ogged onto console, with an empty ipchains or iptables rule set, pinging
yahoo.com shows 70ms of latency. However, if I add an IP Masq rule, then
ping yahoo.com from the Linux box itself, I show latency of 0.5 to 1.4
*seconds*.
For what it's worth, I can not reproduce this problem using a Red Ha
h an empty ipchains or iptables rule set, pinging
yahoo.com shows 70ms of latency. However, if I add an IP Masq rule, then
ping yahoo.com from the Linux box itself, I show latency of 0.5 to 1.4
*seconds*. Deleting the rule returns latency to 70ms. I replaced my kernel
with 2.4.22, to no avail. He
An update on this issue... the Xmms output driver has a setting that
controls the latency. I set this to 30ms (it was 3000ms, matching the
latency I was experiencing).
I also set the aRtsd latency to 30ms via the control panel. I also set
"realtime scheduling" and made sure ar
On Friday 01 August 2003 11:09 am, Greg Bell wrote:
> >> Under RH9, Xmms has a huge latency/delay when skipping
> >> or pausing (soundcard is Via's 686 built-in sound). I'm using OSS, and
> >> Artsd... I need Artsd since there's no sharing of the sound
>> Under RH9, Xmms has a huge latency/delay when skipping
>> or pausing (soundcard is Via's 686 built-in sound). I'm using OSS, and
>> Artsd... I need Artsd since there's no sharing of the sound device with
>> plain OSS.
>
>Are you using KDE (sinc
On Friday 01 August 2003 12:04 am, Greg Bell wrote:
> Hi Listies,
>
> Under RH9, Xmms has a huge latency/delay when skipping forwards/backwards
> or pausing (soundcard is Via's 686 built-in sound). I'm using OSS, and
> Artsd... I need Artsd since there's no sh
staggered
into view and mumbled:
>
> Hi Listies,
>
> Under RH9, Xmms has a huge latency/delay when skipping forwards/backwards
> or pausing (soundcard is Via's 686 built-in sound). I'm using OSS, and
> Artsd... I need Artsd since there's no sharing of the sound de
Hi Listies,
Under RH9, Xmms has a huge latency/delay when skipping forwards/backwards
or pausing (soundcard is Via's 686 built-in sound). I'm using OSS, and
Artsd... I need Artsd since there's no sharing of the sound device with
plain OSS.
Has anyone else seen big latencies
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Stephen Corey wrote:
> I'm going to be running 2 satellite links with RH 7.3 on them. For the
> best performance, I'm told that you use the (bandwidth*latency) product
> as the values for tcp_rmem and tcpwmem values in the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/
> dir
I'm going to be running 2 satellite links with RH 7.3
on them. For the best performance, I'm told that you
use the (bandwidth*latency) product as the values for
tcp_rmem and tcpwmem values in the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/
directory. Do you use the bandwidth in bps, and
latency in s
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Stephen Corey wrote:
> Do I need to tune the RH 7.3 kernel for high latency connections? Im
> installing a linux box on a satellite link (~800 ms roundtrip latency).
> Will the kernel *automatically* change anything based on latency, to
> hurt my throughput perfo
Do I need to tune the RH 7.3 kernel for high latency connections? Im installing a linux box on a satellite link (~800 ms roundtrip latency). Will the kernel *automatically* change anything based on latency, to hurt my throughput performance??Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators
Thanks for the reminder. It's actually /etc/host.conf.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> > I'm having a problem with my RH6.2 box. If I'm trying to ftp into it from my
> > Windows box while I"m online (via an ethernet based ISDN router
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder. It's actually /etc/host.conf.
Yes, it is...
But it wont do you a bit of good if your /etc/hosts file doenst show the
IP and hostname(s) for each machine on the network you wish to have
connections to. Unless, of course, you ar
r if bind
>> was unavailable...)
>>
>> this should work in your situation
>>
>> hth,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> A 10:25 31/01/2001 -0500, vous avez écrit :
>> >On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, you wrote:
>> >> Most of the time, when I see telnet
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> I'm having a problem with my RH6.2 box. If I'm trying to ftp into it from my
> Windows box while I"m online (via an ethernet based ISDN router) I often have
> troubles logging in. I've got that machine name and IP address in the
> /etc/hosts file, but it
seek was successful, and if not try with dns (bind) and
> return whatever the result is (whereever it found it, or not, or if bind
> was unavailable...)
>
> this should work in your situation
>
> hth,
>
>
>
>
> A 10:25 31/01/2001 -0500, vous avez écrit :
> >
0500, vous avez écrit :
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, you wrote:
>> Most of the time, when I see telnet/ftp/ssh latency, it's because the
>> system can't resolve the address from which I'm connecting.
>>
>> Check your /etc/resolv.conf file and make sure you have yo
Since this is happening only on the first connect or two, I would imagine
you dont have the hosts files set up, or DNS is not running, or set up
properly.
I would imagine that its a DNS problem, causing the clinet machine to send
a broadcast looking for the target machine... then after it gets a
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, you wrote:
> Most of the time, when I see telnet/ftp/ssh latency, it's because the
> system can't resolve the address from which I'm connecting.
>
> Check your /etc/resolv.conf file and make sure you have your correct DNS
> servers listed.
&g
Most of the time, when I see telnet/ftp/ssh latency, it's because the
system can't resolve the address from which I'm connecting.
Check your /etc/resolv.conf file and make sure you have your correct DNS
servers listed.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Joseph R. Erlewein wrote:
>
&g
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Joseph R. Erlewein wrote:
> I can ssh, and it will immediately prompt for login/pw...
> But once entered, it can take up to 4 minutes to yield a shell prompt.
> This does not happen at the console, leading me to believe it's network
> related, since this was not an issue on t
hen
I left. Anyway, the internal network is 192.168.///
Since attaching my server, and configuring for this network, I've seen
some VERY bad latency when telnetting to it (rare, but needed to test),
ssh, and samba shares.
I can ssh, and it will immediately prompt for login/pw...
But once enter
my latency patch ( unless I missed something in the directions ) seems
to have caused the
kernel to "freeze" upon decompressing..
it seems to decompress okay but then it freezes with the blinking
underline cursor..
any thoughts?
one interesting note though is the hdparm setting
Sounds like you need to recompile your kernel with dummy net driver support
- that, or load the dummy module...
> -Original Message-
> From: lee [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 2:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: low latency p
i tried applying low latency patch ( sorry seems like it was
discussed? but can't verify via redhat-list website search's aren't
working it seems ) and now my modules aren't complete installation to
point i have to net services/sound and others..
i applied patch
At 09:57 AM 9/8/00 , John wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, Eric Clover wrote:
> > just do what i did and get a job working for your isp.
> >
> > this way there is noone to blame but yourself :)
> >
>Heh. I know that feeling ALL too well! :-) i'm in the same position,
>although I got the job before the
I noticed the same latency. Plus, my reply was posted twice. The time stamps were
many hours apart.
Also, I have noticed MANY posts where I receive several replies long before the
original post appears in my inbox.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Alan Mead [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, Eric Clover wrote:
> just do what i did and get a job working for your isp.
>
> this way there is noone to blame but yourself :)
>
Heh. I know that feeling ALL too well! :-) i'm in the same position,
although I got the job before they were my ISP. :-)
John
___
just do what i did and get a job working for your isp.
this way there is noone to blame but yourself :)
eric
Alan Mead wrote:
>
> I'm just seeing posts I made, and have been discussed, hours ago. I joined
> this address years after my work address... But I guess my provider, At
> Home, is to
Hey Alan
It may be the RH servers again, I notice it every so often ..
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 7/09/00 at 21:34 Alan Mead wrote:
>I'm just seeing posts I made, and have been discussed, hours ago. I
joined
>this address years after my work address... But I guess my pro
I'm just seeing posts I made, and have been discussed, hours ago. I joined
this address years after my work address... But I guess my provider, At
Home, is to blame? My experience complaining to them has been like arguing
with the wind. Anyone have any advice? The bandwidth is nice anyway :)
32 matches
Mail list logo
