On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:10:59PM -0700, R.E. wrote:
> I just insatalled samba 3.0.0 and a weird thing
> happens when a client maps a share. I want to share
> the / root directory not the root home directory.
> When I map the shared directory it takes me to the
> root home directory istead of th
--- "R.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just insatalled samba 3.0.0 and a weird thing
> happens when a client maps a share. I want to share
> the / root directory not the root home directory.
> When I map the shared directory it takes me to the
> root home directory istead of the ro
Gordon,
I reached the same conclusion yesterday and I'm busy building the stuff
now ...
But it doesn't satisfy my curiosity ... ;-)
Where does this error message come from (dynamic loader, kernel, ???)
Is it due to incompatibilities between binaries generated by different
compiler versions ?
As
Paul Libert wrote:
I'm trying to get openLDAP 2.1 and Samba 3.0 on 7.2-enigma (reason :
this machines has Veritas VXfs and VXvm on it and thus I cannot upgrade
the kernel ...)
To achieve this, I've upgraded several packages with RawHide and RedHat
9.0 versions.
Dependencies were OK but now, my s
, October 07, 2003 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Issues
Richard Crawford wrote:
> I'm running Samba 2.3x on a RH 8 box and sharing out my wife's and my
> home directories so that we can access them from our Windows
computers.
>
> I use the "Map Networ
Richard Crawford wrote:
I'm running Samba 2.3x on a RH 8 box and sharing out my wife's and my
home directories so that we can access them from our Windows computers.
I use the "Map Network Drive" tool under Windows to connect my share on
the Linux box to my Windows computer as Drive Z:, so I can
Thomas Fortner wrote:
Hi Yoss,
I've used Samba on Solaris on both Sparc and Intel hardware and it works
almost identically to Samba on Linux. The locations of the Samba files
are different because Red Hat nicely integrates Samba into the OS. On
Solaris, the default is /usr/local/samba. You may ne
Hello Tom
Thanks a lot for your information,
Yes, you correct, we've spent a lot of money to buy Bill Gates's products.
Now, due to cost reduction, gradually we're migrating to Linux and I hope
we're supporting by RH community. Thanks again!
Best Regards
Yoss
Other side of Asia
-Orig
Yes the win98 is in the same workgroup defined in
smb.conf.
Although i've always been able to connect from another
workgroup on prior version of samba (on RH7.1)
--- John Nichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathalie Boulos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I configured samba-2.2.5-10 on RH8 for file
> s
Nathalie Boulos wrote:
Hello,
I configured samba-2.2.5-10 on RH8 for file sharing.
Access from win2k and winXP is smooth and with no
problem.
Access from win98 gives the following error:
Error 53: The computer name specified in the network
path cannot bee located. Make sure you are specifying
the
> i dont have to work with win98 anymore fortunately, so i
> might be wrong.
> But i think with win98 you have to check in the smb config
> file if you are
> encrypting the login or not. I dont remember the exact
> setting or if it
> would give you the error you are getting. But if the prio
At 05:43 AM 10/6/2003, you wrote:
Hello,
I configured samba-2.2.5-10 on RH8 for file sharing.
Access from win2k and winXP is smooth and with no
problem.
Access from win98 gives the following error:
Error 53: The computer name specified in the network
path cannot bee located. Make sure you are spe
You are missing a couple of things, mostly the setup on the xp machine,
check this out
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=windows+xp+samba+pdc&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-
8&oe=utf-8&selm=slrnb0rk25.6ua.sy_nttvr%40gurcragntba.pbz&rnum=2 , and
everything should work fine.
Barry Johnson
Systems Administrator
In your smb.conf make sure you have the samba work group the same as
other computers on your lan and restart the samba services.
James Williams
Network Systems Engineer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Simran Hansrai
Sent: Monday, Septembe
Hi Guys,
Thanks to Ed Wilts for pointing me to the right direction. In my smb.conf
for samba I turned on the option for it to act as a WINS server and added
the ip for my redhat box in the tcp/ip wins section of my windows nic and
it works now :) \\hostname ...
Thanks again,
--
Simran H.
[
Update: It does seem to work with \\hostname.domain.org but not \\hostname...
however, when I try http://hostname that seems to work perfectly.. I am missing
something??
Thanks
Simran Hansrai wrote:
Actually I do have my search domian setup correctly, under the tcp/ip
setting
Actually I do have my search domian setup correctly, under the tcp/ip settings
of my nic - Advanced - Append these DNS suffixes has my domain name in their.
This is why my web services work without me manually adding .domain.org
everytime I need to access my website. Could this be on the WINS
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:34:45AM -0700, Simran Hansrai wrote:
> I have a redhat 8.0 box that has samba running on it and a solaris 9 box
> that is running dns services. Now, when I access my samba account from
> my windows box it works just fine when I do //192.168.0.x from
> start->run, howe
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:50:05AM -0400, Patrick Cable II wrote:
> Anywho, I'm wondering if the samba config tools will be any
> different with the arrival of Samba 3.0.0, and if so is there any
> projected date for release? I am working on a project with my
> school district and i
Why not just run apache on the Linux box? It would far more stable on Linux
than windows, and it's probably already installed and started. Remember
software is only as strong as the OS it's running on.
-Original Message-
From: Rene's Caltech Email [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Did you set the permissions on the folders?
Buck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rene's Caltech Email
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba writable share
im having trouble creating a writable shar
problem solved...it was the xp client that was the problem...i mapped the
drive through console instead of using explorer which didnt work. xp has
alot of quirks
--
-Rene Enriquez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The devil will find work for idle hands to do!"
-The Smiths
--
redhat-list mailing list
uns
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 20:25, Rhugga wrote:
> Rene's Caltech Email wrote:
>
> >thanks to those that helped with samba...it worked!
> >now i have another problem...iis webserver using the samba share as its
> >wwwroot directory...iis sucked and i installed apache server for windows
> >and now i ha
Rene's Caltech Email wrote:
thanks to those that helped with samba...it worked!
now i have another problem...iis webserver using the samba share as its
wwwroot directory...iis sucked and i installed apache server for windows
and now i have to configure it to use the samba share or private ip. i
If you're working with Windows clients, my experience has been that they
tend to try and log in with whatever login info they have and/or prompt
the user for login info, which generally results in failed authenticated
logins instead of guest logins. The following in your global section:
map to gue
guest = ok
read only = ok
-Original Message-
From: Rene's Caltech Email [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba share auth
what configuration do i have to do so no authentication and password is
asked for in a samba sha
Hi,
Please try this
[EBOOKERS_TEST]
path = /var/www/html/
read only = Yes
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Rene's Caltech Email [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba share auth
what configuration
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 18:27, Krautkramer, John wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I thought about writing something like that but was hoping there was something
> already available, possibly similar to the web site monitor Webalizer.
>
> I'd like to who is using what and when.
I'm not really using anything.
Hi Jason,
I thought about writing something like that but was hoping there was something
already available, possibly similar to the web site monitor Webalizer.
I'd like to who is using what and when.
Thanks,
John
PS: I'm new to using this list. How are you supposed to 'reply' to a posting? I
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 17:30, Krautkramer, John wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of a usage monitor for Samba to run on RedHat 9.0? I'd like to keep
> track of who is using what resources. The RedHat machine is setup as a server for a
> group of WinNT and Win200 users.
What kind of statistics ar
Cleber P. de Souza wrote:
I have been configuring smb.conf, but the system don't add automatic users
to the system.
The add user script has been configured like this:
Security = share
Password server = 192.168.1.1
Add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -g users -M -c "NT User" -s /dev/null %u
&& /usr/
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:23:40 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to enable two users from our windows domain to access particular
> share from my samba server. I am new to linux ... please help me out.
>
> I'd setup public share and configured samba long time before. It works fin
Hmm, looks like i got it working by playing with the config file a bit more.
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m multiport --dport 135,139,445
-j ACCEPT
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -i eth0 -p udp -m multiport --dport
135,137,138,139,445 -j ACCEPT
those are the two lines i added, which seem
Ian L wrote:
At 05:43 PM 9/15/2003, you wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Ian L wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
> server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It seems to be working,
although i
> havent finished setting up all the user perm
Hi,
>-Original Message-
>From: Ian L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:33 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: samba and iptables
>
>
>Hey all,
>
>I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
>server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It se
At 05:43 PM 9/15/2003, you wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Ian L wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
> server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It seems to be working, although i
> havent finished setting up all the user permissions. When i
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Ian L wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
> server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It seems to be working, although i
> havent finished setting up all the user permissions. When i turn iptables
> off, i get a p
Hi all,
Just got back in town, I have been gone all week, and I just wanted to
say thanks to Ben and Fred for the info:
THANKS!
Oh and Jason, no I am not preping for the RHCE, I wish I was. Right now
I just don't have the time. But what I am doing is trying to get back
into using Linu
see http://rhce2b.com/
Regards,
Vitaly Karasik, RHCE
***
Information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual
or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:06, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> >
> > > Removed my resolv.conf file off of Linux Box.
> >
> > I have no idea why you would do that. Anybody else know?
>
> He's prepping for the troubleshooting section of the RHCE exam. ;-)
*grin*
I'm getting ready
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:06, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
> > Removed my resolv.conf file off of Linux Box.
>
> I have no idea why you would do that. Anybody else know?
He's prepping for the troubleshooting section of the RHCE exam. ;-)
--
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consultin
> Hi all,
>
> Removed my resolv.conf file off of Linux Box.
I have no idea why you would do that. Anybody else know?
>
> Added two entires to my IPTABLES file to open up ports 137-139 for tcp &
> udp.
> This is the one that I really have a question on. Here or the two
> lines that I added.
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 03:04:25PM -0500, cajun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm back again. This time I am a lot closer. Just have a couple of
> things I need help with and some real good advice. This will be kind of
> long so please bare with me. This is a recap of everything that I have
> done t
Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
Lee,
Well I'm thinking that maybe the firewall is blocking the ports that
SMB uses. I'm not sure what those ports are, there are several on both
TCP and UDP. To quickly test to see if it is the firewall I would
either open it up or disable it entirely. I don't know how yo
> Lee,
>
> Well I'm thinking that maybe the firewall is blocking the ports that
> SMB uses. I'm not sure what those ports are, there are several on both
> TCP and UDP. To quickly test to see if it is the firewall I would
> either open it up or disable it entirely. I don't know how your
> network is
al Message-
From: cajun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
Hi Nick,
Yes they are, actually right now, I am trying to load Samba on the
same
machine as I am running the firewall. I'm using my Linux
ssage-
From: cajun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
teddy wrote:
Also their is a tool that u can use its one of the packages in
redhat9 its
real easy to use should be in set
: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
teddy wrote:
>Also their is a tool that u can use its one of the packages in
redhat9 its
>real easy to use should be in settings somewhere
>
>
>-- Original Message ---
>Fro
teddy wrote:
Also their is a tool that u can use its one of the packages in redhat9 its
real easy to use should be in settings somewhere
-- Original Message ---
From: "teddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:47:37 -0400
Subject
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:07:35 -0500
Subject: Re: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
> Jason,
>
> There is no SWAT module for webmin SWAT comes with SAMBA. In
> RH9 it is not part of the default install. do this: goto the
> install directory > cd ./rh9/RedHat/RPMS ins
Also their is a tool that u can use its one of the packages in redhat9 its
real easy to use should be in settings somewhere
-- Original Message ---
From: "teddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:47:37 -0400
Subject: RE: Samba
You have to make sure you create Samba users its not the same as linux users.
Maybe thats why you are getting login failures.
-- Original Message ---
From: "Jason Tesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:47:53 -0500
S
in. That works well.
>
> Jason Tesser
> Web/Multimedia Programmer
> Northland Baptist Bible College
> (715)324-6900 ext. 3055
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Kishfy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 7:26 AM
> To: [E
]
Subject: RE: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
I'm not sure what your exact problem is but Wade mentioned using SWAT
to help you configure Samba. In my humble opinion SWAT actually makes
the configuration seem more complicated as it presents you with so
many options that you probably don't need. If you
ptember 03, 2003 11:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
I've noticed this error when using secure passwordsdoesn't make
sense to me that the smbclient can't use the secure passwords, but I
think this is your issue. I had the same error. I use SWAT,
I've noticed this error when using secure passwordsdoesn't make
sense to me that the smbclient can't use the secure passwords, but I
think this is your issue. I had the same error. I use SWAT, so I went
to the section.at work right now my Linux setup is at home, but I
turned off the secur
Hugh Taylor wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing a strange problem on the two RH 9 machines upon which we
loaded samba [ both the RH production samba release (2.7.something)
and also on the 3.0 Rawhide samba beta release ].
Smbmount ( or mount -t smbfs) has worked for a few years on old
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing a strange problem on the two RH 9 machines upon
which we loaded samba [ both the RH production samba release
(2.7.something) and also on the 3.0 Rawhide samba beta release ].
Smbmount ( or mount -t smbfs) has worked for a few years on
older machines runni
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: George Nicholls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 12:26 PM
> To: redhat List
> Subject: Re: Samba Issues
>
>
> Txs for the advice; I have followed it and now the win printer dialog
> box shows "read
OH I know what that it but I can't remember where to fix it. The back of my
brain is corrupt.
Try Google for cups octet stream
-Original Message-
From: George Nicholls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 12:26 PM
To: redhat List
Subject: Re: Samba Issues
Tx
Txs for the advice; I have followed it and now the win printer dialog
box shows "ready", however, no pages are spooling.
My error log shows the following
*
print_job: Unsupport format 'application/octet-stream'
Hint: Do you have the raw
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 10:11, George Nicholls wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I have a RH9 server running samba. I wish to use it for printing
> requests from win 2000 clients and also as a simple directory share.
>
> I have set a printer up and can connect and print to it from a RH9
> client so I know th
Try this one.
use client driver = yes
Windows will try to get the queue status from the server and it can't. This
is supposed to tell the server to let the client know to use it's own driver
for the status. This fixed it for me under winnt 4.
-Original Message-
From: George Nicholls [mai
bEEnHeX wrote:
Hi there,
Hey there yourself.
guys, I have three questions, I hope that if anybody could be so kind and
help me with any of them ...
I haven't seen you on the list before. Did you read the welcoming letter?
Please always specify which versions of things you are running and don't
I can see this is not
the problem here... because I still get those messages, so I'm a bit
confused about what is really the problem.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:
do you have a user created in samba for the win2k box? you can tell samba to allow no
password
Jason Tesser
Web/Multimedia Programmer
Northland Baptist Bible College
(715)324-6900 ext. 3055
-Original Message-
From: SarahTF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:04
The only thing I can think of is that win98 didn't encrypt passwords, and
win2k does. Check your configuration file to ensure that encryption is
turned on and see if that helps.
Ben
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, SarahTF wrote:
> I had SAMBA working with RH9 and Win98. Now I have upgraded the Windows
>
Why you don't install the Unix / LPD feature on winsoz2000?
In this way you can forget Samba and print from Linux box with a simple LPR
command.
Ciao
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Yes I believe that is the problem, samba may require a username/password to
gain access to printers, what i did was create a user on my linux box and
create the same user on my winxp box with the same passwords and make sure
they are part of the same workgroup and when I goto My Network Places s
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 13:11, Alex wrote:
> Aug 6 17:52:50 main nmbd[17890]: This response was from IP
> 192.168.254.60, reporting an IP address of 192.168.254.60.
> Aug 6 18:28:12 main nmbd[17890]: [2003/08/06 18:28:12, 0]
> nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(112)
> Aug 6 18:28:12 main
.
~smbinyon
sorry for the top post but thought I keep it straight.
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba errors
I know what OS LEVEL does and in my experience it's enough to put a value
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 22:40, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > > > I did exactly that a couple of days ago and found that I needed to add
> > > >
> > > > kernel oplocks = no
> > > >
> > > > in /etc/samba/smb.conf. Once I did that the errors stopped.
> > >
> > > Isn't there a significant performance hit f
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 21:11, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 21:36, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 20:19, Gerry Doris wrote:
> > > > There's a kernel oplock setting in samba you can change. I don't have
> > > > time to go into it now, but paste your error message into googl
> On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 21:36, Bret Hughes wrote:
>> On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 20:19, Gerry Doris wrote:
>> > > There's a kernel oplock setting in samba you can change. I don't
>> have
>> > > time to go into it now, but paste your error message into google, it
>> > > will give you a heap of references
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 21:36, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 20:19, Gerry Doris wrote:
> > > There's a kernel oplock setting in samba you can change. I don't have
> > > time to go into it now, but paste your error message into google, it
> > > will give you a heap of references to it.
>
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 20:19, Gerry Doris wrote:
> >
> >
> > Gerry Doris wrote:
> >
> >> I get one of these error messages about every 30 minutes in
> >> /var/log/samba/log.smbd. Everything seems to be working fine though.
> >> What are they trying to tell me???
> >>
> >>
> >> [2003/07/26 09:31:27,
>
>
> Gerry Doris wrote:
>
>> I get one of these error messages about every 30 minutes in
>> /var/log/samba/log.smbd. Everything seems to be working fine though.
>> What are they trying to tell me???
>>
>>
>> [2003/07/26 09:31:27, 0]
>> smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287)
>
> There'
Gerry Doris wrote:
I get one of these error messages about every 30 minutes in
/var/log/samba/log.smbd. Everything seems to be working fine though.
What are they trying to tell me???
[2003/07/26 09:31:27, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287)
There's a kernel oplock setting i
> I'm getting "Connection Refused" from the Linux box
> when I try to connect. It APPEARS that the problem
> is that Windows isn't accepting the passwords; anyone
Take a look at the /etc/samba/smb.conf file and see if you have a line
that looks like:
encrypt passwords = yes
Win95 did not encryp
Unfortunately, neither machine is local to me
at the moment, so I can't verify, but I believe
it is in a domain.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Haney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Samba c
Ward William E DLDN wrote:
> I'm having a problem getting a Linux box to connect
> to a Windows Server 2000 via Samba.
>
> I'm getting "Connection Refused" from the Linux box
> when I try to connect. It APPEARS that the problem
> is that Windows isn't accepting the passwords; anyone
> have the sl
You've not given much to go on. Was the box originally a Windows NT/2K server? Was
it part of a domain? Can you view the contents of the partition from the box itself?
i.e. without Samba?
-Original Message-
From: dch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 7/16/2
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 22:14, Scarletdown wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here?
>
> I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share
> files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO router.
>
> Problem is, this system is not showing up in Network
> Neigh
On 16 Jun 2003 at 9:00, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> Scarletdown wrote:
>
> > Would rebooting both 98 machines help, perhaps?
>
> Possibly, you could also tell samba to be the master browser for the
> workgroup. That might help.
>
It did turn out to just be a matter of waiting. Not long after I
If that doesn't work, make sure your Windows machine has the same
workgroup name defined. Also, you might have to enable WINS support on
both the client and the server. Sometimes other protocols like IPX
interfere. Make sure you have unused protocols removed.
> Scarletdown wrote:
>
>> On 15 Ju
Scarletdown wrote:
On 15 Jun 2003 at 13:03, Roger Harrington wrote:
You don't have a period between the 1 and 127 in your hosts.allow line
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scarletdown
Sent: Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
On 15 Jun 2003 at 13:03, Roger Harrington wrote:
> You don't have a period between the 1 and 127 in your hosts.allow line
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scarletdown
> Sent: Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
You don't have a period between the 1 and 127 in your hosts.allow line
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scarletdown
Sent: Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference
Can anyon
What error message do you get?
This problem may be related to the windows registry patch you need to apply
for certain smb configurations. Just do a google for samba windows registry
and I'm sure you'll find what you are looking for.
-Original Message-
From: root_sharif [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
* root sharif
> but still i don't know how to access my Windows BOXES from my linux box.
> or ...the vise versa...
> what are the next steps.. i should follow???
> pls let me know.
I'll recommend you to read one of the many tutorials on samba laying
around on the Internet or on your own /usr/share
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 12:22, root_sharif wrote:
> but still i don't know how to access my Windows BOXES from my linux box.
Are your Windows boxes also in a workgroup called WORKGROUP?
For accessing the Windows boxes from Linux, try smbclient (for a FTP like UI) or, if
you want to mount them like
bulent wrote:
I need working samba.cfg. Can anyone send me live samba.cfg file?
If you use Redhat's distro of Samba you already have a working config
file. Check /etc/smb.conf. The default workgroup is WORKGROUP. All you
have to do is add a Linux user to Samba's password database and you're off
Edward Dekkers wrote:
bulent wrote:
Hello friends,
I need working samba.cfg. Can anyone send me live samba.cfg file?
thank you..
I'm sure you mean smb.conf?
Type 'sample smb.conf' in to google.com
7580 hits, all links on the first page have working examples.
Regards,
Ed.
Thanks Ed
i
I recently upgraded to Red Hat 9 from 7.3. From the System Settings | Server
Settings | Samba Server menu, I tried to look at my settings through
redhat-config-samba, but it would crash. The solution was to rename (never
delete) /etc/samba/smb.conf and to use redhat-config-samba to create a new o
bulent wrote:
Hello friends,
I need working samba.cfg. Can anyone send me live samba.cfg file?
thank you..
I'm sure you mean smb.conf?
Type 'sample smb.conf' in to google.com
7580 hits, all links on the first page have working examples.
Regards,
Ed.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubs
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 21:26, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 29-May-2003/21:45 -0500, Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 19:47, Ian Dobson wrote:
> >> Use a windows 2000 server as the PDC containing all the users and have the
> >> home directories on a linux box running s
On 29-May-2003/21:45 -0500, Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 19:47, Ian Dobson wrote:
>> Use a windows 2000 server as the PDC containing all the users and have the
>> home directories on a linux box running smb and also some data direcotries,
>> these would all be authe
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 19:47, Ian Dobson wrote:
> Use a windows 2000 server as the PDC containing all the users and have the
> home directories on a linux box running smb and also some data direcotries,
> these would all be authenticated back to the pdc and I wouldn't have to
> create users on the l
ginal Message -
From: "Andrew Loughnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:38 AM
Subject: RE: Samba/Winbind
> It would be good to know what you want to do with winbind so as we can
help you more effectively. eg squid auth
Bill Tangren wrote:
I get this repeatedly in the logs for samba:
smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287) Failed to setup
RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler : 136 Time(s)
It doesn't seem to affect the functioning of samba, but I'd like to know
what is causing this error and how to get rid of it
1 - 100 of 800 matches
Mail list logo
