Re: Apache: I'm brand new...need some help

2003-10-10 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 13:05, Jason Williams wrote: > Good morning everyone. > > I started playing with Apache today and really need to find some good > documentation on it, as well as some examples. > I'm running Apache 2.0.44 on RH 8.0. > > I was curious if anyone could point me in the directio

RE: Apache: I'm brand new...need some help

2003-10-09 Thread Richard Crawford
Donald Tyler said: > I have always found the Oreilly books to be really helpful. > > www.oreilly.com I've also found that the documentation on the Apache website was the most helpful. www.apache.org Also, most introductory books on Linux have a chapter or two on building servers. These were al

Re: Apache: I'm brand new...need some help

2003-10-09 Thread Joe Szilagyi
This link should really get you to the good stuff too: http://www.oreillynet.com/search/index.ncsp?sp-q=apache&sp-k=all _ Regards, Joe - Original Message - From: "Jason Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 2:05 PM

RE: Apache: I'm brand new...need some help

2003-10-09 Thread Donald Tyler
I have always found the Oreilly books to be really helpful. www.oreilly.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Williams Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apache: I'm brand new...need some help Goo

Re: Apache redirect badly request to tomcat module

2003-10-09 Thread Barry L. Kline
On Thursday 09 October 2003 09:10 am, Salvador Santander wrote: > Hello, list. I've installed tomcat as apache module and I test it. I've got > that system serves jsp files, but I can't get that serves servlets unless I > put in httpd.conf: "JKMount /* ajp13 "( apache redirects all to tomcat > modu

Re: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-03 Thread John Nichel
James D. Parra wrote: NameVirtualHost 192.168.101.101 DocumentRoot /var/www/html/ddd < Look here ServerName "www.domainname.com:80" < You don't need the ':80' ServerAlias "domainname.com" ErrorLog /var/log/httpd/ddd_error_log TransferLog /var/log/httpd/ddd_access_log

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-03 Thread David Hart
reciated. > > > James D. Parra > Systems Administrator, IT Dept. > Music Reports, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ph (818) 558-1400 x112 > fx (818) 558-3484 > > > -Original Message- > From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-03 Thread James D. Parra
AIL PROTECTED] ph (818) 558-1400 x112 fx (818) 558-3484 -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache server read permissions James D. Parra wrote: > jp -No I am not. I want clients to have read-on

Re: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread John Nichel
James D. Parra wrote: jp -No I am not. I want clients to have read-only access. The directory and its contents have 'rw_r__r__' permissions. You do not need .htaccess to accomplish this. This will be handled by the user/group Apache is running as vs. the user/group ownership of the directory. j

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread James D. Parra
> > ...And I see that answer is the '.htaccess' file is not readable. But there > is NO .htaccess file in this directory. I am using Webmin to configure this > site. > Are you trying to restrict access to this dir? jp -No I am not. I want clients to have read-only access. The directory and its

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 17:53, James D. Parra wrote: > Thanks, Bret. > > Output of access.log; > 192.168.101.78 - - [02/Oct/2003:15:02:41 -0700] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 403 410 "-" > "Opera/7.20 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [en]" > > Output of error.log; > [Thu Oct 02 15:03:05 2003] [crit] [client 192.168.101.78]

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread James D. Parra
dd the virtual server entry to the file. What is the proper syntax so I can edit it manually? Again, many thanks. James -Original Message- From: Bret Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Apache server read permissio

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 16:31, James D. Parra wrote: > Okay, I am getting the below error from the 'virtual server'. I must be > missing something from either in the global settings or the virtual > settings. Any ideas on how to configure the virtual web server? > > Thank you, > > James anything

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread James D. Parra
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache server read permissions On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 12:35, James D. Parra wrote: > Hello, > > How do I set the directory/file permissions to 'read only' for website > viewers? >

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread James D. Parra
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 12:35, James D. Parra wrote: > Hello, > > How do I set the directory/file permissions to 'read only' for website > viewers? > > I am getting a, "You don't have permission to access / on this server," > error when I try to view this page. > Thank you, > What page? The i

RE: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread James D. Parra
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache server read permissions James D. Parra wrote: > Hello, > > How do I set the directory/file permissions to 'read only' for website > viewers? > > I am getting a, "You don't have permission to access / on this server,

Re: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 12:35, James D. Parra wrote: > Hello, > > How do I set the directory/file permissions to 'read only' for website > viewers? > > I am getting a, "You don't have permission to access / on this server," > error when I try to view this page. > Thank you, > What page? Either

Re: Apache server read permissions

2003-10-02 Thread Sasa Stupar
James D. Parra wrote: Hello, How do I set the directory/file permissions to 'read only' for website viewers? I am getting a, "You don't have permission to access / on this server," error when I try to view this page. Thank you, James where is your root directory? this should be readable by use

[Thanks Steve] Re: Apache Upgrade

2003-09-30 Thread damovand
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 09:42 am, Steve Gonzales wrote: > RPM is relatively easy to use. > > rpm -Uvh httpd-X.X.xx updates an already existing installation from RPM > or installs if not there. > > The source code route is more complicated, but you stay up with security > and bug reports better

Solved: Re: Apache ReDirect

2003-09-30 Thread Mike McMullen
://my.example.net/fred/ [L] RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^80$ RewriteRule ^(.*) https://my.example.net/fred/$1 Thanks to all who responded. I finally found the correct answer in the archives which I missed the first time I looked. Mike > Subject: Re: Apache ReDirect > I meant to add t

Re: Apache Upgrade

2003-09-30 Thread Steve Gonzales
RPM is relatively easy to use. rpm -Uvh httpd-X.X.xx updates an already existing installation from RPM or installs if not there. The source code route is more complicated, but you stay up with security and bug reports better. I usually move /usr/local/apache2 to /usr/local/apache2.X.X.xx where X

Re: Apache ReDirect

2003-09-28 Thread Mike McMullen
I meant to add that it can be code added in the pages themselves unless there is a more general solution. Mike > Hi All, > > Sorry for the off-topic questions but I've googled and not found > anything useful. > > I want to be able to redirect requests for certain pages to port > 443 ie https vs

RE: apache not utilizing all CPUs

2003-09-23 Thread Wade Chandler
I haven't built my own Apache yet, but I am a programmer. The code should have some type of #ifdef which will be used to compile in SMP support. Applications are not SMP capable by default usually. Sometimes applications have runtime library switching, but I find that many Open Source projects go

Re: Apache Issues

2003-09-19 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
> > Hey all, > > > > After upgrading one server to httpd-2.0.40-11.7.i386.rpm via up2date, > > the webserver now only answers Error 400. The only change was this new > > package (No config changes). > > > > I host 3 domains on this box, and none of them answer... > > > > Anyone have any ideas

Re: Apache Issues

2003-09-19 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
> Hey all, > > After upgrading one server to httpd-2.0.40-11.7.i386.rpm via up2date, > the webserver now only answers Error 400. The only change was this new > package (No config changes). > > I host 3 domains on this box, and none of them answer... > > Anyone have any ideas... I've already t

Re: Congrats on rh9 distr...but questions remain about choices made re: Apache/Samba

2003-09-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
Mike Klein wrote: Problem#1: Apache2 that you distribute doesn't seem to have apxs support enabled. Install httpd-devel. It's in there. Problem#2: Your Samba distribution was linked against ssl libraries (ldd shows this), yet for some reason all of the ssl params in smb.conf give errors to effect

Re: Congrats on rh9 distr...but questions remain about choices made re: Apache/Samba

2003-09-17 Thread Ian Mortimer
> Problem#1: Apache2 that you distribute doesn't seem to have apxs support > enabled. For this reason I needed to get apache src and rebuild. Not a > problem doing this, but for others it might be. Plus, given that production > sites will probably build from source anyways...why wasn't this includ

Congrats on rh9 distr...but questions remain about choices made re: Apache/Samba

2003-09-17 Thread Mike Klein
First thing, you have put out a great 'hardened' distribution with RedHat 9. About 90% of the reasons why I used to recompile/relink various apps (for ssl, krb, pam, ldap, etc.) are now eliminated because of your extra work. Good job. However, I have noticed (unless I'm mistaken) two glaring omiss

RE: apache question re: tag not viz.

2003-09-17 Thread Wade Chandler
Wade -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leonard den Ottolander Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: apache question re: tag not viz. Hello Bob, > If I open by "http://localhost"; > ther

Re: apache question re: tag not viz.

2003-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Bob, > If I open by "http://localhost"; > there is a brief flash of a blank square image box of the > correct height but no image. Sounds like you should check the file ownership and permissions. Bye, Leonard. -- How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste? Stop the use of d

Re: Apache sending incorrect mime type for Excel files

2003-09-10 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 12:55 10 Sep 2003, Parker Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003, at 12:32 US/Eastern, Reuben D. Budiardja | wrote: | >On Wednesday 10 September 2003 11:46 am, Parker Morse wrote: | >>Apache is sending the mime type "application/x-gzip" for them, even | >>though the mime.

Re: Apache sending incorrect mime type for Excel files

2003-09-10 Thread Parker Morse
On Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003, at 12:32 US/Eastern, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: On Wednesday 10 September 2003 11:46 am, Parker Morse wrote: Apache is sending the mime type "application/x-gzip" for them, even though the mime.types file shows "application/vend.ms-excel" for files with an .xls extension

Re: Apache sending incorrect mime type for Excel files

2003-09-10 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 11:46 am, Parker Morse wrote: > We've got a bunch of Excel files on our website. > > Apache is sending the mime type "application/x-gzip" for them, even > though the mime.types file shows "application/vend.ms-excel" for files > with an .xls extension. > > Where else s

Re: Apache proble..

2003-09-02 Thread NfoCipher
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 01:52, Ravi Narwade wrote: > You don't have permission to access /var/www/html/index.html on this > server. > Apache/1.3.23 Server at cs.unipune.ernet.in Port 80 > > but when I changed the ownership of the log file ie /var/log/httpd/access_log > as apache:apache then its

Re: Apache 2.0 stability

2003-08-29 Thread Didier Casse
very stable! I have been using it for months without any problem at all. :-) regards, Didier --- PhD student Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS) 5 Research Link, Singapore 117603 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Edwin

RE: Apache + Tomcat with mod_jk on RH 9.0

2003-08-21 Thread sentinel
Not with Apache 2.x but with 1.3.27 I've been able to make it work fine with RedHat 7, 8, and 9. Setting up mod_jk was tricky If I recall correctly. But after doing it a few times it becomes much clearer how the pieces fit in. I also am using the autoconfig option of Tomcat which worked great! F

Re: Apache, Mysql & central-european charset

2003-08-07 Thread Lee Flier
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 10:10, Alex wrote: > I have a rh9 installed on a server that runs a forum (phpbb) and I need to > use local translation (romanian). The thing is that I can't see special > caracters like â and such... I understand that I have to modify the settings > for mysql and maybe apache

Re: Apache removal

2003-07-29 Thread David Eduardo Gomez Noguera
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 21:18, Ben Sewell wrote: > I have Apache 1.2.20 which was installed during Red hat 7.2 installation. > How do I uninstall Apache before I install my prefered version of Apache? > > I remeber rpm -e but no idea what the package is called. > this might be wrong, but try rpm

Re: Apache removal

2003-07-29 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:18:37AM +, Ben Sewell wrote: > I remeber rpm -e but no idea what the package is called. $ rpm -qa | egrep 'apache|http' $ locate http Given one of the package file names, you can then use something like: $ rpm -qf /usr/sbin/httpd -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA

Re: apache

2003-07-17 Thread Richard Bewley
Hi, What are permissions set to on www.html? ls -al www.html I would suggest setting permissions to 644, apache:apache chown apache:apache www.html chmod 644 www.html Richard At 11:49 AM 12/3/2002 -0800, you wrote: Hi all I put file and folder in dot format eg: 25.www.html under the root dire

Re: apache

2003-07-17 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 13:49, chris wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > Hi all > > I put file and folder in dot format eg: 25.www.html under the root > directory of apache > > but I can't access it by http://www.abc.com/25.www.html > > In error file, it doesn't allow > > H

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-07-17 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:59, Jonathan Bartlett wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > I use phpGroupware. It's a little quirky, but works well. > > As for your problems, you need to make sure that you have the > following line somewhere in your httpd.conf: > > AddHandler cgi-s

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-07-17 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
I use phpGroupware. It's a little quirky, but works well. As for your problems, you need to make sure that you have the following line somewhere in your httpd.conf: AddHandler cgi-script .pl In addition, in the directory configuration you will need Options +ExecCGI For your directory listings

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-07-17 Thread Eric Sisler
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 06:10, Mark Haney wrote: > Has anyone ever setup/used CyberCalendar? I'm really looking > for a good Web-based Calendar for our website. I followed the > install instructions for CyberCalendar, but I can't get any of the > perl scripts to execute. I must have apache config

Re: apache not starting up

2003-07-15 Thread Wartnick, James
Look at your apache log files (Your error files). It will tell you exactly what the problem is. -Jim > -Original Message > Message: 9 > Subject: Re: apache not starting up > From: David Eduardo Gomez Noguera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: redhat list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Apache throws PHP errors at starup on RH9 upgrade.. Ideas ??

2003-07-15 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
> I have done some research but nothing makes sense > with these errors. I can remove the php4.conf and > the errors go away but there must be something > simple that is missing to cause all this grief It appears that there is something wrong with the imap and ldap modules. I would remove the ref

Re: apache not starting up

2003-07-15 Thread David Eduardo Gomez Noguera
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 21:18, Daniel Tan wrote: > hi, > i am trying to start up my apache using service httpd start.i get ok.but > when i point to the page, no page displayed. > i am listening on another port instead of the normal port 80. > doing a restart of the service does not help too n i a

Re: apache not starting up

2003-07-14 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Monday 14 July 2003 22:22, Daniel Tan wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > i got it to work now...mysqld was stopped...coz i upgraded it through > up2date. But funny thing is the error log is not telling me anything > about mysql... top posting != nice msqld caused moz not

Re: apache not starting up

2003-07-14 Thread Daniel Tan
TED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: Re: apache not starting up On Monday 14 July 2003 21:18, Daniel Tan wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > hi, > i am trying to start up my apache using service httpd start.i get > ok.but when i point to the

Re: apache not starting up

2003-07-14 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Monday 14 July 2003 21:18, Daniel Tan wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > hi, > i am trying to start up my apache using service httpd start.i get > ok.but when i point to the page, no page displayed. > i am listening on another port instead of the normal port 80. > doing

RE: apache not starting up

2003-07-14 Thread Aung Min Naing Oo - Unidux Electronics
Hi, Can you send the content of the httpd.conf file? Regards, Aung Min -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Apache UNINSTALL

2003-07-12 Thread John Nichel
Cornelius Kölbel wrote: Hari Om wrote: how do I uninstall Apache on RED HAT LINUX. it is not in rpm format...how can I do that _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/fea

Re: Apache UNINSTALL

2003-07-12 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
On Friday 11 July 2003 02:15 pm, Hari Om wrote: > how do I uninstall Apache on RED HAT LINUX. it is not in rpm > format...how can I do that if you didn't install it using RPM, just find the directory in which you install it (the dir you put for --prefix during configure), and remove it rm -

Re: Apache UNINSTALL

2003-07-12 Thread Cornelius Kölbel
Hari Om wrote: how do I uninstall Apache on RED HAT LINUX. it is not in rpm format...how can I do that _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail I guess you

Re: Re: Apache Virtual Hosts and site name

2003-07-09 Thread edukes
> > From: Rus Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2003/07/09 Wed PM 12:35:25 CDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Hosts and site name > > On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Mike McMullen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have created a virtu

Re: Apache Virtual Hosts and site name

2003-07-09 Thread Mike McMullen
Thanks Laurie! That did the trick! Mike - Original Message - From: "Laurie Harper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:41 AM Subject: RE: Apache Virtual Hosts and site name > Add a line to the container for tha

RE: Apache Virtual Hosts and site name

2003-07-09 Thread Laurie Harper
Add a line to the container for that vhost: ServerAlias virtualhost.com -- Laurie Harper Dealer ImpactR Systems WWWeb Impressions, LLC 7725 Douglas Ave Urbandale, IA 50322 (515)334-9638 ext.15 http://www.dealerimpact.com http://www.webimpressions.com -

Re: Apache Virtual Hosts and site name

2003-07-09 Thread Rus Foster
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Mike McMullen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a virtual host on my apache server with a > name like www.virtualhost.com. If I use that URL to access > it, everything is fine. > > However, if I use the URL of virtualhost.com., I get the > default host home page which is an e

Re: Apache - not to listen on port 443

2003-07-09 Thread Distribution Lists
Thanks for all you help. I bit the bullet and done this the virtual host way rather that run 2 httpd server on one box. What I wanted was to have httpd listening on 2 ports, port 80 and port , and to use 2 different cgi-bin's. Port 80 is my public site, but there are some administrative cgi's

Re: Apache - not to listen on port 443

2003-07-08 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 17:00, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote in an attempt to be witty and informative: > At 7/8/2003 16:48 -0500, you wrote: > > > Find the line that says "Listen 443" and change it to "#Listen > > > 443". Now restart the httpd service. > > > >He doesn't even have mod_ssl > > For the sake

Re: Apache - not to listen on port 443

2003-07-08 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/8/2003 16:48 -0500, you wrote: > Find the line that says "Listen 443" and change it to "#Listen 443". > Now restart the httpd service. He doesn't even have mod_ssl For the sake of my general eddication, how do we know this? -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsu

Re: Apache - not to listen on port 443

2003-07-08 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 16:40, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote in an attempt to be witty and informative: > At 7/8/2003 14:01 -0500, you wrote: > >I can't run 2 httpsd servers as both copied will listen to port 443 > >(https), how do you switch listening to 443 off ? > > Find the line that says "Listen 443

Re: Apache - not to listen on port 443

2003-07-08 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/8/2003 14:01 -0500, you wrote: I'm running RH8 with Apache Server version: Apache/2.0.40 Server built: May 22 2003 05:19:58 I want to run 2 httpd servers listening on 2 different ports (yes I realize you can use virtual hosts) This is generally not a good idea... why do you want to do that?

Re: Apache - not to listen on port 443

2003-07-08 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 14:01, Distribution Lists wrote in an attempt to be witty and informative: > I'm running RH8 with Apache > Server version: Apache/2.0.40 > Server built: May 22 2003 05:19:58 > > I want to run 2 httpd servers listening on 2 different ports (yes I > realize you can use virt

Re: Apache 2.4 and frontpage extensions

2003-07-08 Thread David Hart
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:33, Mark Haney wrote: The FP scheme was changed to DSO on Apache 2 which means that HTTPD does NOT get hacked in the process. Installation was a hell of a lot easier and faster. Even the docs are very un-Linux like (steps 1 through 5 instead of a collection of links to var

Re: Apache 2.4 and frontpage extensions

2003-07-08 Thread Mark Haney
I've successfully run the FP extensions on 2.0. I don't recall any specific issues with them other than security. I deliberately moved from IIS to Apache to avoid FP in my job here. I was here 2 months and the IIS server was hacked through the FP extensions. On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:27, Alex w

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-29 Thread Leo Huang
I always rebuild Apache from source tar balls. Leo - Original Message - From: "Joseph A Nagy Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Apache RPMs? > Daevid Vincent wrote: > >>I don't lik

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-28 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
Daevid Vincent wrote: I don't like the way they changed the structure of the httpd.conf file. Takes too long to get used to. :-p Yeah, but having the .conf files just dropped in a directory is pretty sexy... Yes, yes it is. I put all my config files for my virtual hosts in a sub-dir of /etc/h

RE: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-28 Thread Daevid Vincent
> I don't like the way they changed the structure of the > httpd.conf file. Takes too long to get used to. :-p Yeah, but having the .conf files just dropped in a directory is pretty sexy... -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinf

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:05:14AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > Michael H. Warfield wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:04:07AM -0500, John Nichel wrote: > > > > > >>>when I tried it told me that the Apache needed to be greater than or > >>>equal > >>>to 2.0.44 - are you sure it needs to be

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-27 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:04:07AM -0500, John Nichel wrote: when I tried it told me that the Apache needed to be greater than or equal to 2.0.44 - are you sure it needs to be greater than ? I went back to 1.3 apache and redhat 7.3 at that point and installed php 4.3

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:04:07AM -0500, John Nichel wrote: > >when I tried it told me that the Apache needed to be greater than or equal > >to 2.0.44 - are you sure it needs to be greater than ? > >I went back to 1.3 apache and redhat 7.3 at that point and installed php > >4.3.2 fine > >Jim:-

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-26 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
Shaun T. Erickson wrote: John Nichel wrote: The gang at PHP recommend that you do NOT use any version of php with Apache 2.x. They recommend that you stick with Apache 1.3.x as 2.x support of php is beta at best. Now, if only RH distributed an Apache 1.3.x rpm for RH9 ... -ste Use the

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-26 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
John Nichel wrote: The gang at PHP recommend that you do NOT use any version of php with Apache 2.x. They recommend that you stick with Apache 1.3.x as 2.x support of php is beta at best. Now, if only RH distributed an Apache 1.3.x rpm for RH9 ... -ste -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscrib

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-26 Thread Ricky Boone
> The gang at PHP recommend that you do NOT use any version of php with > Apache 2.x. They recommend that you stick with Apache 1.3.x as 2.x > support of php is beta at best. I noticed that, but I have 3 Red Hat Linux 9 boxes that run Apache 2.x and PHP just fine... Can you not use the same (or

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-26 Thread John Nichel
oz0 wrote: Original Message - From: "Chad Udell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:49 AM Subject: Apache RPMs? Is there a newer Apache RPM for Redhat available anywhere? I am trying to update my PHP to 4.3.2 (I needed to add support for Sybase

Re: Apache on RH9

2003-06-25 Thread Cornelius Kölbel
Hello Thomas, that would be a very good point to start, I think. What services can be made running chrooted. Is there anywhere some good documentation? Why does a major distribution does not support this by default? Regards Cornelius T. Ribbrock wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:28:59PM -0500, Ed

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-25 Thread oz0
Original Message - From: "Chad Udell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:49 AM Subject: Apache RPMs? > Is there a newer Apache RPM for Redhat available anywhere? I am trying > to update my PHP to 4.3.2 (I needed to add support for Sybase, too),

Re: Apache RPMs?

2003-06-25 Thread David Hart
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 10:49, Chad Udell wrote: > Is there a newer Apache RPM for Redhat available anywhere? I am trying > to update my PHP to 4.3.2 (I needed to add support for Sybase, too), > but I can not 'make' as it complains that Apache needs to newer than > 2.0.44... this led me on the nev

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: I have the stock apache 1.3.27-2 RPM installed, and I'm trying to get suEXEC to work without success. In the virtual host file I have the DocumentRoot set to /home/rash/www and I have User and Group set. The configtest passes without a problem. However whenever I

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread John Nichel
Michael Schwendt wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 08:37:45 -0500, John Nichel wrote: -D DOC_ROOT="/var/www" -D GID_MID=100 -D HTTPD_USER="apache" -D LOG_EXEC="/var/log/httpd/suexec_log" -D SAFE_PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin" -D UID_MID=100 -D USERDIR_S

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 08:37:45 -0500, John Nichel wrote: > >>>-D DOC_ROOT="/var/www" > >>>-D GID_MID=100 > >>>-D HTTPD_USER="apache" > >>>-D LOG_EXEC="/var/log/httpd/suexec_log" > >>>-D SAFE_PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin" > >>>-D UID_MID=100 > >>>-

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread John Nichel
Michael Schwendt wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:40:47 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: -D DOC_ROOT="/var/www" -D GID_MID=100 -D HTTPD_USER="apache" -D LOG_EXEC="/var/log/httpd/suexec_log" -D SAFE_PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin" -D UID_MID=100 -D US

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:52:41AM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > I have the stock apache 1.3.27-2 RPM installed, and I'm trying to > get suEXEC to work without success. The most common problem I've seen is that the suexec binary is not marked suid by default, or least it wasn't back

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:40:47 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > -D DOC_ROOT="/var/www" > > -D GID_MID=100 > > -D HTTPD_USER="apache" > > -D LOG_EXEC="/var/log/httpd/suexec_log" > > -D SAFE_PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin" > > -D UID_MID=100 > > -

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: -D DOC_ROOT="/var/www" -D GID_MID=100 -D HTTPD_USER="apache" -D LOG_EXEC="/var/log/httpd/suexec_log" -D SAFE_PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin" -D UID_MID=100 -D USERDIR_SUFFIX="public_html" Ok, so I changed everything to match what that output says. I changed my Us

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Michael Schwendt wrote: Run "suexec -V" to find out. Okay, so that says: -D DOC_ROOT="/var/www" -D GID_MID=100 -D HTTPD_USER="apache" -D LOG_EXEC="/var/log/httpd/suexec_log" -D SAFE_PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin" -D UID_MID=100 -D USERDIR_SUFFIX="public_html" How do I overwrite that

Re: Apache problem on 7.3

2003-06-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:52:41 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > I have the stock apache 1.3.27-2 RPM installed, and I'm trying to > get suEXEC to work without success. In the virtual host file I have the > DocumentRoot set to /home/rash/www and

Re: Apache 2.0.40 --> 2.0.45 upgrade via RHN

2003-06-16 Thread Bill Tangren
Christian Campbell wrote: My mistake. A quick read of the advisory had me thinking it upgraded 2.0.40 to 2.0.45. Regardless, does anyone know if the RHN update to Apache 2.0.40 breaks anything? Anyone had good luck with the update? Christian Christian Campbell Systems Engineer Information Techn

RE: Apache 2.0.40 --> 2.0.45 upgrade via RHN

2003-06-16 Thread Christian Campbell
Linus Torvalds -Original Message- From: dnk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.40 --> 2.0.45 upgrade via RHN I think the latest is still 2.0.40 on RHN and liveupdate. - Original Message - From: "Chri

Re: Apache 2.0.40 --> 2.0.45 upgrade via RHN

2003-06-16 Thread dnk
I think the latest is still 2.0.40 on RHN and liveupdate. - Original Message - From: "Christian Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Red Hat Listserv (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:26 AM Subject: Apache 2.0.40 --> 2.0.45 upgrade via RHN > Has anyone experienc

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-06-06 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 03:04, Peter Kiem wrote: > > Yes the module is loaded, i put the app in the cgi-bin dir. > > I now get a "Premature end of script headers:" error > > Did you write the script on a Windows box and upload it to the server? If > so, make sure your script is in Unix file format

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-06-05 Thread Peter Kiem
> Yes the module is loaded, i put the app in the cgi-bin dir. > I now get a "Premature end of script headers:" error Did you write the script on a Windows box and upload it to the server? If so, make sure your script is in Unix file format and not Windows file format. vi file.pl :set ff=unix :wq

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-06-05 Thread pwallett
I'm running redhat 9 and trying to execute a perl script through a web browser http://host/file.pl and the file displays as text, how do i get my apache to recognize this extension? Has your Apache loaded the mod_perl module? -- Regards, +-+--

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-06-05 Thread Peter Kiem
> I'm running redhat 9 and trying to execute a perl script through a web > browser > > http://host/file.pl > > and the file displays as text, how do i get my apache to recognize this > extension? Has your Apache loaded the mod_perl module? -- Regards, +-+-

Re: Apache and Perl

2003-06-05 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi, On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm running redhat 9 and trying to execute a perl script through a web > browser > > http://host/file.pl > > and the file displays as text, how do i get my apache to recognize this > extension? You should run those scripts in /cgi-bin dir

Re: Apache patch needed... ?

2003-04-04 Thread nate
DuSTiN KRySaK said: > Anyone heard if Redhat will be releasing an update for Apache that will > patch the below issue? I'm certain redhat will, but probably not until april 8th. releasing a patch early allows some to reverse engineer the patch to figure out what the bug was(happened to samba recen

Re: Apache Cache - Repost

2003-04-02 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:59:49PM +0500, Hussain Akbar (Khi) wrote: > I tried enabling the cache feature of Apache by uncommenting the CacheRoot > etc directives, but get an error on each of the Cache line when I start > Apache. > > Any idea why? > > I am using Redhat 8.0 So you think we can r

RE: Apache Cache - Repost

2003-04-02 Thread Hussain Akbar (Khi)
Title: RE: Apache Cache - Repost (Why the heck are these emails being sent in HTML? I get a warning from the list not to do so. Outlook is showing that this is a text formatted message. Sigh!) Ok, first, the lines in my httpd.conf are: #CacheRoot "/etc/httpd/proxy" #CacheSize etc.

RE: Apache Cache - Repost

2003-04-02 Thread Hussain Akbar (Khi)
Title: RE: Apache Cache - Repost Um, sorry about that. I'll boot it up and send the error message. There's a Log file? (grin) okey dokey, will send that as well.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >