On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> It would be nice if someone convinced Microsoft et. al. (in the Windows
> E-mail client world) to support the reading and parsing of QSBMF in the
> same way Outlook already does this for Exchange server based E-mail.
I don't think will happen any
> Hello! I'm a new user of qmail. I need filter a direction [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> how can I do it?
I am not sure what you are asking, but I assume that you need to filter
mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The method of doing this depends on whether yyy.zzz is a virtualdomain, or
is the name of the
hi all
!i'm wondering if exists some binaries or scripts to cleanup/fixthe
qmail queue(
/opt/qmail/queue/mess
/remote
/info
/bounce)because i got error messages in logs like :"cannot stat
mess/[message N°]""cannot
Kevin asked:
> how do I unsubscribe?
> there is no info on qmail.org??
Normally, we charge a one-time fee of $59.95 for this service, as Peter has
explained. However, I am offering a special contest, since it is the year
2001 (a Qmail odyssey).
The winner of this contest will get a message fro
Hi All
I am looking for a way to selectively strip attachments from e-mails
based on their extension. I can probably make up a way myself, but I
don't want to reinvent the wheel if someone has already done this. I
don't mind if it includes patches, other software packages, filtering
tools, or wha
Oh boy, since this is cross-posted to both the qmail and to the Postfix
list, this could become a holy war.
I myself have never used Postfix, but have used Qmail. My general sense:
* Postfix and Qmail both are very hi-performance MTAs
* Qmail apprently has slightly better performance for mail
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Joel Gautschi wrote:
> hi,
> I get this error when user try to send a message to freesurf.ch. Is this my
> problem, or is it the problem of freesurf.ch?
>
> cya
> Joel
> Jan 29 11:30:57 joshua qmail: 980764257.483799 delivery 1: deferral:
> Connected_to_194.230.0.8_but_conne
Skip it. I'm a dope, and must have screwed something up.
- Original Message -
From: "Boz Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail@List. Cr. Yp. To" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: relay-ctrl-age problem
> I'm trying to run relay-ctrl-age to allow fo
I'm trying to run relay-ctrl-age to allow for smtp relaying after pop3
authentication. I'm trying to run it from root-crontab, but even if I run
it from the command line as root I get an "access denied" error on the
tcprules directory.
Has anyone else had this problem, and if so, what's the reso
i am using fetchmail to get all my pop mail and it directs it all to my
user name and i use my .qmail to redirect it to a mail filter (a perl
script using Mail::Procmail). that script detects messages to my lists
and resends them back to qmail which should forward them to the ezmlm
code. it seems
Hi,
I have a unix user iad001 on my linux box. All mail
for iad001 is sent to /var/spool/mail/iad001. I also have an /etc/aliases.db
file in which my email address raymondo@mydomain is aliased to iad001.
How do I set a max message size on a per alias
basis? I tried using the mailquota.s
Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:56:38PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It means that a user sending a steady stream of 10 (small)
> > > messages/sec over a dialup connection makes your system deal with
> > > 600 mess
Read the first message you got when you subscribed to the list, it tells
you how.
Since the list is run by ezmlm, maybe you should look at the documentation
for it.
I also offer a service where I can get you unsubscribed for $59.95. I
accept payment by paypal or cash, but you must be willing to
Title: Re: SOMEONE GET ME OFF THIS LIST
>From http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#support
To specify a subscription/unsubscription address, say [EMAIL PROTECTED], send the message to:
* listname[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Medi Montaseri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: PrePass
Reply-To: [EM
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
>
> If finaldomain.com is hosted elsewhere and you just want to forward everything,
> you can do this:
>
> echo 'domain1.com:alias-domain1' > /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
> echo '|forward "$DEFAULT"@finaldomain.com' > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-domain1-
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks, but will the RCPT TO: be changed accordingly?
> Because Server B will only accept mails in the form of
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> I have limited control over Server B (it's not running qmail
> either).
In that case, since you have to re
Peter van Dijk wrote:
> I am not aware of any software parsing QSMBF. Are you?
It would be nice if someone convinced Microsoft et. al. (in the Windows
E-mail client world) to support the reading and parsing of QSBMF in the
same way Outlook already does this for Exchange server based E-mail.
For
Thanks, but will the RCPT TO: be changed accordingly?
e.g.
External client to Server A
Mail from:<>
rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
data
blahblahblah
crlfdotcrlf
Then:
Server A to Server B
Mail from:<>
rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
data
blahblahblah
crlfdotcrlf
Because Server B will only accept mai
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:52:52AM +0800, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I do this:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> XXX@finaldomaincom
>
> That is to say mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
Scott Gifford wrote:
> Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Chris McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I'm wondering what the consequences of breaking QSBMF are. My
> > >desire is to change the bounce messages to something more
> > >professional (we've had some complaints)
> >
> > Ser
Hello,
I am looking into hosting a high volume discussion list (~3000 users, 20
MB of messages per month). The available hardware will probably be a RaQ3
server with 32 MB of RAM (should I pay for more RAM? if so, how much?), so
I wouldn't have much system resources to spare. My preferred MLM is
when you send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you get a reply - sent to the address that you mailed from of course -
to which you have to reply once more for confirmation (so that nobody can
subscribe your adress by forging it)
i just tried it ...
wolfgang
--
if it is there and you can see it
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I do this:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> XXX@finaldomaincom
In smtproutes (on Server A) -
domain1.com:mx.finaldomain.com
dom
Hi,
How do I do this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> XXX@finaldomaincom
That is to say mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is sent/forwarded/redirected to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (the To: etc should not be
me too
where is the instruction for unsubscribing...
Henry Ong wrote:
haha. i sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a few times
but i'm still getting mail messages from the list server
:-)
-henry
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Hubbard, David wrote:
> I know this can be very complicated but try sending an
> Get a life, Sam. Really.
Sigh, oh, sigh. I haven't heard a word from you in three years, so I
thought that you, like me, completely forgot about it.
For the other members of the list, I am sorry this personal spat, which I
thought I had resolved with Robin three years ago, has been taken to
how do I unsubscribe?
there is no info on qmail.org??
Kevin
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:52:33PM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
> I'm not even sure what QSMBF is.
http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt (yes, some of us were misspelling it
:)
Greetz, Peter.
I'm not even sure what QSMBF is.
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QSBMF -
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:30:13PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
[snip]
> >and the req'd "Hi. This is the" woul
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:17:14PM -0800, Greg White wrote:
[snip]
> A user on a dialup sending 10 messages per second can start a DoS
> attack normally only possible for a user with a T1, consisting of
> 600 messages per second.
And with only the system-load (taken as a broad concept :) associat
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:30:13PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
[snip]
> >and the req'd "Hi. This is the" would probably be the first
> >thing to go. So, if I change it to something else, what will I
> >break?
>
> Well, anything that parses QSBMF. I'm not sure offhand what the
> consequences would be
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:55:26PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
[snip]
Do you really find it necessary to send us 26 lines of X- headers?
Greetz, Peter.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Brett Randall wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Hi, i would like to use maildir instead of mailbox, but now
>> > theres a problem, does imap support maildir? what is the best
>> > imap daemon which works with maildir?
>>
* Sam Trenholme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The writers of Courier are a pedantic bunch. They reject mail with
> 8-bit info in the headers and will not send mail to places with
> "improperly configured MX records".
Good to see you again, Sam. *sigh* Still haven't learnt anything, have
you?
Or better yet get off the list..
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:56:38PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It means that a user sending a steady stream of 10 (small)
> > messages/sec over a dialup connection makes your system deal with
> > 600 messages/sec, which would normally take a T1.
>
> But
Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It means that a user sending a steady stream of 10 (small)
> messages/sec over a dialup connection makes your system deal with
> 600 messages/sec, which would normally take a T1.
But this doesn't involve any real network connections - it's all on
loopba
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:01:02PM -0500, Scott Gifford wrote:
> Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Chris McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >I'm wondering what the consequences of breaking QSBMF are. My
> > >desire is to change the bounce messages to something more
> > >profe
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:48:21 +0200, "Alex Kramarov" wrote:
> I do not use a broken MUA. I use an MUA that helps me construct
> a more personal e-mail by adding backgrounds and other multimedia
> elements. If you want to check that out, there is a link to it's site
> on the bottom of my e-mail. N
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm wondering what the consequences of breaking QSBMF are. My
> >desire is to change the bounce messages to something more
> >professional (we've had some complaints)
>
> Seriously? Sheesh.
We got similar c
Quoting Alex Kramarov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> >Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of messages
> >to this mailing list, only because
> >a) you use a broken MUA
> >b) you are unable to configure it correctly
> >c) you seem to be the onl
Chris McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm wondering what the consequences of breaking QSBMF are. My desire is to
>change the bounce messages to something more professional (we've had some
>complaints)
Seriously? Sheesh.
>and the req'd "Hi. This is the" would probably be the first
>thing t
Hello Henry
On 29-Jan-01, you wrote:
> haha. i sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a few times
> but i'm still getting mail messages from the list server
>
> :-)
>
> -henry
The same account as your using to post now ?
Your not multiple subscribed ?
Anyone can post to this list whether they
Hi,
I'm wondering what the consequences of breaking QSBMF are. My desire is to
change the bounce messages to something more professional (we've had some
complaints) and the req'd "Hi. This is the" would probably be the first
thing to go. So, if I change it to something else, what will I break?
forget this
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Henry Ong wrote:
> haha. i sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a few times
> but i'm still getting mail messages from the list server
>
> :-)
Look at your headers, are you unsubscribing with the address ezmlm
thinks you should be using?
Vince.
--
==
Markus Stumpf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of
messages>to this mailing list, only because>a) you use a
broken MUA>b) you are unable to configure it correctly>c)
you seem to be the only one th
Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 09:30:35PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > If you really want to retry failed deliveries more often, send
> > qmail-send SIGHUP every once in a while.
>
> I'm no wizard or anything, but isn't ALRM the signal you want for that?
> Doesn't
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:23:14PM -0500, Steve Woolley wrote:
> > The problem is probably with you moving the queue directory (which is a
> definite no-no, because the filenames in there must
>
> So would the proper order have been to:
>
> first: halt qmail processes on original qmail server
I
haha. i sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a few times
but i'm still getting mail messages from the list server
:-)
-henry
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Hubbard, David wrote:
> I know this can be very complicated but try sending an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the address you subscribed
> with
Add me to "Sorry list". pasted into the wrong reply.
Peter Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: Re: Sorry about
the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).:
> 216.25.232.3
> 216.25.232.4
> >> Original Message <<
> On 1/29/01, 2
216.25.232.3
216.25.232.4
>> Original Message <<
On 1/29/01, 2:20:39 PM, Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on
this before).:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Markus Stumpf wrote:
>
> The problem is probably with you moving the queue directory (which is a
definite no-no, because the filenames in there must
So would the proper order have been to:
first: halt qmail processes on original qmail server
then: copy /var/qmail/control and /var/qmail/users to new qmail server
This
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:12:54PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> > well, that was in the heat of the moment, make it 5000. But 2000 can make people
>send in plain text, someone has already proposed this here.
>
> Why should anyone impose artificial lim
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:12:54PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> well, that was in the heat of the moment, make it 5000. But 2000 can make people
>send in plain text, someone has already proposed this here.
Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of messages
to this mailing list,
> I don't know what their definition of 'improperly configured MX
> records' is.
I was also curious, so I took a quick scan through the sources. It
appears that this means MX records pointing to recursive CNAME records.
This is not apparently configurable.
Courier also apparent
In the previous episode (29.01.2001), Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>>#!/bin/bash
>>#~/filter
>>cat > /tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt
>>if [ "$(grep 'Subject: whatever' /tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt)" = "Subject:
whatever" ]
>>then
>>cat "/tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt" | qmail-inject devnul
>>else
>>
Hello! I'm a new user of qmail. I need filter a direction [EMAIL PROTECTED],
how can I do it?
Thanks
Pablo
well, that was in the heat of the moment, make it 5000. But 2000 can
make people send in plain text, someone has already proposed
this here.
---Original Message---
From: Alex Pennace
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday
Mail1:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 2389 invoked by uid 503); 29 Jan 2001 19:17:26 -
Received: from unknown (HELO billy) (193.253.221.190)
by ns207.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 19:17:26 -
From: "NDSoftware" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:55:26PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> The problem is probably with you moving the queue directory (which is a definite
>no-no, because the filenames in there must correspond to their inode numbers). Check
>out queue-fix on qmail-org, it should help at least one of your
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:01:50PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> Maybe a maximum-mail size has to be set on the box running this list, to prevent
>such errors from happening again. a simple
>
> echo 2000 >/var/qmail/control/databytes
>
> would suffice ...
You do realize that a limit of 2000 b
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:25:25PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
> The logs say only for one message !
And the headers of the emails please.
Possibly the MUA does a Fcc and as the mail is to yourself you end up
with two copies, a local saved one and a sent and received one.
\Maex
Maybe a maximum-mail size has to be set on the box running this list,
to prevent such errors from happening again. a simple
echo 2000 >/var/qmail/control/databytes
would suffice ...
___
The problem is probably with you moving the queue directory (which is
a definite no-no, because the filenames in there must correspond to their
inode numbers). Check out queue-fix on qmail-org, it should help at least
one of your problems.
---Ori
I recently tried (unsuccessfully) to replace one of my qmail servers (Red
Hat Linux 6.2)
by:
1) creating new qmail server (lets call it mail2)
2) tar'ing up the following dirs:
/var/qmail/control
/var/qmail/queue
/var/qmail/users
/home/vpop
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:25:25PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
> The logs say only for one message !
I don't think so. What do the logs say?
(we are not asking for your interpretation. We are asking for logfile
excerpts).
Greetz, Peter.
"NDSoftware" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The logs say only for one message !
OK, but I'd still like to see a sample. And you never answered by
other question:
>>What's in antivirus' .qmail file?
-Dave
The logs say only for one message !
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
Wolfgang Zeikat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>#!/bin/bash
>#~/filter
>cat > /tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt
>if [ "$(grep 'Subject: whatever' /tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt)" = "Subject:
>whatever" ]
>then
>cat "/tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt" | qmail-inject devnul
>else
>cat "/tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt" | qmail-in
"NDSoftware" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why when a send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with my account
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Outlook or The Bat!, i receveid this message in
>double ?
What's in antivirus' .qmail file? What Do The Logs Say? (tm)
-Dave
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:21:14PM -0300, suporte wrote:
>> I'm looking for a way to implement something like 'Delivery
Notification'. I
>> want to let my users know that his/her e-mail was delivered successfully
to
>> the other side ( or at least have an affirmative return from the other
SMTP
>>
"hari_bhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>could some one help me which operation system is the best
>usage of qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+mysql+sqwebmail
Ask ten people and you'll get ten answers--nine of which will be
newbie flames.
All UNIXes and UNIXlikes will work pretty well with qmail, but the
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:08:06 PST, Sam Trenholme wrote:
> The only security document I could find in the source tarball for
> courier-0.30.0 has this note:
courier is not an IMAP package but a MTA like qmail. What you need to
get is courier-imap and look there... I just looked there myself and
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:21:14PM -0300, suporte wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to implement something like 'Delivery Notification'. I
> want to let my users know that his/her e-mail was delivered successfully to
> the other side ( or at least have an affirmative return from the other SMTP
> serv
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:21:36PM -0300, suporte wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a way to implement something like 'Delivery Notification'. I
> want to let my users know that his/her e-mail was delivered successfully to
> the other side ( or at least have an affirmative return from the othe
Tomas TPS Ulej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
>qmail-start '|dot-forward .forward
>./Maildir' splogger qmail&
That should be:
./Maildir/' splogger qmail
(note the trailing slash)
-Dave
Hello Mate
On 29-Jan-01, you wrote:
>> I did note in the earlier mail that rblsmtpd is now in the ucspi-tcp
>> program and has a -a query. The only thing about this is why it
>> says "anti-listed" instead of listed.
>
>
> Perhaps you want to read the docs for rblsmtpd for the meaning of the
>
Hi
all,
I'm looking for a
way to implement something like 'Delivery Notification'. I want to let my
users know that his/her e-mail was delivered successfully to the other side (
or at least have an affirmative return from the other SMTP server... ).
Does anybody know a
Jose AP Celestino escribió:
> Is qmail-pop3d.c the only file affected by the patch?
I don't know. Is there a way to know it?
> If so why don't you cd the qmail source tree, apply the patch and then:
> make
> and copy the qmail-pop3d to /var/qmail/bin ?
I hope. Thanks
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:33:28PM +0100, J.J.Gallardo wrote:
> This is a doubt about the best way to compile again qmail:
>
> I have my system running qmail perfectly, but some days ago i discovered
> that qmail has not the patch that "Scott Moorhouse" re-wrote to solve
> the problem with the "N
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 10:26:33AM -0500, Greg Owen wrote:
> > The writers of Courier are a pedantic bunch. They reject
> > mail with 8-bit info in the headers and will not send mail
> > to places with "improperly configured MX records".
>
> Next thing you know, they'll be refusing to spe
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:05:58AM +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > could some one help me which operation system is the best
> > usage of qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+mysql+sqwebmail
>
> I highly suggest that Windows might be the best for you.
Or B
Yeah, right Alex.
make
= stop qmail =
cp qmail-pop3d /var/qmail/bin
chown root:qmail /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d
= start qmail =
FIN.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> from my experience, the easiest way to effectively kill you server (for some time,
>until you so
from my experience, the easiest way to effectively kill you
server (for some time, until you solve it) is to do just what is
proposed by Jose below, and to forget to set the right permissions
and o
* Greg Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010129 11:09]:
> Brett Randall wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hi, i would like to use maildir instead of mailbox, but now theres
> > > a problem, does imap support maildir? what is the best imap daemon
> > > which works with maildir?
certainly a newbie question : how to apply the Bruce Guenter's patch
from his email to qmail sources ...
Thanks.
Cordialement,
Michel Boucey Administrateur Système
> Société Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 <
imap-4.5-3mdir4.i386.rpm
The above is the UW-IMAP server w/ the Maildir patches alreayd applied. I'm
trying to locate the site I downloaded it from but I'll email it to you if
you like.
http://www.davideous.com/imap-maildir/
Found it
It works a lot better for me then the Courier-Imap progr
Is qmail-pop3d.c the only file affected by the patch?
If so why don't you cd the qmail source tree, apply the patch and then:
make
and copy the qmail-pop3d to /var/qmail/bin ?
Best regards.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:33:28PM +0100, J.J.Gallardo wrote:
> This is a doubt about the best way to c
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:41:41PM -, Gon?alo Gomes wrote:
> Hi, i would like to use maildir instead of mailbox, but now theres a
> problem, does imap support maildir? what is the best imap daemon which works
> with maildir?
>
> best regards
> Gonçalo Gomes
>
Courier-IMAP, and it also suppo
Brett Randall wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi, i would like to use maildir instead of mailbox, but now theres a
> > problem, does imap support maildir? what is the best imap daemon
> > which works with maildir?
>
> Read the FAQ and the docs that come with qmail. There
> I did note in the earlier mail that rblsmtpd is now in the ucspi-tcp
> program and has a -a query. The only thing about this is why it
> says "anti-listed" instead of listed.
Perhaps you want to read the docs for rblsmtpd for the meaning of the
-a flag.
Unpatched rblsmtpd blocks using TXT re
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, i would like to use maildir instead of mailbox, but now theres a
> problem, does imap support maildir? what is the best imap daemon
> which works with maildir?
Read the FAQ and the docs that come with qmail. There's a start for you.
--
B r e
> Hi, i would like to use maildir instead of mailbox, but now theres a
> problem, does imap support maildir? what is the best imap
> daemon which works with maildir?
Courier supports Maildir (and maildir only).
http://www.courier-mta.org and look for the "standalone IMAP package."
Hi, i would like to use maildir instead of mailbox, but now theres a
problem, does imap support maildir? what is the best imap daemon which works
with maildir?
best regards
Gonçalo Gomes
This is a doubt about the best way to compile again qmail:
I have my system running qmail perfectly, but some days ago i discovered
that qmail has not the patch that "Scott Moorhouse" re-wrote to solve
the problem with the "Netscape's download indicator doesn't progress".
The file involved is "qm
> The writers of Courier are a pedantic bunch. They reject
> mail with 8-bit info in the headers and will not send mail
> to places with "improperly configured MX records".
Next thing you know, they'll be refusing to speak with SMTP clients
that send bare linefeeds.
--
gowen -
Hi!
I have made a patch to rblsmtpd that allows to call an arbitrary
program whenever a connecting mailserver is in one of the lists.
I use it to send the postmasters of this host and the respective
domains a short mail saying that they have an open relay and they
should fix it.
This is maybe n
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> could some one help me which operation system is the best
> usage of qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+mysql+sqwebmail
I highly suggest that Windows might be the best for you.
Have fun.
--
B r e t t R a n d a l l
http://xbox.ipsware.com/
brett
* hari_bhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010129 07:51]:
>
> could some one help me which operation system is the best
> usage of qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+mysql+sqwebmail
Stupid, stupid question. And it's operating system, just for the record.
> linux freebsd hp sun AIX Solaris
You forget one that fits
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
