will make any
difference in searching.
Jack
>>> "J. McRee Elrod" 12/6/2013 1:00 PM >>>
Jack Wu said:
>you can for the time being at least, go back to AACR:
>Just use: S.L. : s.n., n.d.
AACR2 did no have "n.d.". One was supposed to guess, even
ntified],
and [date of publication not identified]. These are the "... not
identified" placeholders referenced by Thomas Brenndorfer in his earlier
reply.
John Myers, Catalog Librarian
Schaffer Library, Union College
Schenectady NY 12308
518-388-6623
( tel:518-388-6623)
mye...@union.edu
When all elements are lacking, and there's no RDA provision, I suppose
you can for the time being at least, go back to AACR:
Just use: S.L. : s.n., n.d.
Until no mixed record or coding is allowed, or a 264 5 should come
along.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steuben
rulers of the temporal and temporary flesh and blood kind who
have so far failed to come up with a stable standard. Whether anyone will come
is anyone's guess; perhaps we will find that out soon enough.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Ja
If the cost of changing that awful legacy data is prohibitively high, what good
are all the wonderful things that cannot be fully implemented. Price change is
one thing, product changes another. If the Toolkit continues to be unfinished,
unstable, untried, what's to say how much, or little it ma
$g is superfluous.
Also, can your system display the text in $g in front of the other data?
If not, I think it would just look odd.
Adam
From: Jack Wu
( mailto:j...@franciscan.edu)
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 5:32 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 502 dissertation
Adam,
As you say, in the structured 502 $a is not used. In which case $g Thesis would
be helpful, incorrect, or superfluous?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Adam Schiff 10/25/2013 3:42 AM >>>
In the structured (or complex) 502,
e; uses $a
only."
It seems if you follow LC/PCC practice, you would use $b $c $d, the
"complex one."
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "McRae, Rick" 10/24/2013 9:38 AM >>>
Hi, Basma—I’ve been following the “co
Yes, these discussions, over 500 lengthy ones, certainly are on the JSC
website. But I was hoping for something more summarizing in nature, yet
not so brief as just a listing by date of the documents.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Gene
next best alternative. Is there a summary every so often of
changes of any consequence that one should be aware of?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "Danskin, Alan" 10/21/2013 5:08 AM >>>
Dear Yan,
I will take the liberty of
t, or assume that Pooh, Snoopy, and Kermit actually wrote anything . Such pretense will not make catalogers, cataloging, or the cataloging code more intelligent or more intelligible than they are not.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>&g
that happens will Schultz and Milne go to the secondary 700?
The autobiography of Sherlock Holmes (OCLC#828418251) has Holmes in 100, and
600; Watson in 650. Am I just behind with the changes?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Adam Schiff 10/11
think if a note exists, and is applicable, I would leave it alone, and to
construct a note, I would stop where I'm competent to do, to provide one
lengthy or brief, in either or both languages.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "J.
mples
that illustrate differences in geographic coverage, etc.:
OCLC#15176463 Eastern edition.
OCLC#3787143 Western edition.
OCLC#22196174 Europe.
OCLC#36098632 Central Edition.
OCLC#48917220 Classroom Ed.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>>
I think if AACR2 clearly says Shortest Form, and RDA still allows
Omission of Levels, and LC/PCC only says Generally Not to Omit, I'd
stick with the AACR2 way, at least until machines take over.
It is to the point and sufficient, consistent with past practice, and
at least still not against RDA r
For between 1310 and 1319, can you not say 1310s anymore. It says in the
draft version of RDA 1.9.2.5:
Decade Known: If the decade is known, record the first year of the
decade followed by an s. I don't find it in the Toolkit. Was there a
reason for taking it out.
Jack Wu
Franciscan Universi
Quoting Mac. : Some tell me I need not worry about Bibframe I will be dead by
then; wish RDA
could have waited that long!
Can't imagine who'd be qualified to tell you that. For all we know, Bibframe
may be implemented in a few years, not for a long time, even not at all. We
know none of us li
hange proposals
and endless updating.
Jack Wu
Franciscan university of Steubenville
>>> Bernhard Eversberg 9/24/2013 7:43 AM >>>
24.09.2013 13:01, Danskin, Alan:
> ... JSC recognised that the omission
> of the article is not good practice because the resulting title do
ent is need, perhaps What type of media, or mediation, or
intermediate means? I don't think any of these terms are entirely clear
either, but that's all I can think of.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "MCCUTCHEON, SEVIM"
I don't know if this is oversimplification. The way I see it. If you
have Place Name followed by Distributed by, Published by or whatever,
it's entirely logical to capitalize the first word. I can say this is
great. Come. So what. O, no. Each is a separate statement. Regardless
whether Separated by
igible?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Wojciech Siemaszkiewicz 7/29/2013
>>> 10:00 AM >>>
James has introduced a new word that I have not seen before "discombobulated"
from "combobulated" also "r
or in codes which don't
need to be translated. So what is wrong with Anglocentrism? That it's not
Germancentrcism?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Cary Isley 7/17/2013 3:28 PM >>>
In that sense, the abbreviations are them
Mac,
You certainly have a point, a user's point of view. Well said.
Jack
>>> "J. McRee Elrod" 7/9/2013 3:30 PM >>>
Jack Wu asked:
>Would the 264 0 have $a Place $b [Producer not identified] $c Date,
>or could the 264 0 have only $c but missing $b
Mark,
Thank you for a very detailed and thorough analysis of the requirements,
options, and their ramifications.
Think I know what to do now.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "M. E." 7/9/2013 3:44 PM >>>
Jack Wu
core?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "M. E." 7/9/2013 12:11 PM >>>
Jack Wu wrote:
I interpret this to mean there would be no place in fixed country code if in
264 1 Publication field there's no $a, no $b but
duced (even if only
by the student) but not published, right?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "M. E." 7/9/2013 11:13 AM >>>
Jack Wu wrote:
Just a follow-up of questions on thesis for Country of Publication, etc.
(008/
264 0 Place, Institution, date to indicate production,
since a place is then provided, would that then be translated into same
place being recorded in fixed code, or still be xx/b?
Thanks,
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Joan Wang 7/3
copyright dates which are not used to infer the publication dates
are no longer core, may still be included in another area, especially
since they differ from the dates used.
My take.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Deborah Fritz 6/18/201
one add it?
When an access point has no justification, can one justify it through a note?
Is the more complete record to be considered as enhanced, therefore preferred?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
efore preferred?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Robert Maxwell 6/13/2013 8:50 PM >>>
Julie,
Strictly speaking once you’ve recorded or supplied a date of
publication (264 _1 $c) you have fulfilled the RDA core requirement and
can
order of the Areas the future then?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Kevin M Randall 4/25/2013 11:09 AM >>>
Jack: There is no direct correspondence between MARC tag
numbers/sequencing and the order of ISBD elements. For instance,
Perhaps I should qualify my questions with: cataloging in OCLC Connexion
and in bib. records of most paragraph breaks.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Jack Wu 4/25/2013 9:24 AM >>>
Not trying to harp on a ., but I do have so
f a paragraph"
Would the New ISBD standard, which I assume we are or will be
following, then call for a point at the end of any paragraph break,
including end of the 300 field?
Thanks,
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>>
on be at a .
of no return. I just think it easier and worthwhile for RDA to continue
the . and resolve our singular . , .., no . confusion if for no other
reason than to please the vast crowd of non-catalogers that we serve.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
sting OCLC bib records to follow
in a few days, months, years???
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Adger Williams 3/26/2013 9:40 AM >>>
We had a bunch without any subfield codes. They have to be tended by hand.
On Tue, Mar 26, 20
ptance of the thesis.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Michael Cohen 3/7/2013 6:49 AM >>>
RDA Exercise
A patron asked us to correct a typo in the title page of his
dissertation. The rules are quite clear
on how to handle thi
rules are so inconsistent, shouldn't
they be changed, rather.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Kevin M Randall 3/1/2013 3:44 PM >>>
I think most of us were ignorant about metric symbols before RDA came
along. I certainly w
same with RDA's cardinal conceptual
base, not just details of the 33x fields. I'm not sure if the categories are
actually blurry or just my eyes.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> John Hostage 2/25/2013 5:01 PM >>>
I wa
o think in this case, copyright date, being the only date
identified from the resource, is perhaps not optional?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> Deborah Fritz 1/11/2013 10:49 AM >>>
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Descript
e with a period, copyright date
without?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Deborah Fritz 1/11/2013 9:15 AM >>>
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Beh
have become some major sources of ambiguity and
discussion, if not confusion.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> James Weinheimer 12/19/2012 5:48 AM
>>>
On 19/12/2012 10:08, Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
Am 19.12.2012 09:29, schrie
Ingenious. Picture certainly worth a thousand words. The 4 Group one entities,
3 group two entities, 4 group three entities all supposed to work together with
clearly defined powers and relationships. Enjoyed it.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
And the searcher, in order to search successfully, would have to know
this distinction in our use of a different qualifier for the same person
under different circumstances, as well, I presume?
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Jenny Wright 11/26/
Then, in MARC, it can sometimes be using $e illustrator, but at other times $e
artist? Or would one be using both terms? It's somewhat confusing to me.
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> JSC Secretary 11/23/2012 8:14 AM >>>
Jenny,
Th
it consistently would be simpler for
everyone. Too bad that's not what RDA says and catalogers judgment covers a lot
of things.
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "J. McRee Elrod" 11/16/2012 2:54 AM >>>
Jenry Lam asked:
among
Desktop's long list of cataloging resources instead of being singularly
tied to RDA subscription, if for no other reason than to avoid an
appearance of being heavy-handed.
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> "Fox, Chris" 11/1/2012 9:42 PM >>&
But is the subfield e relationship designator mandatory or optional, for
the 1xx field, for the 7xx field?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> "Brenndorfer, Thomas"
10/16/2012 4:27 PM >>>
Here’s a simple chart:
MARC has two main fields for
Some rather basic questions I'm still ignorant of. Is it allowable to have some
access points with the relationship designator and some without any
relationship designator? And are the terms of creator and author mutually
exclusive.
Thanks,
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan Universi
~~~~~
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Jack Wu wrote:
> Yes, I do remember now. This is a change on account of the rule of three. In
> RDA is there an exception or
> another rule that governs the entry under title for video recordings,
> serials...
> Thanks,
>
Yes, I do remember now. This is a change on account of the rule of three. In
RDA is there an exception or another rule that governs the entry under title
for video recordings, serials...
Thanks,
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> "Adam L. Schiff"
AACR1 editors are chosen where AACR2 would choose the title. And if we agree in
the case of editor that it cannot be main entry in either AACR2 or RDA, in what
instances then would AACR2 and RDA be different when main entry is considered
in the sequential MARC environment?
Jack
Jack Wu
So in this regard it's exactly like AACR2?? Somehow while the short explanation
given here is clear, I must admit what the RDA says is confusing to me.
Jack
>>> "Adam L. Schiff" 10/4/2012 5:57 PM >>>
Editors are not considered creators in RDA, nor are they considered other
persons, families,
done but I
don't see any near term solutions.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> James Weinheimer 9/21/2012 4:13 AM >>>
On 21/09/2012 00:07, Kelley McGrath wrote:
I sometimes wonder what the silent majority on lists thinks. There are
definite
all legacy records that lack
these, and that can be a huge problem. I'm just glad there will be a unified
authority file and conversion of bib. headings is more machine actionable.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University
>>> James Weinheimer 9/17/2012 7:12 AM >>>
All,
For
Thanks Mac, hope you're right about the rewrite. Somehow I wonder how revision
and rewrite are coordinated, or are they on different tracks where they would
endlessly chase each other.
Jack
>>> "J. McRee Elrod" 9/17/2012 5:05 PM >>>
Jack Wu said:
>I
I have read these before as well, the brief listing anyway. I'm not a fast
reader and there are more than 70 documents listed for this month alone. Sure
can use a digest or summary from time to time.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> Gene Fieg 9/14/2012
econd indicator coded 0 for production, 1 for
publication... 4 for copyright to accommodate any new RDA differentiations? As
it is, when will it be RDA and AACR all have the same 26x fields, perhaps
never?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "J. McRee
t sub-field b delimiter is one
way; the other way is to leave everything in 245s the way they are, but add a
246 field title that includes the distinguishing terms of a report or summary.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> "Adam L. Schiff" 8/27/201
Adam,
Thank you for your reply which alerted me to check a few of the records in the
LC catalog itself. Yes, the LC catalog does have $b before $e and that's good
enough for me.
Perhaps OCLC can investigate so that in Connexion the records would not display
$e before $b.
Jack
Ja
still puzzles me, since they are DLC of rather recent dates of input and
modification.
Regards,
Jack
Jack Wu
Technical Services
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
>>> Gary L Strawn 8/16/2012 5:00 PM >>>
I asked a program to look at the weekly files of LC/N
true of nearly all DLC
records. I would love some consistency to follow but perhaps that's not here
yet?
Jack
Jack Wu
j...@franciscan.edu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> Gary L Strawn 8/15/2012 10:02 AM >>>
Yep. During the manipulation of the LC/NACO authority
nly 3
exceptions in my search are entry 22, 32, 38. It would seem current LC practice
varies somewhat from the PCC recommendation.
Just waiting to see how OCLC, LC, and PCC will come together on these, if they
have not already and I'm only behind in the news.
Jack
Jack Wu
j...@franciscan.edu
62 matches
Mail list logo