"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
man hier should be a lot older than OpenBSD or whatever. I mean, really.
Unix-88 said that this sort of non-vendor provided stuff should go in
/opt/{vendor}/, but SunOS 4.1.x chose not to do that and few others do
even now. (SunOS 4's HIER(7)
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible
I really should let this die, but I just can't...
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Where does apachectl live?
/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or
stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl in
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
I really should let this die, but I just can't...
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Where does apachectl live?
/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as
On 21.02.2001 20:04 + Kris Kelley wrote:
Rick Updegrove wrote:
Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems
everything
is
started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
I may be way off base here, having never used OpenBSD, but couldn't you
Hello,
I have been running qmail on Linux (RedHat and Mandrake) for a few months
now and I am growing interested in switching to OpenBSD for many obvious
reasons.
I did try a "ports" install of qmail and watched what was happening, and
saved the ports version of what was needed for the user ids
Rick Updegrove wrote:
Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything
is
started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
I may be way off base here, having never used OpenBSD, but couldn't you
create the LWQ qmail start-up script as a file
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote:
Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is
started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
The lack of the complicated sysv-style init and its dependencies is a big
advantage
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:24:04AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just enter
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
svscan /service
in your /etc/rc.local
Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
/var/qmail/supervise ". But putting:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just enter
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
svscan /service
in your /etc/rc.local
Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
/var/qmail/supervise ". But putting:
/usr/local/sbin/qmail start
in rc.local is the correct approach.
-Dave
* Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010222 09:36]:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:24:04AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
/var/qmail/supervise ". But putting:
/usr/local/sbin/qmail start
in rc.local is the correct approach.
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Dave, but having such a beast like the sysv-init-script for qmail on
OpenBSD is definetly not the correct approach. Thats against any BSD
concept, especially the OpenBSD concept.
Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
going to stop just because some upstart free OS's want to impose their
idea of the One True Filesystem Hierarchy
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010222 10:41]:
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
going to stop just because some upstart free OS's want to
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Dave, but having such a beast like the sysv-init-script for qmail on
OpenBSD is definetly not the correct approach. Thats against any BSD
concept, especially the OpenBSD concept.
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010222 10:41]:
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
going to stop just
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible with BSD and
generally useful on all UNIX flavors as a qmail
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote:
Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is
started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
I recently set up an openbsd 2.8 box LWQ-style. The 'qmail' script that
is
* Kris Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rick Updegrove wrote:
Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems
everything is started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I
to follow LWQ?
I may be way off base here, having never used OpenBSD, but couldn't
you create
19 matches
Mail list logo
