Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> > >- BackSpace not working in X11 (try netscape for this.) What kind
> > > of keyboards do you use at RH?
> >
> > My backspace key works just fine in X (and in Netscape). I've got a
> > generic PS/2 keyboard, nothing special.
>
> Hmmm, perhaps this is something special
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Scott Kindley wrote:
> post in this thread) and all linux distro's soon to follow or be dead". I cant
> understand why a 5.x version ISN'T backward compatible with libc5. Seems to me,
> IMHO, if libc5 was to become unsupported it should phase out over a couple of
One "small
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Mike Wangsmo wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 22:37:05 +0100 (CET), Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
>
> >What bugs me quite with RH are many small non-security related bugs, that
> >have a tendency to be NOT fixed; Examples:
> >- taper is being supplied, but taper require ncurses v4 ->
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 22:37:05 +0100 (CET), Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
>What bugs me quite with RH are many small non-security related bugs, that
>have a tendency to be NOT fixed; Examples:
>- taper is being supplied, but taper require ncurses v4 -> RH5 ships with
> ncurses 1.99. Either upgrade ncur
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Mike Wangsmo wrote:
> Considering how drastic and fundamental the change, I'm *very* pleased at how
> well RH 5.0 is being received and how well it works. I am still able to stand
> by my original projection for the level of bugs and fixes for 5.0. My goal
> was to make
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 10:14:54 -0500, Jason Costomiris wrote:
>: IMHO, if libc5 was to become unsupported it should phase out over a couple
of
>: versions while the interim versions maintain backward compatibility.
>
>libc5 still works just fine. If you have libc5 bins, install the libc5
>packag
Thanks Mike,
Scott Kindley
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
On Thu, Mar 12, 1998 at 11:58:14PM -0500, Scott Kindley wrote:
: IMHO, if libc5 was to become unsupported it should phase out over a couple of
: versions while the interim versions maintain backward compatibility.
libc5 still works just fine. If you have libc5 bins, install the libc5
package.
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 23:58:14 -0500, Scott Kindley wrote:
>Im just catching the last of the "Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can'
>t
>execute RH 5.0 exe" thread but I have a question I don't think has been answer
>ed
>(at least not that I have found), Why is," libc5 going away (according
> Whats the mistake?
The mistake is you wrote one line of text, yet sent like a hundred.
Please trim what isn't relevant, and always trim the RH subscription
messages at the bottom.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-F
gt;
> xun
>
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 23:58:14 -0500
> From: Scott Kindley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i586)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why is libc5 going away and glibc gonna be "It"
From: Scott Kindley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why is libc5 going away and glibc gonna be "It".
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cont
Im just catching the last of the "Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't
execute RH 5.0 exe" thread but I have a question I don't think has been answered
(at least not that I have found), Why is," libc5 going away (according to one
post in this thread) and all linux distro's soon to follow
13 matches
Mail list logo
