[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying install qmail on a Mandrake 7.1 server. I get a unauthorized message
when I try login via pop3 locally or remotely. checkpassword seems don't work.
This system uses shadowed passwords. I was unable to execute qmail-pw2u on
/etc/passwd.
Thanks jjc
Travis Leuthauser wrote:
> Stephen Bosch wrote:
>
> > Actually, I want to make sure that mail addressed to
> > address_set1@vdomain1 will only be accepted if it is sent to
> > address_set1@vdomain1, but bounced or dumped if it is sent to
> > address_set1@vdomain2; mail addressed to address_set2@v
Oh, and in case you're wondering...qmail doesn't reject it because we have
an smtp route for all traffic which isn't delivered locally or taken care of
by another smtp route for a specific domain... Thanks!
Brett Randall
Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/
> -Original Mes
There's a long story that I don't want to tell, but is there any way of
rejecting e-mail with two @ signs in the 'RCPT TO' part of the SMTP
conversation? We have problems in our particular system of mail being
relayed through a particular machine because they are being addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I was afraid of just "eyeballing it" and really screwing it up. No, I
don't know exactly what I am doing, I am LEARNING, that is why I asked for
help with a qmail related issue which is what I thought the purpose of this
list was. If you have problems answering a question politely, don't both
Hi, I'm new to qmail and one year old in linux. I'm trying to set up a mail
server and having problems. I want to use my slackware 7.1 linux as a local
mail server for a small LAN; maybe eventualy for an external domain later.
I want clients to use their Win Outlook to retrieve mail, so I should
Dears Friends
I need your help.
I'd like use tarpitting-patch for run on my dial-up users
I have very users spamers, and need than ever users send a max of
15 e-mails for each message.
I am looking your web site:
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/tarpit.patch
But I don't understand how use that pa
Mark van der Putten wrote:
>
> I did
> ---
> Installed q-mail 1.03 OK
>
> Computer response
>
> Oke
> Everybody is getting the mail they should have. Here is no problem
> But the root doesn't get ANY mail no more. This is strange especially since every
>other mail is deli
Hi Adam,
Adam McKenna wrote:
> You need at least 3 disks to do raid 5, and 4 to do 0+1. Since
> he mentioned that he only has two disks, and that they are "striped",
> it's pretty likely that he's talking about raid 0.
oops. sorry, you are right...it was 4:20 AM...
(kernel back trace: ff
it worked thank you
-Original Message-
From: Paul Schinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: port 25 cannot telnet
>At 1:53 PM -0700 9/19/00, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
okay, here's the deal. I've got qmail sending from my subdomain to anywhere
else and I can also send messages (from my mail client on my machine (not the
server)) to the other user accounts on the machine and can get those messages
back to my machine (recieve them) so it looks like pop is working
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:26:07AM +1000, Danny Hay wrote:
> hi, I am currently running a website which is pretty much all php, part of
> the websites function is to send user's their username and password via
> email, this was all working fine with sendmail.. so my problem is when a
> user signs
At 1:53 PM -0700 9/19/00, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in the process of learning scripts so please be patient.
>When you said use numbers did you mean gid and uid numbers instead of
>
>id -u qmaild
>id -g qmaild, so it will look something like this QMAILDUID=100
>
>NOFILESGID=1001
Yes,
hi, I am currently running a website which is pretty much all php, part of
the websites function is to send user's their username and password via
email, this was all working fine with sendmail.. so my problem is when a
user signs up or requests a password they get the message that the password
is
how would you apply more than one patch then?
wolfgang
Also sprach Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 20.09.2000:
Yes this is why it failed. As is usually the case, patches are against
UNTOUCHED sources.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 12:33:03PM -0400, French, Michael wrote:
> I got the QMAILQUEUE patch the other day so I could get scan4virus
> working. When I tried running the patch on the qmail source, it failed out.
>...
> Could this be because I used the DNS qmail patch? If so, should
> > You can use an automated relay tester, but beware that
> > qmail appears not to pass the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > test (and the test usually says "This is not conclusive
> > unless you actually got mail").
>
> It appears that my Qmail setup allows relaying when % is
> between uername an
It's in the docs, sorry I can't say exactly where though.. they work the
same as all the other .qmail files. .qmail-address
Contents:
&account to deliver mail to
Travis Leuthauser
Network Administrator
WinConX Online, Inc.
225-751-0959
225-752-6517
- Original Message -
From: "dG" <[EMA
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 05:29:28PM -0500, dG wrote:
> .qmail files for EVERY address
> > @virtualdomain.com, but do not put a .qmail-default file.
>
> What would the naming format and contents of those .qmail filez be? If its
> in the docs then RTFM works for me :)
man dot-qmail for contents, m
.qmail files for EVERY address
> @virtualdomain.com, but do not put a .qmail-default file.
What would the naming format and contents of those .qmail filez be? If its
in the docs then RTFM works for me :)
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:19:50PM -0500, zealot wrote:
> Results from http://www.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest show that 8 out of 9
> relay tests fail when probing my machine. However, the last test produced
> the following message:
>
> Relay test 9
> >>> RSET
> <<< 250 flushed
> >>> MAIL
Results from http://www.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest show that 8 out of 9
relay tests fail when probing my machine. However, the last test produced
the following message:
Relay test 9
>>> RSET
<<< 250 flushed
>>> MAIL FROM:
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO:<"relaytest%abuse.net">
<<< 250 ok
I
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Bosch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Virtualdomains - AGAIN
>
>
> Hello =)
>
> Charles Cazabon wrote:
>
> > > You can probably see by now that I have a common user space. Wha
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I want to make sure that mail addressed to
> address_set1@vdomain1 will only be accepted if it is sent to
> address_set1@vdomain1, but bounced or dumped if it is sent to
> address_set1@vdomain2; mail addressed to address_set2@vdomain2 will be
Hello =)
Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > You can probably see by now that I have a common user space. What I want to
> > do is prevent mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from also being
> > accepted as [EMAIL PROTECTED] I look at the above virtualdomains
> > scenario and ask myself why I am even bothe
I am in the process of learning scripts so please be patient.
When you said use numbers did you mean gid and uid numbers instead of
id -u qmaild
id -g qmaild, so it will look something like this QMAILDUID=100
NOFILESGID=1001
than I can take -u and -g from this line
-u $QMAILD
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 02:34:16PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, this is a foolish newbie question. I'm having trouble wrapping my
> > head around the problem.
>
> A newbie who has apparently read, and understood, most of the documenation,
RAID 5 sucks for writes in the first place, but is excellent for reads. I'm
running raid 5 on my mailing list box for availability reasons, but that
distributes to my qmqp servers which are all RAID 0. I don't care that much
if I lose a drive on the QMQP servers since I can have a new one built
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay, this is a foolish newbie question. I'm having trouble wrapping my
> head around the problem.
A newbie who has apparently read, and understood, most of the documenation,
FAQs, Life with qmail, ... what a novelty!
> In control/virtualdomains we
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 03:07:11PM -0500, Austad, Jay wrote:
> Make sure your files in /var/qmail/control have the correct settings in
> them. I ran into this yesterday and it turned out I had bad info in
> defaultdomain, locals, me, and plusdomain.
Or more specifically, helohost. If that's not
Make sure your files in /var/qmail/control have the correct settings in
them. I ran into this yesterday and it turned out I had bad info in
defaultdomain, locals, me, and plusdomain.
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Jens Georg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2
So what do most
people consider the best log analyzer for qmail logs (I'm using multilog)?
I'd like to see
real-time stats if possible, or at least near realtime...
:)
Jay
-- Jay Austad Network Administrator CBS
Marketwatch 612.817.1271
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cbs.marketwat
hi,
while sending emails to AOL qmail reports the following error-messages:
Remote host said: 501 syntactically invalid HELO argument(s)
Remote host said: 501 HELO requires domain address
i did not find anything about this in the faqs. somebody here who can
help me ?
regards,
jens
i telnetted into port 25 (not sure if this is the machine you wrote about
tho) and got this:
220 info.load-otea.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca ESMTP
mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 ok
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
if you telnet from a ma
How did you check my ports in my IP? I telneted the ports from an external
machine and couldn't connect to both ports (80 and 25). How did you connect
to port 80? I'm using Windows telnet program, just putting the IP and port
number and trying to connect. Is there a more low level way of doing tha
> I am new to qmail but I have read the "Qmail newbie's guide
> to relaying" and I thought when I sent from a remote email
> address to a remote email address I should have received a
> 553 domain not in allowed rcpthosts message. None of the
> mail i was trying to deliver has appeared in the
>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:19:30AM +0900, James T. Perry wrote:
[snip]
> > I had both of my QMQP servers bouncing off of the 120 limit
> > yesterday, and they were pretty much idle (Dell 2450's with
> > 2 striped 9GB 10k rpm drives).
>
> Which RAID level?
> I remember somebody mentioning in this
Today the postmaster "account" recevied about 20 messages stating unable
to deliver mail, unable to return to sender. Neither address was a local
address in any of these cases.
Our rcpthosts file only lists our domains.
When I telneted into port 25 however and tried to mail from: a remote
address
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:19:30AM +0900, James T. Perry wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> "Austad, Jay" wrote:
>
> > I had both of my QMQP servers bouncing off of the 120 limit
> > yesterday, and they were pretty much idle (Dell 2450's with
> > 2 striped 9GB 10k rpm drives).
>
> Which RAID level?
> I re
Okay, this is a foolish newbie question. I'm having trouble wrapping my
head around the problem.
We have two ways of accepting mail for a domain. We can either treat it
as a local, *real* domain, or we can treat it as a virtual domain which
supplements a real domain.
If we treat it as a local r
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
> I had both of my QMQP servers bouncing off of the 120 limit
> yesterday, and they were pretty much idle (Dell 2450's with
> 2 striped 9GB 10k rpm drives).
Which RAID level?
I remember somebody mentioning in this list that 0+1 will perform
faster than 3 (or 5 obvi
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:16:14PM -0500, dG wrote:
> For all fans of linuxpeople, this is the latest news on his website,
> www.linuxpeople.cc.
>
> September 14th, qmail: WHAT @ FSCKING JOKE!
> Brought to you from the "Do not even waste your time department"
I'm famous! From http://www.linuxpeo
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:24:00PM -0500, Austad, Jay wrote:
[snip]
>
> What happens if I start a second copy of qmail using /var/qmail2, different
> uids, and bind to another IP on the same box? Will I be able to do 509
> concurrency out of each copy since they are running as different users?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Stephen Bosch wrote:
> Oh, and I couldn't resist:
> > Where do I begin? Asking the qmail discussion list for help on legitimate
> > tech support issues is like going to #linux channel and asking "what's a
> > kernel"?
> BTW... what *IS* a kernel, anyway?
> Stephen Bosch
RTF
in the file INSTALL.alias in qmail-1.03.tar.gz it says:
* root. Under qmail, root never receives mail. Your system may generate
mail messages to root every night; if you don't have an alias for root,
those messages will bounce. (They'll end up double-bouncing to the
postmaster.) Set up an alias fo
Oh, and I couldn't resist:
> Where do I begin? Asking the qmail discussion list for help on legitimate
> tech support issues is like going to #linux channel and asking "what's a
> kernel"?
I take it he speaks from personal experience?
BTW... what *IS* a kernel, anyway?
Stephen Bosch
I did
---
Installed q-mail 1.03 OK
Computer response
Oke
Everybody is getting the mail they should have. Here is no problem
But the root doesn't get ANY mail no more. This is strange especially since every
other mail is delivered oke.
The only thing that I see is differen
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:16:14PM -0500, dG wrote:
> Where do I begin? Asking the qmail discussion list for help on legitimate
> tech support issues is like going to #linux channel and asking "what's a
> kernel"? In other words swallowing razor blades would have been a more
> pleasurable expe
dG wrote:
> For all fans of linuxpeople, this is the latest news on his website,
> www.linuxpeople.cc.
>
> September 14th, qmail: WHAT @ FSCKING JOKE!
> Brought to you from the "Do not even waste your time department"
>
> Where do I begin? Asking the qmail discussion list for help on legitim
>I haven't reached a concurrency greater than 100 (*blush*) yet so
>I can't say what would exactly happen when the concurrency really
>hits a high number - above the real 1024 limit (or 509 in qmail).
I had both of my QMQP servers bouncing off of the 120 limit yesterday, and
they were pretty much
For all fans of linuxpeople, this is the latest news on his website,
www.linuxpeople.cc.
September 14th, qmail: WHAT @ FSCKING JOKE!
Brought to you from the "Do not even waste your time department"
Where do I begin? Asking the qmail discussion list for help on legitimate
tech support issues is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Sep 2000, at 16:38, Stephen F. Bosch wrote:
> Petr Novotny wrote:
> > On 19 Sep 2000, at 15:47, Stephen F. Bosch wrote:
> >
> > > I've put it in /etc/hosts like so:
> > >
> > > 192.168.0.102 hotcube
> > > dsl-XX-cgy
To clarify: I'm not able to connect neither to port 25 or 80 from my
internal machine, using *telnet*. However, I can open my web site (using www
browser) using my external IP as URL. I don't know too much about this, but
I though strange because I think web browser connect to URL (my external IP)
Hello,
I have been tasked to come up with a solution, but before I go into it, i
thought some background information
would be prudent:
Currently, we have about 1000 mail users.
Currently, we have two Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5/SP3 running. (names
mail1/mail2)
In front of Exchange is two Win
Petr Novotny wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 19 Sep 2000, at 15:47, Stephen F. Bosch wrote:
>
> > I've put it in /etc/hosts like so:
> >
> > 192.168.0.102 hotcube dsl-XX-cgy.nucleus.com
>
> qmail ignores /etc/hosts, completely. If y
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
>
> Here's what I did to rebuild the rpm:
[snip]
Thanks for the information!
I gotta get used to building RPMs...
(after all, I am using an RPM distro ;)
> As for the FD_SET problem, Dell sucks and ships a RAID card
> that requires a proprietary driver on their so
"Wagner R. Landgraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm..., that might be correct. However, in an internal machine, I can
open
> the www browser and type http://200.201.1.1 as the URL of web page, and
it
> works. What does it mean?
You originally said that trying to access port 80 using the exte
Hmmm..., that might be correct. However, in an internal machine, I can open
the www browser and type http://200.201.1.1 as the URL of web page, and it
works. What does it mean?
Anyway, if you could test it for me, my real IP is 200.201.34.197 .
Thank you
Wagner R. Landgraf
Automa Consultoria &
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:42:53AM -0400, Jonathan J. Smith wrote:
> Anyone willing to spend a little time and a few emails to help clear
> some things up for me? I appreciate the time.
Sure. But if you ask your questions actually on the list others with
similar questions will be able to read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Sep 2000, at 15:47, Stephen F. Bosch wrote:
> I've put it in /etc/hosts like so:
>
> 192.168.0.102 hotcube dsl-XX-cgy.nucleus.com
qmail ignores /etc/hosts, completely. If you need to override IP
address, put
dsl-X
As I am back at the site I can now provide some log information.
(PS: I have set the line length longer to avoid wrapping
log information)
Okay, here is normal message to a real user:
Sep 19 09:06:25 hotcube qmail: 969375985.801584 new msg 643380
Sep 19 09:06:25 hotcube qmail: 969375985.801693
Anyone willing to spend a little time and a few emails to help clear
some things up for me? I appreciate the time.
Jonathan Smith
"Wagner R. Landgraf" wrote:
>
> I cannot receive mail. Let's say that my internal IP is 192.168.1.20 (local
> net inside the firewall) and my external IP is 200.201.1.1 . If I do (from
> another machine in the local network) telnet 192.168.1.20 25 , it works
> fine, and I can send mail to the mai
If you're on a machine on the inside and you're trying to hit an ip on the
outside of a firewall or router that does NAT, it won't work. I think
Checkpoint makes a firewall that works around this problem, but that's the
only one I can think of.
You need to do your testing from a remote machine i
Here's what I did to rebuild the rpm:
rpm -ivh qmail-1.03-16.src.rpm
cd /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES
tar zxvf qmail-1.03.tar.gz
patch -p0 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 4:01 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: concurrency remote patch
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
>
Allama Hicham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm working With Unix and Solaris and I'm insttaling Qmail.
>When I send a mail to a local user and I open the /var/log/syslog, I
>find that message
> "delivery26.: failure :Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/"
>So I must create a Mailbox!
Wha
unsubscribe qmail
I cannot receive mail. Let's say that my internal IP is 192.168.1.20 (local
net inside the firewall) and my external IP is 200.201.1.1 . If I do (from
another machine in the local network) telnet 192.168.1.20 25 , it works
fine, and I can send mail to the mail server using telnet commands. However
At 8:33 PM -0700 9/18/00, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am trying to install qmail on the Solaris 7 x86 system using Life with
>qmail. I have few problems:
>1. /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run script is having some errors
>
>QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
>exec /usr/local/
Yes. This answer is _very_ late.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 02:20:13AM -0800, Aaron Nabil wrote:
>
> Thanks for the "qmail-remote outgoingip patch", I was able to
Who contributed this, and where?
Has anything been done to this further? Making it possible to bind
qmail-remote to a specific inter
read INSTALL.maildir
there is something like this:
- create structure ~/Maildir in every user directory with
maildirmake $HOME/Maildir
- add file .qmail with content
./Maildir/
into user's directory
and replace ./Mailbox with ./Maildir/ in /var/qmail/rc
Stano.
- Original Message
qmail Digest 19 Sep 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1128
Topics (messages 48851 through 48933):
Re: Mail delivery problem
48851 by: Olivier M.
Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS!
48852 by: James T. Perry
Mailman -> qmail
48853 by: Phil Barnett
48856 by: Ricardo Cerque
unsubscribe qmail
begin:vcard
n:PORCHER;Franck
tel;work:(689) 56 23 95
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.esoft.pf/
org:Essential Software
adr:;;BP 4206 ;Papeete;Tahiti;98713;Polynésie française
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Fondateur & Directeur Associé. Founder & Executi
Hi everyone,
I'm working With Unix and Solaris and I'm insttaling Qmail.
When I send a mail to a local user and I open the /var/log/syslog, I
find that message
"delivery26.: failure :Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/"
So I must create a Mailbox!
But I don't now how can i do that!
Tha
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
>
> I grabbed the source rpm and just applied the patch to it and
> rebuilt it. Works great.
Congrats!
Please teach me how you did it!
> Except, FD_SET is limited to 1024 descriptors.
Don't you hate it when that happens? ;)
> How do I change this? I assume I c
I grabbed the source rpm and just applied the patch to it and rebuilt it.
Works great.
Except, FD_SET is limited to 1024 descriptors. How do I change this? I
assume I can't just echo something into /proc... I want to be able to do
more than 509 concurrency.
Jay
-Original Message-
76 matches
Mail list logo
