On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, markus schnalke wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> I'm using qpsmtpd and am quite happy with it. Now I encountered
> a problem, when someone sent a message with an (as the sender
> said) empty body to me.
You might want to look at:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2016-08-03 16:38] Charlie Brady <charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au>
> > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, markus schnalke wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm using qpsmtpd from the Debian package version 0.84-9.
> >
> >
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, markus schnalke wrote:
> I'm using qpsmtpd from the Debian package version 0.84-9.
I think you should be reporting your problem to the Debian bug tracker.
As you can see in the advisory:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9
exim allows remote exploit of a buffer overflow in glibc.
Has anybody done an analysis of qpsmtpd to see whether there is a code
path via qpsmtpd (and plugins) and perl which allows the same exploit?
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, David Favor wrote:
What's the actual problem you are trying to solve though?
Problem is ParaDNS is failing on all lookups for this server.
...
Notice the there lines with prepended '' which show ParaDNS failing.
Perhaps you should be looking for assistance on a
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
and are dealing with the fallout.
I dealt with the fallout on my mailing lists in May of 2013:
http://matt.simerson.net/news/2013/05/01/dkim-and-mailing-lists
Your fix:
cd path/to/ezmlm/list; rm prefix text/trailer addtrailer
doesn't
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
If you're operating a mailing list, you have 3 choices:
1. Don't break DKIM
2. If you insist upon breaking DKIM by adding subject prefixes and message
trailers, take ownership of the message by changing the From address to your
own domain.
I'm guessing that Matt didn't intend this information to be private to me.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:45:55 -0700
From: Matt Simerson m...@tnpi.net
To: Charlie Brady charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: Yahoo's DMARC debacle
On Apr 28, 2014
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
So either DKIM isn't relevant, or something else in my
qpsmtpd/qmail/ezmlm-idx chain is breaking DKIM. Any suggestions?
If ezmlm isn't adding a list prefix or message trailers, then it's
unlikely that ezmlm is breaking the messages DKIM
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Charlie Brady
charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au wrote:
I'm guessing that Matt didn't intend this information to be private to me.
Correct, but perl.org is rejecting all messages from domains with DMARC
p=reject
I'm sure that many of you know about this:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg87153.html
and are dealing with the fallout. I'm interested to know what people are
doing about it. Does anyone have working plugins?
I've seen suggestions about rewriting From addresses, and
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Charlie Brady wrote:
I'm sure that many of you know about this:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg87153.html
Here's a very clear explanation of how the problem manifests:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg87436.html
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Devin Carraway wrote:
This was reported as Debian bug#684571 (http://bugs.debian.org/684571):
When TLS is in use, qpsmtpd creates a Received header of the form
Received: from 87.114.148.171.plusnet.thn-ag1.dyn.plus.net (HELO
george.localnet) (87.114.148.171)
that your qpsmtpd-dev might not become qpsmtpd-0.85 any time
soon.
BTW, http://smtpd.develooper.com/get.html could be corrected. A new
release every 3-9 months is no longer typical. The 'browse the repository'
link is also 404.
Matt
On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Charlie Brady wrote
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm reopening this thread as I independently ran into it today, and I still
don't see it in the Git repo.
I still don't see it in the Git repo:
https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/blob/master/lib/Qpsmtpd/SMTP.pm
It's nearly a year now since Jared
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/29
Make sure the HELO hostname has an A or record that matches the senders
IP address, and make sure that the senders IP has a PTR that resolves to the
HELO hostname.
This might sound pedantic, but since
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/29
I consider this statement to be troublesome also:
Per RFC 2821, the HELO hostname must be the FQDN of the sending server or
address literal.
RFC 2821 doesn't say must. It says neither should nor must, but
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
In my experience, reverse DNS is frequently managed (or, frequently, not
managed) by an ISP, not by the admin of the mail server.
In my experience, every ISP that provides clients with dedicated IPs
also provides the client with the ability to
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
Is it a good idea to validate that the MAIL FROM address is the same as
the From: header in the message?
What exceptions need to be made, if any?
What problems might I encounter if I were to do this?
For starters, you would penalise this
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
---
plugins/connection_time | 18 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/plugins/connection_time b/plugins/connection_time
index bfac4d2..9cff7f9 100644
--- a/plugins/connection_time
+++
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
Is it a good idea to validate that the MAIL FROM address is the same as
the From: header in the message?
...
Also wouldn't work well for mailing
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
+my $count = $self-connection-notes('unrec_cmd_count') || 0;
+ $self-connection-notes('unrec_cmd_count',
++$count );
Which does increment correctly.
This also works (note the parens), which is how it was done
.
http://www.mail-archive.com/qpsmtpd@perl.org/msg06534.html
Matt
On May 18, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Maybe I've missed it in the flurry of patches, but I still see no sign of
timeouts being enforced across plugins.
http://grokbase.com/p/perl/qpsmtpd/097nr0gyr2
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
I have written a plugin that is currently named naughty.
The POD has a good description of what it does and how it works. You can
read the POD here:
https://www.tnpi.net/internet/mail/naughty.html
The plugin is very effective at blocking
I think the documentation of the reject option could be clearer. What
value of the parameter should be used when first using this plugin? I
think reject 0.
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
added reject option
document the existence of the loglevel option
---
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
On May 18, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
I think the documentation of the reject option could be clearer. What
value of the parameter should be used when first using this plugin? I
think reject 0.
Boolean means 0 or 1, but your
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
factored date validity tests into their own sub
added tests
improved POD
Excellent. But:
s/deffered/deferred/
and ...
+# provide backwards comptibility with the old 'days' argument
+if ( $self-{_args}{days} ) {
+$self-log(LOGWARN,
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Charlie Brady wrote:
and ...
+# provide backwards comptibility with the old 'days' argument
+if ( $self-{_args}{days} ) {
+$self-log(LOGWARN, deprecated arguments. Update your config.);
$self-log(LOGWARN, deprecated argument 'date'. Update
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:28, Charlie Brady wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance,
Could you supply some details, please?
Off the top of my head
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
On Jul 27, 2011, at 16:41, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance,
Could you supply some details, please?
IPv6 support, ease of maintenance
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On Mon 06.12.2010 16:34, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Do you have benchmarked it with smtpstone from postfix or some other
tools?
I just threw it on our spamtrap which does approx 50m
.
That code won't happen, because of the return(DENY, ...).
-R
Charlie Brady wrote:
Do I need to do something more to have this considered for merging?
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
check_basicheaders fails if there are no headers at all:
http
Do I need to do something more to have this considered for merging?
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
check_basicheaders fails if there are no headers at all:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6345
--- a/plugins/check_basicheaders
+++ b/plugins/check_basicheaders
check_basicheaders fails if there are no headers at all:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6345
--- a/plugins/check_basicheaders
+++ b/plugins/check_basicheaders
@@ -46,10 +46,11 @@ sub hook_data_post {
return (DENY, You have to send some data first)
if $transaction-data_size ==
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Pedro Melo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen a...@develooper.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:49, David Favor wrote:
My primary challenge with exim is it's difficult to understand
configuration system and the random nature of exim suffering
, and is not
settable in the current code.
Matt
PS: IIRC, I pulled the high, medium, low settings out of the openssl docs.
On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
I've seen some reports that qpsmtp fails some PCI compliance testing
because it can be accessed via SSLv2
if you could send patches instead of
suggestions.
It wasn't my suggestion - I was just relaying it. But point taken.
-R
Charlie Brady wrote:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5808
Jesper Knudsen 2010-03-01 01:29:10 MST
When using the require_resolvable_fromhost
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Robert Spier wrote:
Applied: 3a7f46aa3e75988686ef9fcae5158fc29f6a86f6
This doesn't seem to be in either of these repos:
http://git.develooper.com/qpsmtpd.git
http://github.com/abh/qpsmtpd/
Where should I be looking? Thanks.
Matt Simerson wrote:
switched default
?
Matt
On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Here's a simple, and untested, patch - someone might care to do something
more elaborate to allow choice of TLSv1 or SSLv3 (unfortunately
IO::Socket::SSL doesn't seem to allow disable of just SSLv2
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Robert Spier wrote:
I've committed this as ab7c2601f0740fac1c3c117e7e5c0a5690348194.
I'm not 100% sure it's a good idea, but I think it's mostly a good
thing.
What are your reservations?
I don't think it would ever
it. But point taken.
-R
Charlie Brady wrote:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5808
Jesper Knudsen 2010-03-01 01:29:10 MST
When using the require_resolvable_fromhost plugin for qpsmtpd I noticed
that mails from u...@localhost.localdomain
I've seen some reports that qpsmtp fails some PCI compliance testing
because it can be accessed via SSLv2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6141
Here's a simple, and untested, patch - someone might care to do
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5808
Jesper Knudsen 2010-03-01 01:29:10 MST
When using the require_resolvable_fromhost plugin for qpsmtpd I noticed
that mails from u...@localhost.localdomain was actually getting through
this filter. I finally found out that the plugin has a
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6025
if ! id smtpd /dev/null 21
then
# need to create smtpd user.
if perl -e 'exit ! defined(getgrnam(postdrop))'
then
# if postfix is installed, we will probably use
# queue/postfix, which will need this:
supp=-G postdrop
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Robin Bowes wrote:
On 12/05/10 07:00, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On May 11, 2010, at 21:25, Robert Spier wrote:
Does anyone else have any opinions on doing a massive perltidy?
I'm on the fence.
I'm on the fence, too. My concern is mostly for the people with
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone remember the reason that the spool files aren't proper temp files
(deleted upon open)? We often end up with a hard restart of qpsmtpd and having
these files left around is annoying...
I asked that question, and I think there was a
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone remember the reason that the spool files aren't proper temp files
(deleted upon open)? We often end up with a hard restart of qpsmtpd and
having
these files left around is annoying
My tuppence worth - this potential debugging value doesn't justify risking
leaving detritus in the spool directory. Delete the files on open and be
done with it. There's no reason they shouldn't be anonymous.
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Charlie Brady wrote
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 17:19, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Can anyone remember the reason that the spool files aren't proper temp
files (deleted upon open)? We often end up with a hard restart of
qpsmtpd and having these files left around is
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Steve wrote:
On Apr 1, 2010, at 2:56, Steve wrote:
Hello list,
somehow I don't get a new line separating the mail body from the mail
headers. How can I enforce a new line between header and body?
I am using qpsmtp 0.83 and delivery to maildir.
Hallo Bjørn,
Can
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
Can you give an example of the SMTP transaction (the input to the
server)
that gives the unexpected result?
I did a simple transaction over telnet and port 25:
--
HELO localhost
MAIL FROM:f...@domain.tld
RCPT TO:t...@domain.tld
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Chris Lewis wrote:
On 3/30/2010 4:08 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Perhaps we need queue/smtp-passthru.
It's a fairly complex thing to do in a single plugin in a way sufficiently
flexible for a variety of setups. For example, how do you do your RCPT TO
lookups? Call
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Rick wrote:
Charlie Brady wrote:
[...]or should use a SASL challenge string in the context of AUTH PLAIN.
RFC4954 was more clear:
The AUTH command initiates a [SASL] authentication exchange between the
client and the server.
[...]
A server challenge is sent as a 334
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 16:25, Rick wrote:
Hi Rick!
I'm pretty sure Charlie wasn't just being stubborn but rather just
trying to figure out what the behavior really should be so we don't
change it to work compatibility with alpine just to break it
-respond( 334, Please continue );
$prekey= STDIN;
}
To this:
if ( $mechanism eq plain ) {
if (!$prekey) {
$session-respond( 334, );
$prekey= STDIN;
}
Signed-off-by: Charlie Brady charl...@budge.apana.org.au
bash-3.2$ git diff
diff --git a/lib
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Rick wrote:
Also I noticed that Auth.pm does not respond to a client * command during
AUTH PLAIN. * is supposed to cancel the AUTH exchange regardless of the
mechanism. Here's what I get:
AUTH PLAIN
334
*
504 Invalid authentificat
*
500 Unrecognized command
According
aborted
Signed-off-by: Charlie Brady charl...@budge.apana.org.au
diff --git a/lib/Qpsmtpd/Auth.pm b/lib/Qpsmtpd/Auth.pm
index 993c176..b23402d 100644
--- a/lib/Qpsmtpd/Auth.pm
+++ b/lib/Qpsmtpd/Auth.pm
@@ -20,8 +20,11 @@ sub SASL {
if ( $mechanism eq plain ) {
if (!$prekey
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Rick wrote:
Trying to get SMTP auth working with alpine, I came across a bug. Alpine
sends AUTH PLAIN and waits for a 334 response, then sends the auth string.
According to the RFC, the server should reply with 334 and a nothing else,
but in Auth.pm qpsmtpd responds
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Rick wrote:
That the initial ready response should be empty is a little more discreetly
implied:
When the initial-response argument is used with such a mechanism, the
*initial empty challenge* is not sent to the client and the server[...] as if
it were sent in response
Does anyone know what's happening here? To my thinking, permission
denied != Invalid argument.
...
9566 gettimeofday({1258399355, 828006}, NULL) = 0
9566 open(/tmp/PerlIO_tQARsp, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_LARGEFILE, 0600)
= -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
9566 write(2, 9566 FATAL PLUGIN ERROR
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Hinrik �~Vrn Sigurðsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Charlie Brady
charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au wrote:
9566 open(/tmp/PerlIO_tQARsp, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_LARGEFILE, 0600) =
-1 EACCES (Permission denied)
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/dirent.h
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Johan Almqvist wrote:
On 16. nov. 2009, at 22.18, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Charlie Brady
charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au wrote:
9566 Â open(/tmp/PerlIO_tQARsp, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Shad L. Lords wrote:
Johan Almqvist wrote:
On 5. nov. 2009, at 19.55, Shad L. Lords wrote:
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:31, Shad L. Lords wrote:
This might not be the best place to fix this. The correct way would
be to fix header-add to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Shad L. Lords wrote:
Robert Spier wrote:
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal,
that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from
outside
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal,
that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from
outside the lan (non relay clients) the email address is not reachable
(non existent).
I don't think this is
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Steve Kemp wrote:
According to my dictionary Authentification is not
a real word.
According to mine 'canceled' isn't either. Wanna try again? :-)
Patch:
--
diff --git a/lib/Qpsmtpd/Auth.pm b/lib/Qpsmtpd/Auth.pm
index 635491a..993c176 100644
---
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
The peers plugin by Charlie Brady permits different plugins for
connecting clients.
Selection of different plugin set is by source IP address of the
connection. So the network can be conveniently partitioned into
different trust zones
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
The peers plugin by Charlie Brady permits different plugins for
connecting clients. It's used in thousand of sme server installations
since he presented it to the list:
It's worth noting that this has only been used with forkserver, and could
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Larry Nedry wrote:
Hi All,
The require_resolvable_fromhost plugin returns DENYSOFT when a host doesn't
resolve. This makes sense with a well behaved host. But I've noticed that
some hosts that don't resolve will continuously retry and never seem to
disconnect.
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Chris Lewis wrote:
You'd have to push/pull the data to a centralized process. Eg: separate
daemon.
e.g. memcached.
Ick. Mostly ;-)
Having a plugin fire a UDP packet to a daemon which collects, analyses them,
and stuffs 'em where qpsmtpd can get data back from (eg: a
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On Die 28.07.2009 09:34, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Chris Lewis wrote:
You'd have to push/pull the data to a centralized process. Eg:
separate daemon.
e.g. memcached.
But, isn't this a cache.
It's usually used
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Junyi-HUANG wrote:
I have a requirement that base on the X-PropertyID header info to route
the messages to a set of smtp servers in Round Robin mode .
For example , if the conf file is like :
PID SMTP servers
pid_a smtp1:10025, smtp2:10026, smtp3:10027
pid_b -
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:13, Filippo Carletti wrote:
+++ qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/check_spamhelo 2007-06-14 13:21:45.0 -0600
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
for my $bad ($self-qp-config('badhelo')) {
if ($host eq lc $bad) {
$self-log(LOGDEBUG,
This one's mine.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
See
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3390
for discussion.
diff -Nur -x '*.orig' -x '*.rej' qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/rhsbl
mezzanine_patched_qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/rhsbl
--- qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/rhsbl 2007-06-14
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3340
Also me. Here's the background.
Line 195 highlighted:
my ($flag, $hits, $required);
while (SPAMD) {
$self-log(LOGDEBUG, check_spam: spamd: $_);
#warn GOT FROM SPAMD1: $_;
last unless
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
This is needed to use clamav-0.95 which changed an option.
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5108
Jonathan Martens smeserver-contr...@snetram.nl
--- qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/virus/clamav.fixClamscanParameterChange
2009-03-28
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3098
Shad L. Lords slo...@mail.com
--- qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/virus/clamav 2007-06-14 11:57:23.0 -0600
+++ mezzanine_patched_qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/virus/clamav 2007-06-14
17:46:23.0 -0600
On Sat, 23 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009, J wrote:
However, I'm back to seeing the connection processes being left behind,
despite an explicit quit from the remote host.
...
It looks to me as though qpsmtpd should have
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Diego d'Ambra wrote:
Jared Johnson wrote:
What's orphaned is not a child process, but a shared mem hash record for
a
process which no longer exists. I suspect that code is racy.
Hrm, then if we're getting a whole lot of these, does this mean child
processes are
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Jared Johnson wrote:
We're experiencing some strange issues and have been looking at
qpsmtpd-prefork's output with $debug set. We're getting a whole lot of lines
like this:
orphaned child, pid: 1285 removed from memory at /usr/bin/qpsmtpd-prefork
line 598.
...
Any
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Matt Sergeant wrote:
years. So my qpsmtpd runs a no_bounces plugin, which I believe I've
posted here before.
Google seems not to have heard of it.
On Wed, 27 May 2009, David Favor wrote:
Having qpsmtpd listen on an additional control port
creates serious complexity when running multiple
copies of qpsmtpd, as each copy has to somehow figure
out which control port to use, hope it's free and then
connect.
Please clarify what you mean:
$
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Peter Walter wrote:
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Hanno Hecker wrote:
What about something like the attached?
I'll have a closer look, but looks an excellent suggestion. Thanks Hanno.
Charlie, I assume Hanno asked you for code review? Did you get
On Sun, 24 May 2009, J wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009, J wrote:
Looks like I may have been mistaken. I connected twice from the same
system, and I think what actually happened is that the one process was
reused.
Because when I make one connection each from different systems, two
processes were
On Mon, 25 May 2009, J wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
./qpsmtpd-prefork [192.168.1.50 : testlaptop : 23:12:05 2009-05-23]
...
I think there might be an issue here however, which is that the modified @ARGV
is not set back to pre-connection state when the peer disconnects
On Mon, 25 May 2009, J wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
./qpsmtpd-prefork [192.168.1.50 : testlaptop : 23:12:05 2009-05-23]
I think there might be an issue here however, which is that the
modified @ARGV is not set back to pre-connection state when the peer
disconnects
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009, J wrote:
However, I'm back to seeing the connection processes being left behind,
despite an explicit quit from the remote host. I suspect this is due to
not using a queueing plugin, at this point.
I also see that 'svc -d
On Fri, 22 May 2009, J wrote:
My current 'run' file (posted in previous message(s)):
=
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
No, that's not what you have. You've deleted the trailing backslash,
right?
sh -c '
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 10
On Sat, 23 May 2009, J wrote:
A manual connection where I connect, helo, then quit - stays in the
process table.
If you strace that process, you'll see that it goes back to select()
waiting for a new connection on the socket. You should expect each child
process to be reused up to 100
On Fri, 22 May 2009, J wrote:
However, I'm back to seeing the connection processes being left behind,
despite an explicit quit from the remote host. I suspect this is due to
not using a queueing plugin, at this point.
I also see that 'svc -d' leaves all the qpsmtpd-prefork processes in the
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Devin Carraway wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:40:21PM -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
I think the -T *should* be there on the command line, but there are some
bugs in qpsmtpd and/or your plugins which need to be fixed before
On Tue, 19 May 2009, J wrote:
I reinstalled clean, from scratch.
I changed my 'run' file to the following:
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
sh -c '
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1 \
${PERL-perl} -T ./qpsmtpd-prefork \
--port 25 \
--port 587
On Wed, 20 May 2009, J wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
So try:
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1 \
...
./run: line 2: exec: exec: not found
Sorry, I cut and pasted without checking each line. You are asking shell
to run
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009, J wrote:
When I remove that (and installed a missing Math::BigInt package from
CPAN), everything loads, but complains about an insecure dependency on
line 416 in setpriority (in qpsmtpd-prefork). (And the prefork processes
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Hanno Hecker wrote:
What about something like the attached?
I'll have a closer look, but looks an excellent suggestion. Thanks Hanno.
---
Charlie
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Robert Spier wrote:
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On May 9, 2009, at 19:21, Charlie Brady wrote:
This is really a namespace issue, I think. Should check_spamhelo
belong to an old simple ineffective plugin, or a newer, and
presumably more useful, one?
As much as it sucks
On Sat, 9 May 2009, Robert Spier wrote:
Reading through that thread, it looks like the right code to use is
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2004/07/msg1674.html
Because this is a large change, and the old version is so simple, I
think I'd rather add this as a new plugin,
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, J?rg C. Meyer wrote:
we have the following situation. A mail from a scpecial sender is
processed and it seems it is forwarded by smtp-forward to the next hop (a
queueing qmail process on the same host). But it never arrives there,
qmail-send log is empty and the mail is
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, J?rg C. Meyer wrote:
we have the following situation. A mail from a scpecial sender is
processed and it seems it is forwarded by smtp-forward to the next hop (a
queueing qmail process on the same host). But it never arrives
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, ahmad riza h nst wrote:
then i tried to telnet to port 465:
Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx...
Connected to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Escape character is '^]'.
the log continue:
9202 running plugin (pre-connection): hosts_allow
9202 trying to get config for hosts_allow
9202 Plugin
1 - 100 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
