Hi,
Can anyone tell me why I'm receiving this message apart from the obvious
99.9% of the Qmail List messages I receive anyway.
The bottom of the message says relaying denied. Why on earth would I allow
relaying on my server apart for myself and trusted users?
Cheers,
Kevin
> <[EMAIL PR
> From: Tim Legant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Have you noticed that the people who get frustrated over the same
> questions being asked again and again are the same people who answer the
> vast majority of real questions? For free? Day in and day out?
>
> That's where your whole argument falls
"David Coley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mainly how to get SQL based archives...
If I remember it all correctly the archives are located in the
filesystem. The database is only used for the subscriber information.
If you want to archive in the database you have do use an additional
tool that
Hi Tim,
I was setting up a new QMail server on Sunday and had added the new IP to
the qmqpservers file on my webserver. When I powered down the old QMail
server, I deleted the wrong IP from the file. So I was left with a
qmqpservers file with an IP address of a freshly retired QMail server. As
Ma
"Edgardo Lust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map
> segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory.
Possibly you installed a RPM that doesn't match your system. Please
provide more information.
Regards, Frank
Tim Legant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Each time I post, I get one of these. It's been happening for the last
> few days. I think lasoleil (?) is misconfigured.
I already noticed Dan of that. I don't know if he found some matching
addresses - in the meantime I blocked the lasoleil mail server
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:12:36PM -0700, Tyrone Mills wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I made a stupid mistake and left a QMQP Client machine with a bad IP in the
> qmqpservers file. I'm re-reading the Installing mini-qmail doc on
Can you tell us what you mean by a bad IP? Was qmail-qmqpd running on
tha
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:12:36PM -0700, Tyrone Mills wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I made a stupid mistake and left a QMQP Client machine with a bad IP in the
> qmqpservers file. I'm re-reading the Installing mini-qmail doc on
> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/mini.html and if I am reading it correctly, I'm
>
Hello All,
I made a stupid mistake and left a QMQP Client machine with a bad IP in the
qmqpservers file. I'm re-reading the Installing mini-qmail doc on
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/mini.html and if I am reading it correctly, I'm
screwed when it comes to getting those messages back. Am I right? There wa
I'm looking for a hand with a new Ezmlm server I'm building.. if anyone can
point me towards a few good sites with information about migrating from one
server to another I'd appreciate it. I've already read all the pages on the
ezmlm.org site but they don't answer my questions about Ezmlm and SQL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Wagner Teixeira wrote:
>I've had many difficulties trying to understand this wonderful and *very*
>poorly documented mail environment (qmail + tools), even with my systems
>expertise and C knowledge. I had to read the source code many times to
>discover some si
> From: David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 18:40:52 -0500 (CDT)
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Robin S. Socha wrote:
>
> >Also note that I am subscribed
> >to this list. *Do* *not* *Cc* *me*.
>
> I've been guilty too. It's an unfortunate result of the lac
I'm trying to start qmail but /var/log/qmail/smtpd file is logging:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to
map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory.
Any idea?
Saludos
Edgardo Lust
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Robin S. Socha wrote:
>Also note that I am subscribed
>to this list. *Do* *not* *Cc* *me*.
I've been guilty too. It's an unfortunate result of the lack of a
'Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' field, which causes the MUA to assume
that a reply will go to you definit
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:57:36PM -0500, Bill Andersen wrote:
> OK, I guess I have to fall in the "stupid" group today. I posted
> a message a little earlier to the qmail list with the subject of
> "RE: slow smtp connection" and it made the list fine. However, I
> received this as a bounce...
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:57:36PM -0500, Bill Andersen wrote:
> OK, I guess I have to fall in the "stupid" group today. I posted
> a message a little earlier to the qmail list with the subject of
> "RE: slow smtp connection" and it made the list fine. However, I
> received this as a bounce...
Does qmail(or vpopmail) can do so that one domain can include some system accounts(via
passwd) and some virtual accounts(via
vpopmail w/ mysql)!!? Please advise.
\TM
Test post to list
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 03:35:11PM -0700, Travis Turner wrote:
> Oh so the fact that you answer a few questions
I wasn't referring to me.
>allows you to be omniscient
> in deciding who gets flamed.
1. No one has ever sought my permission to flame
OK, I guess I have to fall in the "stupid" group today. I posted
a message a little earlier to the qmail list with the subject of
"RE: slow smtp connection" and it made the list fine. However, I
received this as a bounce...
===
>Tim,
>
> Why not just write an web interface for subscribing to the list.
> In order to get to the actual form that asks for your email address,
> you would have to answer some basic questions that can be found in
> the FAQs and LWQ? Take the top 10 questions with multiple choice
> an
At 04:49 PM 5/1/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:28:15PM -0300, Wagner Teixeira wrote:
> > With my respect to everyone on this list. I *really* feel some guys here
> > think they are better than others. I don't think so. They can be more
> > experienced in some tools they could n
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:47:44PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Yes -- but the event which caused the core-dump appeared to happen in the
> child, so we don't know exactly what caused it. There are options to strace
> (and I assume truss) to make it also trace any children -- try adding that
>
You are better off asking ORBS to do a relay test, which is more reliable.
http://www.orbs.org/
-K
"Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste
good with ketchup."
> From: Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 12:15:19 -0300
> To:
In the infamous words of Kitri, well said Wagner.
./trav
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Wagner Teixeira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "John Hogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <[EMAIL PRO
>The only other solution I can think of is to travel to each of these
>people's homes and staple the above to their foreheads. This, for
>obvious reasons (the cost of travel), is not going to happen.
Tim,
Why not just write an web interface for subscribing to the list.
In order to get to the
>Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 14:50:49 -0700
>To: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Travis Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: slow smtp connection
>
>>
>>Why leave the list open? There is a USENET newsgroup if you think you
>>need to allow lusers to ask FAQs in technical forums. Moderat
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:28:15PM -0300, Wagner Teixeira wrote:
> With my respect to everyone on this list. I *really* feel some guys here
> think they are better than others. I don't think so. They can be more
> experienced in some tools they could never build alone.
[snip Zeus fantasies...]
H
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:44:04PM -0500, Jim O'Leary wrote:
> We've recently switched from "sendmail" to "qmail" as the "SMTP Server" for
> the majority of Eudora/Outlook/Messenger clients on campus.
Well, this isn't an exact answer to your question - Charles already
addressed that, but it's a
With my respect to everyone on this list. I *really* feel some guys here
think they are better than others. I don't think so. They can be more
experienced in some tools they could never build alone.
I beg Hogan's agreement to make mine his words, and suggest some guys to set
up an autoresponder
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:01:00PM -0500, davidu wrote:
> Charles, I agree with you here. I don't agree when you are always so harsh
> to people, but I understand why you are. Is there a way to send a "welcome"
> message when people subscribe that tells them this in nice big CAPS LOCKS or
> some
> http://learn.to/edit_messages
Thanks Robin. Exactly that was meant when I wrote about
http://learn.to/quote
Regards, Frank
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:07:51PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm getting the following for one of my local lists:
> > >
> > > @40003aeef9c40fe92884 delivery 2345: deferral:
> > >
>Segmentation_Fau
Why can you lusers not quote properly? Your mailtoys totally fuck up
threading in decent MUAs and also destroy archives. I manually
re-formatted your mail to make it readable. READ
http://learn.to/edit_messages, *PLEASE*. Also note that I am subscribed
to this list. *Do* *not* *Cc* *me*.
* dan. k
Jim O'Leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We've been looking through the tcpserver/qmail logs and see a disturbing
> pattern.
[...]
> It's the "status 256" that bothers us. It seems we don't see a "new msg"
> creation entry from qmail after these "status 256" entries, but we do see
> "new ms
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:07:51PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm getting the following for one of my local lists:
> >
> > @40003aeef9c40fe92884 delivery 2345: deferral:
> >
>Segmentation_Fault_-_core_dumped/ezmlm-moderate:_fatal:_Unknown_temp
"Flavio Alberto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How I'm test my autoresponder? I'm setup my autoresponder from qmailamdin
> but not works...
First have a look if it is inserted correctly.
Second: look at the logfile. If you find anything there and don't know
what it means, ask again (and don't fo
We've recently switched from "sendmail" to "qmail" as the "SMTP Server" for
the majority of Eudora/Outlook/Messenger clients on campus.
We've been looking through the tcpserver/qmail logs and see a disturbing
pattern. We see hundreds of entries per day like the following pair, mostly
sporadic,
right, but then you could moderate the qmail-arch list, and leave the
qmail-newbies list open. (i'm cribbing of the freebsd lists; the freebsd-arch
list gets virtually no static, near as i can tell).
On Tue, 01 May 2001, denis wrote:
> Alas, so very true
>
> Jeremy Suo-Anttila wrote:
>
How I'm test my autoresponder? I'm setup my autoresponder from qmailamdin
but not works...
I'm it using autoresponder-1.0.0 for inter7.com
> Well said.
>
> Kirti
Me too (c).
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Nissim Penias wrote:
> I have a patched my qmail with the spamcontrol patch version 1.4.2 which can be
>found in :
> http://www.feccom.de/qmail/spam.html
> This patch enables the badrcptpatterns under ../control/ in the qmail directory but
>it seems to b
Alas, so very true
Jeremy Suo-Anttila wrote:
> if you break it up then the newbies will just post to both lists.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dan.kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:58 PM
> To: Brett Randall; Charles Cazabon
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting the following for one of my local lists:
>
> @40003aeef9c40fe92884 delivery 2345: deferral:
>
>Segmentation_Fault_-_core_dumped/ezmlm-moderate:_fatal:_Unknown_temporary_error_from_child/
>
> This is a Solaris 8 box.. Anyone seen this be
Well said.
Kirti
-Original Message-
From: davidu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Charles Cazabon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: slow smtp connection
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
From: "davidu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -o Please check the FAQ's at http://cr.yp.to/ for qmail.
> -o Please read and/or search the archives. It is rare these days to get a
> question that hasn't been answered.
> -o If you are going to post to the list, please include REAL logs,
> unaltered that cov
Here is the last few lines of a truss I ran on the ezmlm-moderate process.
It looks like the segfault is happening right after the fork(), but I don't
know what it's trying to fork.
--Adam
[...]
open("outlocal", O_RDONLY|O_NDELAY) = 3
read(3, " t e s t\n", 128) =
if you break it up then the newbies will just post to both lists.
-Original Message-
From: dan.kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Brett Randall; Charles Cazabon
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: slow smtp connection
or how about breaking up th
Yes, it is a great idea!
>From: Tim Legant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: POP3 Login
>Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:24:37 -0500
>
>On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:02:24AM -0700, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> > P.S. Should we all just just add the response to this FAQ our
>signatures
I'm getting the following for one of my local lists:
@40003aeef9c40fe92884 delivery 2345: deferral:
Segmentation_Fault_-_core_dumped/ezmlm-moderate:_fatal:_Unknown_temporary_error_from_child/
This is a Solaris 8 box.. Anyone seen this before? This is standard
ezmlm 0.53 + ezmlm-idx 0.40.
or how about breaking up the list to qmail-newbiesand qmail-arch, or somthing
similar? i know this has been suggested before.
dan
On Tue, 01 May 2001, Brett Randall wrote:
> > "Charles" == Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > A note to potential qmail newbies: we'll help you
Charles wrote:
> A note to potential qmail newbies: we'll help you. Honestly.
> You just have
> to promise to do your homework, give it an honest try before
> asking for help,
> and to post good problem reports (detailing what you did, what
> the system did,
> and what you thought it was going
> Wow, good come back Kirti. Retard.
>
> ./trav
>
> At 12:16 PM 5/1/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > >> for future reference, what sort of question would qualify for your
> >enlightened views? <<
...
Does anybody know an English resource that provides the same as the following?
http://learn.to/quot
Hi John,
I hope you don't unsubscribe from this email list. You are not alone in
spending days printing and reading and feeling lost. I'm really dreading my
installs.
Actually, I know sendmail really well. I saved one company from spending
$100,000 on a software package to solve a Unix/PC ema
> "Charles" == Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A note to potential qmail newbies: we'll help you. Honestly. You
> just have to promise to do your homework, give it an honest try
> before asking for help, and to post good problem reports (detailing
> what you did, what the syst
Spam Control 1.4.2 may be using wildmat v0.3 at
http://www.unixpimps.org/wildmat/ but, I don't remember. That version
removed badmailfrom.
Personaly I would really like to have a badmailfrom when I don't use any
wildcards.
--
SgtChains
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cat BOFH | sed s/Operator/Postm
At 10:34 AM 5/1/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > since i joined this list, i have gotten nothing but grief for my
> > questions... i would estimate that i have printed/read over 200 pages of
> > documentation on the various source packages, patches, add-ons and c
Wow, good come back Kirti. Retard.
./trav
At 12:16 PM 5/1/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >> for future reference, what sort of question would qualify for your
>enlightened views? <<
>
>Probably NO QUESTION!
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: John Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, M
John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> you know, i've had about enough of you guys... on and off the
Simply do what you are told to do. Look at the archive. Your question
was answered at least two times in the last two days and about ten
times in the last week.
Frank
I appreciated hearing from you about Courier. I'm going to start out with
Courier. Wish me luck! I have a big job ahead of me with installing qmail,
courier, ldap, etc.
By the way, your http://my.gnus.org website is very impressive.
>From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROT
I appreciate your pointing this out.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John R. Levine)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes
>only"?
>Date: 30 Apr 2001 19:15:38 -0400
>
> >One last note on this thread. While rereading the FA
John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> since i joined this list, i have gotten nothing but grief for my
> questions... i would estimate that i have printed/read over 200 pages of
> documentation on the various source packages, patches, add-ons and cetera
> that i have had to install...
We're so
>>> for future reference, what sort of question would qualify for your
>enlightened views? <<
>
>
>Probably NO QUESTION!
you know, i've had about enough of you guys... on and off the list... please don't
email me anymore... i will be unsubscribing this morning
i would be the first to admit tha
>> for future reference, what sort of question would qualify for your
enlightened views? <<
Probably NO QUESTION!
-Original Message-
From: John Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: slow smtp connection
man, you guys a
you know, i've had about enough of you guys... on and off the list... please don't
email me anymore... i will be unsubscribing this morning
i would be the first to admit that i'm not the 'guru' that you guys are... i've spent
the last four full days trying to figure out qmail/tcpserver/qpopper/
John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> i am having slow smtp connectivity from an internal machine to my qmail
> >> smtp/firewall machine... once the message hits the smtp server, all is
> >> well what should i check?
> >
> >The mailing list archives
[...]
> >You can find a link to the archive
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:53:01AM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
> i'm sorry to have trouble you... for future reference, what sort of question
> would qualify for your enlightened views?
Perhaps one that you couldn't answer yourself with a minimum of effort.
Chris
PGP signature
man, you guys are tough - i thought it was a simple question... it probably took
charles more time to type the links than to type the answer
i'm sorry to have trouble you... for future reference, what sort of question would
qualify for your enlightened views?
- hogan
At 09:31 AM 5/1/2001, Cha
Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've tested my qmail smtp server for spam using the Prodygy Solutions
> relay test utility:
[...]
> And got 2(two) holes on my server:
No, you don't. Your machine didn't relay mail, and the tests (hah!) didn't
even actually do any testin
Greetz,
I've tested my qmail smtp server for spam using the Prodygy Solutions
relay test utility:
http://www.prodigysolutions.com/services/relay_test.php
And got 2(two) holes on my server:
* I'll omit the domain for security reasons of course.
Relay test 7
MAIL FROM:([EMAIL PROTECTED]@mail.
> "John" == John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what should i check?
The archives.
--
"I had a fortune cookie the other day and it said: 'Outlook not so
good'. I said: 'Sure, but Microsoft ships it anyway'."
John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am having slow smtp connectivity from an internal machine to my qmail
>smtp/firewall machine... once the message hits the smtp server, all is well
>
> what should i check?
The mailing list archives -- questions about slow network connections to qmail
se
i am having slow smtp connectivity from an internal machine to my qmail smtp/firewall
machine... once the message hits the smtp server, all is well
what should i check?
- hogan
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http
thanks for the really prompt answer
next time I will do a search of qmail.org
Neil
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
qmail Digest 1 May 2001 10:00:00 - Issue 1351
Topics (messages 61669 through 61722):
Re: POP3 Login
61669 by: Chris Johnson
61670 by: qmail mailing list
61671 by: QML Killer
61672 by: Wagner Teixeira
61674 by: Henning Brauer
61685 by: |nix Zix
Hello all ,
I have a patched my qmail with the spamcontrol
patch version 1.4.2 which can be found in :
http://www.feccom.de/qmail/spam.html
This patch enables the badrcptpatterns under
../control/ in the qmail directory but it seems to be that
it disables the badmailfrom because qmail is
i
76 matches
Mail list logo
