List:
Actually this turns out to be a little more difficult than the info in
'http://www.qmailtoaster.com/dkim.html'. We have a client sending out
newsletters in behalf of other entities (allowed by their SPF's). But he
wants to sign the emails with his domain's key. So really the question
i
Yep spamd is running although I don’t see any denies.
03-12 10:24:02 Mar 12 10:24:02.712 [7620] info: prefork: child states: II
03-12 10:25:15 Mar 12 10:25:15.315 [7644] info: spamd: connection from
localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 50874
03-12 10:25:15 Mar 12 10:25:15.319 [7644] info: s
Lets make one!
Here are tid bit’s I have picked up over the past few weeks.
Implementation
Host MUST be on a NAT or outside address where it can see the real IP address
of the last hop.
Internet facing Reverse DNS on your hostname must work to prevet getting
blocked by remote rDNS SPF
Yea I got, that but I’m a little confused on how one would have multiple mail
scanners operating on a msg in flight to a forward.
This is how I think that’s working.
The supervise script runs both symscan and spamdyke via the supervise script.
tcprules/tcp.smtp run’s simscan via QMAILQUEUE
On 03/12/2014 02:41 AM, Scot Needy wrote:
So I installed spamdyke using /usr/sbin/qtp-install-spamdyke thinking that
would replace my spam engine but from the logs and your comment I’m guessing I
need to uninstall spamassasin as I still see simscan in the logs from tcprules.
Don't get me wrong
Got it Finn
Here’s what I have but apparently unuseful due to the systems network position.
dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org
dns-blacklist-entry=bl.spamcop.net
graylist-dir=/var/spamdyke/graylist
graylist-level=always
graylist-max-secs=2678400
graylist-min-secs=180
greeting-delay-secs=6
idl
Hi Scot.
Nope You're not alone !
Remember to check /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf to en/disable
dns-blacklists, greylists ,time etc.., (advice will be to make use of a
couple of these dns-blacklists)
Regards,
Finn
Den 12-03-2014 10:41, Scot Needy skrev:
Thanks for the feedback Eric, Are we
Thanks for the feedback Eric, Are we the only two on this list ! “nudge”
qmailtoaster-list
Working on moving the qmt to a public address space. I just need to eat a
little crow first.
When I did my research and asked those questions it lead me to believe that the
“last hop” of the TCP pa
On 03/11/2014 08:56 PM, Scot Needy wrote:
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=5,attach=.ade:.adp:.app:.asd:.asf:.asp:.asx:.avi:.bas:.bat:.bin:.chm:.cil:.cla:.class:.cmd:.com:.cpl:.crt:.csh:.css:.dll:.dot:.email:.eml:.exe:.fxp:.hlp:.hta:.htm:.html:.inf:.ins:.isp:.js:.jse:.ksh:.lnk:.mda:.mdb:.mde:.mdt:.md
New dilemma in my fight against SPAM.
I updated the simcontrol file to include additional attachments and shortly all
mail was blocked but I’m not sure why
What exactly is the function of spam_hits ? Block ALL mail after 12 hits ? Per
hour per … ?
Is simcontrol even in play anymore ?
03-11
Yea,
I guess that was my original question when I asked about NAT.
Forgive me if I ask a dumb question but..
I thought that the source TCP address wasn’t an issue because much of the spam
prevention will look at mail headers not just the TCP source IP of the last
relay before mail got to q
I had to disable my SPF checks until I get this resolved.
/var/qmail/control/spfbehavior = 1
But even with this disables I should still be using blacklists and other
spamdyke features.
/var/qmail/control/blacklists
-r zen.spamhaus.org -r list.dsbl.org -r combined.njabl.org
On Mar 11, 20
The device is behind a firewall/SLB.
I can't make the source IP transparent at this time. My only other option would
be to stand it up directly on the public network.
On Mar 11, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 09:57 AM, Scot Needy wrote:
>> NOTE: All sender domains and
NOTE: All sender domains and IP’s have been replaced with a unique name.
CHKUSER accepted sender: from remote
rcpt <> :
sender accepted
spamdyke[8804]: DENIED_OTHER from: joeu...@mydomain.com to:
serviced...@supportdomain.com origin_ip: 10.189.254.17 origin_rdns: (unknown)
auth: (unknown)
Appears to be a valid deny based on the senders domain SPF rules.
The postmaster for the domain rejected confirms the connection and the SPF deny
list.
I can get them to update the list but we would both prefer a public IP that
would be difficult to spoof.
On Mar 11, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Eric
SPAM dyke is working great but I am also getting false positives from my
clients SPF records.
Back to the NAT issue. spandyke is testing SPF records against it’s local
internal IP and failing to send the traffic.
Mail administrators are not keen to adding non routable IP addresses to their
S
Yes, I could, but I was really hoping to avoid managing psudo users as
employees come and go from support here as well as AD.
A single common account and password seems to be the best way to handle this
One password to change when an employee leaves.
That account would only be used for sendi
Ok Got spamdyke up and running.
Seems to be catching the spam very well..
This domain has no local accounts at this time other than postmaster and other
admin accounts.
So I have a forward supp...@mydomain.com -> Exchange users.
I also need support staff to send mail as supp...@mydomain.
Wait spamdyke is more robust ?
>>> If you're running spamdyke, it's very likely that spamassassin won't
>>> find much spam.
Based on that comment I ran qtp-install-sanesecurity.
Still getting these obvious txt based spam mails.
qmlog -f smtp Does look like simscan is being run and
03-07
Hi Guys, starting to get more and more of these errors
Sorry, I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address. (#5.4.4)
Various domain names,
I have pdns resolver installed , and have done for some time.
my resolv.conf only has 127.0.0.1
If I " dig "the a domain, from the CLI
MX record show up
I didn’t think NAT had anything to do with it. Just wanted to make sure that
was not the issue.
Searching around google results and the lists I find a lot of helpful
information but it’s in small chunks like correcting the tcp.smtp rules to
include simscan to the QMAILQUE variable.
Installed
My spam assassin does not appear to be working.
Anyone have any good links for validating and troubleshooting spam through a
NAT ?
@40005319d7120170bc7c Mar 7 09:26:16.024 [31183] info: prefork: child
states: II
@40005319d7b1226759a4 Mar 7 09:28:55.577 [31082] info: spamd: conne
Hello list...Again,
Below are 1) the smtp log and 2) the send log of a message that started
looping (whatever that is).
I tracked the beginning of the message (from
christoph...@tysoncentral.net) in SMTP and it tried (I guess) to send it
to one of my valid users, but never could. Then Qmail respon
Hi,
It is alright. We call this kind of setup, virtual hosting. You can unlimited
domains and host them on only 1 IP
Regards
Nic
On 3 Sep, 2013, at 6:15 PM, "ChandranManikandan" wrote:
> Hi Nic,
> The same Server IP, i already have one domain hosted for email,web,ftp. so
> how to do that
Hi Nic,
The same Server IP, i already have one domain hosted for email,web,ftp. so
how to do that this case.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Nicholas Chua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this case, give your static IP to them and specify the sub-domains you
> want to use with your IP.
>
> So since someone
Hi,
In this case, give your static IP to them and specify the sub-domains you want
to use with your IP.
So since someone else is hosting your DNS, then you can skip the setup of your
name part
Regards
Nic
On 3 Sep, 2013, at 5:44 PM, "ChandranManikandan" wrote:
> DNS is host our registrar.
DNS is host our registrar.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Nicholas Chua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who will be hosting the DNS? Yourself or your registrar?
>
>
> Regards
> Nic
>
>
> On 3 Sep, 2013, at 5:07 PM, "ChandranManikandan"
> wrote:
>
> Hi Nic,
> You mean give same ip for both domain mail,smtp,po
Hi,
Who will be hosting the DNS? Yourself or your registrar?
Regards
Nic
On 3 Sep, 2013, at 5:07 PM, "ChandranManikandan" wrote:
> Hi Nic,
> You mean give same ip for both domain mail,smtp,pop3 to our service provider.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Nicholas Chua
> wrote:
>> Hi,
Hi Nic,
You mean give same ip for both domain mail,smtp,pop3 to our service
provider.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Nicholas Chua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First man named
>
> Create A records for mail smtp pop3 etc.
>
> Create MX record to point to your mail
>
> To add another virtual domain,
>
> #/ho
Hi,
First man named
Create A records for mail smtp pop3 etc.
Create MX record to point to your mail
To add another virtual domain,
#/home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain newdomain.com
Provide postmaster password and confirm
Regards
Nic
On 3 Sep, 2013, at 4:45 PM, "ChandranManikandan" wrote:
>
Hi All,
Am running Centos 5.7 32 Bit with Qmailtoaster + Dovecot + Vpopmail.
I configured one domain and it's working perfect email send and receive.
I registered one more domain in our Service provider and how to configure
that domain in the same server and how to setup Name server.
--
*Thanks
Yet another weird error , came up on the consle ( putty login )
I was checking the queue for messages again
qmHandle -s
Messages in local queue: 0
Messages in remote queue: 0
[root@mail2 ~]# qmHandle -s
Messages in local queue: 0
Messages in remote queue: 2
*and this showed up after the mail cou
33 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] more correct version for this situation
emili...@zoioroxo.com.br wrote:
Good morning, friends, someone who already has some experience with
qmailtoaster, what would be the best distro for running qmailtoaster,
today I get a
. CentOS also has a much longer life cycle.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 7:33 AM
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] more correct ve
On 2-Mar-09, at 4:06 AM, emili...@zoioroxo.com.br wrote:
Good morning, friends, someone who already has some experience with
qmailtoaster, what would be the best distro for running qmailtoaster,
today I get around 9000 e-mail around, I run a dell 2060 server with
8GB
of ram
--
-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] more correct version for this situation
emili...@zoioroxo.com.br wrote:
Good morning, friends, someone who already has some experience with
qmailtoaster, what would be the best distro for running qmailtoaster,
today I get around 9000 e-mail arou
bject: Re: [qmailtoaster] more correct version for this situation
emili...@zoioroxo.com.br wrote:
> Good morning, friends, someone who already has some experience with
> qmailtoaster, what would be the best distro for running qmailtoaster,
> today I get around 9000 e-mail around, I run a de
emili...@zoioroxo.com.br wrote:
Good morning, friends, someone who already has some experience with
qmailtoaster, what would be the best distro for running qmailtoaster,
today I get around 9000 e-mail around, I run a dell 2060 server with 8GB
of ram
Best distro? With the 8G of RAM, I'd sugge
Good morning, friends, someone who already has some experience with
qmailtoaster, what would be the best distro for running qmailtoaster,
today I get around 9000 e-mail around, I run a dell 2060 server with 8GB
of ram
-
To unsubs
I've done that, but that means that I should regenerate the sandbox?
because I re-run qtp-model and it didn't work out
Jake Vickers wrote:
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
I am using :
qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.12-1.3.15
try:
rpm -e send-emails-toaster
--
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
I am using :
qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.12-1.3.15
try:
rpm -e send-emails-toaster
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I am using :
qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.12-1.3.15
Jake Vickers wrote:
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
Ok, so now I have tried to update the server, but when I run new
model I get the following:
vpopmail-toaster >= 5.4.17 is needed by
send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch
how can I solve this
Are
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
Ok, so now I have tried to update the server, but when I run new model
I get the following:
vpopmail-toaster >= 5.4.17 is needed by
send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch
how can I solve this
Are you running the new version of QTP?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME C
Ok, so now I have tried to update the server, but when I run new model I
get the following:
vpopmail-toaster >= 5.4.17 is needed by
send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch
how can I solve this
Thanks
-
QmailToaster hosted b
Michael H wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email addys ... ?
Did you "qmailctl cdb" after making those changes?
well, I did a service restart qmail, nearly the same thing, right?
Nope. qmailctl cdb rebuilds all the .cdb
Jake Vickers wrote:
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email addys ... ?
Did you "qmailctl cdb" after making those changes?
well, I did a service restart qmail, nearly the same thing, right?
-
Michael H wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
You put to many recipients in the To: or CC: fields. That is defined
in your /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file. You'll see:
CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10"
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email
Jake Vickers wrote:
You put to many recipients in the To: or CC: fields. That is defined in
your /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file. You'll see:
CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10"
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email addys ... ?
M
Michael H wrote:
anyone have any idea why these are happening?
571 sorry, reached maximum number of recipients for one
session (#5.7.1 - chkuser)
571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1
- chkuser)
You put to many recipients in the To: or
You reached the max number of recipients according to chkuser.
On 4/19/07, Michael H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
anyone have any idea why these are happening?
_
From: System Administrator
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:38 PM
To: Russ X
Subjec
anyone have any idea why these are happening?
_
From: System Administrator
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:38 PM
To: Russ X
Subject: Undeliverable: NETMA Notes
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: F
As clever as I was running `sudo -H -u vpopmail sa-learn --sync` somehow my
bayes_tok and bayes_journal files continue to be changed to root ownership. I
will continue to try to find why this is. But for this and other reasons I am
exploring the bayes SQL option.
I came across this in the ANNO
This is how vpopmail manages large user or domain servers. Without
doing this, traversing dir's could take a lot longer. I'd recommend
just going with it.
Erik
On 9/29/06, Gonzalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi:
We have more than 99 domains hosted in the qmail. Untlil the domain
number 99, the h
Hi:We have more than 99 domains hosted in the qmail. Untlil the domainnumber 99, the home domain directory is/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com but the next domain (number 100) was
created in /home/vpopmail/domain/0/domain.com. I wish know if isposible store all domains in the /home/vpopmail/domains
Ron Horist wrote:
package caching-nameserver is not installed
Ron
Try this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rc.d]# rpm -qa | grep caching
and see if anything is installed (I think under FC it's got a longer name).
-
QmailToaster hos
on Horist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:20 PM
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] More Fedora 5 help.
>
>
>> When I am trying to install the djbdns this is the error I am getting:
>>
>> Installing djbdns-localcache
>> error:
This is what I get:
error: package djbdns-localcache is not installed
Ron
> rpm -e djbdns-localcache
>
> then redo it
>
> jer
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ron Horist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:20 P
er... woops.. other way around... sorry didnt read that one.
rpm -q caching-nameserver
see if it shows up .. if it does, rpm -e caching-nameserver
jer
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Horist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:20 PM
Subject: [qm
rpm -e djbdns-localcache
then redo it
jer
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Horist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:20 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] More Fedora 5 help.
When I am trying to install the djbdns this is the error I am getting:
I
When I am trying to install the djbdns this is the error I am getting:
Installing djbdns-localcache
error: Failed dependencies:
caching-nameserver conflicts with djbdns-localcache-1.05-1.0.2.i386
caching-nameserver is not installed on the system. What is the issue here???
Tha
> and symlinked, but removed later on.
>
> // Mattias
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: Nick Hemmesch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Skickat: den 14 maj 2006 21:50
> Till: Mattias Segerdahl
> Ämne: Re: SV: EI: [qmailtoaster] More problems compiling the new qmail
>
Hi Mattias,
The way domainkeys work, you move qmail-queue to qmail-queue.orig. Then
you link qmail-dk to qmail-queue. You call it in tcp.smtp as:
QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",
(this is really qmail-dk calling simscan)
DKQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig
(this is q
Hi Mattias,
I will setup a test box with Mandriva 2006 x86_64 and see if I can correct
this problem. A friend did test qmailtoaster on a Mandrive 2006 i586 box
and it installed and tested fine for him.
Unfortunately, I won't be able to talk with him for a few days.
I am not a Mandriva user. If y
ail-toaster-1.03/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.proof*
Now, where did that qmail-queue.orig file
go?
Från: Mattias Segerdahl
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 14 maj 2006 14:37
Till:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Ämne: [qmailtoaster] More
problems compiling the new qmail dis
Using mkd103 switch, compiling latest qmailtoaster release.
zlib
daemontools-toaster
ucspi-tcp-toaster
vpopmail-toaster
libdomainkeys
All compiles and installs fine, but once I reach qmail-toaster,
I get the following error
Processing files: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.2mdk
erro
Thanks for the email.
I guess it has run 5 times since I posted the message because I'm not
seeing the problem any more. Quite an oddity there.
Regards
Nigel
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:09:39PM -0500, Nick Hemmesch wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> Run the following command 5 times:
>
> env LANG=C /usr/b
Hi Nigel,
Run the following command 5 times:
env LANG=C /usr/bin/mrtg /usr/share/toaster/mrtg/qmailmrtg.cfg
5 times sounds nutz, but it will get all the right files overwritten.
Then, edit crontab and replace:
root /usr/bin/mrtg /usr/share/toaster/mrtg/qmailmrtg.cfg
with
env LANG=
Rateup WARNING: /usr/bin/rateup could not read the primary log file for messages
Rateup WARNING: /usr/bin/rateup The backup log file for messages was invalid as
well
Rateup WARNING: /usr/bin/rateup Can't remove messages.old updating log file
Rateup WARNING: /usr/bin/rateup Can't rename messages.lo
I agree with Jake.
I spent a little time trying to look into this before commenting. I
think you should uncheck "Spam Detection" in all of your users. This
will disable the mailfilter script.
Thanks,
Erik
On 2/24/06, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Martin wrote:
>
> >Normally I ge
Mark Martin wrote:
Normally I get 10-15 on this list a day, but, things is desparate...
I'm a stupid redneck, so one of you compassionate types may be able to
look past my stupidity here and see something I am not. I have no
reason to have anythin' against qmail, have been running it on
other s
Normally I get 10-15 on this list a day, but, things is desparate...
I'm a stupid redneck, so one of you compassionate types may be able to
look past my stupidity here and see something I am not. I have no
reason to have anythin' against qmail, have been running it on
other servers for a few years
71 matches
Mail list logo
