On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:58:22PM +0100, Tanuj Shah wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: C P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 26 June 2001 11:20
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: open relay
> >
> >
> > the problem is that even
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:58:22PM +0100, Tanuj Shah wrote:
> Use something like this:
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 20x.x.x.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :DENY
> I just presume it's because there's no ':DENY' which blocks all else.
No, that will refuse connections from everywhere except the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:50:20PM +0530, C P wrote:
> we are having problem regarding open relay. the tcp.smtp file looks like
> 20x.xx.xxx.x:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> tcp server has been started as
>
> tcpserver -x /etc/tcp
> -Original Message-
> From: C P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 June 2001 11:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: open relay
>
>
> the problem is that even after running tcpserver it's
> allowing open relay...
>
> what could be the pos
hi all,
we are having problem regarding open relay. the tcp.smtp file looks like
20x.xx.xxx.x:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
tcp server has been started as
tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 501 -g 2108 0 smtp
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
where u
"John Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can you people please stop sending me "you didn't read the docs" email.. I
>DID.. if I didn't I probably would have never got qmail up and running in
>the first place..
Then either you didn't read the right docs or you didn't understand
them.
>I'm am whol
I did have rcpthosts set.. but I was under the impression that I could
secure my server with just tcp.smtp alone.. I was wrong.. I am sorry
> Exception: If the environment variable RELAYCLIENT is set,
> qmail-smtpd will ignore rcpthosts, and will append the value
> of RELAYCLIEN
setting of the
RELAYCLIENT environment variable through tcpserver can then be used to
override this mechanism for particular hosts if desired.
> now that I do have my domain into rcpthosts it is the only way it will stop
> the open relay behavior because the server responds with "domain not i
will stop
> the open relay behavior because the server responds with "domain not in my
> rcpthosts" which is fine because I can bypass this with adding people to my
> tcp.smtp file
>
> this is how it's supposed to work?
Absolutely.
--
* Henning Brauer
From: "John Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> the problem
> it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
> my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
> localhost address and recompiled with tcprules
Once I forgot to run ./config-fast FQDN in th
too well...
>
> the problem
> it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
> my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
> localhost address and recompiled with tcprules
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="&q
> How did you follow docs without having your domain in rcpthosts?
> It -should- be there.
I worded that incorrectly.. it was in there..
> The fact that it wasn't there caused your open relay behavior.
>
> AFTER you add your domain to rcpthosts, add your networks back
>
John Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the problem
> it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
> my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
> localhost address and recompiled with tcprules
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :allow
with tcprules
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
compile it.. restart qmail.. and it's still an open relay.. people from any
network can bounce email off me.. the only way I can stop it is to add my
domain to /var/qmail/rcpthosts which will then bounce any email not sent to
my do
Hello,
My SMTP server is in mail-abuse.org. Follow the Faq I did:
#cat .qmail-fixup-default
| [ "@$HOST" = "@fixme" ] || ( echo Permission denied; exit 100 )
| qmail-inject -f "$SENDER" -- "$EXT2"
#cat virtualdomains
fixme:fixup
#cat smtp.rules
200.18.178.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="@fixme"
Bjorn Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to allow open relay on my mail server for a certain domain eg:
> *.somedomain.com. tcpserver does not seem to support domain names is there
> some other way that I can do this?
You should be able to use
=.somedomain.com:al
Hi,
I need to allow open relay on my mail server for a certain domain eg:
*.somedomain.com. tcpserver does not seem to support domain names is there
some other way that I can do this?
cheers,
Bjorn
--
Bjorn Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Manux Solutions Ltd
Ph +64 3 343 2031 Fax +64 3 34
re and to receive mail from anywhere
>while atill preventing the machine to became an open relay.
>
>My idea is the following. I'd set up two copies of qmail,
It is possible with a single qmail implementing RFC2487 (STARTTLS).
Qmail-smtpd will then relay mail iff the connection
access the
Internet using their various ISPs where they have
dynamic IP numbers. They are authenticated by their
individual SSL certificates.
The requirement would be to allow the users to send
mail to anywhere and to receive mail from anywhere
while atill preventing the machine to became an open
Am Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2000 09:31 schrieb Jimmy Newell:
> How do I completely open up my qmail smtp server to be a smtp relay?
nice joke.
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
www.bsws.de|
just out of curiosity, why would you want to do that?
- jeremy
At 06:20 PM 12/12/2000 -0600, joshua stein wrote:
>Jimmy Newell wrote:
> > How do I completely open up my qmail smtp server to be a smtp relay?
>
>don't.
>
> > I've searched the archives is deleting the
> > /var/qmail/control/rcpthos
Unless you are running the server on an internal LAN, I *high*
discourage you from opening up a smtp relay.. Not only will you be
frowned upon by the internet community for being a spam-haven, but you
and your ISP could be put on the RBL (which is very bad).. But to
answer your question, deleting
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I completely open up my qmail smtp server to be a smtp relay?
>
> I've searched the archives is deleting the
> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file all I need to do?
And make sure that you aren't passing tcpserver a -x argument (checks
to make
Jimmy Newell wrote:
> How do I completely open up my qmail smtp server to be a smtp relay?
don't.
> I've searched the archives is deleting the
> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file all I need to do?
no.
How do I completely open up my qmail smtp server to
be a smtp relay?
I've searched the archives is deleting the
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file all I need to do?
What are the symptoms of not compiling the DNS
patch, I don't remember if I patched it.
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2000 04:18 schrieb Bruce Guenter:
> I believe relay-ctrl is the only one that supports Courier
> IMAP, but other than that all the ones I'm aware of do the same thing.
Hmm, open-smtp's concept is so clear, easy and powerfull that it's really
easy to add support. I'm us
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 05:12:07PM -0600, Eric Walters wrote:
> Is there a compelling reason to use one form of smtp auth vs. another?
If you're referring to the various SMTP-after-POP/IMAP packages, not
really. I believe relay-ctrl is the only one that supports Courier
IMAP, but other than that
Is there a compelling reason to use one form of smtp auth vs. another?
-Original Message-
From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Open Relay questionnaire
Eric Walters <[EMAIL PROTEC
rying to find a happy medium between
> security
> > and user-friendliness. Is there a way to ensure that unless the rcpt
> to: or
> > mail from: contain a local domain qmail will not deliver the message?
>
>Relaying based on the envelope sender address causes your server
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open Relay questionnaire
Eric Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for some input on this as it relates to virtual hosting. My
> users are all remote and I am
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:16 PM
To: 'Alex Pennace'; 'Eric Walters'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Open Relay questionnaire
That makes sense. I am getting the impression that most people support some
form of SMTP auth like Vpopm
Based on Alex's comments this is still "security by obscurity" so I am less
vulnerable, but still vulnerable.
-Original Message-
From: schmonz [mailto:schmonz] On Behalf Of Amitai Schlair
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 2:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Open Relay questionnaire
<< File: ATT00013.dat >> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 02:24:39PM -0600, Eric
Walters wrote:
> I am looking for some input on this as it relates to virtual hosting. My
> users are all remote and I am trying to find a happy mediu
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2000 21:52 schrieb Amitai Schlair:
> Eric Walters wrote:
> > I am looking for some input on this as it relates to virtual hosting. My
> > users are all remote and I am trying to find a happy medium between
> > security and user-friendliness. Is there a way to ensure that
pt to: or
> mail from: contain a local domain qmail will not deliver the message?
Relaying based on the envelope sender address causes your server to be
an open relay by my standards, a spammer only needs to know the secret
(using certain envelope senders) to use your MTA as a relay.
PGP signature
is connecting
to. The above would provide no security, and essentially act as an open relay.
> So far I have implemented relayclient but that is a real pain to administer
> and an inconvenience to my users.
Not sure what you're referring to above; do you mean setting the RELAYCLIEN
Eric Walters wrote:
> I am looking for some input on this as it relates to virtual hosting. My
> users are all remote and I am trying to find a happy medium between security
> and user-friendliness. Is there a way to ensure that unless the rcpt to: or
> mail from: contain a local domain qmail w
I am looking for some input on this as it relates to virtual hosting. My
users are all remote and I am trying to find a happy medium between security
and user-friendliness. Is there a way to ensure that unless the rcpt to: or
mail from: contain a local domain qmail will not deliver the message?
rnet to send and receive email.
> Therefore I need it to allow people to send messages from a local user to a
> remote user. It seems to be allowing all email to pass through.
You've probably got no /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file, and are therefore
an open relay. This is Very Bad (tm).
I have an qmail server setup and running, but am having difficulty getting
it to selectively relay.
I have a server setup so that it is using virtualdomains. The users of the
mail system connect to it from the Internet to send and receive email.
Therefore I need it to allow people to send mess
Title: How does one configure a 1-way open relay?
How does one set up qmail as a oneway outgoing email only relay?
Of course one does not want an open relay to be accessible to incoming
SMTP messages, but we need to have sender/recipient be anyone/anyone.
I have remove control/rcpthosts to
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html is a good way.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: open relay test
How do I check for open relay?
I saw something once with a simple test
How do I check for open relay?
I saw something once with a simple test.
could someone please point me to something
similar
--
Kind regards
Kevin Waterson
CEO OceaniaTLA
email
> address I should have received a 553 domain not in allowed rcpthosts
> message. None of the mail i was trying to deliver has appeared in the
> remote accounts I was using.
>
If the mail never got there, you're not relaying. An open relay would
have immediately sent the mail on
> > You can use an automated relay tester, but beware that
> > qmail appears not to pass the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > test (and the test usually says "This is not conclusive
> > unless you actually got mail").
>
> It appears that my Qmail setup allows relaying when % is
> between uername an
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:19:50PM -0500, zealot wrote:
> Results from http://www.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest show that 8 out of 9
> relay tests fail when probing my machine. However, the last test produced
> the following message:
>
> Relay test 9
> >>> RSET
> <<< 250 flushed
> >>> MAIL
RCPT TO:<"relaytest%abuse.net">
<<< 250 ok
It appears that my Qmail setup allows relaying when % is between uername and
domain. Why would that happen?
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000
i telnetted into port 25 (not sure if this is the machine you wrote about
tho) and got this:
220 info.load-otea.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca ESMTP
mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 ok
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
if you telnet from a ma
ide address, one not
owned by you or your users.
> I am concerned that we may be acting as an open relay. How
> can I check/fix this?
You can use an automated relay tester, but beware that qmail appears
not to pass the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" test (and the test usually says
&qu
e. None of the mail i was trying to deliver has appeared in the
remote accounts I was using.
I am concerned that we may be acting as an open relay. How can I check/fix
this?
Jjen
Jennifer Franklin
Assistant Application Designer
Labour Operations Applications Development
Human Resources Development Canada
On 8 Sep 2000, John R. Levine wrote:
| (Friendly hint: if you ignore the ugly blinking message and send me
| mail anyway saying that the tester claimed that your system is an open
| relay because it accepted the test message, I'll write back and call
| you a moron.)
|
Hrmm.. i just ra
ters that your system is only an open relay if it actually forwards
the message back. If you're a registered abuse.net user, it can
assign you a temporary abuse.net forwarding address so you can test
your own server using an address not in your own domain.
(Friendly hint: if you ignore the u
> > "%" or "!" in the To: field?
>
> NO ONE!
>
> ORBS tester requires the E-Mail to reach them at their test account,
> this can only happen if you are an Open Relay server.
> They also keep the relayed message at their site for verification.
AH good.
=)
-Stephen-
BS tester requires the E-Mail to reach them at their test account,
this can only happen if you are an Open Relay server.
They also keep the relayed message at their site for verification.
MVH André Paulsberg
er as you reported
> > at the bottom it is not considered a open relay.. But if ORBS runs the test
> > and it fails then you are added to the ORBS database..
>
> I don't think that's true. They bad-mouth qmail for doing this in their
> tech section, but I'm almo
Sean C Truman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree the ORBS test are dumb and don't really pertain to 95% of the
> mail servers out there. But if you are in the ORBS database then some mail
> is going to be rejected.
Except that ORBS doesn't actually add people who "fail" that test but
don't re
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
>
> I imagine that more than one person on this list has spoken to ORBS
> about their misleading relay test? How many people have ended up on the
> ORBS list simply because their qmail installations accepted emails with
> "%" or "!" in the To: field?
None. ORBS doesn
Sean C Truman wrote:
>
> I am adding the non-colors, table feature.. I do not like the colors or
> tags. GUI people like it.. I will add a Bool for the Graphics and table
> format.. so that you can switch from either mode.. however as you reported
> at the bottom it is not co
I imagine that more than one person on this list has spoken to ORBS
about their misleading relay test? How many people have ended up on the
ORBS list simply because their qmail installations accepted emails with
"%" or "!" in the To: field?
This seems extraordinarily stupid to me...
-Stephen-
Magnus,
Newbieproof the script.. Gottcha.. That all you had to say.. Sorry.. :)
Sean
- Original Message -
From: Magnus Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmail list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Open relay test.
> On Sun, Sep
*duh* - telnetting into the world from our mail server is prohibited by
the firewall hehe.
mail-abuse.org accepts mail from me via that server tho (relay reports).
wolfgang
Also sprach Sean C Truman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
03.09.2000:
From your mail server just telnet to mail-
don't apply to your server.. The test does not report it's
> results to anywhere except your browser.
I agree partly.
But my point is that the test is misleading and will cause confusion for
those who don't understand. Especially if it states with big letters that
"You ar
mail-abuse.org and you
will see what I am explaining.
Sean
- Original Message -
From: wolfgang zeikat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Open relay test.
> Also sprach Sean C Truman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sean
- Original Message -
From: Magnus Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmail list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: Open relay test.
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 11:00:14AM -0400, Sean C Truman wrote:
> > I am adding the non-colors,
Also sprach Sean C Truman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
03.09.2000:
But if ORBS runs the test
and it fails then you are added to the ORBS database..
i doubt that.
my server has repeatedly been tested by ORBS and is considered clean.
wolfgang
> at the bottom it is not considered a open relay.. But if ORBS runs the test
> and it fails then you are added to the ORBS database..
But ORBS tests are dumb.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] could actually be a
mail address at my system.
Why should anybody make a false decision about me running an op
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Open relay test.
>
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 09:49:19AM -0400, Sean C Truman wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have put together a small OPEN relay tester. It runs the same test
ORBS runs.
> &g
I am adding the non-colors, table feature.. I do not like the colors or
tags. GUI people like it.. I will add a Bool for the Graphics and table
format.. so that you can switch from either mode.. however as you reported
at the bottom it is not considered a open relay.. But if ORBS runs the test
oops sorry,
that was rather a temporary netscape problem that didnt let me copy/paste.
Also sprach wolfgang zeikat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03.09.2000:
(*erm*, wouldnt it be easier if you could copy/paste from the
results page
without having to open the page source an
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 09:49:19AM -0400, Sean C Truman wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have put together a small OPEN relay tester. It runs the same test ORBS runs.
>
> http://www.prodigysolutions.com/relay_test.html
It also states falsely that if a host that handl
i tested your tester, thanks :)
(*erm*, wouldnt it be easier if you could copy/paste from the results page
without having to open the page source and seeing those *tons* of
color/font tags? :)
however, your test claims i am running an open relay due to these results:
MAIL FROM:([EMAIL
Hey all,
I have put together a small OPEN
relay tester. It runs the same test ORBS runs.
http://www.prodigysolutions.com/relay_test.html
Sean Truman[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.prodigysolutions.com/
y, June 15, 2000 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: Fixing open relay
> Dewald Strauss wrote:
> >
> > In /etc/qmail/locals I have just the domainname of the server.
> > In /etc/qmail/control/rcpthosts I have the names of the 7 domains
> > In /etc/tcpcontrol there are 2 files: pop-3.r
On Tue, Jan 22, 1980 at 02:38:51AM +0200, Dewald Strauss wrote:
[snip]
> In /etc/qmail/locals I have just the domainname of the server.
> In /etc/qmail/control/rcpthosts I have the names of the 7 domains
This combination doesn't make sense. If locals is in /etc/qmail, so is
rcpthosts. Either one
Dewald Strauss wrote:
>
> In /etc/qmail/locals I have just the domainname of the server.
> In /etc/qmail/control/rcpthosts I have the names of the 7 domains
> In /etc/tcpcontrol there are 2 files: pop-3.rules and smtp.rules
> both these files have all 7 domainnames with
> :allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Hi everybody,
Some @#%^%& spammer decided to abuse my mailserver today,
and it ended up in orbs.
I really want to fix this, but need some help.
I have the following setup:
qmail 1.03 with ucspi and daemontools
vpopmail
sqwebmail
I am hosting mail for 7 domains, all connecting to the server via
> Bolivar Diaz Galarza:
> Please help because I am even having a hard time sending e-mail to this list
> and I do not understand what is going on, as soon as I place the rcpthosts
> file in /var/qmail/control with the name of my servers
i just tried to check the conditions given and found that m
a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aaron L. Meehan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: Open Relay
> Sorry I mispelled it in the e-mail, but in the system is right, the rule
> looks
processes
Bolivar,
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron L. Meehan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: Open Relay
> Quoting Bolivar Diaz Galarza ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Thanks f
Quoting Bolivar Diaz Galarza ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Thanks for the tip, I read everything in the links you gave me, but still
> doesn't work.
>
> I checked the tcprules using tcprulescheck:
>
> tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb 200.38.239.65
>
> and the response is:
>
> rule 200.38.239.:
> set e
won't send any e-mail to the outside word.
Bolivar,
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bolivar Diaz Galarza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 2:58 PM
On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 03:58:20PM -0600, Bolivar Diaz Galarza wrote:
> I am running an open relay because I took out the file
> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts. I took it out because if I copy whatever is in
> locals (I don't have any virtual domains) and place it in rcpthosts, I can
Hi there,
I am running an open relay because I took out the file
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts. I took it out because if I copy whatever is in
locals (I don't have any virtual domains) and place it in rcpthosts, I can
not send any messages to the outside world, I get an error that reads like
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:49:32 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (warning-timeout)
>
>
>*
: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PLEASE help me secure my open relay!!
Okay, I'm trying hard to close my open server.. Am having some probs,
and I hope I can get some help..
I've been following the instructions at
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html
Okay, I'm trying hard to close my open server.. Am having some probs,
and I hope I can get some help..
I've been following the instructions at
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html (and some other sites I could
find) as well as I possibly can, but I'm having some probs. The popular
ad
c) IF you use the RBLSMTPD patch and TCPSERVER (outside the scope of my
discussion) THEN QMAIL will behave as a dynamic, on-demand
blocking RELAY.
==> Disregarding the IFSs and THENs and even if a) to c) are a very,
very rough
description I called this for simplicity: &qu
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is just a guess, because you haven't given us enough information to
> go on, but perhaps just because qmail-smtpd is not immediately aborting
> with an error after the RCPT TO: portion of the smtp transaction, you think
> that's relaying. It's
Juan E Suris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I followed the installation as per LWQ, but I my SMTP is allowing relaying,
> with only localhost on rcpthosts file. Here's my tcp.smtp content:
>
> 127.0.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 216.42.24.88:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> What could be wrong?
Why do yo
Hi All!
I followed the installation as per LWQ, but I my SMTP is allowing relaying,
with only localhost on rcpthosts file. Here's my tcp.smtp content:
127.0.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
216.42.24.88:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
What could be wrong?
JES
On the qmail list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>I am using Qmail and I want to receive mail for "mynet.com.pk" and want =
>to forward it to our another mailserver=20
>"welcome.mynet.com.pk" for relaying.
OK.
>But I want to make the Qmail an =
>open relay too
Sir,
I am using Qmail and I want
to receive mail for "mynet.com.pk" and want to forward it to our another
mailserver
"welcome.mynet.com.pk" for
relaying. But I want to make the Qmail an open relay too. So i deleted
recpthosts to make open relay. I
put "myn
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 10:02:45AM +0100, Dr. Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> try my SPAMCONTROL Patch I posted into this group recently.
> However, I really advise everybody NOT to use the LOOPBACK address to be
> included in the relaying control mechanism. Its easy enough to fake that.
It's ea
At 01:16 27.1.2000 -0500, you wrote:
>
>| Hi
>| I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
>| with 3 domains in rcpthosts and the following in etc/tcp.smtp
>|
>| 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>| 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>|
>| According to what I've read, this shoul
You don't need that. allow is the default.
As someone else pointed out, his problem is that he has no rcpthosts file.
--Adam
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 01:16:40AM -0500, Keith Warno wrote:
> | Hi
> | I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
> | with 3 domains in rcp
| Hi
| I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
| with 3 domains in rcpthosts and the following in etc/tcp.smtp
|
| 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
| 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
|
| According to what I've read, this should allow only users with 192.168.1.*
| to use my
Jeff Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> According to what I've read, this should allow only users with 192.168.1.*
> to use my server as a relay.
That's correct.
> But when I test remotely, the test messages are allowed through.
Hi
I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
with 3 domains in rcpthosts and the following in etc/tcp.smtp
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
According to what I've read, this should allow only users with 192.168.1.*
to use my server as a rel
Look for tcpserver on qmail.org
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Tonino Greco
> Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2000 14:38
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Open relay??
>
> Hi,
>
> I have r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I have read somewhere that you can sen your SMTP server to only allow
>mail from specific addresses???
I don't know if you read that somewhere or not. How should I know?
It's certainly possible to restrcit access to your SMTP server.
>If this is so - how do you allow f
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
