but it seems that you'd never want the 451 in this case
because obviously it will be the same mailer that will
retry each time and it will continue to be broken for each
try...
If you don't like this behaviour block him at the firewall or via
tcpserver. At least for a while.
If you want
I have implemented this into sqwebmail + SSL: qmail + mysql + vitual maildir
et authmysql only environment, only the crypted password in DB is checked
for all applications : pop3 + checkpasswd (local) , courier imapd (local)
and sqwebmail+SSL (web Internet and local).
The user account is
qmail Digest 27 Oct 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1166
Topics (messages 51121 through 51162):
Re: Queue growing...
51121 by: Jeroen ten Berge
51122 by: Nicolas Deslions
51130 by: markd.bushwire.net
POP3 on tcpserver
51123 by: Jeroen ten Berge
Dubs about flushing
Hi
I'm running a fbsd/qmail system with around 500 concurrent qmail-remote
processes.
The problem now is the speed on my raid system... it's not fast enough to
handle all the incoming mails and i get the not yet preprocessed growing
fast.
I'm thinking about using a 500Mb ramdisk on
Thanks Adam, that is exactly what I needed to know.
I'm assuming that all I need to do is edit qmail-smtpd.c
and change this:
void straynewline() { out("451 See
http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.\r\n"); flush(); _exit(1); }
To:
void straynewline() { out("553 See
when I send message at 11:00 , but when I receive the letter, it
tell me the time is 2:00.
I trace the source program, the time which the qmail-inject get is
not right also.
How to modify it?
when I send message at 11:00 , but when I receive the letter, it
tell me the time is 2:00.
What does the header contain? May be your MUA plays tricks with the date
header to display local time.
I trace the source program, the time which the qmail-inject get is
not right also.
How to
Hi,
Some of our users are regularly wasting bandwidth by sending
large emails to multiple recipients. Since large mails can be
quite useful, we would not like to impose limits on the message
size in general. A solution would be to refuse only large mails
with many recipients. Is there a patch or
Title: Dennis USA Stationery
Howdy qmailers
I have been burnt again. This is the second
list that I have subscibed to and it just so happens that it is also the second
list I have had trouble unsubscribing from. Perhaps one of you knows the secret
of how to do this and will be kind enough
I'm trying to configure QMail, and I'm at the part where I need to set up my
ME config file. My box isn;t hooked up yet so I want to run the conf-fast
script in /var/qmail/configure/ only it appears I have no
/var/qmail/configure/ directory!! I ran find on the entire /var/qmail/
directory and
Since nobody else seems able to do it, maybe you should write a book on
qmail?
Dave
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Documentation Specialist Seeking Contract Work
Im using Qmail with VPOPMAIL.
My MX records look like this :
MX 10 mail.web-trade.com.
MX 20 be.wise.no.
This means of course, that when mail.web-trade.com is down, the mail will be
stored localy in the postmaster account on
Well the modifications I made to sys/sys/types.h and in qmail source have
done it!
I set FD_SET to 2048 in the OpenBSD kernel header and applied the
big-concurrency patch.
I am getting 512/512 outgoing connections. I am also getting 8500 deliveries
started in 3 minutes,
which is just grand.
There are two books on QMail. The first was written by Rich Blum in
September and is available through Barnes Noble or Amazon. The second
book has not been released yet, but is expected to be so by Christmas.
I bought the Rich Blum book (Running Qmail) yesterday and find it pretty
well
Nicolas Deslions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem now is the speed on my raid system... it's not fast enough to
handle all the incoming mails and i get the not yet preprocessed growing
fast.
I'm thinking about using a 500Mb ramdisk on /var/qmail/queue/todo
Anyone already done
Anthony Abby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to configure QMail, and I'm at the part where I need to set up my
ME config file. My box isn;t hooked up yet so I want to run the conf-fast
script in /var/qmail/configure/ only it appears I have no
/var/qmail/configure/ directory!! I ran find
Wilson, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im using Qmail with VPOPMAIL.
My MX records look like this :
MX 10 mail.web-trade.com.
MX 20 be.wise.no.
This means of course, that when mail.web-trade.com is down, the mail will be
unsubscribe qmail
Mike Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
302-326-5820
888-559-5550 (Tech Support)
The directory the control files reside in is /var/qmail/control .
Charles:
When you install QMail /var/qmail/control/ is empty, and can remain so
except for the me file. Reading through the Rich Blum "Running QMail" book,
there is supposed to be a /var/qmail/configure/ directory with
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Anthony Abby wrote:
There are two books on QMail. The first was written by Rich Blum in
September and is available through Barnes Noble or Amazon. The second
book has not been released yet, but is expected to be so by Christmas.
I bought the Rich Blum book (Running
I have installed qmail for the first time and the install has gone extremely
smooth until now. I have run into two problems that I can't seem to solve and
have not been able to find solutions on the list.
My network currently consists of RedHat Linux 6.2 running a P90 server with 64
Hello all,
I just tried to compile qmail on Suse 6.4. It stopt on
./compile sig-alarm.c with the following message:
In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300,
from sig_alarm.c:1:
/usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28: asm/sigcontext.h: No such file or directory
make: ***
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:26:50PM +0200, Nicolas Deslions wrote:
I'm thinking about using a 500Mb ramdisk on /var/qmail/queue/todo
AFAIK, you need to put the entire /var/qmail/queue on the same
drive. As mentioned, make sure that you're using the big-todo
patches. However, note that moving
"Vince" == Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I bought the Rich Blum book (Running Qmail) yesterday and find it
pretty well writtem, but I still have some questions about
configuration because of my Linux inexperience.
Vince Since you just bought it yesterday you may still be able
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:43:58AM +0800, Philip Tong wrote:
What is a good method to allow users to have their mail password changed
using a Web Browser?
The recent versions of "passwd" on Linux have the ability to change the
password by piping the password in. This means that changing the
Me too
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unsubscribe qmail
unsubscribe qmail
Mike Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
302-326-5820
888-559-5550 (Tech Support)
Hello,
Someone is using another smtp server to send a very big spam, but they
write the header with FROM = an unknown user of one of my virtual domains,
so postmasters keep sending bounce messages or autoresponders to this
unknown user and my postmaster is receving more than 1 emails.
Crap. I just released a new version of it yesterday. Hmmm. That must
mean you're the only person using this feature. Shows how really useful
it is. I'll apply the fix to the next release.
I've had to use it in the past as well, though I haven't done so with
Bruce's RPM. Basicly it's
"McGillicuddy, Dennis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been burnt again. This is the second list that I have subscibed to
and it just so happens that it is also the second list I have had trouble
unsubscribing from. Perhaps one of you knows the secret of how to do this
and will be kind enough to
"Scott" == Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scott Me too
I'll third that!
--
"But what...is it good for?"
- Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968,
commenting on the microchip
This may be off base, but I normally set the default shell for most
users to be /bin/passwd. Then spawn a telnet process to the local
machine. Once the process is logged on, the process will be prompted
for a new passwd. This is good, because no one needs root permissions
through the web. I use a
If your using tcpserver, you should be denying his connection.
If not you should be, you need to check LWQ for a good reference.
-Original Message-
From: Ari Arantes Filho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM - Help!
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:37:42PM -0300, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
Hello,
Someone is using another smtp server to send a very big spam, but they
write the header with FROM = an unknown user of one of my virtual domains,
so postmasters keep sending bounce messages or autoresponders to
Hi Hans-Jürgen,
wrong with it? Do you got any ideas?
no I don't. I am running qmail under SuSE 6.4. I installed it according
to LWQ.
If you want I can send you my compiled qmail via e-mail which hopefully
runs on your SuSE.
Furthermore you might have a look on Erwin Hoffmanns website for more
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 05:28:28PM +0200, Goran Blazic wrote:
[snip]
I actually do call this an error... ;-)
You are very much free to implement your own locking. That shouldn't be
too hard either.
Greetz, Peter
--
dataloss networks
'/ignore-ance is bliss' - me
'Het leven is een stuiterbal,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:50:46 +0200, "Wilson, Frank" wrote:
This means of course, that when mail.web-trade.com is down, the mail will be
stored localy in the postmaster account on be.wise.no.
You must have configured it do deliver email locally then. If you
simply accept the mail and not
unsubscribe qmail
Landon Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
Is there a seamless drop-in email virus scanner program which
will work with qmail v1.03, tcpserver, vpopmail, and qmailadmin packages
installed on my system, one system in here got munched by the love bug
virus. Any ideas, my mail system works nicely, but don't want to have
to
Are you people sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your
signed e-mail addresses?
You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your
address.
The very first (mostly) is something like this:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which means I'm subscribed to qmail list as
Are you people sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your
signed e-mail addresses?
You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your
address. The very first (mostly) is something like this:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which means I'm subscribed to qmail list as [EMAIL
Tim Hunter wrote:
If your using tcpserver, you should be denying his connection.
If not you should be, you need to check LWQ for a good reference.
I think his problem is bigger than that! What I understood was that he's
receiving bounce from lots of the spam destination servers.
Well if he was denying the spammers ip it would stop any incoming mail, for
the mail still in the queue I would setup a .qmail for the "fake" user and
redirect it to /dev/null
Problem solved, well except for contacting the spammers isp.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Augusto Fernandes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:37:42PM -0300, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
Hello,
Someone is using another smtp server to send a very big spam, but they
write the header with FROM = an unknown user of one of my virtual domains,
so postmasters keep sending bounce
Please, explain us how can tcpserver help in this case.
It is NOT his server which is used for spamming.
Thanks
= 27/10/00 11:22 by Tim Hunter =
| If your using tcpserver, you should be denying his connection.
|
| If not you should be, you need to check LWQ for a good
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:19:19AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed qmail for the first time and the install has gone
extremely smooth until now. I have run into two problems that I can't
seem to solve and have not been able to find solutions on the list.
My network
"Landon" == Landon Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Landon unsubscribe qmail
Oh no! Its contagious!!!
--
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
- Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
Are you people sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your
signed e-mail addresses?
You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your
address. The very first (mostly) is something like this:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which means I'm subscribed to qmail list as [EMAIL
* Landon Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001027 13:18]:
unsubscribe qmail
Now, Landon, take a look at this:
http://cr.yp.to/lists.html#qmail
"To subscribe, send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Kinda makes one wonder what would happen if one sent an empty message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], eh? And
"Bill" == Bill Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill Hi All, Is there a seamless drop-in email virus scanner program
Bill which will work with qmail v1.03, tcpserver, vpopmail, and
Bill qmailadmin packages installed on my system, one system in here
Bill got munched by the love bug virus.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:03:41AM -0700, Bill Parker wrote:
Is there a seamless drop-in email virus scanner program which
will work with qmail v1.03, tcpserver, vpopmail, and qmailadmin packages
installed on my system, one system in here got munched by the love bug
virus. Any ideas,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Daniel Augusto Fernandes wrote:
[snip]
You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your
address.
The very first (mostly) is something like this:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[clip]
Great, except that it doesn't seem to exist on my messages.
.
.
.
Well, it seems that the server running the mailing list is very busy
too.
So you'll have to be patient.
That's why we now have two messages of mine regarding this.
Daniel Augusto Fernandes (DAF tm)
hi,
/etc/resolv.conf is empty
qmail needs dns! it does not look in /etc/hosts.
SMTP is defined as being on port 25/tcp in the /etc/services file.
how do you start your qmail-smtpd?
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.monea.org
/bin/checkpassword
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:24:39PM -0400, Tim Hunter wrote:
Well if he was denying the spammers ip it would stop any incoming mail, for
the mail still in the queue I would setup a .qmail for the "fake" user and
redirect it to /dev/null
Problem solved, well except for contacting the spammers
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 08:29:42PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote:
1) Does anyone have a list of commonly used mail
servers that violate this?
I've seen mainly Lotus, MS, Novell and even Netscape Mailserver running
on Solaris producing this kind of problems.
From my experience most of the
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 07:15:28PM +0200, Mira Tempir wrote:
Please, explain us how can tcpserver help in this case.
It is NOT his server which is used for spamming.
Someone is mistaken, tcpserver cannot help. Like many things,
only time can fix it.
Regards.
Hi Tim,
Well if he was denying the spammers ip it would stop any incoming mail,
as I understood this is not a problem at all. The spamer uses a
different smtp server (perhaps his own serer ;-) but fakes the FROM: tag
so that bounces are directed to Ari's mailserver. For short there is no
way
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:46:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In !qmail Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted ...
[Queuing outgoing PPP mail to multiple ISPs]
But this is what ISP SMTP relays are _for_.
I know and suppose that is why it doesn't appear in the FAQs, etc.
However it may be desirable for
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:28:38PM -0400, Robin S. Socha wrote:
* Landon Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001027 13:18]:
unsubscribe qmail
Now, Landon, take a look at this:
http://cr.yp.to/lists.html#qmail
"To subscribe, send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Kinda makes one wonder what
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be inclined to make the user valid and have their .qmail just be
a comment so that the bounces gets delivered to nowhere. Other than that you
have to sit it out.
What I found has helped a lot in this situation are the
Sometimes we have our mail server busy sending out a lot of newsletters. While
it's doing that any other mail sent through the server has to wait in the
queue. Is there any way to tell qmail that some messages should be processed
and sent before others? Thanks.
=
Greg Jorgensen
Deschooling
We send lots of newsletters and other subscription-type emails. Our qmail
server seems to max out at 10,000 outbound messages per hour. I already have
concurrencyremote set to 120, and reverse DNS lookups and other slowdowns
turned off. The CPU (a dual UltraSparc) is not maxing out; it looks like
Sean Reifschneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd try modifying qmail-smtpd so that it pauses when the todo gets
too large. Probably using some complicated scheme so that every
incoming connection doesn't walk the todo, but that's just my style.
The biggest cause of this, that I have, is the
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:37:37PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be inclined to make the user valid and have their .qmail just be
a comment so that the bounces gets delivered to nowhere. Other than that you
have to sit it
Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be inclined to make the user valid and have their .qmail just be
a comment so that the bounces gets delivered to nowhere. Other than that you
have to sit it out.
What I found has helped a lot
Actually, someone brought this up recently, and I didn't have an
explanation
for them -- why does ezmlm subscribe the envelope sender instead of the
address in From: ?
Probably to help curb, if only slightly, the possibility of somebody
subscribing somebody else without the latter person's
Hello all,
Anyone know if it's possible to do per user RBL/RSS spam checks? I.e..
something out of .qmail maybe?
-j
---
Robert J. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.siscom.net
Looking to outsource news? http://www.newshosting.com
SISCOM Network Administration - President, SISCOM Inc.
Phone:
hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:24:39PM -0400, Tim Hunter wrote:
Well if he was denying the spammers ip it would stop any incoming mail, for
the mail still in the queue I would setup a .qmail for the "fake" user and
redirect it to /dev/null
Problem solved,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:43:42PM -0700, Greg Jorgensen wrote:
We send lots of newsletters and other subscription-type emails. Our qmail
server seems to max out at 10,000 outbound messages per hour. I already have
concurrencyremote set to 120, and reverse DNS lookups and other slowdowns
guys,
just a quick question. when qmail recieves mail, does it immediately try to
send it out w/o putting it on the queue? or does it ALWAYS put it in the
queue and have some other process pick it up for delivery?
-marlon
The reason it's so slow is a large number of the connections are most likely
being tied up for long periods by mailservers than don't respond. About 80
of my 120 connections when I sent out mailings would do the same thing.
Apply the big concurrency patch. My concurrency is at 508 now, and I
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 27 October 2000 at 15:37:01 -0400
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:28:38PM -0400, Robin S. Socha wrote:
* Landon Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001027 13:18]:
unsubscribe qmail
Now, Landon, take a look at this:
http://cr.yp.to/lists.html#qmail
* Bill Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a seamless drop-in email virus scanner program which will
work with qmail v1.03, tcpserver, vpopmail, and qmailadmin packages
installed on my system,
http://qmail.org/top.html, look for AMaVis and similar products.
one system in here got
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 04:03:02PM -0500, Kris Kelley wrote:
Actually, someone brought this up recently, and I didn't have an
explanation
for them -- why does ezmlm subscribe the envelope sender instead of the
address in From: ?
Probably to help curb, if only slightly, the possibility
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 02:37:42PM -0700, marlon abao (TS-US) wrote:
guys,
just a quick question. when qmail recieves mail, does it immediately try to
send it out w/o putting it on the queue? or does it ALWAYS put it in the
queue and have some other process pick it up for delivery?
It
Actually, someone brought this up recently, and I didn't have an explanation
for them -- why does ezmlm subscribe the envelope sender instead of the
address in From: ?
My understanding is that the underlying belief is that the envelope
sender will be configured invalidly less often.
I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
The only solution I could find is reverting to Amavis.
Amavis is bit harder to setup
I manually set up q-mail on my Linux Mandrake (7.1) workstation a few
weeks ago in order to send out emails from my computer on a dialup ppp
connection.
Every time I try to send a message, I get the following error:
Oct 27 09:58:46 localhost qmail: 972665926.585538 new msg 408214
Oct 27
Hi there,
Suppose Qmail cannot send an email for a user, so it will send back a
message to the user telling her (or him) that that message cannot be
delivered. How can I customize the returned message so that a
non-English speaking user can know what has happened clearly.
BTW, is there any
I've walked through the lwq file and was pretty happy with my progress untill
it came to power up the program by "/etc/rc.d/qmail start" . Then a repeated
error message fills up that terminal like this :
supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: file does not exist
supervise: fatal: unable to
Thus said Daniel Augusto Fernandes on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:07:49 -0200:
You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your
address.
The very first (mostly) is something like this:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately, the return-path may not always be
Thus said Adam McKenna on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:51:03 EDT:
That's why ezmlm creates a random tag for each subscription that is sent back
to the subscriber for confirmation. There is no way to subscribe someone
else to an ezmlm list unless you have access to their mail spool.
Then, what is to
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:26:33 GMT:
I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
I don't see how you
mee too!
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 03:39:43PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. Maybe I'm confused. How do people think the envelope sender
value is determined in the first instant? Eg, how does Eudora go from
a mail in a window to "Mail From: " in SMTP? Or how does qmail-inject
for that matter?
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 05:01:21PM -0400, Robert J. Adams wrote:
Hello all,
Anyone know if it's possible to do per user RBL/RSS spam checks? I.e..
something out of .qmail maybe?
Search for rblchk. It's a cute little perl script which you can use with
procmail or maildrop.
RC
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 27 October 2000 at 15:39:43 -0700
Actually, someone brought this up recently, and I didn't have an explanation
for them -- why does ezmlm subscribe the envelope sender instead of the
address in From: ?
My understanding is that
I'm calling
tcpserver with this line:
tcpserver -q -c 500
-x /etc/smtp.cdb -H -l mail.marketwatchmail.com -R -u 503 -g 503 0 smtp
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3
I need to use
fixcrio to fix stupid emailers that put stray lf's in their
messages. How do I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
The only solution I could find is reverting to
89 matches
Mail list logo
