On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
proof that ORBS is somehow worse than any
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:59:38AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
proof that ORBS is somehow worse than any
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
So tell us your IP and show it is being listed by ORBS, so we can see
for ourselves if this is true.
Now it is not possible, because the ORBS is closed
The host is sun.lodz.ptkardio.pl [212.51.193.152]
relays that stay open that long probably will
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 01:29:59PM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Now it is not possible, because the ORBS is closed
The host is sun.lodz.ptkardio.pl [212.51.193.152]
relays that stay open that long probably will never get fixed.
Since
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
You have shown us no proof. That you are unable to for external
reasons is too bad, but I suggest that you do not claim the above
until you can show us proof.
I don't believe you. Why I should believe you, when A. Brown
has presented arrogant
Can you guys please stop feeding this troll?
--Adam
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 05:10:32PM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
You have shown us no proof. That you are unable to for external
reasons is too bad, but I suggest that you do not claim the above
until you can show us proof.
I don't believe
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 01:29:37PM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Each use SMTP on server, which don't lead to
sent or receive mail without a permission of administrator
should be taken as inappropriate activity and illegal by any
law.
With that attitude you criminalize:
1. Incomplete
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Johan Almqvist wrote:
* Alex Pennace [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010601 04:25]:
http://www.orbs.org/ says Due to circumstances beyond our control,
the ORBS website is no longer available.
http://www.dorkslayers.com/ seems to be the successor in some ways. But
the first
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
[...]
I'm very happy thaht NZ Court has been this same opinion
as I.
Well, they don't.
The court didn't tell him to shut down ORBS, only to remove a few
defamatory listings.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
law.
Maybe in Netherlands is not illegal, but in Netherlands even euthanasia
is legal by any law, in other countries
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:28AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
law.
Maybe in Netherlands is not illegal,
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:50AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz allegedly wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
law.
Maybe in Netherlands is
Besides, ORBS is dead!
http://www.orbs.org/
Or, is that the wrong site?
David
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:50AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz allegedly wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
proof that ORBS is somehow worse than any other list of IPs.
1) My host was by me secured (qmail+tcpserver with
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:06:52PM -0400, David Means wrote:
Besides, ORBS is dead!
http://www.orbs.org/
Or, is that the wrong site?
That is the right site, and ORBS is indeed currently dead.
Greetz, Peter.
Hello
Alan Brown, operator of ORBS, was served 2 New Zealand High Court
injunctions ordering the removal of several OBRS listings. The compalies
who filed for these injunctions are Actrix and NZ Telecom.
I have written to this list one year ago, Allan Brown activity
is illegal, moreover hi
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:25:10AM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Hello
Alan Brown, operator of ORBS, was served 2 New Zealand High Court
injunctions ordering the removal of several OBRS listings. The compalies
who filed for these injunctions are Actrix and NZ Telecom.
I have written
* Alex Pennace [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010601 04:25]:
http://www.orbs.org/ says Due to circumstances beyond our control,
the ORBS website is no longer available.
http://www.dorkslayers.com/ seems to be the successor in some ways. But
the first statement
It is our intention to never list IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Alex Pennace wrote:
http://www.orbs.org/ says Due to circumstances beyond our control,
the ORBS website is no longer available.
That seems pretty abrupt. Anyone know why they vanished?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with
* David Talkington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010601 09:29]:
Alex Pennace wrote:
http://www.orbs.org/ says Due to circumstances beyond our control,
the ORBS website is no longer available.
That seems pretty abrupt. Anyone know why they vanished?
legalese
Alan Brown, operator of ORBS, was served 2
http://www.orbs.org/ says Due to circumstances beyond our control,
the ORBS website is no longer available.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/ is an RBL-like blacklist of domains that
think RFC conformance is for wimps. Currently they list domains that
refuse mail from (null sender) and refuse mail
22 matches
Mail list logo
