On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> I really should let this die, but I just can't...
>
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> >
> >> Where does apachectl live?
> >
> >/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats i
I really should let this die, but I just can't...
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> Where does apachectl live?
>
>/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or
>stopped or whatever by apachectl, apac
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> >>
> >> Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
> >> init script mechanism, but it's also perfectl
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> man hier should be a lot older than OpenBSD or whatever. I mean, really.
Unix-88 said that this sort of non-vendor provided stuff should go in
/opt/{vendor}/, but SunOS 4.1.x chose not to do that and few others do
even now. (SunOS 4's HIER(7) sugges
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
>> init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible with BSD and
>> generally useful on all UNIX flavors as a
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 10:41]:
>> "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
>> I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
>> go
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Sorry Dave, but having such a beast like the sysv-init-script for qmail on
> >OpenBSD is definetly not the correct approach. Thats against any BSD
> >concept, especially the OpenBSD concept.
* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 10:41]:
> "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
> I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
> going to stop just because some upstart free OS's wan
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
going to stop just because some upstart free OS's want to impose their
idea of the One True Filesystem Hierarc
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sorry Dave, but having such a beast like the sysv-init-script for qmail on
>OpenBSD is definetly not the correct approach. Thats against any BSD
>concept, especially the OpenBSD concept.
Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the Syste
* Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 09:36]:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:24:04AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> > Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
> > /var/qmail/supervise &". But putting:
> >
> > /usr/local/sbin/qmail start
> >
> > in rc.local is the correct a
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:24:04AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Just enter
> >
> >PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
> >svscan /service &
> >
> >in your /etc/rc.local
>
> Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
> /var/qmail/supervise &". Bu
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just enter
>
>PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
>svscan /service &
>
>in your /etc/rc.local
Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
/var/qmail/supervise &". But putting:
/usr/local/sbin/qmail start
in rc.local is the correct approach.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is
> started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
The lack of the complicated sysv-style init and its dependencies is a big
advantage
Rick Updegrove wrote:
> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything
is
> started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
I may be way off base here, having never used OpenBSD, but couldn't you
create the LWQ qmail start-up script as a file somewh
Hello,
I have been running qmail on Linux (RedHat and Mandrake) for a few months
now and I am growing interested in switching to OpenBSD for many obvious
reasons.
I did try a "ports" install of qmail and watched what was happening, and
saved the ports version of what was needed for the user ids
On 21.02.2001 20:04 + Kris Kelley wrote:
> Rick Updegrove wrote:
> > Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems
> everything
> is
> > started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
>
> I may be way off base here, having never used OpenBSD, but couldn
* Kris Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rick Updegrove wrote:
>> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems
>> everything is started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I
>> to follow LWQ?
> I may be way off base here, having never used OpenBSD, but couldn't
> you
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is
> started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
I recently set up an openbsd 2.8 box LWQ-style. The 'qmail' script that
is suggest
19 matches
Mail list logo
