mrtg simply creates html files with refresh rate=300s i.e. 5minutes.. if you
take a look into it's source you'll find it there.. another point, edit
your /etc/crontab file.. there mrtg is mentioned to be executed every 5 minutes.
cheers!
ritesh
Quoting Budi Febrianto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm
Budi Febrianto said:
> I'm playing around with MRTG, installed it, setup and run it. And it
> doesn't works :)). So, I decided to disabled it. And try it again later.
>
> I run ps -A, and I can't find any MRTG in the list.
> Check the services, can't find one.
it is called from /etc/crontab on my
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:01:29 +0700 "Budi Febrianto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm playing around with MRTG, installed it, setup and run it. And it doesn't
> works :)). So, I decided to disabled it. And try it again later.
>
> I run ps -A, and I can't find any MRTG in the list.
> Check the servi
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:01:29AM +0700, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> I'm playing around with MRTG, installed it, setup and run it. And it
> doesn't works :)).
Yes it does :)
> I run ps -A, and I can't find any MRTG in the list.
Probably running as a cron job every so many minutes.
--
Hal Burgi
I'm playing around with MRTG, installed it, setup and run it. And it doesn't
works :)). So, I decided to disabled it. And try it again later.
I run ps -A, and I can't find any MRTG in the list.
Check the services, can't find one.
But, I can see that in the /var/www/html/mrtg/stats (where I put al
This is a Redhat issue, not LinNeighborhood. IIRC, you need to change
the permissions of /usr/bin/smbmnt and /usr/bin/smbumount to allow
execution by a user. This has security implications, though, so be aware.
Irv
Jim Hale wrote:
Thanks Irv!
I have it working great if I'm logged in as root -
g: http://halelearning.no-ip.info
Ya'll Come Visit Us Ya Hear? :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Irv Cobb
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LinNeighborhood - NEXT Stupid Question...
Jim
half Of Patrick Nelson
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:45 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: LinNeighborhood - NEXT Stupid Question...
someone wrote:
->>>>
> Found the RPM for Redhat 8.0 and it installed with no errors. :)
>
> Now - how to
someone wrote:
-
> Found the RPM for Redhat 8.0 and it installed with no errors. :)
>
> Now - how to I run/access it? I don't know where the RPM put it and it's
> not showing up in any of the (KDE) menus. :/
>
> Thanks! :)
>
> Jim Hale
-
where did you fin
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 11:31, Jim Hale wrote:
> Found the RPM for Redhat 8.0 and it installed with no errors. :)
>
> Now - how to I run/access it? I don't know where the RPM put it and it's
> not showing up in any of the (KDE) menus. :/
>
> Thanks! :)
>
> Jim Hale
You should be able to either ma
Jim Hale wrote:
Found the RPM for Redhat 8.0 and it installed with no errors. :)
Now - how to I run/access it? I don't know where the RPM put it and it's
not showing up in any of the (KDE) menus. :/
Thanks! :)
From a terminal, "LinNeighborhood" works for me. Or you can right
click/create new
Found the RPM for Redhat 8.0 and it installed with no errors. :)
Now - how to I run/access it? I don't know where the RPM put it and it's
not showing up in any of the (KDE) menus. :/
Thanks! :)
Jim Hale
---
'Man Cannot Live By Bread Alone - He Must Also Have Peanut Butter' -
Duffey,1986
---
The
On 13 Oct 2002, Peter Kiem wrote:
> I have rsa2 SSH logins running now. I can see this is a great idea as
> even if the attacker KNOWS your root password they STILL cannot get in
> without your private rsa key, right?
That's sort of correct. Root can, in fact, connect to an existing
ssh-agent s
Hi all,
I have rsa2 SSH logins running now. I can see this is a great idea as
even if the attacker KNOWS your root password they STILL cannot get in
without your private rsa key, right?
Is there some way to make it easier to run ssh-agent? I was trying to
put the eval `ssh-agent'; ssh-add into
> wrong ! With the public key and the root password known,
> and files appropriately configured, the "attacker" won't
> be prompted for a password.
>
> If the root password is known in any senario then "is all over" !
Can you clarify what you mean here?
If you force key
> If you have it set up like A -> B where A is your workstation and B is
> your server so that A has your private key and B has your public key
> what happens if you now want to log into another remote server C (A -> B
> -> C)?
Use agent forwarding. It will forward your key authentication-challe
On 13 Oct 2002, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have rsa2 SSH logins running now. I can see this is a great idea as
> even if the attacker KNOWS your root password they STILL cannot get in
> without your private rsa key, right?
wrong ! With the public key and the root password known
> > Again, only if you create keys that have no passphrase.
>
> If you are using keys, you only need to fully trust your local SSH client.
A
> remote server can't compromise your public key or your passphrase, even if
> you are using the compromised server to log into other servers (and are
u
they need the key and then to guess the password
Simon
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 02:31, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might seem a stupid question but I often see people recommending that
> you never log into SSH with password but rather use keys.
>
> Doesn't this create
> > At least if you are using passwords they need to work out the other
> > computer's passwords before they can SSH into them?
>
> Again, only if you create keys that have no passphrase.
Also, if you are using a password to log into a server that's been
compromised, they don't need to work out
On 10/10/02 9:31 PM, "Peter Kiem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might seem a stupid question but I often see people recommending that
> you never log into SSH with password but rather use keys.
>
> Doesn't this create a security issue
key file then your system has
probably been horribly compromised anyway.
Cameron.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kiem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 11:31
> To: Red Hat Mailing List
> Subject: Stupid question about SSH keys and security
>
Hi,
This might seem a stupid question but I often see people recommending that
you never log into SSH with password but rather use keys.
Doesn't this create a security issue as if someone manages to break into one
computer you own they can simply SSH straight into the other systems wi
But unlike mandrake RH7.1 and newer won't boot from cd on older machines where
mandrake still will cuz they
haven't gone to the 2.88FD format in their iso. If their was a way for me to bypass
that in a laptop that
doesn't have a floppy drive (external or internal) or the money to buy a new one
And incomplete gui tools at that
-eric
- Original Message -
From: "loophole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And to think of it
> -they are replacing some great text based tools with
> gui based ones.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
i agree. what rh is doing is driving users craze.
every release they add new programs and exludes some
(like linuxconf, rp3-config etc.). And to think of it
-they are replacing some great text based tools with
gui based ones. they are beginning to look like
mandrake :)
=
--
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 17:58, daniel wrote:
> this may sound like a stupid question
> but why are there releases at all?
> isn't linux an evolving thing?
> if each release just includes new software packages
> why not just release them as updates to older versions?
> w
this may sound like a stupid question
but why are there releases at all?
isn't linux an evolving thing?
if each release just includes new software packages
why not just release them as updates to older versions?
what exactly requires an upgrade
if everything, including the kernel c
>
>Regards, Hugh
>
>--
>Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:49 AM
>>
>> Hello people,
>>
>> Maybe a stupid questi
On 2002.06.07 09:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> Maybe a stupid question but can anybody tell me clearly what the
> difference(s)
> is (are) between functions and library routines ??
See http://www.foldoc.org.
Functions are components of a structured program.
e,
>
> Maybe a stupid question but can anybody tell me clearly what the
> difference(s)
> is (are) between functions and library routines ??
>
> Thanx
>
>
> patrick
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft
Hello people,
Maybe a stupid question but can anybody tell me clearly what the difference(s)
is (are) between functions and library routines ??
Thanx
patrick
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman
/*
To everyone: not sure what this list's policy is on "thank you" posts,
but I'd rather be thought a rude fool who didn't bother to find out than
a rude fool who didn't bother to find out and didn't say thank you :o).
So, thanks for your help. There's some stuff I need to iron out, but
it's
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Joachim Breuer wrote:
> Or you have the "new" xinetd:
> - 'man xinetd'
> - configuration is a collection of files (one per service) in
>/etc/xinetd.d
> - services are turned on/off by the configuration statement
>'disable = yes'/'disable = no' in their respective f
Mark Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How on earth do you start ftpd? Simply typing "ftpd" into a shell
> comes up with "ftpd: command not found" - the same occurs with
> variations of capitalisation like "Ftpd" and "FTPD". Various guesses
> like "start ftpd" and "init ftpd" don't work e
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Mark Gallagher wrote:
> I feel a right dolt for asking this, but I can't think of anything.
>
> My knowledge of Linux (indeed, UNIX in general) is suficient for me to
> use it for day-to-day stuff, but more detailed things leave me far behind.
>
> Things like starting ftpd
> How on earth do you start ftpd? Simply typing "ftpd" into a
> shell comes
> up with "ftpd: command not found" - the same occurs with
> variations of
> capitalisation like "Ftpd" and "FTPD". Various guesses like "start
> ftpd" and "init ftpd" don't work either.
>
> Any ideas?
depends on
I feel a right dolt for asking this, but I can't think of anything.
My knowledge of Linux (indeed, UNIX in general) is suficient for me to
use it for day-to-day stuff, but more detailed things leave me far behind.
Things like starting ftpd. That's right.
How on earth do you start ftpd? Simpl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 10 May 2002 02:14 pm, daniel wrote:
> wanting to keep my conscience happy, i'm trying to set a up a personal
> up2date server that i can access from a single location to keep all of
> my linux boxes current. here are the steps that i've wor
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 11:14, daniel wrote:
> wanting to keep my conscience happy, i'm trying to set a up a personal
> up2date server that i can access from a single location to keep all of my
> linux boxes current.
...
> 1. set up an ftp server on one box that's visible to the world.
Any FTP serv
wanting to keep my conscience happy, i'm trying to set a up a personal
up2date server that i can access from a single location to keep all of my
linux boxes current. here are the steps that i've worked out in my brain
that i *think* should do what i want... if anyone can fill me in on any
gaps i
You don't necessarily need the ones marked SRPM...those are all the source
file RPMs.
You do need the other two.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Geoffrey Lane wrote:
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/iso/i386
>
> Sorry for the stupid question, there are 4 files here to downlo
Geoffrey Lane wrote:
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/iso/i386
>
> Sorry for the stupid question, there are 4 files here to download. What
> are they? I know they are all CD images but do I need all 4 to install
> Redhat? What do they all contain?
MD5SUM
enigma-
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/iso/i386
Sorry for the stupid question, there are 4 files here to download. What
are they? I know they are all CD images but do I need all 4 to install
Redhat? What do they all contain?
___
Redhat-list
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 23/12/00 at 10:07 Charles Galpin wrote:
>Philippe
>
>This is an FAQ. It has been covered before on this list several times. and
>I believe is also on the Red Hat site as well.
>
>You need to first upgrade to rpm-3.05.*
>
>Then it can install rpm-4.0.
]]On Behalf Of Philippe Moutarlier
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: stupid question about upgrading rpm
Well,
this is where the problem is : to install rpm-4.0*.rpm using
rpm 3.* does not work. Basically it reports that my version
of rpm (3.*) is not able
Philippe
This is an FAQ. It has been covered before on this list several times. and
I believe is also on the Red Hat site as well.
You need to first upgrade to rpm-3.05.*
Then it can install rpm-4.0.* just fine
BTW, this is *not* a stupid question, and is clearly a sticky problem that
would
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: stupid question about upgrading rpm
I haven't been able to figure this out either. I think the only choices
are to compile from scratch, or to do something like what
I am trying to install the new rpm as the old one doesn't install
most of the new packages.
So now I am trying to install the rpm for "rpm" and guess what :
I need the new rpm to install it :=(
What is the right way to make the transition (I guess I could always
recompile ..)
Thanks
Philippe
hehe. stupid me answers this (supposedly) stupid question, then realizes
someone else has already provided the correct answer. doh!
So don't feel bad - this is the kind of effort the list needs. Lately it
seems the quality/volume of responses has dropped (but this is only my
opinion,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:35:11PM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
> close - it's /etc/redhat-release
That's what you get when trying to answer Linux questions while sitting
on front of a Solaris box... ;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
"Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"
close - it's /etc/redhat-release
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:40:13AM -0600, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
> > How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
> > machine?
>
> There is a file in /etc:
>
> cat /etc/rh-release
> (no guarant
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question
When you log in usually the version comes up.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Skrogstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Red Hat Mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:40 AM
Subject:
When you log in usually the version comes up.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Skrogstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Red Hat Mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:40 AM
Subject: Stupid question
> How the heck to I
If you haven't changed your /etc/issue file, the information is usually
present on the console screen (text console) prior to login, and if you
haven't changed your /etc/issue.net file, it'll be presented prior to
login when you telnet to the box.
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
>
uname -a?
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Skrogstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:40 AM
> To: Red Hat Mailing list
> Subject: Stupid question
>
> How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:40:13AM -0600, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
> How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
> machine?
There is a file in /etc:
cat /etc/rh-release
(no guarantee with regard to correct spelling...)
HTH,
Thomas
--
"Look, Ma, no obsolete q
Look at the file /etc/issue.
Scott Skrogstad wrote:
>
> How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
> machine?
>
> Scott Skrogstad
> Computer Integration Inc,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 800-522-3475 Phone
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mail
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
> How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
> machine?
cat /etc/redhat-release
rpm -ql redhat-release
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
> machine?
"cat /etc/redhat-release"
best
rickf
--
Rick Forrister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Definition: Honest Politician: Once bought, stays bought."
Thanxs Rick I knew it was easy. But that is really easy...
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Rick Forrister wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
> > machine?
cat /etc/issue or cat /etc/redhat-release
for example:
# cat /etc/issue
Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
Kernel 2.2.16-3 on an i586
/etc/issue gets written by rc.local every time the system boots.
__
Larry Grover, PhD
Assoc Prof of Physiology
Marshall Univ Sch of Med
On Thu, 02 Nov 2000
How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
machine?
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/red
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 08:19:21AM -0400, Ward William E PHDN wrote:
[...]
> That said, there is nothing that says a Winmodem can't run under
> Linux... except that you need to have knowledge of how the hardware
> hooks into the software DSP. And that tends to be proprietary.
[...]
> And what m
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, rpjday wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> > > Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular
> > > modem?
> > >
> > WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's
>
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Peter Massey wrote:
> >On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> >> Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a
> regular
> >> modem?
> >>
> >WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's
> >replaced by software that EMULATES the mi
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This describes Plug 'n Play not "soft" modems
>
> Linux supports Plug 'n Play
>
True. Howeve,r it's also true of "soft" modems. :-)
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Steve Dixon wrote:
> Actually our Lexmark that we have isn't.
>
Hmm...last I heard most of them were WinPrinters -- they are / were
very limited under Linux.
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
ing to interface
with a moving target, in terms of what kernel to use.
Oh well.
Bill Ward
-Original Message-
From: Peter Massey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @nswcphdn.navy.mil
Subject: RE: Stupid que
ace, thus making it impossible to
develop a single LINUX driver. That's why only one or two have been made to
work...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake McHenry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 3:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
But VMware is awesome!
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
I know! Winabagels! They're wheels that only work on Winnebagos. :-)
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Stranger things have happened but none stranger than this. Steven W. Orr-
Does your driver's license say Organ Donor?Black holes are where God \
--
%-> How about the WinPC? It would have no hardware at all, just
%-> software that
%-> emulates all the hardware. Now wouldn't that upset Intel? And
%-> that might
%-> lead to WinMicrosoft .. .
A.k.a. VMWare ;-)
-- Juha
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs
%-> one wonders what the next world's dumbest invention will be.
%-> winmonitors?
%-> winkeyboards? wincd-roms? winhard-drives? god, i wish i was being
%-> facetious. sigh.
Well, hrrmm... I'm reasonably certain that the next generation of external
modems which utilise the V.92 standard will b
>On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
>> Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a
regular
>> modem?
>>
>WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's
>replaced by software that EMULATES the missing hardware, thus making
>the processor do all the
This describes Plug 'n Play not "soft" modems
Linux supports Plug 'n Play
Jake McHenry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/06/2000 03:23:27 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Stupid question about winmodems
A regular mo
Actually our Lexmark that we have isn't.
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, rpjday wrote:
> >
> > one wonders what the next world's dumbest invention will be. winmonitors?
> > winkeyboards? wincd-roms? winhard-drives? god, i wish i was being
> > facetious. sigh.
> >
> They've alre
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Stupid question about winmodems
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> > Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a
regular
> > modem?
> >
> WinModem is missin
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, rpjday wrote:
>
> one wonders what the next world's dumbest invention will be. winmonitors?
> winkeyboards? wincd-roms? winhard-drives? god, i wish i was being
> facetious. sigh.
>
They've already got WinPrinters. What do you think the Lexmark
printers are? :-/
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular
> modem?
> SK
>From one Stephen King to another (imagine that!)
winmodems are missing hardware that the windows OS makes up for. Thus
winmodems need windows to operate and don
A regular modem has hard set com ports and IRQ's, usually set by jumpers
or not adjustable at all. A winmodem rely's on the windows operating
system to determine what com port it uses when you install the modem, and
it get's set temporaroly in a type of flash memory on the modem. This is
why win
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> > Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular
> > modem?
> >
> WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's
> replaced by software that EMULATES the missing ha
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular
> modem?
>
WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's
replaced by software that EMULATES the missing hardware, thus making
the processor do all the work tha
s
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:04:35 -0700
> From: Stephen King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Stupid question about winmodems
> Resent-Date: 6 Jul 2000 15:06:45 -
> Resent-Fro
"Stephen King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/06/2000 11:04:35 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Stupid question about winmodems
Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular
modem?
SK
--
To unsu
Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular
modem?
SK
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
when i use emacs to edit a file it creates a backup file with the same
name and a '~' at the end of it. the original file is the one with the
'~'. my question now is, is there anywasy to force emacs to create more
files with '~' at the end. say for instance i do:
emacs test, edit that file and th
n these two events. :-)
>
> Sorry for stupid question,
Its not a stupid question -- its these types of questions that lead to
investigation of something that _is_ important.
Anyway, the first one is printed by the shutdown shell script routine, and the
second is actually printed by the /sb
Hi everybody,
when I halt my Linux box the last two strings are
'The system is halted' and 'System halted'.
They mean quite the same to my mind, so I am very curious
what is going on in my system between these two events. :-)
Sorry for stupid question,
thanks in advance,
A
89 matches
Mail list logo
