand, that's a client
side deal.
Louis Theran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Len Budney) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as clear text over the network for
On Wed, 24 May 2000 13:33:11 -0600 (MDT),
John Gonzalez/netMDC admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
N Are there any known exploits for 2.1b1?
CUCIpop has been mentioned on this list before; small, fast, some
nifty features, and I don't remember seeing any security warnings
about it.
"Louis Theran" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original comment was merely pointing out that `there is no way'
is correct only in a narrow sense.
Right; namely, the sense in which the poster asked. He asked for a way
to modify the server ONLY, and end up using POP3 without any passwords
traveling
From: "Len Budney" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:38:53 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as clear text over the network for a pop3 session?
I'm afraid the best way is also the only
Len Budney writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as clear text over the network for a pop3 session?
I'm afraid the best way is also the only way, and it doesn't exist. You
cannot use POP3 without sending
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Len Budney writes:
I'm afraid the best way is also the only way, and it doesn't exist. You
cannot use POP3 without sending passwords in the clear.
Doesn't anybody implement APOP??
Even better, there are innumerable different authentication
on 5/24/00 8:03 PM, Russell Nelson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm afraid the best way is also the only way, and it doesn't exist. You
cannot use POP3 without sending passwords in the clear.
Doesn't anybody implement APOP??
The Gnome/Helixcode guys are working on an outlook type app that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using qmail 1.0.3 with the included qmail-pop3d.
What's the best way on the server side to prevent passwords from being
sent as clear text over the network for a pop3 session? I know users
will be reluctant to change their mua's. So what can I do on my side?
i have to setup qmail with vpopmail/qmailadmin to forward all mail for
domain-a.com to domain-a.nl
only domain-a.nl contains the users.
so mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in control/virtualdomains:
domain-a.nl:domain-a.nl
domain-a.com:domain-a.nl
problem is
62 matches
Mail list logo
