Re: Determine process which consumed CPU cores

monitoring system like snmp based tools (nagios).. > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:33 PM Kaushal Shriyan > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to find out which process consumed CPU cores as per the > > below sar output? OS is Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server rele

Re: Determine process which consumed CPU cores

out which process consumed CPU cores as per the > below sar output? OS is Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > with 64-bit arch. > > 04:40:01 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait%steal > %idle > 04:50:01 PM all 4.25 0.00 0.69

Re: Determine process which consumed CPU cores

t; > > > Is there a way to find out which process consumed CPU cores as per the > > below sar output? OS is Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > > with 64-bit arch. > > > > 04:40:01 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait%steal >

Re: Determine process which consumed CPU cores

Hi, Checking in again if someone can pitch in for help. Thanks in advance and i look forward to hearing from you. Best Regards, On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:03 PM Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to find out which process consumed CPU cores as per the > below sar o

Determine process which consumed CPU cores

Hi, Is there a way to find out which process consumed CPU cores as per the below sar output? OS is Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) with 64-bit arch. 04:40:01 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait%steal %idle 04:50:01 PM all 4.25 0.00 0.69

Re: modprobe using 99% cpu

Update: Problem has not reoccurred. It's been six days since my original posting about this problem and everything is working fine. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: kernel upgraded now missing 2nd CPU

Steve Buehler wrote > Jason > Thank You. That was the problem. Now I have another problem, but > I can't fix it from here. I do have the SMP kernel on the system and > changed the lilo.conf file. Then did a 'lilo -v -v' and it didn't show any > errors, so I rebooted. Now it won't c

Re: kernel upgraded now missing 2nd CPU

Will see what happens. Thanks for the help. Steve At 11:18 PM 10/16/2003, Jason Dixon wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 00:14, Steve Buehler wrote: > I have two RedHat 7.3 machines. I did and 'up2date kernel' a few days ago > and for some reason, now 'top' and the /var/log

Re: kernel upgraded now missing 2nd CPU

On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 00:14, Steve Buehler wrote: > I have two RedHat 7.3 machines. I did and 'up2date kernel' a few days ago > and for some reason, now 'top' and the /var/log/message files only show one > CPU. Is there anyway to make it see the 2nd CPU again? Are

kernel upgraded now missing 2nd CPU

I have two RedHat 7.3 machines. I did and 'up2date kernel' a few days ago and for some reason, now 'top' and the /var/log/message files only show one CPU. Is there anyway to make it see the 2nd CPU again? Thanks Steve -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EM

Re: modprobe using 99% cpu

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:46:04 -0400 "David C. Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 10:35, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > I would think that this is a problem with an individual module. I get > this with Tulip, for example. Which kernel and what

Re: modprobe using 99% cpu

to be random times and goes into some sort of loop. It > > can't be killed and uses up almost all of the cpu. There are no errors and > > nothing in the logs that look like they would have anything to do with modprobe. > > ALl I have been able to do is renice o

Re: modprobe using 99% cpu

up almost all of the cpu. There are no errors and nothing > in the logs that look like they would have anything to do with modprobe. ALl I have > been able to do is renice or reboot. Rebooting never lasts more than 24 hours. > > I have Gooled this to death and can't f

modprobe using 99% cpu

I have a really odd problem with a Dell GX300 and RH73. Modprobe runs at what seems to be random times and goes into some sort of loop. It can't be killed and uses up almost all of the cpu. There are no errors and nothing in the logs that look like they would have anything to do with mod

Re: CPU number in hyper threading machine

> I have just installed Redhat 9 on a dual-Xeon hyper threading machine. I > run 'top' and see the expected 4 virtual CPUs, they are labeled as CPU0, > CPU1, CPU2 and CPU3. > > How do I know which two virtual CPUs belong to a single physical CPU? > I need this info to

CPU number in hyper threading machine

Hi, I have just installed Redhat 9 on a dual-Xeon hyper threading machine. I run 'top' and see the expected 4 virtual CPUs, they are labeled as CPU0, CPU1, CPU2 and CPU3. How do I know which two virtual CPUs belong to a single physical CPU? I need this info to do cpu binding. Thank

High CPU usage for simple window tasks

Hello, My CPU usage goes to 100% whenever I do simple window tasks like resizing, opening new windows, opening menus, etc (for any application). It's really driving me crazy how slow it is :( I doubt it's due to my hardware, my CPU/memory/video card is an Athlon 2600/1GB/Radeon 7500, re

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

hehe That's funny! To the original poster: Run "top" to see what's eating the CPU time. You can use the shift-P option to sort vie CPU. <> -- Original Message --- From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sen

Re: Troubleshooting CPU Performance

On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 09:46, Steve Gonzales wrote: > I followed Dumbledore's lead and got a pensieve :-D. > Have they released the encrypted version yet? I love those books. Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-l

Re: Troubleshooting CPU Performance

I followed Dumbledore's lead and got a pensieve :-D. Steve Gonzales, RHCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] > H| I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. > + > Ashley M. Kirchner . 303.442.641

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

Edward Dekkers wrote: It's a safety feature not a lot of people know about. It's called throttling, which has been around for a while now. The CPU will effectively cut its power down to 50% first, and will continue to do so till it reaches a point where it can stay cool enough, wh

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

he OP didn't specify) will actually do something a lot more fantastic. I was recently at an Intel demonstration of a 2.8GHz CPU. They made it run, then ripped the fan/heatsink off. The system immediately started to run slower and slower and slower, until it was almost as good as frozen. Howeve

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 20:11, David Barkman wrote: > It might be worth it to crack open the case and make sure your fans are > working > newer cpu's would probably immediately fry without a fan, but older ones > may run for a while at degraded performance. > Good point. do you have lm-sensors ins

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:18 PM Subject: troubleshooting cpu performance > Is there a way to troubleshoot where performance > bottlenecks may be occurring with httpd? Such as some > module such as mod_rewrite? Can you print out what > files httpd is c

troubleshooting cpu performance

Is there a way to troubleshoot where performance bottlenecks may be occurring with httpd? Such as some module such as mod_rewrite? Can you print out what files httpd is currently serving? Starting a couple days ago, it's as if my CPU has been replaced with one far less powerful. Just

Re: Random CPU initialization on Athlon SMP

an mix up every stepping, the only > requirement is (should be) that CPU speed must be the same on both CPUs. I didn't find anything explicit on athlons, but after searching a little further I found out the above statement of mine is not true. It seems the first references I found on the subje

Re: Random CPU initialization on Athlon SMP

m Pentiums: you can mix up every stepping, the only requirement is (should be) that CPU speed must be the same on both CPUs. --Tony -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Random CPU initialization on Athlon SMP

> Hello niteowl, > Have you tried swapping the cpu's? Not sure if the 2 cpu's should be > identical. See the MB docs for that. When googling for this I find references that at least for Pentium's the stepping of cpu's in dual processor boards must be identical in most cases. Guess that might

Re: Random CPU initialization on Athlon SMP

Hello niteowl, > I have a very strange problem on my dual Athlon MP system since CPU > initialization seems to be performed in a random way. In about 50% of > bootstraps the kernel manages to correctly enable the second CPU, in the > other 50% not. I have no idea what causes th

Random CPU initialization on Athlon SMP

Hello all. I have a very strange problem on my dual Athlon MP system since CPU initialization seems to be performed in a random way. In about 50% of bootstraps the kernel manages to correctly enable the second CPU, in the other 50% not. In the former case the system is rock solid, in the latter

Re: kernel CPU speed

At 02:43 9/7/2003 -0400, you wrote: i just moved a system drive with RH8.0 from an older PIII 1.6 box to a newer PIV 2.4 one... after booting everything seems to be fine so far except this: in the dmesg i see this: Detected 1793.493 MHz processor. and then a few lines blow: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium

kernel CPU speed

hi list, i just moved a system drive with RH8.0 from an older PIII 1.6 box to a newer PIV 2.4 one... after booting everything seems to be fine so far except this: in the dmesg i see this: Detected 1793.493 MHz processor. and then a few lines blow: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz

X using 99% CPU

Hi everyone, The system is loaded with redhat 7.2 and configuration is dual cpu (AMD) and 4 GB RAM when I execute top command 9:06pm up 7 days, 10:50, 10 users, load average: 2.11, 2.14, 1.88 95 processes: 92 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU0 states: 97.0% user, 2.0% system

Re: CPU States: System % high

working at the Kernel level Except that it's not because all of your TCP traffic ends up going through this history, rather than generating one DNS lookup per SYN packet. Seriously: the box was crashing. The system CPU utilization is very high. How can you conclude that this method i

Re: Xinetd with RH 9 causing 100% cpu utilization.

Bart Reagan said: > After installing RH 9 (and RH 8.094 beta prior) I noticed that my CPU > utilization goes to 100%. The top process is xinetd. The current > shipping version is 2.3.10-6. If I downgrade to 2.3.7-5 the cpu > utilization returns to normal. > > Anyone else ex

Xinetd with RH 9 causing 100% cpu utilization.

After installing RH 9 (and RH 8.094 beta prior) I noticed that my CPU utilization goes to 100%. The top process is xinetd. The current shipping version is 2.3.10-6. If I downgrade to 2.3.7-5 the cpu utilization returns to normal. Anyone else experience this? Any suggestions other than

Re: X taking lots of CPU

On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 00:06, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > If you're using the KDM/GDM/XDM you will definitely suck more CPU time > down - but if you change to runlevel 3 and login via console and start > Xwindows with the "startx" command, you'll find that XWindows

RE: X taking lots of CPU

On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 18:19, Cannon, Andrew wrote: > Stephen, > > Going to runlevel 3 is fine for me, but what about the other users on the > network? Can they still log in to the system when it is in single user mode > (am I right in thinking that runl level 3 is single user mode)? > > Andy > R

RE: X taking lots of CPU

auto starting X(under redhat at least). I do not agree with the other poster that starting X with 'startx' will reduce CPU load(vs using a display manager). having been using X11 since 1995 I have never seen/experienced/read/heard of such a thing. runlevel 1 is single user mode, and

Re: X taking lots of CPU

Cannon, Andrew said: > Hi All, > > We use a Red Hat 8 box to do production runs of a piece of software that > produces a graphical output of it's progress. The Program is taking up 30% > of the cpu but X is taking 65% of the cpu. This is impairing the > calculation time. Is

RE: X taking lots of CPU

PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: X taking lots of CPU On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 17:32, Cannon, Andrew wrote: > Hi All, > > We use a Red Hat 8 box to do production runs of a piece of software that > produces a graphical output of it's prog

Re: X taking lots of CPU

On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 17:32, Cannon, Andrew wrote: > Hi All, > > We use a Red Hat 8 box to do production runs of a piece of software that > produces a graphical output of it's progress. The Program is taking up 30% > of the cpu but X is taking 65% of the cpu. This is impai

X taking lots of CPU

Hi All, We use a Red Hat 8 box to do production runs of a piece of software that produces a graphical output of it's progress. The Program is taking up 30% of the cpu but X is taking 65% of the cpu. This is impairing the calculation time. Is there any way to reduce this load on the cpu?

Re: CPU monitoring service?

I'm using Big Brother and it works like a charm. We can also monitor specific process with it. - Original Message - From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: CPU monitoring service? > Is the

Re: CPU monitoring service?

I've been Big Brother and it works like a charm for the same purpose. We can also monitor specific services with it. - Original Message - From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: CPU monitoring ser

Re: top crashing on intel CPU

Yeah, especially when top eats up all the CPU just displaying all the info that fast :-P -- Joe Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] AOL: mcigiles --- Registered Linux User #264910 http://counter.li.org --- Ben Russo said: > Kailesh Mussai wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>I have

Re: top crashing on intel CPU

Kailesh Mussai wrote: Hello, I have an Intel machine single processor ( Pentium 3, 1000 MHz) running RedHat 7.3 and it has as kernel: uname -r 2.4.18-3 When running top with the option "-d 0.01" I get: top -d 0.01 Floating point exception but running top with no paramet

top crashing on intel CPU

Hello, I have an Intel machine single processor ( Pentium 3, 1000 MHz) running RedHat 7.3 and it has as kernel: > uname -r 2.4.18-3 When running top with the option "-d 0.01" I get: > top -d 0.01 Floating point exception but running top with no parameters is perfectly fine. I tried Re

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 18:02, Chris wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > > Now, is it possible to kill a process, based on it's name (not PID) when > > > such message is triggered and an email is dispatched to my cell phone? > The > > > > Yes it is possible. Lets see you come up with some ideas and we'll help

Re: Re[2]: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

Hello Brian, > Don't know that much about the FP extensions, but... > > Have you tried adding... > alias Author.exe='nice +19 /path/to/Author.exe' > to the user who runs that process' ~/.bashrc ? > (I don't know if it is your webserver or not) > > That should slow it down a bit. > > Alternatively,

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

Hi Jeff, > > Now, is it possible to kill a process, based on it's name (not PID) when > > such message is triggered and an email is dispatched to my cell phone? The > > Yes it is possible. Lets see you come up with some ideas and we'll help > you refine them. You already got a free gimme. :-) T

Re[2]: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

Hello Chris, Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 4:36:41 PM, you textually orated: C> I'd love to just kill the "Author.exe" process sucking up all the CPU C> cycles when the load gets to 5+ level (for example), to automatically C> stop her unnecessary imact on the server. Since t

Re: CPU monitoring service?

Chris wrote: Is there a way to have a Red Hat 7.x machine send an email to a predetermined email address when the CPU usage reaches a certain point? Sort of like those godawful RaQ servers do, but for standard RH7 installation. I'd like to have such emails sent to my cell phone with server

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

running at 10+ load for 30 minutes at a time. I'd love to just kill the > "Author.exe" process sucking up all the CPU cycles when the load gets to 5+ How about replacing the Author.exe with a script that sees if it is necessary to actually recalculate the links at that time and on

RE: CPU monitoring service?

://www.sins.com.au/nmis/ >> -Original Message- >> From: Jeff Bearer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 4:56 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: CPU monitoring service? >> >> >> I scanned the replies and didn't see i

Re: CPU monitoring service? (OpenNMS + Net-SNMP).

them, are very flexible and extensible, secure (if configured properly) and OSI certified. You can monitor almost everything (besides CPU usage and not only SNMP variables), you can get reports, and so on. Also you can try Nagios (http://www.nagios.org) but i drop it in favor of OpenNMS because Op

Re: CPU monitoring service?

I scanned the replies and didn't see it mentioned, Nagios is the free clone that Ed was talking about. http://www.nagios.org/ On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 14:04, Chris wrote: > Is there a way to have a Red Hat 7.x machine send an email to a > predetermined email address when the CPU usag

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

s HUGE and every time she runs this, the server is running at 10+ load for 30 minutes at a time. I'd love to just kill the "Author.exe" process sucking up all the CPU cycles when the load gets to 5+ level (for example), to automatically stop her unnecessary imact on the server. Si

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

Chris wrote: I sort of got it working, other than it complains with "integer expression expected" on the "if [ $load -gt $#MY_THRESHOLD ] ; then". If I comment out the whole loop and have it send the current CPU level by itself, without checking MY_THRESHOLD, it works perfect

Re: CPU monitoring service?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:09:23PM -0800, Chris wrote: > Thanks for the info - this looks very cool indeed! The Spotlight product > looks really cool too - I'll definitely have to have a look at both. > Pricing on Big Brother Pro is a little high for my pocket, but we'll > see how the demo wo

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:05:56PM -0800, Chris wrote: > Jeff, > > Thanks!! > > I sort of got it working, other than it complains with "integer expression > expected" on the "if [ $load -gt $#MY_THRESHOLD ] ; then". If I comment out > the whole loop

Re: CPU monitoring service?

- Original Message - From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:33 AM Subject: Re: CPU monitoring service? > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:04:08AM -0800, Chris wrote: > > Is there a way to have a Red Hat 7.x mac

Re: CPU monitoring service => Correction

Jeff Kinz wrote: [snip] #The name of the server NAME=`hostname` Shouldn't you be able to just use the $HOSTNAME env var? Tony -- Anthony E. Greene OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05 HomePage:

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

Jeff, Thanks!! I sort of got it working, other than it complains with "integer expression expected" on the "if [ $load -gt $#MY_THRESHOLD ] ; then". If I comment out the whole loop and have it send the current CPU level by itself, without checking MY_THRESHOLD, it works pe

Re: CPU monitoring service?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:04:08AM -0800, Chris wrote: > Is there a way to have a Red Hat 7.x machine send an email to a > predetermined email address when the CPU usage reaches a certain point? If you're concerned about the cpu load, you're probably also concerned about other

Re: CPU monitoring service => even more Correct

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:25:52PM -0500, Jeff Kinz wrote: CORRECTION: mail -s "$NAME load is at $load" [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be : mail -n -s "$NAME load is at $load" [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null resulting in.: #The name of the server NAME=`hostname` #

Re: CPU monitoring service => Correction

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:21:06PM -0500, Jeff Kinz wrote: > Off the top of my head - totally untested, not even syntax checked. CORRECTION: mail -s "$NAME $MY_THRESHOLD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be : mail -s "$NAME load is at $load" [EMAIL PROTECTED] resulti

Re: CPU monitoring service?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:04:08AM -0800, Chris wrote: > Is there a way to have a Red Hat 7.x machine send an email to a > predetermined email address when the CPU usage reaches a certain point? > Sort of like those godawful RaQ servers do, but for standard RH7 > installation. I&#x

CPU monitoring service?

Is there a way to have a Red Hat 7.x machine send an email to a predetermined email address when the CPU usage reaches a certain point? Sort of like those godawful RaQ servers do, but for standard RH7 installation. I'd like to have such emails sent to my cell phone with server name and CPU

2nd CPU in AcerAltos server and RH8 SMP kernel

Hi, I've recently added a 2nd CPU into my AcerAltos 930 server. The server is correctly configured for DUAL CPU mode. I've updated the stepping codes to correctly support the Pentium II CPU's (both 300MHz). I've installed the latest kernel-2.4.18-27.8.0 SMP kernel, but when

Re: What the hell is removeservice and why does it eat CPU cycles

On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 16:51:50 -0600 Nicholas Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yikes! I have never seen a process by that name before (running as > root even), but it may or may not be an issue. > > Are you running any special or custom software that may own that > process? If not I would suggest

Re: What the hell is removeservice and why does it eat CPU cycles

Yikes! I have never seen a process by that name before (running as root even), but it may or may not be an issue. Are you running any special or custom software that may own that process? If not I would suggest you download and run chkrootkit at www.chkrootkit.org. Chkrootkit is kinda like a vi

Re: What the hell is removeservice and why does it eat CPU cycles

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 13:06:19 -0700, Kapil Khanna wrote: > My linux box is running slow and on running top i find the following > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 13033 root 14 0 996

What the hell is removeservice and why does it eat CPU cycles

My linux box is running slow and on running top i find the following PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 13033 root 14 0 996 996 848 R40.1 1.0 2:25 rmoveservice 13032 root 13 0 1036 1036 884 S18.8 1.0 1:19 expandrepeats 13034

Re: Red Hat on an old CPU - Which version?

On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 05:57, Kevin MacNeil wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 09:58:40PM -0500, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: > > Until redhat announced they were going to end-of-life version 6.2 in > march, I would have suggested that. Now I'd suggest redhat 8, provided > you do a minimal installation

Re: Red Hat on an old CPU - Which version?

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 09:58:40PM -0500, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: Until redhat announced they were going to end-of-life version 6.2 in march, I would have suggested that. Now I'd suggest redhat 8, provided you do a minimal installation (no X, no development tools, etc.). Install webmin you'll b

Re: Individual CPU statistics

h cpus are detected, "top" should show two lines of cpu-state (one for each cpu) and "cat /proc/cpuinfo" should show you the info for each cpu. Emmanuel -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Individual CPU statistics

you should downloaded/installed the smp version of the kernel i.e. kernel 2.4.16.smp.rpm S Peram wrote: > Hi, > I'm using Redhat Linux 6.2 kernel 2.4.16 on one my > servers. It is a SMP machine. Is there any way I can > view the statistics of individual processors?I'd > appreciate your comments

Individual CPU statistics

Hi, I'm using Redhat Linux 6.2 kernel 2.4.16 on one my servers. It is a SMP machine. Is there any way I can view the statistics of individual processors?I'd appreciate your comments and thoughts. Thanks, Peram __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Se

Red Hat on an old CPU - Which version?

smime.p7m Description: application/pkcs7-mime

Re: CPU Temp

Yes, RedHat 7.3 has everything you need to display the CPU Temp unlike RedHat 8.0 (this is one of my pet peeves with the latest version). Follow these steps and all should be well: 1.  Run 'rpm -qa | grep lm_sensors' to verify that lm_sensors is installed. 2.  Run 'rpm

Re: CPU Temp

Delao, Darryl W said: > Anyone aware of any way to check cpu temp while RH 7.3 is running? Is > there some kind of command? not sure if redhat ships with it, but lm_sensors is the method to check temperature, it requires a supported chipset and the proper kernel modules loaded, it&#x

RE: CPU Temp

Title: RE: CPU Temp You have to install lm_sensors http://freshmeat.net/projects/lm_sensors/ -Original Message- From: Delao, Darryl W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:00 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: CPU Temp Anyone aware of

CPU Temp

Anyone aware of any way to check cpu temp while RH 7.3 is running? Is there some kind of command? Darryl -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Re[2]: Please help me, I can't get RH to use my second CPU

On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 16:36, Søren Neigaard wrote: > I will try this, but I have a few questions first. If I install the > binary SMP kernel RPM, will it overwrite my existing kernel, or can I > keep them both? > No an install will NOT overwrite an existing kernel. An upgrade will though. use r

Re: Re[2]: Please help me, I can't get RH to use my second CPU

el and mods > BR> and then try that. If it works you can do a make xconfig again and try > BR> removing a few more things. > > BR> -Ben. > > > BR> On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 11:53, Søren Neigaard wrote: > >> I have this old IBM PC Server 520 with 2 P133 CPU&#x

Re[2]: Please help me, I can't get RH to use my second CPU

On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 11:53, Søren Neigaard wrote: >> I have this old IBM PC Server 520 with 2 P133 CPU's. When the machine >> boots, it says that it initializes the second CPU, so at least the >> BIOS sees both CPU's. >> >> I have now compiled my ow

Re: Please help me, I can't get RH to use my second CPU

a make xconfig again and try removing a few more things. -Ben. On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 11:53, Søren Neigaard wrote: > I have this old IBM PC Server 520 with 2 P133 CPU's. When the machine > boots, it says that it initializes the second CPU, so at least the > BIOS sees both CPU's. &

Please help me, I can't get RH to use my second CPU

I have this old IBM PC Server 520 with 2 P133 CPU's. When the machine boots, it says that it initializes the second CPU, so at least the BIOS sees both CPU's. I have now compiled my own kernel to get rid of the extra luggage, but if I try to compile it with SMP support, my machine won&#

Re: ksoftirqd_cpu0 eats too much cpu

On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 05:31, Francisco Ruiz Ibañez wrote: > Since two days ago, I have a process, ksoftirqd_cpu0, that consumes too > much cpu, and the network becames very slowly. > > What is this process and what can I do? It's part of the kernel. Take a look at /

ksoftirqd_cpu0 eats too much cpu

, ksoftirqd_cpu0, that consumes too much cpu, and the network becames very slowly.    What is this process and what can I do?       Sorry my poor English   Regards!    

Re: Funny dmesg CPU messages

I see some funny stuff, could you guys maybe explain it to | me? | | It starts out saying it detects a 132.959 MHz CPU. Then it says that I | have the old pentium bug, well ok it's a old CPU :) But now it get's | weird, what does this mean: "CPU: Intel Pentium 75 - 200 stepping 0c"

Funny dmesg CPU messages

I have this old IBM PC Server 520 with 2 P133 CPU's, but I think Redhat only detects one of them, I guess I have to compile the kernel to get SMP support, right? In my dmesg I see some funny stuff, could you guys maybe explain it to me? It starts out saying it detects a 132.959 MHz CPU. Th

Re: URGENT. CPU, HDD and RAM Perfomance.

On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 10:24, moises wrote: > Hello! I have a University project that it have to do next: > A server that it can get the machine performance conected in a network such as: >memory free and using, CPU percent iddle or using, Operating System, hard disk >storage(free an

URGENT. CPU, HDD and RAM Perfomance.

Hello! I have a University project that it have to do next: A server that it can get the machine performance conected in a network such as: memory free and using, CPU percent iddle or using, Operating System, hard disk storage(free and Used), etc. I need a C/C++ code for doing this. i've fo

Re: Changing the default target CPU for the redhat GCC installationon RH8.0.

ch. While -march chooses the instruction set, and thus minimum required machine, and RPM package arch... -mcpu selects instruction sheduling order. The instruction scheduling order is optimized to run the fastest on the arch you tell it. While the instructions are reordered for the given CPU, they remai

Re: Changing the default target CPU for the redhat GCC installationon RH8.0.

On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 12:41, Dave wrote: > BTW - The RH 8.0 GCC 'as shipped' default target CPU for Intel x86 machines > is i386 and according to the docs. this is used only as an optimization > 'hint' for the compiler Red Hat uses -mcpu=i686 as the default

Re: Changing the default target CPU for the redhat GCC installation on RH8.0.

BTW - The RH 8.0 GCC 'as shipped' default target CPU for Intel x86 machines is i386 and according to the docs. this is used only as an optimization 'hint' for the compiler, which is why I want to change it so that it produces better code for my P4 (and about 95% of the Intel

Re: CPU Types

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:44:30PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > I'm writing an instruction sheet for some elementary kids and was wondering > if anyone knows of some web page that contains information on types of CPU that > exists (or existed). Things I'd l

Re: Message 1, CPU Types (Ashley M. Kirchner)

anization: Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. To: Red Hat Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CPU Types Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm writing an instruction sheet for some elementary kids and was wondering if anyone knows of some web page that contains information on types of

  1   2   3   >