Re: populate local IMAP from remote POP?

AIL PROTECTED] Second, can a company host mail in such a way that all email for a hosted domain despite the username is placed into a single mail box, and is it possible to use fetchmail or a similar application to split this mail up by account on the local IMAP server? yes, this is called a multidrop

Re: populate local IMAP from remote POP?

On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 20:21, Chad Skinner wrote: > I am thinking about trying to set a local IMAP server, but I have a dynamic > connection. Basically, I am just wanting to gain a little more experience > and was hopeing someone could direct me as to what I am going to need to > read. Here are two

populate local IMAP from remote POP?

I am thinking about trying to set a local IMAP server, but I have a dynamic connection. Basically, I am just wanting to gain a little more experience and was hopeing someone could direct me as to what I am going to need to read. Here are two situations I would like to investigate. First, I have a

imap/pop location of inbox mail

Hi, I've recently setup a system to be delivering it's inbound mail from something other than the default /var/spool/mail directory. Now I need to tell POP and IMAP to look at this new directory instead of /var/spool/mail. How do I do this? I use imap-2001a-15 from Red Hat 8.0, and

Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux

Thanks a lot for the reply. I'd appreciate if you can let me know what all software do I need to configure a mail server. - Original Message - From: "Ian Mortimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:45 PM Subj

Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux

Thanks a lot for your reply. I appreciate that. - Original Message - From: "Ian Mortimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:45 PM Subject: Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux > > > > I'm looking to

Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux

Thanks a lot for your reply. I appreciate that. - Original Message - From: "Le Ngoc Thach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:47 PM Subject: Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux > Hi Peram, > You can file packag

Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux

gurus can let me know the software required for implementations on implementation of an IMAP/POP server for Redhat Linux 9. Regards, Peram -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux

> > I'm looking to implement IMAP/POP3 server on Redhat. I did a search on > google but I could not get a correct answer. > I'd appreciate if you gurus can let me know the software required for > implementations on implementation of an IMAP/POP server for Redhat Linux &g

IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux

Hi, I'm looking to implement IMAP/POP3 server on Redhat. I did a search on google but I could not get a correct answer. I'd appreciate if you gurus can let me know the software required for implementations on implementation of an IMAP/POP server for Redhat Linux 9. Regards, Peram

Re: POP Servers??

Aly Dharshi wrote: See the courier package. http://www.courier-mta.org it also has a bundled Imap server. Get the Courier-Imap package has all that you need in there. Cheers, Aly. On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:39, Rhugga wrote: What are some good, secure, reliable POP servers out there? Preferably

Re: POP Servers??

See the courier package. http://www.courier-mta.org it also has a bundled Imap server. Get the Courier-Imap package has all that you need in there. Cheers, Aly. On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:39, Rhugga wrote: > What are some good, secure, reliable POP servers out there? Preferably &g

POP Servers??

What are some good, secure, reliable POP servers out there? Preferably one that also supports SSL. Thanks, CC -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: quick question pop/imap

Hi, -Original Message- From: Drew Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: quick question pop/imap >Can Pop3/imap4 co-exist peacefully, like if i wanted to run Cyrus and Popper on the same box? You can do that with Cour

quick question pop/imap

Can Pop3/imap4 co-exist peacefully, like if i wanted to run Cyrus and Popper on the same box?   -Drew  

rh9 imap and pop problems

when listed. The one byte is a space I think.. or just end of line or something. If you delete the byte, then the message goes away also when new mail comes in, the problem goes away, so it's non critical, but users love to complain of course. I'm using stock imap/pop server that come

imap/pop logging

gs is there someway to stop that? I'm trying to clean up my logs a bit so they are easier to read and manage and the constant logging in logging out of pop and imap users, which at some point in the whole process of things might be needed, but on a day to day basis, isn't for me, make

RE: scan imap/pop for viruses

Oh and panda or clamscan -Original Message- From: Jason Staudenmayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: scan imap/pop for viruses Squid and squirm with virulator. -Original Message- From: mailli

RE: scan imap/pop for viruses

Squid and squirm with virulator. -Original Message- From: maillists (josef " "radinger) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:50 AM To: redhat-list Subject: scan imap/pop for viruses hi, does anyone have experience on how to scan imap/pop mail-traffic? the

Re: scan imap/pop for viruses

Hi, On 2 Jun 2003, maillists (josef radinger) wrote: > > does anyone have experience on how to scan imap/pop mail-traffic? > the servers on which the mails are stored are not under my control, but > i would like to provide the possibility for our users, to reach their > private

scan imap/pop for viruses

hi, does anyone have experience on how to scan imap/pop mail-traffic? the servers on which the mails are stored are not under my control, but i would like to provide the possibility for our users, to reach their private mails, but also be on the safe side and stay without viruses. yours josef

Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 11:58:08AM -0400, dch wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 11:28, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > > > > Have you considered SMTP Auth? > > > > http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/ > > Yes and it seems more daunting tha

Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

I've used it with RH7.x. Should work the same way with RH9. In the "my_networks" area, add "btree:/etc/mail/dracd" (dracd usually keeps the dracd.db in the /etc/mail directory, and it's a btree database). The question is, have you modified your POP3 or IMAP daemon to work with DRAC? If not, I

Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/ Yes and it seems more daunting than pop authentication. Even my ISP (Verizon) uses pop-first to authenticate SMTP. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

On 01-Jun-2003/11:06 -0400, dch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Has anyone gotten this or DRAC to work with RH9 and Postfix? I need to >authenticate roaming users. Have you considered SMTP Auth? http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/ Tony -- Anthony E. Greene

Pop-Before-SMTP

Has anyone gotten this or DRAC to work with RH9 and Postfix? I need to authenticate roaming users. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Pop - SMTP lag time

Tried this $IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -d any/0 -p tcp --source-port 113 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT still lags on connect and send.. g which I new which rpm caused the problem I would remove. At 12:25 PM 05/31/03 -0400, you wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:04:57AM -0500, R

Re: Pop - SMTP lag time

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:04:57AM -0500, Rob wrote: > Someone mentioned something about IDENTD one time. Is there a port > required for that? > If so, what is the port, I can try that. tcp/113 -- Hal Burgiss -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.red

Pop - SMTP lag time

Just curious if anyone knows why my Pop & SMTP connections lag so long. When I first installed RH8 it connected quickly. Did some RHN upgrades and now I get like a 20sec lag time on POP and SMTP. This lag is experienced by people checking externally as well as internally. I attempted to

Pop <- SMTP

I could use a bit of help. RH9 Postfix 2 Has anyone been able to install DRAC or Pop-Before-SMTP? No matter what I do I can't seem to get either to compile properly. I need to authorize relays for roaming users. Is there another option that won't get me on Osirusoft's sh*t list?

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On 05-Apr-2003/09:14 -0500, William Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:02:00PM -0500, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: >> You have to install the winpopup service through add/remove progs /windblows >> setup. > >Please provide more information on this: my Windows 98 SE box shows

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:02:00PM -0500, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: > You have to install the winpopup service through add/remove progs /windblows > setup. Please provide more information on this: my Windows 98 SE box shows winpopup as installed, and messages sent to it seem to be accepted, but

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:13:36AM -0500, Neumann, Shannon M wrote: > I just tried it, and it popped up on my WinXP Pro box just as > expected... > > Shannon Neumann > CIS Coordinator > Indiana Institute of Technology > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (260) 422-556 ext. 2231 > > > > FWIW I was told that XP

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

April 03, 2003 1:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: message pop-up onto a windows box? > > > And to the best of my knowledge, neither does 95, 98, and ME > > Bret Hughes wrote: > > > FWIW I was told that XP no longer has this functionality > > I

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

003 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: message pop-up onto a windows box? And to the best of my knowledge, neither does 95, 98, and ME Bret Hughes wrote: FWIW I was told that XP no longer has this functionality Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

You have to install the winpopup service through add/remove progs /windblows setup. -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: message pop-up onto a windows box? And to the best of my

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

Unless they happen to be running winpopup. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: message pop-up onto a windows box? And to the best of my knowledge, neither does 95, 98, and ME

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

And to the best of my knowledge, neither does 95, 98, and ME Bret Hughes wrote: FWIW I was told that XP no longer has this functionality Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 10:13, Neumann, Shannon M wrote: > I just tried it, and it popped up on my WinXP Pro box just as > expected... > Good info thanks. Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

I just tried it, and it popped up on my WinXP Pro box just as expected... Shannon Neumann CIS Coordinator Indiana Institute of Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] (260) 422-556 ext. 2231 FWIW I was told that XP no longer has this functionality -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 08:21, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > kewl, thanks. > > - -Original Message- > From: James Vellenga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 kewl, thanks. - -Original Message- From: James Vellenga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: message pop-up onto a windows box? Hi Tom, The following could work for you: echo

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

ions > are all windows boxes of some sort or another, using SAMBA. In *nix, > you can send a broadcast message to all users on the machine (& in > some cases all workstations attached). I would like to be able to > send a message from the server & have it pop up on the windows bo

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

l users on the machine (& in > some cases all workstations attached). I would like to be able to > send a message from the server & have it pop up on the windows boxes. > Is this possible? > > Thanks, > T

message pop-up onto a windows box?

*nix, you can send a broadcast message to all users on the machine (& in some cases all workstations attached). I would like to be able to send a message from the server & have it pop up on the windows boxes. Is this possible? Thanks, Tom -BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR

Re: POP mail server - can't find the one shipped with RH 7.3

On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 14:59, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > Hello, > > I need to set up a pop mail server. I currently use sendmail as the MTA. IIRC, > redhat used to have a pop server included, but a search on the redhat cd does > not help me (RH 7.3). If you did the default ins

Re: POP mail server - can't find the one shipped with RH 7.3

It comes with imap. Look for imap2000 I think on the 7.3 CD. Be sure to enable it in /etc/xinetd.d/ipop3 once you install it. <> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 22:59, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > Hello, > > I need to set up a pop mail server. I currently use sendmail as the MTA. II

POP mail server - can't find the one shipped with RH 7.3

Hello, I need to set up a pop mail server. I currently use sendmail as the MTA. IIRC, redhat used to have a pop server included, but a search on the redhat cd does not help me (RH 7.3). The pop mail server will be just for a light weight use, let's say less than 10 users, and the user

Re: outlook pop not working error PTR record not found error

On 17-Mar-2003/11:46 +, Nanyar Lankan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I just installed red-hat 7.2 and configured the sendmail too. > >i could pop mail from my windows machies but unable to send messages the >error comes > > Protocolo: SMTP, Respuesta del servidor: '

outlook pop not working error PTR record not found error

hai all,   I just installed red-hat 7.2  and configured the sendmail too. i could pop mail from my windows machies but unable to send messages the error comes  Protocolo: SMTP, Respuesta del servidor: '450 4.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying temporarily denied. Cannot resolve PTR

Re: disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on theserver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 23:50:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > is there a way to disallow pop users from leaving a copy > > > > of the messages on the server. this is a growing issue. > > > > we now have clo

Re: disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on theserver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26 Dec 2002 14:40:50 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > is there a way to disallow pop users from leaving a copy > > > of the messages on the server. this is a growing issue. > > > we now have close to 17gigs of mail

Re: disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server

On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 10:15, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:52:45 -0600, dogface wrote: > > > is there a way to disallow pop users from leaving a copy > > of the messages on the server. this is a growing issue. > > we now have close to 17gigs of mail

Re: disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server

Hi Rick, On Thursday, December 26, 2002, 12:41 PM, you put forth, in part, about "disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server": R> This depends on the pop3 dæmon you're using. I know Qualcom's qpopper R> has the ability to handle this. I wasn'

Re: disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary wrote: | Hi dogface, | | On Thursday, December 26, 2002, 11:52 AM, you put forth, in part, about "disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server": | | d> is there a way to disallow pop users from leaving a co

Re: disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on theserver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:52:45 -0600, dogface wrote: > is there a way to disallow pop users from leaving a copy > of the messages on the server. this is a growing issue. > we now have close to 17gigs of mail being stored on > our mail s

Re: disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server

Hi dogface, On Thursday, December 26, 2002, 11:52 AM, you put forth, in part, about "disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server": d> is there a way to disallow pop users from leaving a copy of the d> messages on the server. this is a growing issue. we now

disallow pop users to leave a copy of the messages on the server

hello, is there a way to disallow pop users from leaving a copy of the messages on the server. this is a growing issue. we now have close to 17gigs of mail being stored on our mail server. Thank you, eric -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe

Re: How to send a pop up message to windows?

You have to have winpopup running on the windows machine for this to work. The following command would make the message in message.txt on the windows machine cat message.txt | smbclient -M WinMachine You could makeit a script file to save typing Linda -- redhat-list mailing

Re: How to send a pop up message to windows?

indows 98 workstation. What > should I use on the linux worksation and what should be running on > the windows workstation? An example of what I want to do: have a > message pop up on the windows workstation saying "the server will be > shut down in 5 minutes." > >

Re: How to send a pop up message to windows?

x worksation and what should be running on the windows workstation? An > example of what I want to do: have a message pop up on the windows > workstation saying "the server will be shut down in 5 minutes." > > Thanks for any thoughts, > > Mark > Use "smbclient&qu

How to send a pop up message to windows?

workstation? An example of what I want to do: have a message pop up on the windows workstation saying "the server will be shut down in 5 minutes." Thanks for any thoughts, Mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubsc

RE: Text based POP mail reader

Hi, Try pine, it's like mutt but you can use some functions more, for example you can it use to read news too alex -Original Message- From: Linux [mailto:linux@;dounsix.co.nz] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:13 AM To: 'Redhat-List (E-mail) Subject: Text based POP mail r

RE: Text based POP mail reader

> This may turn out to be a dumb question but does anybody know > of a text > based POP mail reader that can be run on Windows/Linux. They can be > different the important thing is the text no GUI. mutt http://www.mutt.org for the unix version (or use the rpm) http://

Text based POP mail reader

Hi This may turn out to be a dumb question but does anybody know of a text based POP mail reader that can be run on Windows/Linux. They can be different the important thing is the text no GUI. Many thanks Mike -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com

Re: Pop 3 Server

s. > I have a Red Hat 6.2 Mail server. The pop service is shutting it self down. The >message says "pop-3/Tcpp server failing ( looping or being flooded) service >terminated for 10 minutes. Now as most of you can imagine... My phone rings off the >hook when this happens... > >

Re: Pop 3 Server

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:09:58AM -0400, William Mahler wrote: > > Greetings. > I have a Red Hat 6.2 Mail server. The pop service is shutting it self down. The >message says "pop-3/Tcpp server failing ( looping or being flooded) service >terminated for 10 minutes. No

Pop 3 Server

  Greetings. I have a Red Hat 6.2 Mail server. The pop service is shutting it self down. The message says "pop-3/Tcpp server failing ( looping or being flooded) service terminated for 10 minutes. Now as most of you can imagine... My phone rings off the hook when this happens...   I c

Re: Pop Server failing

At 18:28 17.10.2002, Emmanuel Seyman said: [snip] >On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:26:26AM -0400, William Mahler wrote: >This isn't really your pop3 server but inetd (which controls >several ports including the pop3 one). To prevent flooding, >it automatically shu

Re: Pop Server failing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-Oct-2002/11:26 -0400, William Mahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Greetings. >I have a Red Hat 6.2 Mail server. The pop service is shutting it self >down. The message says "pop-3/Tcpp server failing ( looping or being >floo

Pop Server failing

Greetings. I have a Red Hat 6.2 Mail server. The pop service is shutting it self down. The message says "pop-3/Tcpp server failing ( looping or being flooded) service terminated for 10 minutes. Now as most of you can imagine... My phone rings off the hook when this happens...   I c

Re: Pop Server failing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-Oct-2002/20:26 +0200, Ernest E Vogelsinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 18:28 17.10.2002, Emmanuel Seyman said: >[snip] >>On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:26:26AM -0400, William Mahler wrote: >>This isn't reall

Re: Pop Server failing

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:26:26AM -0400, William Mahler wrote: > Greetings. > I have a Red Hat 6.2 Mail server. The pop service is shutting > it self down. The message says "pop-3/Tcpp server failing > ( looping or being flooded) service terminated for 10 minutes. > Now as mos

Re: POP and IMAP through NAT

On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 08:06:24AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Yes, if you are not using an ipchains rule to DROP the traffic and are > not running the ident service on that machine. Yup, that does it. I can also change logging to HOST and facilitate the same change I've been told... I'll

Re: POP and IMAP through NAT

On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 04:35, Michael George wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:45:53PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > > "Dropping" all traffic (via the DROP rule, as opposed to REJECT) is what > > causes ident timeouts. To avoid them, the REJECT rule is proper. > > If I forward port 113 fr

Re: POP and IMAP through NAT

On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:45:53PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 18:16, David Talkington wrote: > > Michael George wrote: > > > > >We just started a lease on our own server on Rackspace.com for doing our web > > >and mail serving. However, whenever we fetch mail from the o

Re: POP and IMAP through NAT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gordon Messmer wrote: >> Drop all traffic to port 113 on the floor (to avoid annoying ident >> timeouts) > >"Dropping" all traffic (via the DROP rule, as opposed to REJECT) is what >causes ident timeouts. To avoid them, the REJECT rule is proper. O

Re: POP and IMAP through NAT

On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 18:16, David Talkington wrote: > Michael George wrote: > > >We just started a lease on our own server on Rackspace.com for doing our web > >and mail serving. However, whenever we fetch mail from the office, we have > >about a 20-30s delay before the transfer starts. > > Dr

Re: POP and IMAP through NAT

On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:22:06AM +1000, Darryl Harvey wrote: > Your mail server is probably doing a reverse IP lookup to find the real > DNS name for the host your are coming from. > > Some providers do NOT map this and hence this can cause a delay as the > DNS tries to find one.. > > > Solut

Re: POP and IMAP through NAT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael George wrote: >We just started a lease on our own server on Rackspace.com for doing our web >and mail serving. However, whenever we fetch mail from the office, we have >about a 20-30s delay before the transfer starts. Drop all traffic to po

RE: POP and IMAP through NAT

assigned to your IP(s). Rgds, Darryl > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Michael George > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: POP and IMAP through NAT &g

POP and IMAP through NAT

the first time. Rackspace is at a loss to explain it and offer a solution. The server is running RHL 7.2 with the imapd POP/IMAP server RPM. I'm hoping that someone here on this list can offer an explanation and hopefully a work around. Thanks! -Michael -- In light of the terrori

Re: POP before SMTP

my 2 cents. smtp auth is cool, however, users are stupid and can't set it up. My clients can't even find this in their outlook, netscape that i had to go back to pop before smtp. On Sun, 19 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash:

Re: POP before SMTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19-May-2002/19:07 -0400, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Brother Paiz, I'm afraid you misread or misunderstood my comment. > >Not all mailers understand or can make use of SMTP AUTH. I did not say >"not all MTAs"...mailers = client mail p

Re: POP before SMTP

Sorry...he specifically noted Sendmail, and it was obvious, at least to me, that he was referring to servers. On 19 May 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Yeah, that's what he said. All of the common mailers (and I mean both > clients and servers) understand SMTP AUTH. POP before SMT

Re: POP before SMTP

Warning Unable to process data: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_ascension.dragonsdawn.net-2986-1021851151-0001-2"

Re: POP before SMTP

10:10 PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: > >On Thu, 16 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > > > > > > Because POP before SMTP is a kludge. SMTP AUTH is part of the standard. > > > > > > >But Pop-Before-SMTP utilizes existing, easily implementable standards. &

Re: POP before SMTP

At 5/16/2002 10:10 PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: >On Thu, 16 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > > > > Because POP before SMTP is a kludge. SMTP AUTH is part of the standard. > > > >But Pop-Before-SMTP utilizes existing, easily implementable standards. > >Not a

Re: POP before SMTP

But Pop-Before-SMTP utilizes existing, easily implementable standards. Not all mailers understand or can make use of SMTP AUTH, and it's not necessarily an easy thing to properly implement. On Thu, 16 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: S

Re: POP before SMTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16-May-2002/20:59 -0400, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [about POP-before-SMTP vs SMTP AUTH] >not to be argumentative, but why is one necessarily more preferable than >the other? Because POP before SMTP is a kludge. SMTP AUT

Re: POP before SMTP

not to be argumentative, but why is one necessarily more preferable than the other? On Thu, 16 May 2002, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 5/16/2002 08:10 AM -0400, you wrote: > >Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a > >few problems with spammers getting through

Re: POP before SMTP

Words by Chris Mason [Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:10:20AM -0400]: > Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a > few problems with spammers getting through and using my web server as a spam > relay. > So you confess yourself guilty of "bad sysadmin practice"? Why sh

Re: POP before SMTP

At 5/16/2002 08:10 AM -0400, you wrote: >Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a >few problems with spammers getting through and using my web server as a spam >relay. Preferably, don't. Use SMTP AUTH instead; check the archives for how to do so. All you need t

POP before SMTP

Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a few problems with spammers getting through and using my web server as a spam relay. Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Box 340, The Valley, Anguilla, British West Indies Tel: 264 497 5670 Fax: 264 497 8463 Take a virtual tour

Re: OK - My Brain Is About To Pop...

M Subject: OK - My Brain Is About To Pop... > So I better do this one at a time - tried installing PostFix/MailMan and Python > and nothing's working so I did a reset (thank god for Ghost images) and > reinstalled PostFix. > > My machine name is halemail.dyndns.org. This

Re: OK - My Brain Is About To Pop...

x to provide SMTP service for incoming email, a POP3 server like qpopper, and mailman for mailing lists. > the accounts in there and then I just use halemail.dyndns.org as the pop and > smtp servers. I just have the added entries in my HOST and LMHOSTS files for > windows that points to t

OK - My Brain Is About To Pop...

ently, under IEMS, I have all the accounts in there and then I just use halemail.dyndns.org as the pop and smtp servers. I just have the added entries in my HOST and LMHOSTS files for windows that points to this machine by name instead of having to use the IP address all the time. It's be

Re: Pop-up banner with iptables

On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 10:00:31PM -0700, Brian wrote: >Does anyone have any idea's how use iptables to STOP these pop-up ad's? Either Galeon or Mozilla will allow you to disable popups. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E> OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D

Re: Pop-up banner with iptables

On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 10:00:31PM -0700, Brian wrote: > > Does anyone have any idea's how use iptables to STOP these pop-up ad's? That probably is not the best way to do that. See www.privoxy.org (enhancde junkbuster).

Pop-up banner with iptables

Does anyone have any idea's how use iptables to STOP these pop-up ad's? Brian ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

  1   2   3   >