ter.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] qtprune
-Original Message-
From: d...@acbsco.com [mailto:d...@acbsco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:46 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtprune
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
Phil L
ginal Message-
From: Phil Leinhauser [mailto:p...@teqknow.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:02 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] qtprune
-Original Message-
From: d...@acbsco.com [mailto:d...@acbsco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> I was wondering why mtime only returned one page... I missed the
>> --more--. mtime does seem to work correctly to find the messages.
>>
>> Why is there a preference to ctime over mtime? I just did a bit of
>> reading and it seems mtime onl
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> I was wondering why mtime only returned one page... I missed the
>> --more--. mtime does seem to work correctly to find the messages.
>>
>> Why is there a preference to ctime over mtime? I just did a bit of
>> reading and it seems mtime onl
-Original Message-
From: d...@acbsco.com [mailto:d...@acbsco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:46 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtprune
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> >> > Phil Leinhauser wro
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> >> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> >> >> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> >> >> >> Thanks for the info Dave. I did just what you described except I
> >> >> pushed
> >> >> >> it to a text file so I could see better what was happening.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> >> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> >>
>> Thanks for the info Dave. I did just what you described except
I
>> >> pushed
>> >> >> it to a
text file so I could see better what was happening.
>>
>> >>
>> >> >> I ran it with the 5 day
setting
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> I was wondering why mtime only
returned one page... I missed the
>> --more--. mtime does
seem to work correctly to find the messages.
>>
>>
Why is there a preference to ctime over mtime? I just did a bit of
>> reading and it seems mtime only changes when the file ch
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> >> Thanks for the info Dave. I did just what you described except I
>> pushed
>> >> it to a text file so I could see better what was happening.
>> >>
>> >> I ran it with the 5 day setting and didn't get anything
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> > Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> >> Thanks for the info Dave. I did just what you
described except I
>> pushed
>> >> it to a
text file so I could see better what was happening.
>>
>>
>> >> I ran it with the 5 day setting and
didn't get anything. Then I
>> dropped
>> >
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I was wondering why mtime only returned one page... I missed the
--more--. mtime does seem to work correctly to find the messages.
Why is there a preference to ctime over mtime? I just did a bit of
reading and it seems mtime only changes when the file changes but ctim
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> Thanks for the info Dave. I did just what you described except I pushed
>> it to a text file so I could see better what was happening.
>>
>> I ran it with the 5 day setting and didn't get anything. Then I dropped
>> it to 2 days and got a l
> >
>> >
>> > Eric Shubert
wrote:
>> >> That might be as a result of not having
everything under INBOX with
>> >> dovecot. I'll try to
have a look at it tomorrow.
>> >>
>> >>
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> >>> OK,
t;> >> That might be as a result of not having
everything under INBOX with
>> >> dovecot. I'll try to
have a look at it tomorrow.
>> >>
>> >>
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> >>> OK, I found the
qtp-clean-trash script and ran that. Qtprune is th
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> Thanks for the info Dave. I did
just what you described except I pushed
>> it to a text file so
I could see better what was happening.
>>
>> I ran
it with the 5 day setting and didn't get anything. Then I dropped
>> it to 2 days and got a list. The script is apparen
d the qtp-clean-trash script and ran that. Qtprune is the
> >>> grandfather but basically the same. They are both looking in .Trash
> >>> for the
> >>> old messages. My system has them in .Trash/cur. It's not finding
> >>> the old
> >>&
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
Thanks for the info Dave. I did just what you described except I pushed
it to a text file so I could see better what was happening.
I ran it with the 5 day setting and didn't get anything. Then I dropped
it to 2 days and got a list. The script is apparently working bu
#x27;s not
finding
>>> the old
>>> ones. It only runs
for a second or 2. I expect it to run a few
>>> minutes
at
>>> least. I have a bunch of trash!
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>>
From:
Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.co
at
>> least. I have a bunch of trash!
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com] Sent: Wednesday,
>> September 09, 2009 8:39 PM
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtprune
>&g
2. I expect it to run a few minutes
>> at
>> least. I have a bunch of trash!
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com] Sent: Wednesday,
>> September 09, 2009 8:39 PM
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
&g
09 8:39 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtprune
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I just decided to start running qtprune. It's the first time I've run it.
I'll cron it once I'm happy with the results. What I see in the script is
that it seems to b
es at
least. I have a bunch of trash!
-Original Message-
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:39 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtprune
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> I just decided to start running
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I just decided to start running qtprune. It's the first time I've run it.
I'll cron it once I'm happy with the results. What I see in the script is
that it seems to be looking in the .Trash folder. The problem is that the
trashed messages are actually in the .Trash/cur f
23 matches
Mail list logo
